Let's Talk Tuesday returns
The program, now in its fourth year, aims to foster connections and conversations among residents, providing a platform for open dialogue and engagement for community building, organizers said.
Residents are encouraged to share their ideas and concerns with Mayor Rod Roberson, their City Council representatives and department heads.
Let's Talk Tuesday will take place on select Tuesday evenings at various locations throughout Elkhart in each council district, offering residents the opportunity to come together, share ideas and discuss issues that matter most to residents. City department representatives will be on hand to provide information and answer questions related to their expertise.
'Let's Talk Tuesday is one of my favorite events to connect with residents,' Mayor Rod Roberson said. 'My administration looks forward to our fourth season of this important series of events.'
All meetings will begin at 6:30 pm. Dates are:
April 15: 5th District with Councilman Brent Curry, Pierre Moran Pavillon, 119 W. Wolf St.
May 27: 3rd District with Councilman David Henke, Pinewood Elementary School, 3420 E. Bristol St.
June 24: 1st District with Councilman Aaron Mishler, High Dive Pavillon, 500 E. Beardsley Ave.
July 22: 6th District with Councilwoman LaTonya King, McNaughton Pavillon, 701 Arcade Ave.
Aug. 26: 4th District with Councilman Dwight Fish, Studebaker Pavillon, 1020 McDonald St.
Sept. 23: 2nd District with Councilman Chad Crabtree, Willowdale Pavillon, 1320 Olive St.
In addition, at-Large council members Arvis Dawson, Alex Holtz and Tonda Hines will be in attendance.
The public is invited to all events and no reservations are required.
More information about Let's Talk Tuesday and upcoming events are available on the City of Elkhart app, MyElkhart311; on the city website, elkhartindiana.org/myelkhart311; or on social media, @CityofElkhart.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
22 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Steve Weinshel: Cutting parking requirements while upzoning Broadway will create a crisis
One of the key aspects of Mayor Brandon Johnson's continued push for more housing development in Chicago is eliminating the city's parking mandates for new multifamily housing construction. It is a major component in Johnson's 'Cut the Tape' initiative intended to boost more affordable housing. While many of us might hope for a utopian future in which the average Chicagoan no longer owns a car, that is distinctly not the current situation. To pretend otherwise invites chaos throughout Chicago. The Johnson administration is attempting to rush through the City Council an ill-conceived and massive upzoning of Broadway from Montrose to Devon avenues in Chicago's Uptown and Edgewater neighborhoods. This change would allow for an additional 10,000 units to be built along this stretch of Broadway in addition to the thousands of units that current zoning already allows. A cornerstone of this plan is to radically reduce the number of parking spaces required in new large-scale housing developments. All of Broadway lies within a transit-oriented development zone due to its proximity to the Red Line and several bus lines. As such, developers are required to provide only one parking space per two housing units. But this is only the city's opening hand for reduced parking requirements. Under the city's Connected Communities ordinance, developers may reduce that one parking space per two-unit requirement even further, even down to no off-street parking at all. For example, several projects currently in development or recently completed in Edgewater provide as little as one parking space per 10 units or less. As a 35-year resident of one of Chicago's densest neighborhoods, I am no stranger to high-density urban living. I live in the Kenmore-Winthrop area of Edgewater, which together with Sheridan Road immediately to the east, is home to roughly 20,000 housing units, making it among the densest census tracts not only in Chicago but also the nation. To contemplate adding 10,000 housing units along Edgewater's adjacent stretch of Broadway with minimal off-street parking requirements constitutes urban planning malpractice. Such lunacy will plague Edgewater for generations to come. Anyone familiar with the east side of Edgewater knows that street parking is already virtually nonexistent. There is also a major shortage of off-street parking for current households. Many of the buildings in the area were built long before car ownership was common and have little or even no off-street parking of their own. Residents, even in higher-end condominiums, are forced to seek off-street parking elsewhere, such as in the neighborhood's many four-plus-one apartment buildings. Historically, residents could find such spaces within a block of where they lived. But in recent years, as parking pressures have continued to increase, residents now often have to venture several blocks or more from