logo
An audience with the ‘dragon king' of Bhutan, from 1984

An audience with the ‘dragon king' of Bhutan, from 1984

The Guardian02-03-2025
The kingdom of Bhutan is the most impenetrable country on earth. Already hidden behind mists, jungles and the Himalayan mountains, the last of the Shangri-las has deliberately isolated itself for centuries. Its once-closed neighbours, Nepal and Tibet, are common tourist destinations, writes Geoffrey Lean in the Observer Magazine on 18 November 1984. 'But Bhutan remains a place that is, literally, out of this world: it apparently defies the maxims that guide the rest of the globe.'
It may be the second poorest country on earth, after Kampuchea [now Cambodia], according to the World Bank, yet it has no poverty, no unemployment and virtually no crime. As for work, 97% are subsistence farmers, most of whom use an ancient system of barter for their transactions. For leisure, archery is the national pastime; the evenings resound to the twang of bowstrings. Folk dances are a main form of entertainment.
'The impression of having strayed into medieval Europe is all the stronger because it is so easy to relate to the people. The Bhutanese are a confident and efficient people, who make a special virtue of pragmatism and have an intellectual bias towards the arts.'
Jigme Singye Wangchuk, the 'Dragon King,' at 29, is the world's youngest hereditary ruler. 'Although we have a hereditary monarchy,' said the shy bachelor monarch, 'the way we function is more democratic than in any other country in the region.'
In theory. In practice, his nationalist assembly is more royalist than the king. When he tried to introduce a constitutional change to the assembly that would allow his leading advisers to criticise him, they protested. He only got it through by royal command.
Keenly aware of China's occupation of Tibet, the forbidden kingdom took the precaution of joining the United Nations in 1971 'to remind the world it was there'. Today, it is now admitting 2,000 tourists a year to see the tiny kingdom for themselves.'What most worries the king and his ministers is that foreigners might teach the Bhutanese to smoke marijuana… At present it is fed to pigs. 'This makes the pigs happy, and us happy,' says the foreign minister. Bhutan may be the one country where pigs do fly.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK admits foreign aid cuts could see deaths rise – with Africa hardest hit
UK admits foreign aid cuts could see deaths rise – with Africa hardest hit

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

UK admits foreign aid cuts could see deaths rise – with Africa hardest hit

The government has admitted that slashing foreign aid spending will likely see global deaths rise – as it confirmed the cuts will fall disproportionately on women and girls' education and on projects across Africa. Its own assessment of the cuts' impact said: 'Any reductions to health spending risk an increase in disease burden and ultimately in deaths, impacting in particular those living in poverty, women, children and people with disabilities.' 'The world's most marginalised communities, particularly those experiencing conflict and women and girls, will pay the highest price for these political choices,' said Gideon Rabinowitz, Director of Policy and Advocacy at Bond, the UK network for international development organisations. 'At a time when the US has gutted all gender programming, the UK should be stepping up, not stepping back.' The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in its annual report published on Tuesday set out cuts of £575 million in 2025 to 2026, The government is cutting aid spending by 40 per cent in total, from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of Gross National Income or roughly £6 billion by 2027, meaning the deepest cuts are still to come. The report confirmed the UK will send £1.8bn to the World Bank's International Development Association (IDA) - providing grants and low-interest loans to low-income countries – in part of a shift in funding towards big multi-country spending programmes including the global vaccine alliance Gavi. This means less money going from the UK directly to projects in specific countries. The African region has been disproportionately hit by cuts, while the Americas, Europe and Indo-Pacific regions all saw increases in their budgets, said Ian Mitchell, a senior policy fellow at the Center for Global Development. "Despite making cuts of roughly half a billion pounds, it's encouraging to see that the government is prioritising multilateral spend and honouring its pledge to the World Bank. Yet, it is unfortunate that Africa – home to over two-thirds of those in extreme poverty – will receive under half of FCDO's country and regional budget,' he said. 'If the government is to achieve its manifesto mission to tackle poverty, it will need to focus its budget where poverty exists and give African countries greater priority in its subsequent allocations.' Mr Rabinowitz said while he welcomed the consistent funding for certain humanitarian crises, vaccines and the World Bank, 'it is clear that the government is deprioritising funding for education, gender and countries experiencing humanitarian crises such as South Sudan , Ethiopia and Somalia.' While the government has committed to protecting spending for Gaza, Sudan and Ukraine, other crisis-hit countries significant cuts, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The plans also see a halving in spending on girls' education as well as reductions in spending on women's health, including sexual and reproductive health, and health emergencies. Leading charities have previously raised the alarm that programmes supporting girls and women would be in the firing line. The UK has been a leader in funding sexual and reproductive health including family planning, and the withdrawal of the US from funding these services has left a huge gap. It remains to be seen whether key programmes increasing access to contraception around the world like the Women's Integrated Sexual Health (WISH) initiative will be protected. While the government's own impact assessment makes it clear that, where cuts fall, they will negative impacts on equality, the report claimed overall spending demonstrated, 'disproportionate impacts on equalities have been avoided', Minister for Development Baroness Jenny Chapman said: "We are modernising our approach to international development. Every pound must work harder for UK taxpayers and the people we help around the world and these figures show how we are starting to do just that through having a clear focus and priorities. 'The UK is moving towards a new relationship with developing countries, becoming partners and investors, rather than acting as a traditional aid donor. We want to work with countries and share our expertise – from world leading science to the City of London - to help them become no longer dependent on aid, and organisations like the World Bank and Gavi are central to how we can work with others to solve some of the biggest challenges of our time: humanitarian disasters, pandemics and the climate crisis.'

