French Olympian Ysaora Thibus cleared of doping after successfully arguing she was contaminated through kissing her partner
French Olympian Ysaora Thibus has been cleared of a doping charge and avoided a four-year ban after successfully arguing that she was contaminated with a banned substance through kissing her partner, former U.S. Olympian Race Imboden.
Thibus, a member of the French fencing team, tested positive in January 2024 for ostarine, a substance that's believed to promote muscle and bone growth. It is not FDA approved and is banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).
Advertisement
A doping tribunal of the International Fencing Federation determined prior to the 2024 Olympics in Paris that Thibus bore no fault or negligence for ingesting the substance after she argued that she had been contaminated via an exchange of bodily fluids with Imboden. She'd claimed that Imboden had taken ostarine on Jan. 5.
"I categorically deny that I have used doping," Thibus wrote after her positive test. "My many negative doping tests are proof of this."
Thibus, a silver medalist at the Tokyo Games, was allowed to compete at the Paris Olympics in her home country. WADA has since appealed the decision to clear Thibus to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and asked CAS to reject the argument that she was contaminated by Imboden. Per The Athletic, WADA sought for Thibus to be disciplined with a "period of ineligibility of four years.'
CAS held an in-person hearing of the appeal at its headquarters in Lausanne, Switzerland, in March. On Monday, a panel of CAS judges issued its verdict clearing Thibus of a doping violation.
Advertisement
Per the verdict obtained by the Guardian, CAS judges determined that 'it is scientifically established that the intake of an ostarine dose similar to the dose ingested by Ms. Thibus' then partner would have left sufficient amounts of ostarine in the saliva to contaminate a person through kissing.'
The CAS judges also accepted that "Ms. Thibus' then-partner was taking ostarine from 5 Jan, 2024, and that there was contamination over nine days with a cumulative effect.'
Thibus, 33, is cleared to compete in further international competition. She finished fifth in women's team foil in Paris and 28th in the women's individual foil.
Imboden, a three-time Olympian fencer for Team USA and two-time Olympic bronze medalist (2016 and 2021), did not compete in the Paris Olympics.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
33 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Olympian Cleared of Doping After Positive Test Came From Kissing Boyfriend
An Olympian's doping suspension has been thrown out after it was deemed the silver medalist tested positive for a banned substance after kissing her boyfriend. French fencer Ysaora Thibus, who won a silver medal in team foil at the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, had been given a four-year suspension after testing positive for ostarine, a prohibited muscle-building substance, in January 2024. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) dismissed the suspension on Monday, July 7, finding "that it is scientifically established that the intake of an ostarine dose similar to the dose ingested by Ms Thibus' then partner would have left sufficient amounts of ostarine in the saliva to contaminate a person through kissing." Thibus' then-boyfriend, United States fencer Race Imboden, was taking ostarine at the time of the positive drug test. The presence of ostarine in Thibus' test was ruled "not intentional," and CAS ruled she "bears no fault or negligence." CAS dismissed an appeal from the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which was seeking a four-year suspension. Thibus was still able to compete at the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris after the International Fencing Federation's doping disciplinary tribunal (DDT) found her not liable, where she finished fifth in the team foil event. She and Imboden, who was inducted into the U.S. Fencing Hall of Fame last month, have not been pictured together since last year. Thibus reflected on her unique Olympic journey in a social media post after the Summer Games in her home country. "This year, I have shown immense courage and unwavering perseverance!" she wrote in September 2024 alongside a picture of herself standing in front of the Arc de Triomphe. "I have had to fight against injustice, injury, and time!! ." Thibus recognized those who "believed in me, in my truth, and who never stopped supporting me." In particular, Thibus thanked members of the French national fencing team for their faith in her story. "I can never thank you enough," she wrote. "You made the courageous choice to keep me on the team, when everything seemed uncertain just days before the competition. This gesture is the greatest recognition of my career. You proved to me that, in this world of performance, there is also room for humanity." Thibus added, "Life is full of uncertainties, but I will never stop aiming high. Hard work, resilience, and hope have brought me to where I am. I am convinced that I still have many beautiful pages to write, in sport and beyond!" Copyright 2025 Us Weekly. All rights reserved.
USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
Three things you missed about WNBA star Caitlin Clark in new book 'On Her Game'
Author Christine Brennan reveals details about Caitlin's Clark's rookie season in the WNBA, including her Olympic snub My book "On Her Game: Caitlin Clark and the Revolution in Women's Sports," was published by Scribner on Tuesday. Much is being written and said about the book, but here are three stories in the book you might not have heard. Clark's real reaction to the Olympic snub During an interview session after the Indiana Fever practice on June 9, 2024, Caitlin Clark was asked about the Olympic team decision. "I'm excited for the girls that are on the team,' she said. "I know it's the most competitive team in the world, and I knew it could've gone either way — me being on the team, me not being on the team. I'm excited for them, I'm going to be rooting them on to win gold. "Honestly, no disappointment," she added. "I think it just gives you something to work for. It's a dream; hopefully one day I can be there. I think it's just a little more motivation, you remember that, and hopefully, when four years comes back around I can be there.' Fever coach Christie Sides said during her availability with the media that Sunday that she and Clark texted right after she got the call on the bus. "She texted me to let me know. I just tried to keep her spirits up. The thing she said was, 'Hey, Coach, they woke a monster,' which I thought was awesome.' Although Clark took the high road in her public comments, Sides said in an interview for this book that the Olympic decision was "such a disappointing moment for her. Being an Olympian is a huge dream of hers, and when she realized it wasn't going to happen, it just lit a fire under her." As the team landed in Indianapolis after a game in Washington earlier that evening and got off the plane late at night, Sides said she and Clark 'were walking and talking about the decision. She could have gone to practice that night, I mean, that's where she was, that's the competitor she is. She didn't really say much more after that.' Clark's 'big sister' As Clark's name was called first in the 2024 WNBA Draft, veteran Fever point guard Erica Wheeler exploded from her courtside seat in Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Giddy with anticipation at the news she knew was coming, Wheeler had placed one hand on the knee of Lexie Hull and the other on the knee of Maya Caldwell, both Fever teammates at the time, and waited to hear Engelbert's words. Wheeler—known as 'EW' to her teammates—leaped for joy with Hull and Caldwell, then pulled a red Fever No. 22 jersey over her head and ran around the court as the fans stood and roared. 'Let's go!' Wheeler shouted to every corner of the arena. Her happiness was predictable, but also admirable, for as she danced, she knew she was celebrating the moment that she had lost her starting job. Clark was going to be the starting point guard for the Fever, guaranteed. Wheeler would be her backup, a difficult role, but one she understood, and even relished. "You know when you go to a different school,' said the 33-year-old Wheeler, 'the first day of school, you don't know anybody, and you find that one person that says hi to you that becomes your best friend.' Wheeler became that person for Clark. "For me as a big sister, I'm going to take the first step, to just let her know, 'We're here, we got you. Whatever you need from me as your vet, even in the same position, I got you.' . . . She's one of the biggest players in the world right now and she don't act like that. She's just like, 'Help me, in any way you can,' in a sweet way, there's no ego at all, she's not selfish. . . . She wants to learn, she wants to be a family, and I'm like a big sister to her.' 27 minutes — not one mention of Clark Throughout the WNBA post- and off-season, the league found itself curiously out of step with the nation's fondness for Clark. On Oct. 10, before Game One of the WNBA Finals in Brooklyn, commissioner Cathy Engelbert spoke for 27 minutes in a press conference about the historic developments in the 2024 season and never once mentioned Clark's name. Calling the season "the most transformational year in the WNBA's history," Engelbert talked glowingly about the record or near-record levels of viewership, attendance, merchandise sales, and digital engagement. "You saw some teams upgrade . . . arenas for certain games this year, and I thought that was a sign and signal as attendance has grown across the league that we can play in bigger arenas. . . . We had our highest-attended game ever, over 20,000, in Washington this year.' Clark, of course, was the reason for most of those moves to larger arenas, and her presence definitely was the only reason Washington had the biggest crowd in WNBA regular-season history on Sept. 19. Engelbert sprinkled the names of various WNBA players throughout her press conference, among them: Napheesa Collier, Sabrina Ionescu, Breanna Stewart, Leonie Fiebich, Aliyah Boston, and A'ja Wilson. But no Clark. Through her spokespeople, Engelbert was asked to be interviewed for this book several times in late 2024 and early 2025. Every request was declined. In March 2025, I asked again, specifically wondering why Engelbert, on Oct. 10, failed to mention Clark's name when referring to the unprecedented season highlights that happened because of Clark. On March 10, Engelbert replied in a text message sent through a spokesperson: "You're asking me why I didn't mention Caitlin Clark during my WNBA Finals press conference? I didn't mention any players in that press conference other than some of those from the Liberty and the Lynx who were participating in the Finals." Engelbert did mention two players who were not participating in the Finals: Aliyah Boston and A'ja Wilson. She talked about them when mentioning WNBA players in commercials: "There's virtually not a sporting event you can turn on where one of our players is not in an ad spot. That was not happening five years ago. Look at Aliyah Boston and Sabrina and A'ja and so many of our players in these ad spots." Engelbert's March 10 text continued: "I have stated many times that Caitlin is a generational talent and there is no denying her impact — not only in the WNBA but beyond the world of sports. We have also always stood by the belief that our league is not about any one player but about the collective talent, teamwork, and dedication of all the athletes who continue to elevate the game and inspire generations. Just because Caitlin's name is not mentioned in