
In about-face, US judge says unions can sue over Trump's mass firings
U.S. District Judge William Alsup in a written order, opens new tab late Monday said two federal labor boards have no particular expertise on whether the U.S. Office of Personnel Management violated the U.S. Constitution by directing agencies to fire roughly 25,000 probationary employees, the central issue in the lawsuit.
Alsup on March 13 had already ordered six agencies to reinstate about 17,000 workers who had lost their jobs as part of President Donald Trump's broader purge of the federal workforce, pending further litigation. Nonprofit groups and the state of Washington had joined four unions in filing the lawsuit.
The Trump administration on Monday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block Alsup's order while it appeals.
Alsup's decision on Monday breaks with three other federal judges who said in preliminary rulings last month that unions could not sue in court over the Trump administration's mass firings and other policies.
The American Federation of Government Employees and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, who sued along with two affiliates, did not immediately have comment. The U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In Monday's order, Alsup said it could be futile for workers and unions to appeal firings to the Merit Systems Protection Board and Federal Labor Relations Authority because of recent political upheaval at the agencies.
"The government here pretends that the constitutional claims are ... intertwined with or embedded in matters on which the MSPB and the FLRA are expert," Alsup wrote. "But defendants point to no specific fact or issue in our circumstances."
Alsup during a hearing in February had ruled that he likely lacked jurisdiction over claims by the unions, but not the other plaintiffs. He also ruled at the time that OPM did not have the power to direct agencies to fire workers.
Probationary employees typically have less than a year of service in their current roles, though some are longtime federal workers, and they have fewer job protections than other government employees. OPM has said that it merely asked agencies to identify probationary workers who could be terminated and did not order any firings.
Federal employees are generally required to appeal their individual terminations to the three-member MSPB, and unions can bring challenges to the FLRA when their members are fired.
Alsup at the February hearing said that because the federal Civil Service Reform Act designated those agencies as the exclusive avenues for federal employees to challenge their firings, he likely could not hear claims by the unions.
But after a closer look, the judge on Monday said the challenge to OPM's authority to order mass firings was distinct from the individual claims that must go through the administrative process.
He also noted that Trump fired the head of the Office of Special Counsel, which can petition the merit board to block mass firings, and is attempting to remove Democratic members of the merit board and the FLRA. The Trump administration is appealing decisions that reinstated those officials.
"The CSRA's review channels are being restrained," wrote Alsup, an appointee of Democratic former President Bill Clinton.
Alsup scheduled a hearing for April 9 on "why the relief extended to the organizational plaintiffs (or more, or less) should not be extended to the public-sector union plaintiffs."
The case is American Federation of Government Employees v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 25-cv-1780.
For the plaintiffs: Danielle Leonard and Stacey Leyton of Altshuler Berzon
For the government: Kelsey Helland of the U.S. Department of Justice
Read more:
US judges order Trump administration to reinstate thousands of fired workers
Trump administration reinstating almost 25,000 fired workers after court order
Trump takes challenge to judge's federal worker rehiring order to Supreme Court
US judge halts Trump administration's calls for mass firings at agencies
Trump poised to launch new round of layoffs despite setbacks in court
US agencies face Thursday deadline to submit mass layoff plans

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why schools could be forced to close in US
Democratic and Republican lawmakers are urging the Trump administration to release nearly $6 billion in frozen federal education funding. The Department of Education initially withheld $6.9 billion on 30 June, stating the funds had been "grossly misused to subsidise a radical left-wing agenda." While $1.3 billion was released for after−school programme s on 18 July, $5.5 billion remains in limbo, causing significant concern among school districts. School districts across the US, including those in Florida and Alaska, are facing potential cuts and closures due to the ongoing delay in funding. Lawmakers argue that withholding these funds contradicts the President's stated aim of returning K-12 education control to individual states.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
US government is building a 5,000-person immigrant detention camp in west Texas
The U.S. government is building an immense 5,000-person detention camp in west Texas, government contract announcements said, sharply increasing the Trump administration's ability to hold detained immigrants amid its ever-growing mass deportation efforts. A Defense Department contract announcement on Monday said Acquisition Logistics, a Virginia-based firm, had been awarded $232 million in Army funds to build the facility, which would be used for single immigrant adults. Procurement documents called it a 'soft sided facility,' a phrase often used for tent camps. The announcement came just weeks after Florida authorities rushed to construct a new immigration detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which was built on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland in the Florida Everglades. The announcement said the new facility would be built in El Paso, which is home to Ft. Bliss, an Army base that stretches across parts of Texas and New Mexico. President Donald Trump recently signed a law setting aside $170 billion on border and immigration enforcement, including $45 billion for detention, even as the number of illegal border crossings has plunged. ICE will see its funding grow by $76.5 billion over five years, nearly 10 times its current annual budget. Trump has vowed to deport millions of immigrants living illegally in the U.S.


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Donald Trump's neighbour demands cops keep him safe from MAGA fans
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump's outspoken Scots neighbour is demanding cops keep him safe from the US president and his die-hard fans when he jets in. David Milne, 61, lives right next door to the tycoon's golf course in Aberdeenshire, and has publicly clashed with him over the years. 1 Trump at the golf course in 2016 Credit: AFP And he fears his past might make him a target for MAGA supporters gone wild during the US President's visit. Mr Milne said: 'People who are protesting against Trump will definitely be taken care of. "But what about me and my home? "I wouldn't be surprised now that he's President if there were some MAGA supporters who would take this opportunity to have a go.' He added: 'He attracts all kinds of people. "There are those who hate what he stands for. "But there are a lot who are drawn to him and agree with everything he says. 'I really want to know what Police Scotland will be doing for my safety. But I'm guessing it will be something they've not thought about.' Mr Milne refused to sell up to Mr Trump when the mogul's resort in Menie was first announced. The now-President was then caught on camera branding David's property 'ugly.' Donald Trump calls for Obama to be arrested with AI vid The feud ramped up in 2011 when crews from the golf course built a fence around the house and billed David for it. He refused to pay. Other locals aside from Mr Milne also fear their daily lives could be impacted by security plans at the weekend. Asst Chief Con Emma Bond said: 'A policing plan will be in place to maintain public safety, balance rights to peaceful protest, and minimise disruption.'