Royal Canadian Navy to retire 8 warships before the end of the year
The navy confirmed Thursday that eight of its 12 Kingston-class vessels will be removed from service following "paying off" ceremonies in Halifax and Esquimalt, B.C.
Officially known as Maritime Coastal Defence Vessels, these small ships were built and launched in the 1990s. Each is 55 metres long, weighs about 970 tonnes and has a crew of about 40.
"There is no loss of capability for the (navy) as a result of the divestment of the Kingston-class," the Department of National Defence said in a statement. "Their missions and tasks will be redistributed to other existing ships and assets, and taken on by new systems being introduced."
The ships, powered by diesel-electric motors, are primarily used for coastal patrols, search and rescue, law enforcement, mine detection, and training. They have been deployed to operations in the eastern Pacific, Caribbean, off West Africa and in European waters, as well as many missions across Canada's three oceans.
Other vessels to take over duties
Meanwhile, the Defence Department says the Kingston-class key mine-sweeping and counter-measures functions will be handled by the navy's fleet diving units and remote and autonomous systems operated from other navy vessels.
As well, the navy's relatively new Arctic and offshore patrol vessels will take on Kingston-class roles, such as counter-narcotics operations. And the training role will be shifted to the navy's smaller Orca-class vessels.
The navy is also moving ahead with replacing its retired Iroquois-class destroyers and its existing Halifax-class patrol frigates with 15 River-class destroyers.
The new warships will be built by Halifax-based Irving Shipbuilding Inc. The federal government said in March the first three ships will cost a total of $22.2 billion. The project has been described as the largest and most complex shipbuilding initiative in Canada since the Second World War.
Paying off ceremonies
As for the "paying off" ceremony for the Kingston-class ships, that tradition comes from the British practice of paying a crew their wages once a ship has completed its voyage. In the Canadian navy, paying off refers to the formal ceremony where the ship's flags and commissioning pennant are removed and the crew departs the ship for the last time.
Ceremonies will be held in Halifax this fall for HMCS Shawinigan, HMCS Summerside, HMCS Goose Bay, HMCS Glace Bay and HMCS Kingston. Ceremonies will also be held in Esquimalt for HMCS Saskatoon, HMCS Whitehorse and HMCS Brandon.
The navy's four remaining operational Kingston-class vessels — HMCS Moncton, HMCS Yellowknife, HMCS Edmonton and HMCS Nanaimo — will operate out of Halifax. They will be retired over the next three years.
"Kingston-class vessels have provided the Royal Canadian Navy with a significant capability throughout their many years of service," Vice-Admiral Angus Topshee, commander Royal Canadian Navy, said in a statement.
"As we move towards the future of the Royal Canadian Navy, I want to recognize the service of these ships and extend my tremendous gratitude to all who have sailed within them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Carney wants to spend an extra $9B on defence by April. Is that possible?
Social Sharing Prime Minister Mark Carney's goal of hitting NATO's defence spending target of two per cent of gross domestic product this year will be an uphill — nearly impossible — battle, say experts and critics. An extra $8.7 billion is earmarked for defence spending by the Department of National Defence (DND) or other government departments, and $370 million for the Communications Security Establishment (CSE). Allies had been pushing Canada to meet NATO's goal for nearly 20 years — but actually actually doing so became imperative with Donald Trump in the White House. "Mark Carney's words are right, but he's gotta crack the whip here real quick," said John Ball, a former Canadian defence industry executive for nearly four decades and now consultant. NATO defines defence expenditures as payments made by a national government specifically to meet the needs of its armed forces, or those of allies and the alliance. Conservative MP and defence critic James Bezan warns it will be difficult for procurement officials inside government to reverse a long-standing culture of risk aversion, deferred decisions and allowing billions of dollars in lapsed spending. WATCH | Canadian defence spending expected to climb further: Canada, NATO allies agree to 5% defence spending target 1 month ago "By the time we get back into Parliament and a budget is passed, we're going to have half a year to spend money that the department won't be able to shovel out the door," Bezan said in an interview with CBC News. He wonders if the government will just engage in a "game of creative accounting" to meet its NATO commitments on paper. But some within the Canadian defence industry as well as DND and Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) themselves point to existing mechanisms that can be leveraged to move quickly. Those include the use of standing offers, supply arrangements and pre-qualified vendor lists, as well as strategic partnerships with defence companies identified as centres of excellence, bilateral partnerships with other countries and the U.S. Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program. In situations that are truly time sensitive, the government can invoke a National Security Exception (NSE), Urgent Operational Requirements (UORs) or issue an Advance Contract Award Notice (ACAN). Although these have strict eligibility criteria and are not everyday tools. "If the government can demonstrate to us that this is in the interest of national security and there is a limited availability from a competitive factor, we would be open to those types of procurement," said Bezan. "But we can't make a habit of using NSEs as a way to … get the equipment that we require for the Canadian Armed Forces." Carney outlined on June 9 the general areas for increased investment, but gave no specifics. The list included better compensation; health care and infrastructure for personnel; new equipment such as aircraft, armed vehicles and ammunition; expanding the Canadian Coast Guard and moving it under DND; repairing and maintaining existing ships, aircraft and other assets; and developing new drones and sensors to monitor the sea floor and the Arctic. "We think it's largely going to be made up of items that are already identified or some that have been languishing in the procurement pipeline or projects that were underfunded," said Christyn Cianfarani, president and