logo
What a $1,000 baby bond buys, and why one and done isn't enough

What a $1,000 baby bond buys, and why one and done isn't enough

The Hill12-06-2025
A new federal proposal included in the administration's 'one, big, beautiful' bill would provide a one-time deposit of $1,000 to every child born between 2025 and 2028 through Trump Accounts — previously known as the Money Account for Growth and Advancement, or MAGA Accounts.
While the name has changed, the underlying proposal remains the same. It's a welcome sign that lawmakers on both sides of the aisle continue to recognize the value of starting early when it comes to building financial security.
There's longstanding bipartisan support for investing in children from birth. Back in 2006, then-Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) introduced a Portable Lifelong Universal Savings Account — a PLUS Account — modeled after the federal thrift savings plan, with an initial $1,000 deposit and a $5,000 annual contribution limit.
More recently, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) reintroduced the American Opportunity Accounts Act, commonly known as baby bonds, which would seed $1,000 into an account for every child born after Dec. 31, 2023.
The most recent Trump Account draws from a proposal by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and would invest that $1,000 in an index fund.
It's been nearly two decades since that first proposal, and Congress is still circling the same starting number. Imagine how much stronger families could be today if, instead of restarting the conversation, we had built on it.
There's broad recognition that raising a family has never been more expensive and that the rising cost of essentials is contributing to declining birth rates. Recent estimates show that families spend between $15,000 to $21,000 in a child's first year alone, covering diapers, formula, baby gear, and child care. These aren't optional extras, they're baseline costs of parenthood.
Baby food and formula costs rose 8.7 percent from January 2023 to January 2024, outpacing overall inflation. Diapers remain a major strain on household budgets, with 1 in 3 struggling to afford them even before the pandemic, and 1 in 4 now reporting they've had to miss work or school due to diaper needs.
Child care is another overwhelming expense. In nearly every state, the cost of full-time infant care exceeds $14,000 a year, which is more than 10 percent of median household income. KPMG estimates that the cost of daycare and preschool has surged by 263 percent since 1990. On top of that, tariffs could raise prices on cribs, car seats and strollers by as much as 128 percent, according to S&P Global.
These are basic safety items, not luxury goods, and they're increasingly out of reach.
None of these costs can be meaningfully addressed by a one-time Trump Account, or by baby bonds or PLUS Accounts alone, but they shape the reality into which these proposals are introduced.
Families grappling with steep costs today are far less likely to contribute to long-term savings accounts, even with a $1,000 head start. That's why policies like the Trump Account must be viewed not as stand-alone solutions, but as part of a comprehensive strategy to help families meet today's demands while planning for tomorrow's opportunities.
The Trump Account would represent a step forward in how the government invests in family and long-term financial stability. It shares a key idea with prior proposals: the earlier the investment, the greater the return.
There are, however, important differences in design. Baby bonds were proposed as government-funded accounts invested in a bond with an anticipated 3 percent annual return, receiving ongoing contributions, especially for children from households with limited financial resources, and these distinctions are a constructive differentiator.
The Trump Account, by comparison, offers a one-time government deposit to be invested in an index fund, which has the potential for a higher rate of annual return, and because it is tied to the stock market, also carries additional risk.
As a one-time deposit, it is not yet a full solution because it lacks the consistent annual investment to make its potential a meaningful tool for financial growth for children who are born into families without wealth.
This ongoing investment matters. With inflation driving up prices and wages failing to keep pace, families need more than symbolic gestures. They need tools that build over time and bridge the gap between short-term help and long-term financial security.
This is not just about individual families. It's about national economic potential. The Institute for Women's Policy Research estimates that if women participated in the workforce at the same rate as men, it could add $4.3 trillion to the U.S. economy this year.
But that participation depends on the affordability of child care, baby essentials and family stability, areas where rising costs continue to hold parents back.
The Trump Account reflects growing awareness that financial opportunity begins at birth. But if we're serious about building economic resilience, we must ensure that early investments are designed to grow and to last.
Ongoing investment, like in the baby bonds and PLUS Account proposals, offers a path forward that is practical, scalable and rooted in research.
If we want to give every child a real chance at economic mobility, it's not just about when and where we invest. It's about how we follow through.
Marisa Calderon is the president and CEO of Prosperity Now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A global HIV/AIDS program that saved millions of lives faces cuts under the Trump administration
A global HIV/AIDS program that saved millions of lives faces cuts under the Trump administration

