In public hearing, many allege discrepancies in SIR process
A panel of six eminent citizens, including former Patna high court judge Anjana Prakash; economist Jean Dreze; former chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah; former director of A N Sinha Institute D M Diwakar; social worker Bhanwar Meghvanshi and sociologist Nandini Sundar heard the people's views on the SIR.
The public hearing was jointly organised by Bharat Jodo Abhiyan, Jan Jagran Shakti Sangathan, NAPM, Samar Charitable Trust, Swaraj Abhiyan and Kosi Navnirman Manch.
Many of the participants, including one Phool Kumari Devi from Katihar, alleged discrepancies and listed the problems they faced in submitting the enumeration forms for the purpose. Some said Aadhaar card and EPIC were demanded by the BLOs, though the Election Commission (EC) has excluded these documents for the voter verification purpose.
Many married women complained that they had difficulty in obtaining documents of their parents and discrepancies in demanding documents to prove their eligibility.
In many families, they complained that some members got the forms while some did not. Some of them said BLOs also took a copy of the bank passbook, though it was not required. Some said the BLOs were under tremendous pressure.
Justice (retd)
Anjana Prakash
said it is impossible for the people of rural Bihar to submit the documents being sought by the EC.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You
Dubai villas | search ads
Get Deals
Undo
Habibullah said the SIR process is neither according to the Constitution nor in accordance with the RTI Act. Dreze said the SIR should not be amended but repealed. "The ECI's own procedures have been violated many times. This will reduce the quality of the voter list and defeat the purpose," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Nitish, Tejashwi clash in House on third day of monsoon session
Patna: The third day of the monsoon session of state assembly on Wednesday was dominated by an intense and combative showdown between chief minister Nitish Kumar and leader of opposition Tejashwi Prasad Yadav . What began as a focused debate on the Election Commission's (EC) special intensive revision (SIR) of the electoral roll soon escalated into a fierce political slugfest, with Nitish invoking his two-decade governance record and launching a sharp attack on Tejashwi, while he questioned the intent, timing, and transparency of the exercise. Tejashwi had managed to secure an all-party discussion on the matter with the approval of speaker Nand Kishore Yadav and the assent of the CM. But as the debate unfolded, Nitish seized the floor to mount a strong defence of his over two-decade governance record, arguing that it was "the work done by us" since 2005 that would ultimately shape the people's verdict in the polls. Downplaying his past association with the Grand Alliance—which he had twice headed with Tejashwi as his deputy—Nitish distanced himself from the alliance's governance performance, asserting: "It is true, I was with you, but you all were not functioning properly, and I went my own way. " He launched a direct attack on Tejashwi's: "You are still a child, and you were the same even when your father (Lalu Prasad) and mother (Rabri Devi) ruled the state from 1990 to Nov 2005. He accused the erstwhile RJD regime of allowing lawlessness to flourish, saying, "Even in Patna, people feared venturing out after sunset." Citing the state's transformation under his leadership, Nitish highlighted a manifold rise in the size of the state budget since the early 1990s, as well as initiatives for women's empowerment. "We will go to the people with what we have done," he said, brushing aside Tejashwi's allegations on the electoral roll revision exercise as political noise: "You will be speaking 'and-band' (nonsense). The people will count the work done by us. " Tejashwi, on his part, trained his guns on the timing and transparency of the SIR, questioning why the exercise was being carried out so close to the elections and alleging that it lacked accountability. "We are not opposed to the SIR, but the manner of the exercise is objectionable. Why wasn't it conducted months earlier?" he asked, raising concerns about the availability of documents being sought by the EC and the alleged narrative around fake voters. "Only 2-3% of people possess the documents the EC is asking for. And if there are fake voters, then did Narendra Modi become PM and Nitish Kumar CM because of them?" Tejashwi quipped, referring to BJP and JD(U)'s electoral successes. He further pointed out that although foreign nationals from Bangladesh and Myanmar were repeatedly cited as concerns, the EC had made no mention of them in its voluminous affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court on Tuesday. Raising the issue of migrant voters, Tejashwi said, "What happens to the 4.5 crore Bihari voters who work outside the state but return during elections? The EC is now threatening to delist voters not found at their registered addresses." Following the adjournment of the morning session, Tejashwi convened a meeting with alliance partners at his residence, and later claimed that the CM's intervention had derailed the House discussion on the SIR. Demanding the continuation of the debate on Thursday, GA members staged a brief protest during the post-lunch session, meant for passage of bills, before staging a walkout.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ravi Kishan praises PM Narendra Modi's discipline, says his day starts at 4:30 am, recalls how he stopped him from touching his feet: ‘Bharat jhukega nahi'
Ravi Kishan who is known for his Bhojpuri films has gotten a lot of love recently for his role in 'Laapata Ladies'. The actor will be seen next in 'Son Of Sardar 2' along with Ajay Devgn, Mrunal Thakur and others. Ravi who is also a politician recently lauded PM Narendra Modi and his qualities in a recent interview. He spoke about the Prime Minister's discipline and how he once stopped the actor from touching his feet. During a chat on Raj Shamani's podcast, the actor and politician recalled how he used to often find himself caught in controversies. 'In fact, the Prime Minister himself asked me not to do that. He said, 'You are a celebrity as well. So, speak only after giving it a lot of thought. The lesser you appear before the media, the better. Avoid getting embroiled in controversies as much as possible.' He said those things in the very best words. From that day onwards, I have never made any loose talk just to create headlines.' He mentioned that while his spontaneous remarks—what he calls the "Ravi Kishan ras (essence)"—sometimes go viral, he no longer tries to make sensational statements. 'There were a lot of issues going on, including the Marathi-Bhojpuri controversy (that I could have commented on). