logo
No bond for former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters as backers go to federal court

No bond for former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters as backers go to federal court

CBS News7 days ago
Lawyers for convicted former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters on Tuesday tried to get a federal court in Denver to let her out on bond as they appeal her case in the Colorado State Court of Appeals. But the magistrate judge in federal court said he was not finding any reason to do so.
"You're saying put her on bond, and I don't know that there's anything that authorizes that," said US Chief Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak.
Peters is in jail in Larimer County as she serves nine years on a variety of convictions for her role in orchestrating a breach of unauthorized areas of Mesa County's elections office. She was convicted last August of three counts of attempted to influence a public servant, conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, violation of duty, and failing to comply with the Colorado Secretary of State.
Attorneys for Peters, who was not brought in for the hearing, are trying to involve federal courts in the review of her state-level convictions.
"If there's ever a case in which somebody should be released from jail, it's this one," said attorney Peter Ticktin.
Ticktin, a Florida-based attorney and longtime friend of President Donald Trump, said he was willing to drop several claims the magistrate judge said were not yet handled by the State Court of Appeals and should be. The petitioners are still hoping to claim in federal court that Peters' sentencing in a state court was a violation of her 1st Amendment rights because they claim the judge at her trial factored in the potential that not putting Peters in jail would allow her to speak publicly about the election security.
But Varholak said the appeals to Colorado's State Court of Appeals is the place to make that case, and until those appeals are exhausted, he did not want to weigh in.
"If Habeas is available, you have to present it to the Colorado Court of Appeals," he said, referring to the petitioner's efforts to have the court exercise habeas corpus, which means the federal court would have to demonstrate a legal basis for detaining her. That would hold the possibility of allowing her out of jail on bond during the appeals process.
Varholek said he could find no example in the history of the United States in which that has been done before appeals were exhausted at the state level.
He gave Peters' attorneys three weeks to file a brief on the issue.
Peters did not attend the hearing. She remains in the custody of the Larimer County Sheriff.
Outside the court, Ticktin railed against Peters' conviction and sentence.
"Why would she possibly be remorseful for doing exactly what her duty was to do? She never did anything wrong. Why are they so afraid of her having free speech? It's because she's not speaking lies, it's because she's speaking the truth."
While Peters appeals her conviction and sentence, the Department of Justice says it is reviewing the case. "This review will include an evaluation of the State of Colorado's prosecution of Ms. Peters and, in particular, whether the case was "oriented more toward inflicting political pain than toward pursuing actual justice or legitimate governmental objectives," said a release from earlier this year. The Colorado Attorney General's Office has characterized the move as unprecedented.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Vladimir Putin is a real-life Bond villain,' says former PM Stephen Harper
'Vladimir Putin is a real-life Bond villain,' says former PM Stephen Harper

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Vladimir Putin is a real-life Bond villain,' says former PM Stephen Harper

Former prime minister Stephen Harper says Russian President Vladimir Putin is "a real-life Bond villain" and "an evil man" who will leave Russia poor and in chaos. "It's a tragedy that somebody with his ability just wasn't imbued with any sense of ideals or higher purpose," Harper said on Monday during a keynote session at the Council of State Governments Midwestern Legislative Conference in Saskatoon. Harper's comments were in response to a question from the moderator about which global leader, whether ally or rival, left the strongest impression on him. "I try in my memoirs to say good things about people or not say much at all," Harper said before he launched into a sharp critique of the Russian president. The former prime minister acknowledged that Putin is smart, hard-working and "a real psychological expert," but that he is also "an evil man. He took what is a fledging democracy and turned it back into a tyranny." WATCH | Harper says Putin will leave Russia in 'chaos': "I don't accept a drink from him or anything like that," Harper joked — a likely reference to allegations the Russian government has poisoned dissidents like Alexei Navalny, who died last year in a remote Russian prison. Harper's frustrations with the Russian president go back more than a decade. In 2014, Harper was lauded by Australian media for admonishing Putin over Russia occupying and annexing Crimea. Australian media reported Harper told Putin to "get out of Ukraine" at a private leaders' retreat ahead of the official opening of the Group of 20 summit in Brisbane. Harper told the Saskatoon conference that he and Putin "had a notoriously bad relationship by the end — quite deliberate on my part, actually …" "Privately I was calling him out on this stuff all the time and quite getting under his skin actually, which I enjoyed," Harper said. U.S. actions 'we can't forget' During his keynote, Harper said Americans should understand that Canadians "are a combination of just angry and bewildered by what is happening here. That is very real and it is very deep." He added that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration believes "everybody needs America, but America doesn't need anybody. That just isn't true." "The Trump administration is completely right to deal with some of its trade challenges. But declaring a trade war on 200 other countries at the same time? Come on. That's not how you move the ball forward long term." Canada is working to reach a trade agreement with Trump by Aug. 1. The U.S. president has threatened to slap a 35 per cent tariff on goods that don't comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) on that date. WATCH | Canada's team downplays prospects for deal by Aug. 1: Harper said Canada seeing the United States "flex its muscles in a way that has nothing to do with values or ideals, that is something we can't forget. We cannot make ourselves entirely dependent on that relationship." He agreed with Canada's decision to spend more on defence and said "we should have been doing it all along." Between 2012 and 2015, the Conservatives — led by Harper — faced substantial criticism for cutting the Department of National Defence budget by $2.7 billion annually in order to reach a balanced budget. Carney has committed to meeting the NATO benchmark of spending two per cent of the country's gross domestic product on defence by the end of current fiscal year in March. As part of a new pact with NATO leaders, Canada has also promised to spend five per cent of GDP on defence-related projects by 2035.