NBC News

time24 minutes ago

  • NBC News

A global HIV/AIDS program that saved millions of lives faces cuts under the Trump administration

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is considering a dramatic cutback and eventual phasing out of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the U.S. program to combat HIV/AIDS in developing countries that has been widely credited with saving 26 million lives since its inception in 2003, according to multiple congressional and administration officials. Created during the George W. Bush administration, PEPFAR was launched with star-power support from U2 frontman and advocate for developing countries, Bono, as well as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Bank. In the two decades since, it enjoyed strong bipartisan support in Congress. But as the Trump administration has sought to cut costs across the U.S. government, particularly for global aid programs, PEPFAR has come up on the chopping block. The administration initially proposed a cut of $400 million from next year's budget, but that funding was restored at the last minute by the Republican-led Senate last week, keeping it going in the short term. Four congressional aides told NBC News that the program was virtually frozen, along with most funding for USAID, in early February. Contracts with providers were put on hold and funding was reduced to what they called a 'trickle.' They said that most promised State Department waivers for critical care did not materialize, and that 51% of current PEPFAR appropriations were either terminated or were not functional. 'They're sitting on the money,' congressional officials said. 'We're not seeing it in the field.' According to the aides, in April, the State Department's then-director of the Office of Foreign Assistance, Peter Marocco, working with Elon Musk's DOGE team to dismantle foreign aid, briefed Congress that PEPFAR would refocus on maternal and child HIV transmission, excluding LGBT individuals and most preventative care that the program has done for decades. Earlier this month, a senior State Department official told reporters, 'The program was actually drowning in too much money, in some cases, you know, sort of going beyond its core mandate.' The official said, 'So instead, we're going to focus on that lifesaving care' and 'work with countries on self-reliance' to ensure there is not a gap in coverage. The senior official said that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is drawing a distinction between people who have HIV and need lifesaving direct treatment, and preventative care for sex workers as well as bisexual and gay men. The State Department official also said, 'It doesn't mean that the United States has to pay for every single thing around the world." "A lot of these countries, they've graduated to the point where their HIV rates are low enough and their economy is healthy enough that they can continue to pay for some of these things. We can get in, make positive change and then get out rather than paying forever so that every sex worker in Africa has PrEP," the official said, referring to HIV medication. Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources Michael Rigas testified to Congress last week that, overall, in the administration's budget request for the next fiscal year there is a 54% cut in PEPFAR's administrative, nondirect care funds. That is in addition to a 15% cut in the department's budget request for direct care in the same budget request. A global health staff of 700 people plus contractors in the field prior to President Donald Trump taking office has been reduced to 80 people after recent firings. Last month, White House budget director Russell Vought told a Senate committee, without providing evidence, that PEPFAR spent $9.3 million 'to advise Russian doctors on how to perform abortions and gender analysis.' Democratic Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, a senior member of the Foreign Relations Committee and former chairman of the Africa Subcommittee, told NBC News that PEPFAR had always planned to get countries that had developed their own hospitals and health care systems, such as South Africa, to take over funding the program by 2030. According to Coons, that transition is already underway. But he and other critics of the current budget cuts said that it is not possible in low-income conflict zones, such as South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Haiti, to replace the U.S program anytime soon. Still, according to a draft planning memo reported by The New York Times, the State Department would shut down U.S. support in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Vietnam within two years. Nations with high HIV infection rates, including Kenya, Zimbabwe and Angola, would get three to four years, the Times reported, while lower-income countries would get up to eight years under the proposal. NBC News has not viewed the draft plan and a State Department official told NBC News it has not been finalized. Dr. Robert Black, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, who evaluated PEPFAR for Congress, told NBC News, 'I think two years for a number of countries, for many countries in Africa, would be too short,' adding, 'I just can't imagine two years would be an effective transition.' Black also said maintaining prevention is 'clearly important" and that withdrawing funding for prevention, which is contemplated under the Trump plan, would increase HIV rates and expand the burden. Rubio, who as a senator supported PEPFAR and other foreign aid, defended $20 billion in overall proposed budget cuts to the Senate Foreign Relations committee in May, citing 'duplicative, wasteful and ideologically driven programs.' Asked last week about the PEPFAR cuts, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who served in the Bush administration when PEPFAR was launched, told NBC News at the Aspen Security Forum, 'I do think PEPFAR is going to not only survive, I think it's going to be just fine. ... There will be some scaling back, and it's probably worth it to take a look at focusing on what we really need to focus on. We've become pretty dispersed and diffuse in the kinds of programs that we were running.' But, she added, 'what makes America different as a great power is that we have not led just with power, but we've also led with principle.' Later at the conference, Rice said launching PEPFAR was 'the proudest moment' in all of her government service. But she added that the U.S. also wants to build other countries' capacity and health care systems to sustain themselves. Former President Bush, in rare criticism of Trump's policies, praised fired foreign aid workers in a video last month. He told the State Department employees who had been fired, 'You've shown the great strength of America through your work, and that is our good heart.' Citing PEPFAR'S lifesaving work, Bush said, 'Is it in our interest that 25 million people who would have died, now live? I think it is. On behalf of a grateful nation, thank you for your hard work, and God bless you.' In a video, Bono told the foreign aid staff in verse, 'They called you crooks — when you were the best of us, there for the rest of us. And don't think any less of us, when politics makes a mess of us. It's not left-wing rhetoric to feed the hungry, heal the sick. If this isn't murder. I don't know what is.'

