A1 dualling ignored, council leader warns
About half the money will be used to build a Metro line linking Washington with Sunderland and Newcastle, while other schemes include introducing integrated contactless payments across bus and rail services.
The dualling of 13 miles (21km) of the A1 between Morpeth and Ellingham was scrapped when Labour came to power last year amid suggestions it would cost £500m.
In all, the government is to award £15.6bn to areas across the UK in a move it claims will "make all parts of the country better off".
As well as silence on plans for the A1 following Chancellor Rachel Reeves' speech on Wednesday, Councillor Glen Sanderson, the Conservative leader of Northumberland County Council, said he was concerned by the failure to mention other schemes in the area such as the Blyth Relief Road.
"It is woefully disappointing that our A1 – now so busy it grinds to a halt regularly – is ignored.
"This announcement will not help Northumberland grow its economy.
"It also ignores the vital improvements needed for Moor Farm roundabout, which is an essential job that has to be done if the government want to keep up with the county council's ambition and incredible growth that the council has attracted.
"The Blyth Relief Road is also ignored."
The outline business case for the relief road was submitted to the Department for Transport for approval in January.
Current forecasts estimate completion in 2027 with the scheme expected to cost just under £60m.
It would provide a direct dual carriageway connection between the A192 Three Horseshoes roundabout and the A193 South Beach in Blyth in a bid to reduce congestion, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.
Responding to Sanderson's comments, North East Mayor Kim McGuinness, of Labour, said there would be a "huge amount" of money for "local projects in Northumberland" with the newly announced funding "just the start" for the region.
She added: "This is money for local projects which the county council supports and which mean we can push ahead with our ambitious plans to build a fully-integrated transport network the North East can be proud of connecting people to real jobs and new opportunities."
Speaking on BBC Radio Newcastle's Hot Seat, McGuinness said she lives on the single lane section of the A1 and knows "exactly how bad it can be".
She said she did "not like" her party's decision not to go ahead with dualling the road and would "keep plugging away at getting national infrastructure money from the Treasury to do that section".
In the meantime, work would continue in improving both safety and the flow of traffic on that stretch, she said.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
New Metro line to be built as part of £1.85bn deal
'Our homes were taken for a road that was never built'
A1 dualling cancelled over £500m cost
Northumberland County Council
HM Treasury
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer lowering the voting age to 16 'just to gain their votes'
Lowering the voting age to 16 - your views WHAT on earth was going through the minds of Starmer and his cronies when they decided to lower the voting age to 16? I know they are stupid, but now I realise they are totally stupid. These are still children. They identify as cats and whatever other creature they feel like. How are they going to vote - with a paw print? There must also be some treats on offer because he ain't doing it for the good of the country. He's doing it to gain their votes. These children think they've been everywhere, seen everything and done everything. Or should that be 'everyfink ay innit'. A lot of them being nothing more than knife wielding, irresponsible and feral. Thugs who refuse to answer to anyone. I wonder just what the treats will be. God help sense or logic lies behind Labour's intent to lower the voting age to 16? There is none, other than a cynical ploy to seduce immature teenagers to vote for them. This by a government that lacks the brains to govern but think they know best how people should conduct their lives.... I WAS brought up with the Second World War still fresh in people's memories and told it was my duty to vote as so many people had died in the fight to be masters of our own destiny. I have always voted as my right and privilege to do so and personally think that people who "can't be bothered" have no rights to criticise. We vote standing on the shoulders of heroes who fought for our freedom. What advice will an 18 year old get from his parents? "Vote for the party who will give you the most, for the least amount of effort". Ask not what England can do for me, but what can I do for England. What do you think? Send your views to: letters@ Write no more than 250 words and please provide your full name, address and mobile number
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Damning numbers show what people think of Welsh Labour in every part of Wales
More than half of people in Wales don't think the Welsh Labour Government is doing a good job for Wales. Pollsters Beaufort asked people "Do you think the Welsh Labour Government is doing a good job for Wales". Of the 1,000 people just 29% believe they are doing a good job. The responses showed 57% thought they were not, with 29% answering yes, and 15% said they didn't know. The polling showed slight differences depending on where people were. People in north and mid Wales (Wrexham, Flintshire, Denbighshire, Conwy, Anglesey, Gwynedd, Powys, Ceredigion) were more likely to think the Welsh Labour government was doing a poor job (60% answered no). For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here. READ MORE: Police confirm why M4 was closed in both directions READ MORE: Police issue statement about Welsh hotel to 'dispel rumours' Those in south west Wales and Valleys (Carmarthenshire, Pembrokeshire, Swansea, Neath Port Talbot, Bridgend, Rhondda Cynon Taf, Merthyr Tydfil, Caerphilly, Blaenau Gwent) were in the middle - with 56% answering no, while in Cardiff and south east Wales (Cardiff, Vale of Glamorgan, Torfaen, Monmouthshire, Newport) Labour had more support (33%) although more of those questioned (54%) said no. Slightly more men than women answered "no" in response to the question, and in terms of ages, those aged over 55 were much more likely to feel Labour was not doing a good job than those aged between 16 and 34 (with 66% of older people answering no compared to 42% of the younger age group). Those was an almost even split among 16 to 34s between those saying Labour is doing a good job in government in Wales and those saying they're not (at 40% and 42% respectively of this age group). Older people were the most negative, with 66% of the over 55s saying they are not doing a good job, compared to 22% saying the reverse. The next Senedd election is taking place in May 2026. So far, all relevant polls show Labour is in for a fight to keep its place as the dominant party. The next election will be fought on new constituencies, with a new voting system and will result in 96 Senedd members elected rather than 60. Polling is consistently showing Labour could come third behind Plaid Cymru and Reform UK. Labour is projected to get around 18% however their rivals, from both sides of the political spectrum, are polling in the high 20s or even 30% mark. Welsh Labour leader, and First Minister, Eluned Morgan, has repeatedly admitted she thinks Reform UK is a threat to her party. Polling also shows Reform UK could be a threat to Labour at a general election. in June, pollster YouGov has asked people across the UK how they would vote in a general election, and in Wales it shows Reform would take 21 of the 32 seats in Wales. The poll showed in 2024, Labour won a historic 172-seat majority but the poll projects they would not only lose their majority, falling to 178 but become the second party by some distance.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are we willing to drop cash Isas and take more risks with our money?