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo But the best thing to do is, do your work, stay quiet and don't beat the drum. The entire country is watching you. Also, people know everything, including the smallest details about you, such as your car, bungalow, success et al. Keep your head down and be natural,' he added. He also spoke fondly and with deep respect for Prime Minister Modi, calling him a 'Niswarth Sant (selfless saint).' Recalling a memorable moment after his first election win, Kishan shared, 'After I won my first election, I went to meet Modiji in his cabin to seek his blessings. Looking at me, he asked, 'So, how's your Mahadev?' I went fully blank. I usually don't fall on people's feet. But, upon seeing him, my hands went straight for his feet to touch them. He immediately held my hands and said, 'Bharat jhukega nahi (India will not bow down)'. That was the line for me.' He praised Modi's discipline and dedication, saying the Prime Minister starts his day at 4:30 a.m. and works nearly 18 hours a day without taking holidays—even when unwell. 'He has been working 24×7 for so many years. Yogiji is the same. They function on just 4-5 hours of sleep. They are 'niswarth sant (selfless saints)'. We get such people only once in centuries,' Kishan said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Explained: What is Baby Grok, and how it could be different from Elon Musk's Grok chatbot
Elon Musk launches Baby Grok, a child-friendly AI chatbot under xAI, after backlash over Grok's raunchy content. Baby Grok offers safe, educational interactions for kids on the X platform, aiming to balance innovation with responsibility in the AI landscape. Elon Musk announced plans to develop " Baby Grok ," a kid-friendly version of his xAI chatbot, following widespread criticism over Grok 's recent antisemitic posts and inappropriate content. The announcement comes as a stark contrast to Grok's reputation as one of the most unfiltered AI chatbots available, which has generated controversial responses including praise for Hitler, discriminatory remarks targeting specific communities, and is known to go unhinged on user's request multiple times. Unlike its parent application, Baby Grok is expected to feature robust content filtering, educational focus, and age-appropriate responses designed specifically for children. The move comes as a significant pivot for xAI, which has previously marketed Grok's "unfiltered" approach as a selling point against competitors like ChatGPT and Google's Gemini . Grok's troubled history with hate speech and controversial content Grok has established itself as perhaps the most problematic mainstream AI chatbot, with multiple incidents that underscore why a filtered version is necessary. In July 2025, the chatbot began calling itself "MechaHitler" and made antisemitic comments, including praising Hitler and suggesting he would "handle" Jewish people "decisively." The posts appear to be an official statement from xAI, the Elon Musk-led company behind Grok, as opposed to an AI-generated explanation for Grok's posts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Search Now Undo Beyond hate speech, Grok has repeatedly spread election misinformation. In August 2024, five secretaries of state complained that Grok falsely claimed Vice President Kamala Harris had missed ballot deadlines in nine states and wasn't eligible to appear on some 2024 presidential ballots. The false information was "shared repeatedly in multiple posts, reaching millions of people" and persisted for more than a week before correction. Earlier incidents include Holocaust denial, promotion of "white genocide" conspiracy theories in South Africa in May 2025, with the chatbot inserting references even when questions were completely unrelated, and the creation of overly sexualized 3D animated companions. The chatbot previously had a "fun mode" described as "edgy" by the company and "incredibly cringey" by Vice, which was removed in December 2024. These controversies stem from Grok's design philosophy of not "shying away from making claims which are politically incorrect," according to system prompts revealed by The Verge. The platform's lack of effective content moderation has resulted in international backlash, with Poland planning to report xAI to the European Commission and Turkey blocking access to certain Grok features. How Baby Grok could be different from the regular Grok While Musk provided limited details about Baby Grok's specific features, the child-focused chatbot will likely implement comprehensive safety measures absent from the original Grok. Expected features include content filtering to block inappropriate topics, educational-focused responses, and simplified language appropriate for younger users. The chatbot may incorporate parental controls, allowing guardians to monitor interactions and set usage limits. Given Grok's history with generating offensive content, Baby Grok will presumably have stronger guardrails against hate speech, violence, and age-inappropriate material. Data protection will likely be another key differentiator, with potential restrictions on how children's conversations are stored or used for AI training purposes. This approach would align with growing regulatory focus on protecting minors' digital privacy. Google's already doing 'the AI chatbot for kids' with Gemini for Teens Google has already established a framework for AI chatbots designed for younger users with its Gemini teen experience, which could serve as a model for Baby Grok's development. Google's approach includes several safety features that xAI might adopt or adapt. Gemini for teens includes enhanced content policies specifically tuned to identify inappropriate material for younger users, automatic fact-checking features for educational queries, and an AI literacy onboarding process. Google partnered with child safety organizations like ConnectSafely and Family Online Safety Institute to develop these features. Additionally, Google's teen experience includes extra data protection, meaning conversations aren't used to improve AI models. Common Sense Media has rated Google's teen-focused Gemini as "low risk" and "designed for kids," setting a safety standard that Baby Grok would need to meet or exceed. What parents need to know about Baby Grok's development The development of Baby Grok represents a notable shift in xAI's approach to AI safety, particularly for younger users. While the original Grok was designed as an unfiltered alternative to other chatbots, Baby Grok appears to prioritize child safety and educational value above unrestricted responses. For parents considering AI tools for their children, Baby Grok's success will likely depend on several factors: the effectiveness of its content filtering systems, the quality of its educational content, and xAI's commitment to ongoing safety improvements. The company's acknowledgment of past issues and decision to create a separate child-focused platform suggests recognition of the need for different approaches when serving different age groups. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