Maxwell's lawyer says she's undecided on appearing for congressional testimony
Maxwell's lawyer says she's undecided on appearing for congressional testimony

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Maxwell's lawyer says she's undecided on appearing for congressional testimony

A lawyer for Ghislaine Maxwell said his client is still deciding whether she will honor a congressional subpoena demanding her testimony next month before House lawmakers. 'We have to make a decision about whether she will do that or not,' said David Oscar Markus, an attorney for Maxwell, the convicted sex trafficker and co-conspirator of the deceased financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'That's been scheduled for the week of August 11th and we haven't gotten back to them on whether we'll do that.' Markus delivered these remarks after Maxwell completed a two-day interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche as part of the Trump administration's continued inquiry into the charges against Epstein's circle. The comments suggest Maxwell is weighing whether to assert privileges to resist the House Oversight and Governmental Reform Committee's effort to compel her testimony. Importantly, Maxwell is still appealing her conviction on the sex trafficking conspiracy that led to a 20-year jail sentence. If Maxwell asserts her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, there's little Congress can do to pierce it, except offer her a rarely used form of immunity. It's unclear if the Justice Department negotiated any sort of immunity agreement with Maxwell for her testimony this week. But Markus said Maxwell answered every question posed by Blanche, covering about 100 different people. 'She didn't hold back,' he said. Markus also said there's been no discussion with the Trump administration about a possible pardon 'just yet, ' adding, 'We hope [President Donald Trump] exercises that power in the right and just way." The Justice Department has long housed deep doubts about Maxwell's credibility — a sentiment Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this week. 'Could she be counted on to tell the truth? Is she a credible witness? I mean, this is a person who's been sentenced to many, many years in prison for terrible, unspeakable, conspiratorial acts and acts against innocent young people,' Johnson told reporters. 'I mean, can we trust what she's going to say? … I don't know, but we'll have to see.' GOP leaders so far have pointed to the Justice Department interviewing Maxwell as a positive step, with more questions lingering over the congressional push to get information from the Epstein associate. A spokesperson for Oversight Committee Republicans had no comment Friday afternoon. Hailey Fuchs contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store