AstraZeneca CEO wants to move listing to the US
Sir Pascal Soriot has spoken privately of his preference to move the FTSE 100 company's listing on a number of occasions and has even discussed moving AstraZeneca's domicile, according to a source familiar with his thinking.
They added that Soriot, 66, was likely to face resistance from parts of the board should he push for such a move, as well as the British government. The government is not believed to have been informed.
Soriot, who has led AstraZeneca since 2012, has spoken publicly of his concerns at how Europe has fallen behind the US and China, the company's two largest markets, in innovating new medicines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Ryanair to make free hand luggage allowance even SMALLER
RYANAIR is set to reduce the size of their hand luggage allowance. The budget carrier currently allows a free bag the size of 40cm x 25cm x 20cm into the cabin, which fits underneath the seat in front and is around 20 litres. However, new rules will reduce this to just 40cm x 30cm x 15cm, the Independent reports which is just 18 litres. Anyone with a bag that fits the new rules, will no longer be able to use it. Not only that, but all airports would need to change the size of their baggage sizers to be able to check them. The new rules are expected to be rolled out by the end of October this year. Ourania Georgoutsakou, Managing Director of Airlines for Europe (A4E) of which Ryanair is included, said: "This will align A4E members with the decision of member states made last month and bring more clarity to passengers across Europe. "From city-hoppers to family travellers, everyone will benefit from the same clear rule across our members' networks.' The size reduction comes amid the new EU rules set to be introduced which will ban airlines from charging for small carry on bags. This means passengers would be allowed a small cabin bag weighing up to 7kg, and no more than 100cm. The rules hope to simplify the travel process, with a common standard across the board for carry-on luggage. A Department for Transport spokeswoman said: 'We want to make sure passengers can travel with ease, which is why we landed a deal with the EU to allow millions more British nationals to use e-gates at airports in time for the summer holidays.' How to check in for a Ryanair flight Yet those opposing it have warned it will race plane ticket prices. Not only that, but most airlines do not have the overhead locker capacity to allow all passengers a cabin bag. Airlines for Europe Managing Director Ourania Georgoutsakou told Politico: 'The European Parliament should let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't.' Other budget airlines that don't allow free cabin bags offer a much larger underseat bag size allowance. EasyJet allows bags that are 45cm x 36cm x 20cm, and have confirmed they won't reduce their sizes. While Wizz Air allow bags up to 40cm x 30cm x 20cm. British Airways and Jet2 have the same smaller size as Ryanair, but also allow a free cabin bag, measuring 56cm x 45cm x 15cm. Earlier this year, Ryanair were forced to refund a customer £124 after it was ruled they shouldn't have charged them for their hand luggage. The Spanish court claimed that the hand luggage was an "essential part of air travel". And last October Ryanair was also fined and after two customers complained how much they had been charged for hand luggage in Spain. 2
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Controversial non-league owner sacks ENTIRE board after they threatened to plunge crisis club into administration
MORECAMBE are facing administration following their relegation from the EFL after the club's board was sacked as takeover talks hit a massive roadblock. Tyson Fury's beloved Shrimps were left stranded on the financial rocks following the row between owner Jason Whittingham and his directors over the proposed sale. 1 EFL bosses gave the green light to the Panjab Warriors consortium headed by London-based businessman Kuljeet Singh Momi at the start of June. Despite the proposed new owners posing for pictures with Morecambe scarves, the deal has yet to be completed, with club directors suggesting Whittingham and his Bond Group Investments 'appear to be considering reneging on the deal'. They set Whittingham a deadline of 4pm on Tuesday, accusing him of not having the funds to meet the club's salary bill and threatening to call in the receivers. But Whittingham has now responded by booting the board - insisting it is the only way for Morecambe to find a solution to keep the club going and denying he is 'stalling' on the sale. In a statement explaining the move to fans, Whittingham said: 'There is no doubt that the Club is in a precarious position and is at a crisis point. 'We also appreciate the stress this is causing for all connected with Morecambe FC. 'As majority shareholder we are making every effort to resolve any issues that have arisen and are working to protect the best interests of the club.' He added: 'Bond Group Investments has started the process to dismiss the board in order that we can take control over the situation giving us the required additional time to ensure that the club has the best chance to avoid Administration. 'We hope the board put the interest of the club before any personal grievances and during this delicate time of negotiation to save the club, refrain from their propensity of issuing negative statements. 'The notion that Bond Group Investments is stalling is not true. We are deeply sorry for the distress and uncertainty this is causing. Abandoned EFL stadium left to rot with pitch covered in weeds just five years after hosting final match 'Bond Group Investments need to ensure that any transfer of shares, in a sale, is done in a way that holds no recourse for either the Club or Bond Group. 'The safety of the club's future is paramount and our focus is to work to find solutions to resolve the matter of staff salary and the sale of the club to avoid administration at all costs.' Whittingham promised a final outcome in the next 24 hours but 10 weeks after their 18-year EFL story came to a crashing end, the entire future of the club is under huge doubt.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hancock: Discharging patients into care homes was ‘least-worst' Covid decision
Matt Hancock has insisted that discharging patients from hospitals to care homes in the early stages of the pandemic was 'the least-worst decision' at the time. The former health secretary admitted that forming a protective ring around care homes was 'impossible' as he doubled down on the policy, which was among the most controversial decisions of the pandemic. The Covid Inquiry previously heard there were more than 43,000 deaths involving the virus in care homes across the UK between March 2020 and July 2022. Alasdair Donaldson, a senior civil servant, was quoted earlier this week describing the toll as a ' generational slaughter within care homes '. On Wednesday, Mr Hancock acknowledged the discharge policy was an ' incredibly contentious issue ' but told the inquiry that 'nobody has yet provided me with an alternative that was available at the time that would have saved more lives'. When the pandemic hit in early 2020, hospital patients were rapidly discharged into care homes in a bid to free up beds and prevent the NHS from becoming overwhelmed. However, there was no policy in place requiring patients to be tested beforehand, or for asymptomatic patients to isolate, until mid-April. This was despite growing awareness of the risks of people without Covid symptoms being able to spread the virus. NHS 'insisted' on policy Mr Hancock, who resigned from the government in 2021 after admitting to breaking social distancing guidance while having an affair with a colleague, has now appeared at the inquiry seven times. Returning for a full-day session to face questions specifically about the care sector, Mr Hancock said the hospital discharge policy had been 'driven' by the then NHS chief executive Sir Simon Stevens, now Lord Stevens. Mr Hancock said: 'It was formally a government decision. It was signed off by the prime minister. It was really driven by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of the NHS, but it was widely discussed.'
