Shares steady, dollar firms on US tariff letters; oil dips
Shares on Wall Street fell after Trump sent letters to 14 countries, including Japan and South Korea, unveiling sharply higher tariffs on imports into the United States, while also postponing their implementation to August 1.
Japan's Nikkei stock gauge (.N225), opens new tab opened lower but then turned positive after Trump described that deadline as "firm, but not 100% firm" and said tariffs may be adjusted for some countries. The Aussie dollar rose ahead of a Reserve Bank of Australia decision later in the day.
Market reaction to the tariff announcements was muted on memories of Trump's rapid walk back of his "Liberation Day" duties initially set out on April 2, said Tapas Strickland, head of market economics at National Australia Bank.
"There's going to be a lot of volatility as the headlines start to emerge, as more of these letters come out, and as the negotiations really come to the fore ahead of that August 1 deadline," Strickland said on an NAB podcast.
In April, Trump capped all of the so-called reciprocal tariffs with trading partners at 10% until July 9 to allow for negotiations. Only two agreements, with Britain and Vietnam, have been reached. In June, Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates, restoring a fragile truce in their trade war.
Tariffs on Japan and South Korea are now due to go up to 25% on August 1. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba called the hike deeply regrettable and said his nation would continue negotiations with the U.S.
The European Union will not be receiving a letter setting out higher tariffs, EU sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday. The EU still aims to reach a trade deal by Wednesday after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Trump had a "good exchange," a commission spokesperson said.
MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan (.MIAPJ0000PUS), opens new tab was up 0.2% in early trade. Japan's Nikkei stock index (.N225), opens new tab rose 0.4% while South Korea's KOSPI (.KS11), opens new tab jumped 1.5%.
The dollar rose 0.2% to 146.36 yen , touching a two-week high. The euro was flat at $1.1741. The Aussie advanced 0.4% to $0.6516 before a meeting by the central bank where policymakers are widely expected to deliver a 25-basis-point cut.
U.S. crude dipped 0.5% to $67.59 a barrel after surging nearly 2% on Monday. Spot gold edged 0.2% lower.
In early trade, pan-region Euro Stoxx 50 futures were down 0.1%, German DAX futures were down 0.1% at 24,133, and FTSE futures slid 0.3%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump Media files for 'Crypto Blue Chip ETF' with SEC
President Donald Trump continues to expand his crypto-related offerings, this time with a planned exchange-traded fund tied to the prices of five popular cryptocurrencies. Trump Media & Technology Group, a Florida company that operates the Truth Social media platform, announced Tuesday it had filed paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission for approval to launch the 'Crypto Blue Chip ETF' later this year. The proposed ETF would have 70% of its holdings in bitcoin, the world's most popular cryptocurrency, 15% in ethereum, the second-most popular, and 8% in solana, a cryptocurrency popular in the meme coin community. The fund would hold 5% in the cryptocurrency developed by the company Ripple and 2% in the crypto created by the exchange which will act as the ETF's digital custodian. Trump Media previously announced plans for a crypto ETF with just bitcoin and ethereum. It's unclear if the company plans to move forward with that ETF offering. Trump Media did not immediately return a request for comment. Cryptocurrency-based ETFs make it easier for investors to gain exposure to cryptocurrencies without having to buy them directly. These funds have exploded in popularity since bitcoin ETFs began trading in U.S. markets last year. The SEC released new guidelines last week for crypto ETF issuers as part of the Trump administration's push to create a more welcoming regulatory environment for crypto-related companies. The agency has also dropped or paused several enforcement actions against crypto companies since Trump took office. Trump was once a bitcoin skeptic who has since warmly embraced the cryptocurrency industry, which has showered him with campaign and other types of contributions. Ripple, for example, was one of the biggest donors to Trump's inaugural committee. While the Trump administration has pushed for crypto-friendly regulations and laws, the Trump family has aggressively sought to expand its crypto-related businesses. That dynamic has led to allegations of corruption from Democrats and concern among some crypto enthusiasts that the president may be undermining their efforts to establish credibility and stability for the industry. At a news conference last month, Trump dismissed any notion that his family's investments were improper and touted his administration's efforts to make the U.S. the world capital for crypto. 'If we didn't have it, China would,' Trump said.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump is bullying Canada over ‘digital taxes' and Canada caved
Donald Trump's announcement calling off trade talks with Canada over its digital tax – and that he would impose retaliatory tariffs – demonstrates, once again, not only the president's ignorance of economics and willful disregard of international norms and the rule of law, but also his willingness to use brute power to get whatever he and the oligarchs who support him want. He was wrong in labeling the tax as outrageous and 'a direct and blatant attack on our country'. It is actually an efficient tax, well designed to ensure that the technology companies – the profits of which benefit the tech oligarchs who have come to dominate US policy – pay their fair share of taxes. It is accordingly disappointing that Canada appears to have caved, even more so as the prime minister had stood up strongly against Trump's demand for Canada to become the 51st state. Regrettably, others are giving in – New Zealand and India have reportedly retreated. Trump's bullying tactics have been in evidence since he took office. In January he threatened to double taxes on Australian citizens and companies in the US if they went ahead with their planned digital levy. Why digital taxes? Because digital companies operate all over the globe, and generate revenue in countries where they do not have a physical presence, they avoid taxation by shifting revenue and profit around the world. Some of the most egregious examples include Google moving $17bn to Bermuda, Apple owing France 10 years of back taxes, and the Italian government's recent investigation of Meta over whether the firm owes €938m in VAT payments. Apple was so successful in avoiding taxes in Europe that it is estimated that it paid in some years a tax of just 0.005% on its European profits. Of course, when the most profitable companies in the world don't pay their fair share of taxes, it just shifts the burden on to others. As more and more activity occurs online, and often from services provided from abroad, countries are losing revenue from sales, employment and profits taxes. Just because an activity is provided digitally doesn't mean it should not be taxed; indeed, economists argue that digital taxes are among the easiest to administer, precisely