home to find a rentable space. As a result, countless drivers now repeatedly circulate throughout the area looking to win the parking space lottery, posing great risk to pedestrian safety and compromising air quality. The Chicago Department of Planning and Development's proposed framework for Broadway is predicated on the wishful thinking that people living near mass transit are substantially less likely to own cars. But that is simply not borne out by the facts. Car ownership rate for homeowners in Edgewater is 1.3 cars per owner-occupied household, according to Ownership rates for renters in the community are somewhat lower but are still 0.9 vehicles per household. Those figures are similar for the Uptown and Rogers Park communities adjacent to Edgewater. Even data provided by the city as part of its case for the Broadway upzoning framework demonstrates the point that it's creating a parking nightmare. That means more cars will be coming to Edgewater if its 'visions' are realized. Where these vehicles will go is anyone's guess, but city bureaucrats and their housing density mouthpieces try to deny this reality. Many new residents will likely aggravate current practices of illegally parking in front of fire hydrants, in handicapped zones, blocking alley entrances and corner tow zones that are essential for the passage of school buses and emergency vehicles. As a major artery for traffic coming off of DuSable Lake Shore Drive, Broadway is already a busy, relatively narrow corridor. It currently has metered parking and numerous business loading zones, but these may soon be disappearing with increasingly dense residential development. Intensified residential development will inevitably bring even more double parking for ride-share and delivery vehicles, which have already exploded in recent years. Before the city moves forward with any additional housing in Edgewater or Uptown, it needs to carefully study the car ownership rates for residents and limit additional housing accordingly. It could also help its own housing cause by requiring developers to proactively address parking problems by establishing car-sharing programs in new properties. Most neighborhoods abutting the CTA's Red, Brown and Blue lines on the North Side are already quite dense. Substantial new housing development has already been coming to all of these neighborhoods, especially along major commercial streets such as Broadway, Clark, Ashland, Western, Milwaukee, Irving Park, Montrose and Lawrence, even under old zoning standards. But does this mean these neighborhoods have endless capacity for further densification? There is a tipping point, and too much development in these communities threatens to greatly diminish the quality of life for future residents as well as the many thousands of current residents who have worked hard for decades to eradicate urban blight in Edgewater. If the Department of Planning and Development is serious about enhancing Chicago's north lakefront neighborhoods, perhaps it ought to actually do some planning.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge to pick Sunbury City Council appointment
SUNBURY — Who will become the newest Sunbury City Council member is officially in the hands of Northumberland County Judge Paige Rosini. City officials petitioned the court to select a member of the public to serve until January, following deadlocked voting on an appointment Monday. The four current council members voted 2-2 on candidates Victoria Rosancrans and Andrew Ramos, who both applied for the open seat. Rosancrans and Ramos were also joined by James Brumbach, Andres Manresa and former Treasurer Kevin Troup in the list of applicants looking to fill a vacant seat until January. The seat was left open when former Sunbury Councilwoman Lisa Martina resigned last month. Martina was appointed to fill the city treasurer seat after Troup resigned his position in May. Martina ran for the position and won in May. She is the only candidate on the ballot this fall. Solicitor Joel Wiest filed the petition Thursday and listed the names of all five candidates, but by law, Rosini can pick one of them or none of them. The judge can order city officials to once again try to fill the seat on their own, or she can name a person of her choice to fill the seat. Rosini can decide on the seat when she deems fit. Council members Jim Eister, Nate Savidge, John Barnhart, and Mayor Josh Brosious conducted a public interview of all five candidates before voting. Brosious asked Ramos, who he defeated in May for the mayor's spot, Manresa and Rosancrans about previous elections they ran in and were defeated. The mayor asked why council should appoint them when the public didn't elect them. Rosancrans, who was defeated in two previous attempts at council, once by nine votes, said she was not concerned with the previous elections and is a resident of Sunbury who loves her city and will continue to try to improve the lives of all residents. Ramos agreed