Savers are missing out on financial rewards because the benefits of investing in stocks and shares are being drowned out by risk warnings, the chancellor says. This week Rachel Reeves said savers would be sent details of investment opportunities if they have money in low-interest accounts. And she won't completely rule out cutting the annual tax-free allowance of cash Individual Savings Accounts (Isas) to push people into stocks and shares Isas instead. But what are her chances of making the UK a nation of investors, rather than risk-averse savers? Experts say women are investing less than men, and have warned the chancellor that some of her ideas could backfire and put off potential new investors. 'Pink websites won't work' Cash savings accounts are steady and safe. The amount of interest varies between account providers, but it is clear how much the returns will be. They are popular when putting money aside for emergencies, or for holidays, a wedding or a car. By contrast, the value of investments in stocks and shares can go up and down, but with risk can come reward. Long-term investments can be lucrative, not only for individuals, but for the economy as a whole. Laura Suter, director of personal finance at investment platform AJ Bell, says Reeves and the finance sector should start by making investing more attractive to women. Having written reports on the Isa gender gap, she argues that, for too long, advertising about investing has been designed by men. Lisa Caplan, director at investment company Charles Stanley, agrees. "It's not about making your website pink. It's about using less jargon, competitive language, and masculine imagery," she says. "When clients who are women feel seen and understood, they will be more willing to trust their money to an adviser or even an investment platform. I think this is beginning to change." Jema Arnold is an investor, and works for UK shareholders' association ShareSoc. She wants investing to be part of general, honest conversation among friends, not private and hidden. "I go to a book club. I want investing to be like that," she says. She is joined in a London cafe by Laura Colucci, who is in her 40s, and Wendy Lanham, who is 71. All three are divorcees, who were forced to think about their relationships with money when their marriages ended. Mrs Arnold was with an investment banker for 17 years. "In many ways I was a traditional housewife," she says. Her now ex-wife had managed that side of the finances. "I'd switched off that part of my brain when raising a daughter. That was a mistake. I felt foolish. I had to switch it back on again fairly quickly." Mrs Colucci was the same. "There were investments in my name," she says. "It was a huge learning curve in one year, when I had to take control." Mrs Lanham put her money into savings accounts. Only later did she consider moving some into investments. But that was a path that all three initially found difficult to join. "People froze up and looked awkward when I talked about investing," says Mrs Arnold. Male domination Mrs Lanham says she joined a group which met to talk about investing. The membership was entirely male. "I bought myself a book called Investing for Idiots, went to a conference, and treated it like adult education," she says. "I did not know anything, but hung in there, and the organisation changed." Now, the trio are members of SIGnet – a network of investor groups that meet in different parts of the UK, or online. It is not-for-profit and covers different areas of interest. It has lots of female members. But they say the chancellor will have little hope of getting more people to invest without initially improving their understanding, especially if they are trying it for the first time. "There's no point telling people to go and run a marathon when they've never run before," says Mrs Colucci. Reeves told financial services and business bosses in her Mansion House speech this week that the "negative" narrative around savers investing money in stocks and shares needed to change. "For too long, we have presented investment in too negative a light, quick to warn people of the risks without giving proper weight to the benefits," she said. She announced new adverts, reminiscent of the "Tell Sid" campaign of the 1980s, which encouraged people to invest in the newly privatised British Gas. Targeted messages will also be sent by banks to people who have money in low-interest accounts. Mrs Suter, from AJ Bell, says this needs to go beyond a "token effort". "If it can get widespread coverage and enthusiasm, then it could make a difference," she says. Isa debate Carol Knight, chief executive of the Investing and Saving Alliance, says Reeves' ambition will be judged a success if more women, more people from ethnic minorities, and more people outside of London become investors. But Anna Bowes, savings expert at the Private Office, says the chancellor risks her plan backfiring by encouraging people to invest now when markets are jittery due to global uncertainty. That could lead to short-term losses. "This needs to be done very carefully or it could put off a generation of investors." And she stresses that forcing people to consider a stocks and shares Isa by reducing the amount that could be put tax-free into a cash Isa would be a huge mistake. Reeves has stepped back from immediately cutting the tax-free limit on cash Isas, following a backlash from banks and building societies. But she is still keen to shift some of the £300bn in these accounts to being invested in the UK and its companies, despite "differing views on the right approach". Any changes would have an impact on millions of people. Isas are incredibly popular - about 42% of UK adults have at least one. Stocks and shares Isas are less popular but more money is held in them overall - around £431bn, compared to £294bn in cash Isas. People with Isas are more likely to be older, with estimates suggesting about half of pensioners have one. And while more women have Isas overall, more men have the investment option, with women more likely to stick to the safety of cash. Many investment companies that sell stocks and shares Isas back a change, while banks and building societies who dominate the cash Isa market are against it. That debate is likely to pick up again as the chancellor's autumn Budget gets closer. What is an Isa and how might the rules change? Savers to be targeted with offers to invest in shares under new plans One in 10 have no savings, financial regulator says