every interview or press conference does not mean we do not recognize, celebrate, and fully support her — both as an athlete and, even more importantly, as a person.' A week and a half before the WNBA Finals, Engelbert, in an interview with 60 Minutes correspondent Jon Wertheim for a piece on Clark and the WNBA, was asked to describe "the Caitlin Clark phenomenon.' Engelbert replied, "She's clearly an unbelievable player, came in with an unbelievable following, has brought a lot of new fans to the league. If you look at our historic season around our attendance, our viewership, Caitlin — Angel, too, Angel Reese, Rickea Jackson, Cameron Brink — this class of rookies, we will be talking about them a generation from now." Wertheim followed up. "I notice when you're asked about Caitlin a lot, you bring up other rookies as well." "No league's ever about one player," Engelbert replied. "That player could get hurt or whatever, so I think it's just to give recognition that in sports, people watch for compelling content and rivalries. And you can't do that alone as one person.' By practically any measure, Clark was that one person. Adapted from "On Her Game: Caitlin Clark and the Revolution in Women's Sports" by Christine Brennan. Copyright © 2025 by Christine Brennan. Adapted for excerpt with permission from Scribner, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
NCAA settlement instituting revenue sharing system faces seven different appeals
The recent $2.8 billion settlement of three athlete-compensation antitrust cases against the NCAA and the Power Five conferences is set to face seven appeals to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based on filings made by a deadline that passed the night of Monday, July 7. None of the appeal notices were accompanied by a motion seeking to put at least a temporary stop to the going-forward aspects of the agreement, which included schools being allowed to pay athletes directly for the use of their name, image and likeness, beginning July 1. Also, beginning July 1, schools that choose to make NIL deals with their athletes are no longer subject to sport-by-sport scholarship limits. But those restrictions have been replaced by roster limits, subject to exceptions for certain athletes who were on teams during the 2024-25 school year and recruits who had been assured of roster spots for the 2025-26 school year. There were 73 valid, timely objections filed out of nearly 390,000 current and former athletes covered by the litigation while U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken considered whether to grant final approval to the settlement. She granted that approval on June 6. Among the athletes being represented in appeals are current Florida State quarterback Thomas Castellanos, who is involved with two appeal efforts; former two-time national women's lacrosse player of the year Charlotte North; former wrestler Sebastian Rivera, who won a bronze medal at the Paris Olympics and now is an assistant coach at Columbia; and former men's basketball player Braeden Anderson, who now works as an attorney. The full range of issues that will be argued in the appeals remains to be seen because the appeal notices followed a standard format and were not accompanied by a legal argument. But based on the objections that the appealing parties made to Wilken previously, they are likely to include: ▶The applicability of Title IX, the federal gender-equity law, to the settlement's sport-by-sport allocations of damages money that heavily favors football and men's basketball players. ▶Whether the settlement's annual per-school cap on new benefits that can be provided to athletes, including the NIL money paid directly from the schools to the athletes, constitutes another illegal limit on athlete compensation. ▶The fairness of the damages allocations to walk-on athletes who sometimes ended up becoming more prominent than their teammates on scholarship, and to some athletes in lower-revenue sports. ▶The adequacy of the plaintiffs' lawyers' representation of the interests of athletes other than football and men's basketball players and the adequacy of the notice and claims submissions process for athletes. Other than the lawyers who filed the first notice of appeal on June 11, many of the lawyers for the appealing parties have either been willing to provide only brief and general comments about their planned arguments to USA TODAY Sports, or they have been unavailable for comment. But Patrick Bradford, an attorney representing Castellanos and Anderson, said in an interview July 8: "This is a settlement that will pay kids less than the market would bear and say, 'That's OK.' " Bradford raised the possibility of pursuing the matter to the Supreme Court, if necessary. Steve Berman, one of the lead lawyers for the plaintiffs, said in an email July 8: 'We remain 100 percent optimistic of our chances of success and are disappointed that these objectors are appealing given the thoroughness and soundness of Judge Wilken's decision. Most of the objectors have not appealed and we thank them for not joining in any effort to hold up payments to the student (a)thletes which is what the appealing objectors are doing.' The appeals could significantly delay the start of payments of damages money to tens of thousands of athletes and to the plaintiffs' lawyers, who have requested that they be awarded hundreds of millions of dollars from the total settlement pool. These payments are set to occur over a 10-year period. As approved by Wilken, the settlement says that in the event of appeals of this nature, the NCAA and the conferences would begin making damages payments, but the money would be held in escrow — not paid to athletes or lawyers — until appeals are completed. Initial scheduling instructions from the 9th Circuit for five of the appeals that were filed called for written arguments to be filed by various dates in September by those appealing and for responses to be filed by various dates in October. However, no scheduling instructions have been issued yet for two appeals. Berman said plaintiffs will ask the 9th Circuit to consolidate the appeals, so they follow a single calendar. According to the 9th Circuit's website, oral arguments in appeals of civil cases occur approximately six to 12 months from the notice of appeal date, or approximately four months from completion of briefing. The site said 'most cases are decided within 3 months to a year after submission,' so even if the 9th Circuit chooses not to hold oral argument in this case, it's unlikely a ruling will be issued before early 2026.
