Sean Flynn has ridden the Classics, next he'd like a British title
Flynn's rise has meant that this season he's already ridden some of the most iconic races on the cycling calendar including Milan-Sanremo, the Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix, to add to his appearance at the La Vuelta a España in 2023.
And what's even more telling about Flynn and his rapidly increasing expectations of himself is that he's not satisfied with merely being on the start line of the biggest races in the sport; rather, he's somewhat frustrated that he couldn't make more of an impact this year in terms of his results.
"This season has been really positive and I've had the chance to do races that I've always dreamed about doing, so that's been exciting and I've gained a lot of experience. Some of my performances have been very good and so I was disappointed not to come away with more of a top level result in some of the Classics,' Flynn says.
'It's obviously encouraging to race well - it's just a pity I've not come away with a result on paper that I can sited and stare at and admire. With cycling, there's just so many variables and sometimes it'll go your way and sometimes it won't.'
Flynn, who rides for Team Picnic PostNL, acknowledges that he's being disproportionately hard on himself. Given he's still only 25 years old and has been in the professional ranks for only two full seasons so far, his progression to the top level has been impressive, to say the least, and he admits racing in the sport's top races against the world's best riders, has been both a steep learning curve and the thrill of a lifetime.
'People do tell me I'm too tough on myself and sometimes I need to take a step back,' the Edinburgh native says.
'In these huge races, I'm racing the biggest stars of the sport who are just incredible riders and so I do need to put into perspective who I'm up against.
'When you watch the Classics on television it can look easy, but there's so much that goes into doing well in terms of positioning, knowing the moments that are important and knowing what to expect.
'And the Monument races, which are 250km or longer, are a whole different ball game so I was happy that I've been able to do races of that length and get through them okay.
'This year has been a really good learning experience for me, and also it's also been really cool to do these iconic races. When I was riding the cobbles section in Roubaix, the fan inside of me couldn't believe it.'
(Image: Luc Claessen/ Getty Images)
The coming days will see Flynn's focus turn to the National Championships, which take place in Ceredigion, Wales with the time trial today before tomorrow's circuit race and the road race on Sunday, in which Flynn will line-up.
There will be a number of Flynn's fellow Scots also in action including, on the men's side, Olympic medallist on the track, Mark Stewart, plus Callum Thornley and Calum Johnson while on the women's side, the Scots worth watching out for are Flynn's girlfriend, Lauren Dickson, as well as Kate Richardson, Neah Evans, Eilidh Shaw and Arianne Holland.
For Flynn, given the form he's in, it's unsurprising he's hopeful of challenging for a podium place.
'Nationals is always tough to predict but I want to try and win it. That's how I'll be racing and so it really just depends how it goes on the day,' he says.
'But given the standard of the riders, I could finish outside the top 10 and still be pretty satisfied with how I've ridden. I'm excited for it and I'll just see what I can get from it but I'll be aiming for the top, for sure.'
For Flynn, there remains a few more months of racing this year, during which he hopes to continue to raise the profile of road racing within Scotland.
His success, alongside the success of the likes of Tour de France rider Oscar Onley and a number of other Scots who are making an impact in Europe, Flynn is hopeful the success of this group of young Scottish men can go some way in persuading more Scottish kids that becoming a professional road racer is a viable career goal.
'It's really nice to be flying the flag at this level for Scotland,' he says.
'The first couple of years of my career, I was just in my own little bubble but now I feel like I'm getting on top of the racing and so I'd like to do a bit more to encourage and inspire more people to get onto their bike.
'When I was younger, there weren't any obvious role models from Scotland at the top level of road racing but now we have quite a few Scottish guys at the top level.