and said he also ran with a vision of improving Sunbury, and that vision has not changed just because he lost. Manresa, who also lost a previous bid for council, is currently the Democratic Party nominee in the race in November, when he squares off against Savidge and Troup for one of the two open seats. The seat that was to be filled Monday night will also be on the ballot in a secondary election that would be for a two-year term to finish out Martina's seat. Rosancrans was named the Democratic nominee for the ballot, while the Republican Party has yet to name a candidate. Councilman John Barnhart nominated Rosancrans for the temporary seat and a vote was taken. Eister and Savidge voted no, while Barnhart and Brosious voted in favor, but the motion failed. Eister then nominated Ramos and another vote was taken. Eister and Savidge voted in favor of Ramos, while Barnhart and Brosious voted no. Council meets again July 28 inside City Hall, on Market Street, in Sunbury. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
New committee rakes in big dollars to influence Virginia Beach election referendum
VIRGINIA BEACH — A new political group backed by local business leaders and elected officials is raking in large donations in its bid to alter Virginia Beach's election system. Every Vote Counts, a referendum committee, has raised more than $330,000 since forming June 9, according to finance reports filed with the Virginia Department of Elections. The committee is gearing up to launch a campaign to persuade Virginia Beach residents to vote 'no' to a district-only election system in November. The committee wants a City Council with seven district-based seats and three seats elected at-large along with the mayor. A referendum question on the ballot this year will ask voters whether they prefer that alignment or the current system, which has 10 single-member districts. 'More citywide representation is good,' said former council member Linwood Branch, the mouthpiece for the group. Virginia Beach's former all at-large election system was overhauled after a federal judge ruled it unconstitutional in 2021, finding it diluted the voting power of minority voters. The city then shifted to the 10-1 election system, with three majority minority districts. But the city has faced lawsuits challenging the validity of the current iteration based on the way changes were adopted. The referendum is the latest in a string of efforts to garner public feedback on how the city should elect its school board and council members. The effort already has drawn support from high-profile business leaders, pulling in a steady stream of donations — ranging from $2,500 to $25,000. The committee is an unstructured group, according to Branch. The group's treasurer is Jack Ross, former president and COO of Dominion and Landmark Media enterprises, which used to own The Virginian-Pilot. Ross collects the funds and Davis Ad Agency is running the promotional campaign. However, multiple business leaders and current and former elected officials are also using their connections to support the effort. Among them are former Virginia Beach Mayor Will Sessoms, developer Bruce Thompson and councilmen Stacy Cummings and Cash Green. 'It's been largely word-of-mouth,' Ross said. Earlier this month, Bob Taylor and his brother, Joe, owners of Taylor's Do-It Centers, each made $10,000 donations to Every Vote Counts in support of an election system with some at-large representation. 'I think it's a much better blend than what we have now,' said Bob Taylor. Sessoms, his longtime friend, approached him about the committee and a donation, he said. Sessoms did not respond to a request for comment. Thompson, who declined to comment, is among 'many prominent supporters,' Branch said. The Pilot also reached out to several donors who did not respond, including Virginia Beach Development Authority member and developer Taylor Franklin, CEO of Franklin Group Companies LLC., which made a $20,000 donation on June 17. Donna Whitaker, a principal broker for Venture Realty Group, the firm behind the Atlantic Park project, contributed $10,000 on June 24. She confirmed the donation but didn't respond as to why she supported the committee. Cummings contributed $10,000 to Every Vote Counts on July 7. He believes the current 10-1 system divides the city. Cummings has served as the District 8 representative since January. 'I'm sitting in these council meeting and invariably, in every meeting, you have people saying my district, my district, my district,' Cummings said. 'It's an impediment of growth for the city, and we're not holding people accountable.' Seven people/businesses have donated $25,000 so far, the largest amount to the effort. They are Pramod Amin of Shamin Hotels; MEB General Contractors Inc.; Manan Shah of Pashm Global Hotel and Resort Management; Brian Holland of Atlantic Bay Mortgage Group; Robert Beasley of Harvey Lindsay, Sunsations Inc.; and Michael Sifen of Sifen Companies. Under the city's previous election system, which was ruled illegal, residents across the city could vote for all 10 council members and the mayor. Under the current system, residents can only vote for the member who represents their district and the mayor. One of Every Vote Counts' key arguments for more at-large representation is that it will increase accountability to voters. 