CEO of the Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries (CADSI). Spending at home One way to spend faster would be to expand existing orders for armoured vehicles, ships and planes. For example, augmenting an existing contract for 360 light armoured vehicles from General Dynamics Land Systems in London, Ont. A company spokesperson says it would be able to quickly respond to contract amendment requests. But if the government intends to buy equipment not already on order or in the inventory, Cianfarani argues DND and PSPC have to change their approach. "There should not be a protracted procurement process," she said. "Probably a good portion of that $9 billion could be spent on Canadian firms." The prime minister has explicitly stated that part of the goal is to build up the Canadian defence industry, while acknowledging that continuing to do business with allies, including the U.S., will remain necessary. Cianfarani is far from alone in her concern over Canada's procurement process, one of the main reasons critics argue spending $9 billion in less than a year is doubtful. PSPC says its preference is for open, fair and competitive procurement. But many argue the process is overly long, and in some cases merely a box-ticking exercise where the winner is a foregone conclusion. "Why did they do it? They did it to appease," said Ball of those requests for proposals that already have a preferred candidate in mind. Cianfarani said it's frustrating for firms to spend millions on a bid for which they never had a real chance. She said it would be better to engage in "directed procurement" more often, as is done in other countries, where the government knows what it wants to invest in — and who the best suppliers are — and it then chooses them. But Bezan and others warn of the risk of boondoggles increases if the rush to spend money also means hurried oversight. "Talking about going to two per cent, and higher down the road, doesn't mean we give licence to spend money frivolously," said Bezan. 'Deliberate urgency' Those in the defence industry argue that they too want to make sure there's value for money. "I use the phrase 'deliberate urgency,' in that we need to think about how that money impacts the Canadian economic situation," said Chris Pogue, a former Royal Canadian Air Force pilot and now president of Calian Defence and Space. "I don't think we should let urgency overcome smart procurement, but things can move quickly if we have a sense of the direction we want to go and the kind of capability we need." Pogue said capabilities around sovereignty need to be homegrown, such as equipment and supplies needed for operations in the Arctic. An additional challenge is that most defence spending, at least on the capital side, is spent and accounted for over a number of years. But a senior government official says they truly plan to increase defence spending by $9 billion before April. That said, the government continues to describe both the amount and the deadline as targets, not certainties.
CBC
14 hours ago
- CBC
Inuit-owned 'state of the art' fishing vessel christened in Iqaluit
Inuit-owned fishing company Baffin Fisheries christened its new vessel Inuksuk II in an Iqaluit ceremony earlier this week. The new vessel is the "largest Canadian-owned fishing vessel" in the country, according to outgoing Baffin Fisheries CEO Chris Flanagan. Baffin Fisheries president Kavavow Mikijuk said the company is extremely proud that Nunavummuit got a chance to see the new "state of the art" vessel at Tuesday's ceremony. Baffin Fisheries is owned by the Hunters and Trappers Associations of Pangnirtung, Iqaluit, Clyde River, Kimmirut, and Pond Inlet. All of the profits from the company are paid out as royalties to members of those communities. People from all five communities got to attend the ceremony, Mikijuk said. The ship, known as a factory freezer trawler, will be out catching turbot and shrimp in Arctic waters, and will offload its cargo in Newfoundland. The vessel is 80 metres long, 18 metres wide, and will be capable of carrying up to 1,300 tonnes of frozen-at-sea turbot or 930 tonnes of shrimp. It cost $72 million to build. Speaking to CBC at the ceremony, Kavavow Mikijuk said the new larger vessel will be more efficient than the smaller Inuksuk I because it won't need to dock as often. He believes it will also create more jobs for Inuit at Baffin Fisheries — one of the company's goals.
Canada News.Net
20 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Porsche, Aston Martin adjust US rates amid tariff shift
BERLIN, Germany: Luxury car brands Porsche and Aston Martin have raised vehicle prices in the U.S., as European carmakers brace for a 15 percent import tariff that takes effect in August under a new U.S.-EU trade deal. While lower than earlier threats, the tariff is still significantly higher than the 2.5 percent rate that applied before President Donald Trump launched his trade push. Porsche said it raised U.S. prices in July by 2.3 percent to 3.6 percent and currently has no plans to set up production in the U.S., which would exempt it from the tariffs. CEO Oliver Blume called the situation a long-term challenge, not a temporary setback, after the company lowered its full-year profit forecast and reported a US$462 million tariff-related loss in the first half. Aston Martin also confirmed incremental price hikes in the U.S. since June and issued a profit warning, citing tariff pressures and weak demand in Asia. While larger automakers have so far held off on significant price changes, analysts expect more to follow. Tariffs have already triggered losses and forecast cuts across the industry, affecting companies like GM, Volkswagen, Hyundai, and Mercedes-Benz. Ford, which manufactures about 80 percent of its U.S. sales domestically, reported an $800 million tariff impact in its latest quarter and warned the annual cost may rise further. Nissan, meanwhile, posted a $535 million quarterly loss, partly due to tariffs and restructuring. Analysts at J.P. Morgan said they are watching whether Mercedes-Benz and other premium brands will eventually raise U.S. prices to offset tariff costs. So far, hopes of securing sector-specific tariff exemptions have faded. Mercedes CEO Ola Kaellenius, who also chairs Europe's carmakers association ACEA, said this week that the group now assumes the 15 percent tariff is here to stay and that individual deals are unlikely. Volkswagen had previously expressed hope that investment commitments might help lower U.S. tariffs, but Blume, who also leads VW, aligned with Kaellenius in dismissing the likelihood of a separate agreement for automakers.