'I know that when I was coming through, if I'd had a connection with anyone doing these huge races I would have found it really cool so I hope I can keep riding these big races for that reason.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Nasser al-Khelaifi plays game of risk with plans to move PSG from the Parc
'Ici, c'est Paris' has been the rallying chant of Paris Saint-Germain supporters since the beginning of the 21st century. It has also become an advertising slogan for the club, who appropriated it to the fury of the ultras, who had trademarked it and have launched a lawsuit in response. But fans and marketing consultants, unless they do not fear ridicule, will not be able to use it once PSG carry out their plan to vacate the Parc des Princes, their home since they were promoted to Ligue 1 in 1974. 'It's over now,' PSG's president, Nasser al-Khelaifi, told reporters in March. 'We want to move.' This was confirmed in a statement on 10 June, the day the newly crowned European champions flew to California and the Fifa Club World Cup. 'I like the Parc a lot,' Khelaifi, known in France as Nak, said of the 48,583-capacity arena. 'Everyone loves it. But [if we stay], we're dead. In Europe, all the big clubs have 80,000- or 90,000-seat stadiums. If we want to be at that level for our supporters, the stadium must be expanded.' And because an expansion of the stadium is out of the question, it is likely that 'Paris' (as the club love PSG to be called in the media) will no longer play in Paris by the time the decade is over, but in one of two towns of the grande banlieue, Massy or Poissy. We will know which come November 2026. Very few professional clubs still play in the stadium where they hosted their first game, Chelsea's Stamford Bridge being among the exceptions. Moving from arenas which had become too old or small is in the natural order of things if clubs have not redeveloped, as Chelsea did, but they have usually then built the new venue as close as possible to their community, as Athletic Club, Tottenham and Arsenal have done. When a lack of available sites has forced clubs to move further from their historic home, efforts have been made to remain as close as possible: Bayern's Allianz Arena is less than a quarter of an hour's drive from their first proper ground on Leopoldstrasse and the Olympiastadion, where they played until the beginning of the 2005-06 season. PSG's case is different. It is as if Arsenal, when the time came to say goodbye to Highbury, had moved to Bromley, or even further. Of the two shortlisted sites, Massy is closer to the capital but still lies more than 11 miles south of the Parc des Princes. Poissy is two miles further to the north-west. It must be remembered that the périphérique, the ring road which girdles the city, acts as a cultural as well as a physical barrier between what is Paris and what is not. The Parc lies on the outskirts of the 16th arrondissement but remains intra muros. Massy and Poissy are not Paris and never will be, whatever PSG fans may sing when they get there. Khelaifi will argue that there is no alternative. The Parc remains the property of the Ville de Paris, which leases it to the club in a deal (intended to run until 2044) worth €2m a season and has no intention of selling it. 'The Parc is [and must remain] a part of the Parisian heritage which belongs to all Parisians,' the deputy mayor of Paris, Patrick Bloche, told Le Parisien last October. What he did not add was that a sale to the club had been envisaged in the past, but that the local authority had discovered that PSG's plans included the transformation of a huge area – about 50 hectares – around the stadium to create an entertainment complex. From then, any hope of reconciliation between the club and the town hall was impossible, especially because, according to the councillor Pierre Rabadan, the last PSG offer for the Parc, made this year, was €38m, not much more than a tenth of what the local authority was expecting and a pittance compared with the billion the club's Qatari owners are said to be prepared to spend for their new stadium. It is a risky move for PSG. The supporters won't like it. The Parc is where their club were born and made history. It is within easy reach of the banlieues of Seine-Saint Denis, where so many of them come from. The neutrals will miss the instantly recognisable bowl and its rib-like concrete projections; the Parc, with its strange, unique, retro-futuristic feel, was an amplifier of emotions which not everyone could live with. Replicating it will be impossible. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion It is also risky because, next season, Paris will no longer be the one-club city it has been since 1990, when Jean-Luc Lagardère's Matra Racing, once home to players such as Luis Fernández, Pierre Littbarski and Enzo Francescoli, fell from the elite and sank into oblivion. The newcomers are Paris FC, who have gained promotion to Ligue 1. The club were founded in 1969 and have been controlled since last autumn by Bernard Arnault, the founder and chief executive of the LVMH group and the sixth-richest person in the world according to Forbes, with a fortune of more than €150bn. The acquisition of PFC is not a billionaire's whim; that another key stakeholder in Paris FC is the Red Bull Football Group is a clear indicator of Arnault's ambition. To add spice, Paris FC were one of the entities involved in the creation of PSG, only to regain their independence in 1972. If this were not enough, as of next season, Paris FC will move into the home of Stade Français rugby club, the 20,000-seat Stade Jean-Bouin, separated from the Parc by a single street, the rue Claude Farrère, right under the nose of their powerful neighbours. PFC's president and minority shareholder Pierre Ferracci has said that 'at the moment' there is no intention to take residence in the Parc des Princes. 'At the moment.' But come 2030, whose supporters will sing 'Ici, c'est Paris'?
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Stomach infection forces Carapaz out of Tour de France
June 29 (Reuters) - Ecuador's Richard Carapaz, who finished third at the Giro d'Italia earlier this month, will miss the Tour de France, which starts next week, due to a stomach infection, his team EF Education-EasyPost said on Saturday. Tokyo Olympics gold medallist Carapaz, who won the mountains classification at last year's Tour de France, had abdominal pain and a high fever and was advised by doctors to avoid long-haul travel and competition, the team said in a statement. "It's with great sadness that I have to tell you that a gastrointestinal infection is forcing me to miss the Tour de France," Carapaz wrote on Instagram. "Not the best news, but health always comes first. Thank you all for your messages and support." Carapaz, 32, will take a few weeks off to recover before resuming his training with a focus on the Vuelta a Espana, which starts in August, his team added. The Tour de France will begin on July 5 in Lille and conclude on the Champs-Elysees in Paris on July 27.