because there is a digital record. The idea of the digital service tax is to help countries recoup revenue by taxing any kind of digital service provided from anywhere in the world: online sales, digital advertising, data usage, e-commerce or streaming services. They might include consumption taxes on internet purchases. Indeed, more than 18 countries have such taxes and some 20 others have proposed them. When it looked like the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) would get a global agreement to raise corporate taxes, the agreement included a prohibition on digital taxes. Indeed, one of the reasons that the US was even willing to engage in these discussions on global taxation was to circumscribe others' ability to impose such taxes. While that agreement was under discussion, the US government, influenced by its tech giants, strongly opposed these digital taxes and then US treasury secretary Janet Yellen spent a good deal of time calling up her counterparts and telling them not to impose them. But on 20 January, Trump issued an executive order saying that the agreement that had been negotiated over years and years 'had no force or effect' in the US. As a result, more countries are now trying to decide whether to keep or adopt digital services taxes. Imposing them will incur the wrath of the US government and tech giants, but countries are well within their rights to do so. Indeed, there was a moratorium on levying digital taxes while there were some prospects of the OECD agreement going into effect; but with Trump, that prospect has all but disappeared, and that moratorium has come to end. Any country concerned with designing efficient, fair and easy-to-administer digital services duties should consider such taxes – indeed, they have the support not only of economists but of global civil society, including the Independent Commission on Reform of International Corporate Taxation (which I co-chair). Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Long-established principles of international taxation hold that so long as a tax does not discriminate across countries – or corporations that are headquartered in different countries – which taxes a country imposes is a matter of national sovereignty. A country may be foolish, levying taxes that are not good for its economy, but so be it: that is a matter for the country to decide. In this case, the tax is actually good for the economy. What Trump has been doing has violated international norms in several ways: using the threat of tariffs or taxes against corporations headquartered in a country whose policy he dislikes, and walking away from what were supposed to be binding trade agreements, without even a pretense of using the mechanisms for dispute resolution embodied in those agreements. The question now: will countries cave in to these threats or can they stick together and collect the billions they are rightly owed? Make no mistake: what is at stake is more than money that will be collected. It is a matter of the rule of law, which Trump has trampled on so fiercely, both within the US and globally. The rule of law is essential not just for economic performance, but for social justice and democracy. And Canada's capitulation to Trump's unilateral move makes a mockery of the whole process by which international agreements are negotiated. Some were skeptical that the so-called 'inclusive framework' was but a facade: others may have been at the table, but their voices were not heard. What has now happened verifies this: whatever the US wants, it gets. Canada should have stood up for its principles and national sovereignty, even in the face of such transparent bullying. The alternative now emerging is the law of the jungle, brute power and Canada becoming, de facto, the 51st US state. Joseph E Stiglitz is a Nobel laureate in economics, university professor at Columbia University and chief economist of the Roosevelt Institute Anya Schiffrin, senior lecturer at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs, and her student Philip L Crane contributed to this piece
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump promises there will be ‘no change' to his August 1 tariffs start - despite previous delays in the timetable
President Donald Trump is digging in on his most recent threat to force Americans to pay exorbitant taxes on imports in an attempt to reverse decades globalization and return the United States economy to one based on manufacturing rather than services. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said new rates of import taxes laid out in a series of letters he has sent or will soon send to various countries' heads of state or government 'WILL START BEING PAID ON AUGUST 1, 2025.' He added: 'There has been no change to this date, and there will be no change. In other words, all money will be due and payable starting AUGUST 1, 2025 - No extensions will be granted. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' The president's doubling down on his announced tax increases comes less than a day after he started sending bizarre, poorly-written letters to American trading partners citing 'unsustainable' trade deficits as justification for the tariffs, which will be at rates ranging from 25 to 40 percent on any imports from Japan, South Korea, Burma, Kazakstan, Laos, Malaysia, and South Africa as well as other nations. The president described his threatening letters as an invitation for each country, already an important ally and trading partner for America, to 'participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World, by far.' 'We have had years to discuss our Trading Relationship ... and have concluded that we must move away from these longterm, and very persistent, Trade Deficits engendered by ... Tariff, and Non Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers. Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from Reciprocal,' Trump said. Trump frequently claims tariffs are paid by foreign governments, even though they are import taxes charged by the federal government and paid by importers who often pass them along to consumers in higher prices. The announcement of the new tax rates and the August 1 deadline came just days before what had been a July 9 deadlines for countries to enter into agreements with his administration that would avoid the outsized 'liberation day' import taxes he announced in April before backing down and extending the initial deadline for imposing them after markets reacted poorly to his attempt to upend the global trading system. Since announcing the 'liberation day' tariffs in April he has routinely extended the self-imposed deadline, leading analysts to bake that tendency into their market predictions as the 'TACO' trade, short for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' The president once claimed his tariff threats would lead countries to beat a path to the White House door and negotiate as many as 90 separate trade agreements in three months, but during a media availability alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday he backed down from that promise, telling reporters he'd simply be sending out letters spelling out new tariff rates. 'We'll make some deals. But for the most part, we're going to send a letter. We're going to say, welcome to the United States, if you'd like to participate, the greatest, most successful country ever,' he said.