'There's no better accountability then being able to vote for or against someone,' Branch said. 'I believe as a former elected official, if someone can vote for or against you, it does make a difference in your accessibility.' The group will launch a website, next week and other promotional material to get the word out before early voting begins Sept. 19, Branch said. Green, who has represented District 7 since January, will appear in a testimonial video. 'Under the 7-3-1, we can keep strong minority voting district and add the chance for more minority leaders to be elected city-wide,' Green said in the video, which Branch shared with The Pilot before its public launch. 'By voting no to 10-1, you're taking back the power to shape the future of our city, our schools, our neighborhoods, our quality of life.' The referendum will pose the question: 'Should the method of city council elections set forth in the Virginia Beach City Charter be changed from a modified 7-3-1 system to a 10-1 system?' That Branch is involved in the effort should come as no surprise. He and four other residents sued the city last year, saying Virginia Beach acted illegally in 2023 when it revised the election system because the General Assembly did not authorize a change to the city charter. A judge ruled last month that the district-based election system Virginia Beach imposed to comply with federal voting rights law is void. Circuit Judge Randall Smith stayed the order until after the referendum vote. If the city decides to pursue a 7-3-1 system, Smith would lift the stay so Virginia Beach can redraw its voting districts, which would need to be analyzed to see if they meet the federal standard, according to the court proceedings' transcript. Virginia Beach's voting system shake-up came after a federal judge ruled in 2021 the at-large voting system violated the federal 1965 Voting Rights Act because it 'denies Hispanics, African Americans and Asians equal access to the electoral and political process.' The same federal judge — Randall Jackson — officially reopened the case while lambasting city officials for what he described as intentionally sidestepping federal law by pursuing the referendum question. To date, Virginia Beach has spent more than $2 million defending the city in the federal lawsuit, according to the city attorney's office. Mayor Bobby Dyer met Wednesday with Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares to ensure that holding the referendum is 'above board,' Dyer said. Miyares, who lives in Virginia Beach, previously said he believes the city can bring back several council seats that would be elected at-large. After meeting with Dyer, his legal analysis remained unchanged. 'A modified 7-3-1 council plan would be in full compliance with the federal Voting Rights Act, the Virginia Voting Rights Act, and all applicable civil rights laws,' a spokesperson for Miyares' wrote in an email. Meanwhile, those in support of the 10-1 system are trying to make their voices heard, too, while decrying the opposing effort. 'This system ensures direct representation and accountability,' Sean Monteiro, chair of the Virginia Beach Democrat Committee, wrote in a newsletter this month. 'A developer-backed front group called Every Vote Counts — funded by the 'Gold Key Gang'— is working to dilute democracy and buy power. But we know better.' Thompson is CEO of Gold Key|PHR, a hospitality and commercial real estate development firm. State Sen. Aaron Rouse, a Democrat from Virginia Beach and a former council member, condemned what he described as the city leadership's attempts to squash a 10-district election system. 'This resistance has been led by the current mayor and several council members,' Rouse said in a July 11 release. 'Notably, the mayor has met with former council members, certain developers, and state officials in efforts to preserve a system that reinforces economic disparities, limits upward mobility and denies equal access to power.' Rouse posted the release on social media with a message: 'I urge all Virginia Beach residents to vote 'YES' to preserve the 10-1 voting system and ensure you have the right to elect your representatives, not special interests.' On Thursday, Virginia Beach's election system took center stage during a 'Good Trouble Lives On' event at the central library, hosted by Freedom Virginia and the NAACP. 'I suggest we go to the polls, and we vote for the referendum, and we vote 'yes,'' said Georgia Allen, one of the plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit. Stacy Parker, 757-222-5125, Solve the daily Crossword