Glasgow Times
6 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
For the sake of tennis, one player in particular must rise to the top
You can have all the quality in the world spread across the field but if there's no rivalries, there's no hook. Which, in turn, means no interest or, at least, much diminished interest from the public. One particularly intense, beautiful and hugely competitive rivalry is exactly why men's tennis thrived to the extent it did for a decade-and-a-half from the mid-2000s. That rivalry was the Roger Federer - Rafa Nadal match-up. Across all of sport, there have been few rivalries which have produced quite as much interest, tension, joy, heartbreak and world-class sport as the Federer-Nadal version. It's why there was such a visceral feeling of devastation when first Federer, then Nadal retired. How would men's tennis ever recover, it was asked? Inevitably, though things move on and already, there's a new rivalry that has seamlessly replaced Federer and Nadal as the most compelling head-to-head in tennis. Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz have filled the vacuum created by the departure of Federer and Nadal and they are, indisputably, the new stars of men's tennis. Of the last eight grand slam tournaments, the pair have won seven between them, with only Novak Djokovic breaking up the monopoly. Sinner and Alcaraz are the biggest names in the sport and, by some margin, the two best players. Their French Open final earlier this month was one of the greatest matches the sport has ever seen. Some have suggested it's the very best ever, although I wouldn't go that far. Alcaraz prevailed in Paris a few weeks ago, and it's the Spaniard who leads the head-to-head 5-2, but it's Sinner who is number one in the world. Whatever the statistics, though, what is clear is that, providing serious injury does not derail the career of either man, it's Alcaraz and Sinner who will dominate men's tennis over the coming years, perhaps even for the next decade. (Image: Andy Cheung/ Getty Images) A rivalry of this quality is, objectively, a good thing for the sport. But for the good of tennis, one man in particular from this duo must prevail. That man is Carlos Alcaraz. There's a number of reasons why it's so important that Alcaraz and not Sinner becomes the next real tennis great. The first reason is down to the style of their tennis. Alcaraz is, to my eye anyway, a far more flashy, skilful and compelling player to watch. The Spaniard has considerably more flair and variety in comparison to Sinner. The Italian is, it cannot be denied, a phenomenon on the tennis court. So consistently outstanding are his ground strokes, he's almost robotic-like. The sparsity of his unforced errors is remarkable. And the quality of his hitting is perhaps the best the sport has ever seen. But, for me, watching that style of tennis for a prolonged length of time, no matter how high quality it is, just isn't all that interesting. Give me variety, flair, imagination and creativity any day of the week, even if it results in quite a few more unforced errors. Alcaraz is the defending champion at Wimbledon (Image: Getty Images) The second reason is personality. Alcaraz is a far more compelling character than Sinner. The Italian is, on the face of it, a nice guy. It's almost impossible to find anyone who has a bad word to say about him, and he certainly comes across in the press as an amicable, friendly and genuinely decent guy. He also, though, is quite boring. Alcaraz in contrast, has a personality that shines through. He seems like a young guy who can't quite believe his luck that he's living this life. There's something very endearing about his youthful exuberance, with the way he celebrated his French Open victory with the Roland Garros ball kids the perfect example of just what's so likeable about the Spaniard. The final reason is perhaps the most pertinent for me. Earlier this year, Sinner served a doping ban. The details of his case are somewhat convoluted but, to simplify it, Sinner claimed that his trainer had a banned substance on his hands and when treating the Italian, the substance transferred to Sinner and caused his positive test. The Italian was banned from tennis for three months but there was considerable outcry over the alleged preferential treatment he was given and the leniency in allowing him back on tour after such a short suspension. His return was, conveniently, just in time for the French Open meaning the world number one didn't miss a major tournament during his time on the sidelines, nor did he lose his number one ranking. While Sinner wasn't unjustly 'let off' with anything, he was, it seems, treated very favourably as a result of his lofty standing within the sport. The outcry over the unfairness of his treatment was entirely justified because when you compare how fast his infringement was dealt with, as well as his lenient punishment, it's hard to argue that his doping case was handled in a comparable way to the cases of his lower-ranked peers following doping allegations. I don't believe Sinner is a prolific doper, not even close. I actually think his explanation for his positive test is entirely plausible. But I do think it's not a good look for any sport to have a doping conviction on the record of the top player. It's hard to see any way in which this new era of men's tennis isn't the Sinner and Alcaraz era. Tennis will benefit from this pair dominating; they're both outstanding tennis players and will, in all likelihood, move the game on even from the remarkable standard that Federer and Nadal set during their time of dominance. With Wimbledon beginning tomorrow, only a fool would bet against the prediction that we're heading for yet another Sinner-Alcaraz final. Objectively, this would be positive for the sport, particularly if the Wimbledon final is another classic in the way the French Open final was but in this head-to-head, I'll always be willing the Spaniard on. So while having this duo at the top of the game is a good thing for tennis, what will be really good for tennis, for so many reasons, will be if Alcaraz prevails, and emerges as the top dog.
