GM profit hurt by over $1B in tariffs — and shares tumble as impact expected to worsen
The largest US automaker by sales said it expects the tariff impact to worsen in the third quarter and stuck to a previous estimate that trade headwinds threaten to hit the bottom line by $4 billion to $5 billion.
GM said it could take steps to mitigate at least 30% of that impact.
Shares fell about 6% in early trading.
3 GM's revenue in the quarter fell nearly 2% to about $47 billion from a year ago. Its quarterly adjusted earnings per share fell to $2.53 compared with $3.06 a year earlier.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
The automaker's revenue in the quarter ended June 30 fell nearly 2% to about $47 billion from a year ago. Its quarterly adjusted earnings per share fell to $2.53 compared with $3.06 a year earlier.
Analysts on average expected adjusted profit of $2.44 per share, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Its adjusted earnings before interest and taxes fell 32% to $3 billion.
GM was among corporations that revised annual guidance due to the impact from President Trump's tariffs, lowering it to an annual adjusted core profit of between $10 billion and $12.5 billion.
The company on Tuesday stood by that forecast.
Beyond tariffs, GM's underlying business in the quarter was solid. Sales in the US market – its main profit center – rose 7%, while the company continued to command strong pricing on its pickup trucks and SUVs.
GM swung back to a small profit in China, after losing money there a year earlier.
Analysts said GM may need to cut investment in future projects or find other ways to trim spending to offset the effect of tariffs.
Jeep-maker Stellantis on Monday warned that tariffs would significantly affect results in the second half of 2025, and said tariffs cost it about 300 million euros in the first half of the year.
Shares of rival Ford Motor, and US-traded shares of Stellantis fell about 1% Tuesday morning.
3 Analysts said GM may need to cut investment in future projects or find other ways to trim spending to offset the effect of tariffs. CEO Mary Barra, above.
AP
The automaker took several steps in recent months to bolster its combustion-engine operations through increased investment in its US factory base, calling into question its goal of ending the production of gas-powered cars and trucks by 2035.
'Despite slower EV industry growth, we believe the long-term future is profitable electric vehicle production, and this continues to be our North Star,' GM CEO Mary Barra told analysts Tuesday.
GM announced in June that it would invest $4 billion at three facilities in Michigan, Kansas, and Tennessee, including a plan to move production of the Cadillac Escalade and increase output of its two big pickup trucks. It added production of its previously Mexico-produced Chevy Blazer to the Tennessee plant.
The automaker imports about half of the vehicles it sells in the US, mainly from Mexico and South Korea.
Crosstown rival Ford produces about 80% of its US-sold vehicles domestically. Ford is expected to report second-quarter results next week.
3 GM imports about half of the vehicles it sells in the US, mainly from Mexico and South Korea.
REUTERS
Car companies are increasingly shifting their focus to bolstering the core lineup of gas trucks and SUVs, as the growth rate of EV sales has slowed.
Demand for battery-powered models already has slowed after rapid growth earlier this decade.
The trend is intensified by the pending disappearance of government support for the battery-powered models.
Sweeping tax and budget legislation approved by Congress will eliminate $7,500 tax credits for buying or leasing new electric vehicles and a $4,000 used-EV credit at the end of September.
Trump also signed tax and budget legislation that eliminates fines for failures to meet fuel economy rules, a move that makes it easier to build more gas-powered vehicles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cox makes $4.7 billion offer for Iberdrola's Mexican assets, El Confidencial says
(Reuters) -Spanish renewable energy and water company Cox has submitted an offer to take over Iberdrola's assets in Mexico worth around 4 billion euros ($4.69 billion), newspaper El Confidencial said on Monday, citing unnamed sources close to the process. Spanish utility Iberdrola hired investment bank Barclays to sell 15 renewable power plants in Mexico as it seeks to exit the country on concerns about the legal and tax stability in the country, El Confidencial reported last week. Iberdrola already sold 55% of its assets in the country to the Mexican government for $6 billion in 2024, which the Mexican government called at the time a "new nationalisation" of the electricity market. Iberdrola and Cox, which is present in Mexico, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. ($1 = 0.8532 euros) Sign in to access your portfolio
CNBC
29 minutes ago
- CNBC
U.S. trade deal offers initial relief but leaves Europe on the backfoot
After an initial sigh of relief at the U.S. and European Union avoiding further escalation by striking a trade agreement, concerns have grown that the framework deal is "unbalanced" and leaves Europe on the backfoot. The two trading partners on Sunday announced an agreement that includes a 15% tariff rate on most EU goods to the U.S. Some goods like aircraft components and certain chemicals are not set to be hit by tariffs, while autos will see duties reduced to the 15% rate. The agreement also includes provisions for the EU purchasing U.S. energy and increasing its investments in the country. The agreement halves the 30% tariff rate U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened the EU with and avoids any further escalation through for example countermeasures. Yet analysts and economists remain cautious as to the impact on both sides as negotiations are still set to take place. "It's a climb down from a much worse place," Cailin Birch, global economist at The Economist Intelligence Unit, told CNBC's "Europe Early Edition" on Monday. However, she noted, "a 15% tariff is still a big escalation from where we were pre-Trump 2.0." Birch also pointed out that a lot of uncertainty remains, with details about the steel and pharmaceutical sector still being unclear. European leaders struck similar notes overnight, with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz saying that while the EU was able to protect its core interests, he would have welcomed further easing of transatlantic trade. France's minister for Europe, Benjamin Haddad, meanwhile said in a Google-translated social media post that while the deal would bring "temporary stability" to some sectors, it is "unbalanced" overall. Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg, warned that while the "crippling uncertainty" was over, the damage for Europe is more frontloaded in comparison to the long-term impact on the U.S. "The deal is asymmetric. The US gets away with a substantial increase in its tariffs on imports from the EU and has secured further EU concessions to boot. In his apparent zero-sum mentality, Trump can claim that as a "win" for him," he said. As it will take some time for U.S. consumers to feel the impact of tariffs, Trump's supporters may not immediately realize they are being hurt by the president's policies, Schmieding explained. This may encourage Trump to continue to pursue economic policies that are "bad" for the U.S., he added. The Economist Intelligence Unit's Birch meanwhile pointed out that the U.S. also did not get everything it may have wanted from the deal. "Both sides are, are kind of set back a bit from this deal," she said. "The U.S. didn't make any headway on a lot of issues that have in recent history been critical to their trade approach to the EU. So agricultural standards, the tech industry regulating standard that has been a big bugbear, there was no real mention of those standards whatsoever," Birch explained, acknowledging that the deal is not yet done.
Wall Street Journal
29 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Audi Cuts Guidance as Tariffs and Restructuring Hit Earnings
Audi cut its full-year guidance as U.S. tariffs, restructuring costs and weak market trends hold back sales and profitability at the German automaker. 'The situation continues to be very challenging,' Audi Chief Financial Officer Juergen Rittersberger said. 'In addition to intense competitive pressure, the drastically increased U.S. import tariffs and expenses for Audi restructuring measures have impacted financial performance in the first half of the year.'