1,400 killed in sectarian violence in coastal Syria in March, committee says
1,400 killed in sectarian violence in coastal Syria in March, committee says

North Wales Chronicle

time6 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

1,400 killed in sectarian violence in coastal Syria in March, committee says

The violence was the first major incident to emerge after the ousting of long-time President Bashar Assad in December. It said there was no evidence that Syria's new military leaders ordered attacks on the Alawite community there, to which Mr Assad belonged. Nearly 300 people suspected of committing crimes including murder, robbery, torture and looting and burning of homes and businesses were identified during the four-month investigation and referred for prosecution, and 37 people have been arrested, officials told journalists. They did not say how many suspects were members of security forces. The committee's report came as Syria reels from a new round of sectarian violence in the south, which again has threatened to upend the country's fragile recovery from nearly 14 years of civil war. The violence on the coast began on March 6 when armed groups loyal to Mr Assad attacked security forces of the new government, killing 238 of them, the committee said. In response, security forces descended on the coast from other areas of the country, joined by thousands of armed civilians. In total, some 200,000 armed men mobilised, the committee said. As they entered neighbourhoods and villages, some – including members of military factions – committed 'widespread, serious violations against civilians', committee spokesperson Yasser al-Farhan said. In some cases, armed men asked civilians whether they belonged to the Alawite sect and 'committed violations based on this', the spokesperson said. The committee, however, found that the 'sectarian motives were mostly based on revenge, not ideology', he said. Judge Jumaa al-Anzi, the committee's chairman, said that 'we have no evidence that the (military) leaders gave orders to commit violations'. He also said investigators had not received reports of girls or women being kidnapped. Some rights groups, including a United Nations commission, have documented cases of Alawite women being kidnapped in the months since the violence. There have been ongoing, although scattered, reports of Alawites being killed, robbed and extorted since the violence. Tens of thousands of members of the minority sect have fled to neighbouring Lebanon. There have been echoes of the coastal violence in the new clashes in the southern province of Sweida over the past two weeks. Those clashes broke out between Sunni Muslim Bedouin clans and armed groups of the Druze religious minority, and government security forces who intervened to restore order ended up siding with the Bedouins. Members of the security forces allegedly killed Druze civilians and looted and burned homes. Druze armed groups launched revenge attacks on Bedouin communities. Hundreds have been killed, and the UN says more than 128,500 people have been displaced. The violence has largely stopped as a ceasefire takes told. The committee chairman said the violence in Sweida is 'painful for all Syrians' but 'beyond the jurisdiction' of his committee. 'Time will reveal what happened and who is responsible for it,' he said.

World Court is poised to mark the future course of climate litigation
World Court is poised to mark the future course of climate litigation

Reuters

time8 hours ago

  • Reuters

World Court is poised to mark the future course of climate litigation

THE HAGUE, July 23 (Reuters) - The United Nations' highest court will deliver an opinion on Wednesday that is likely to determine the course of future climate action across the world. Known as an advisory opinion, the deliberation of the 15 judges of the International Court of Justice in The Hague is legally non-binding. It nevertheless carries legal and political weight and future climate cases would be unable to ignore it, legal experts say. 'The advisory opinion is probably the most consequential in the history of the court because it clarifies international law obligations to avoid catastrophic harm that would imperil the survival of humankind," said Payam Akhavan, an international law professor. In two weeks of hearings last December at the ICJ, also known as the World Court, Akhavan represented low-lying, small island states that face an existential threat from rising sea levels. In all, over a hundred states and international organisations gave their views on the two questions the U.N. General Assembly had asked the judges to consider. They were: what are countries' obligations under international law to protect the climate from greenhouse gas emissions; and what are the legal consequences for countries that harm the climate system? Wealthy countries of the Global North told the judges that existing climate treaties, including the 2015 Paris Agreement, which are largely non-binding, should be the basis for deciding their responsibilities. Developing nations and small island states argued for stronger measures, in some cases legally binding, to curb emissions and for the biggest emitters of climate-warming greenhouse gases to provide financial aid. In 2015, at the conclusion of U.N. talks in Paris, more than 190 countries committed to pursue efforts to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit). The agreement has failed to curb the growth of global greenhouse gas emissions. Late last year, in the most recent "Emissions Gap Report," which takes stock of countries' promises to tackle climate change compared with what is needed, the U.N said that current climate policies will result in global warming of more than 3 C (5.4 F) above pre-industrial levels by 2100. As campaigners seek to hold companies and governments to account, climate‑related litigation has intensified, with nearly 3,000 cases filed across almost 60 countries, according to June figures from London's Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. So far, the results have been mixed. A German court in May threw out a case between a Peruvian farmer and German energy giant RWE ( opens new tab, but his lawyers and environmentalists said the case, which dragged on for a decade, was a still victory for climate cases that could spur similar lawsuits. Earlier this month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which holds jurisdiction over 20 Latin American and Caribbean countries, said in another advisory opinion its members must cooperate, opens new tab to tackle climate change. Campaigners say Wednesday's court opinion should be a turning point and that, even if the ruling itself is advisory, it should provide for the determination that U.N. member states have broken the international law they have signed up to uphold. "The court can affirm that climate inaction, especially by major emitters, is not merely a policy failure but a breach of international law," said Fijian Vishal Prasad, one of the law students that lobbied the government of Vanuatu in the South Pacific Ocean to bring the case to the ICJ. Although it is theoretically possible to ignore an ICJ ruling, lawyers say countries are typically reluctant to do so. "This opinion is applying binding international law, which countries have already committed to. National and regional courts will be looking to this opinion as a persuasive authority and this will inform judgments with binding consequences under their own legal systems," Joie Chowdhury, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law, said. The court will start reading out its opinion at 3 p.m. (1300 GMT).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store