I Asked ChatGPT How Trump's Tax Cuts Could Impact My Family Budget — Here's the Breakdown
I Asked ChatGPT How Trump's Tax Cuts Could Impact My Family Budget — Here's the Breakdown

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

I Asked ChatGPT How Trump's Tax Cuts Could Impact My Family Budget — Here's the Breakdown

President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which he signed on July 4, will impact millions of households, from their student loan repayments to their access to Medicaid and other social safety net programs. I, however, was most concerned with how the legislation's sweeping changes to U.S. tax law might impact my obligations to the IRS. Since my tax attorney charges by the quarter-hour for phone calls, I went with the next-best thing — ChatGPT. I asked the AI platform how Trump's tax cuts could impact my family budget. Here's what it told me. Find Out: Read Next: Many Households — Including Mine — Will Save Money The AI platform began with a bulleted list of benefits that will help many families lower their tax bill. It relied on sources such as the Bipartisan Policy Center and the Tax Policy Center to generate the section, which it titled, 'What You'll Likely Save.' This is its word-for-word synopsis of the potential savings for my family and others. Extended 2017 TCJA benefits — no major tax increases that were scheduled to take effect in 2026. Higher standard deduction — receives a $2,000 extra (married) or $1,000 (single) until 2028 on top of inflation adjustment. (CTC) — boosted to $2,500 per child through 2028, then reverts to $2,000. New tax benefits — exemption from federal tax on tips and overtime income (under $160K), a $40K state-and-local-tax (SALT) cap and a one-time $1K 'Trump account' per child. Learn More: Have a Little, Get a Little; Have a Lot, Get a Lot Next, my unofficial AI accountant used a Tax Policy Center analysis and a CBS News report to surmise that most families would see at least some benefit, with an average household tax bill reduction of $2,900 in 2026. However, it generated the following bulleted list, cited here verbatim, which showed that the 'haves' stand to gain more than the 'have-nots.' Bottom quintile households (≤ $35K income): ~$150 saved (~0.8% of income) Top quintile (≥ $217K income): ~$12,540 saved (~2.5%). Middle-income families fall in between, likely saving several hundred to a few thousand dollars annually. Taxes Aren't the Only Thing That Impact Family Budgets The platform then outlined how what it called the 'offsetting effects' of the tax cuts could shake up my family's — or anyone's — finances. This, too, is in ChatGPT's own words. Cuts to Medicaid, food stamps (SNAP) — billions in savings, but may reduce public benefits your family relies on. Reduced social safety nets — tougher work requirements; lower-income families could see net income decline despite tax cuts. Growing deficit — adds $3-$5 trillion to federal debt over 10 years, increasing future borrowing costs and potential for inflation/higher interest rates. Which Provisions Impact Which Families the Most? It included the following table to break down how different aspects of the legislation will impact different income groups. Income Level Estimated Annual Savings Key New Provisions Watch-Outs Low Income ~$150 Child Tax Credit, tip/overtime exemption Less SNAP/Medicaid Middle Income (~$50K-$100K) $500-$1,500 Standard SALT deduction bump, CTC, SALT cap Social cuts, inflation High Income (>$200K) $5K-$12K+ All above, plus SALT/ deduction benefits Future tax, interest pressure Make Your Situation as Big and Beautiful as Possible It concluded with a numbered list titled 'How To Maximize Benefits,' which outlined steps that my family and others can take to get the most out of the new changes. Use enhanced standard deduction — reduces taxable income directly. Claim full child tax credit if eligible — $2,500 per child. Take advantage of tip/overtime deductions — especially if you receive a lot of tips or extra hours. Monitor public benefits changes — if your household receives Medicaid or SNAP, check whether new work requirements or eligibility changes impact your budget. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How Trump's Tax Cuts Could Impact My Family Budget — Here's the Breakdown

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store