Lab Notes: The telescope redefining the Universe
News Grab: The $13 billion infrared unit is expected to revolutionise astronomy.
Belinda Smith: Faint, distant galaxies snapped into sharp focus in the first photo. The telescope also revealed the steamy atmosphere shrouding a hot gas giant planet. And gave us a rare glimpse into a star nursery inside our own galaxy, the Milky Way.
News Grab: NASA says humans have never before gained such important information about the universe.
Belinda Smith: In the years since, the James Webb Space Telescope has pulled back the veil on a whole bunch of mind-blowing cosmic phenomena. So how has this telescope changed our understanding of the universe? And what is still to come? Hi, I'm Belinda Smith and you're listening to Lab Notes, the show that dissects the science behind new discoveries and current events. To give us a rundown of some of the James Webb Space Telescope's greatest hits, so far, is Laura Driessen, a radio astronomer at the University of Sydney.
Laura Driessen: I think there was a collective gasp around the world when those first images were released because they were just so gorgeous. I can't tell you exactly where I was or anything like that, but I definitely remember seeing those first just beautiful images.
Belinda Smith: What's so special about the James Webb Space Telescope?
Laura Driessen: From an engineering perspective, it's just an amazing feat that they put a whole telescope and it was sort of folded up like origami. They sent it really, really far away to a spot that we call L2 and then unfolded it and it actually worked. That's amazing. I'm sure that everyone at NASA was doing the collective holding their breath thing because that would have been pretty stressful. The thing about JWST compared to Hubble, we can't go and fix it. If it breaks, that's it.
Belinda Smith: It's broken. Wow. One and done situation.
Laura Driessen: So it was a huge risk when they sent it up, but everything had worked perfectly on the launch. So, you know, maybe they were feeling a little bit more comfortable, but I think it's just stressful when you do anything like that.
Belinda Smith: I've seen the JWST described as doing infrared astronomy. What does that mean?
Laura Driessen: So there's all different kinds of light. The type of light that we can see with our eyes is called optical or visible light. And it's really just a teeny tiny little slice of all the different kinds of light that exist. It's in the nanometers part of the spectrum. So each little wave is nanometers, which is you divide a meter into a thousand, that's a millimeter. Another thousand is a micrometer and another thousand is a nanometer. Oh wow. So really tiny wheels. A thousandth of a thousandth of
Belinda Smith: a thousandth of a meter. Yes,
Laura Driessen: exactly. And the longest wavelength we can see is red. And if you keep going longer, then we get to infrared. We usually think about infrared as sort of heat. That's how we experience infrared light. For example, a fire would be quite bright in infrared and that's what we feel as heat. So it's a different kind of light that's invisible to us.
Belinda Smith: That's infrared light is what the JWST sees. But...
Laura Driessen: That also means the colours you see in the JWST images aren't real. That's us adding the colours because it's light we can't see. We don't have a colour for sort of invisible light. That wouldn't help if we just showed invisible light and you couldn't see anything. So we add the colours later.
Belinda Smith: Sure, those pretty pictures wouldn't be so beautiful. So in the three years since the James Webb Space Telescope sent back its first batch of images, we get treated to new cosmic insights on the reg, really. So how has it changed our understanding of the universe?
Laura Driessen: Ooh, I think one of my favourite things is from a cosmological perspective. So that's a subset of astronomy, but it's thinking about the universe as a whole. And because JWST can see things that are more distant, it's discovering things like black holes and galaxies further back in time than we thought that they existed.
Belinda Smith: Yeah, it can see back in time, so to speak, because the telescope picks up light that may have travelled for billions of years. So it's really seeing, say, a galaxy as it was all that time ago, maybe even from the baby universe.
Laura Driessen: So one of the main things is the universe started and expanded and there's a time period at the very start that we can't see anything because it's kind of foggy. There's just a whole bunch of electrons, very foggy. Then there was a flash in the universe that we could see when things cooled down enough that the fog kind of demystified. And then there was a period called the Dark Ages, which sounds very fancy and dramatic. And it's also a time period when the light couldn't escape. So at the start we had a fog of electrons, then we had a fog of hydrogen, so we couldn't see. After that time period, the first stars started forming. And that's called the cosmic dawn. We're very dramatic as it turns out. And that's when we start seeing light.
Belinda Smith: The JWST is helping push back when this cosmic dawn, well, dawned.
Laura Driessen: This is really interesting from the perspective of how our universe changed over time and how we started with kind of just a mess and ended up with the beautiful things that we can see in space today, planets, stars, galaxies, all that good stuff didn't just happen. And we're trying to work that out. So telescopes like JWST, as they push back in time, seeing black holes earlier than we thought we saw black holes, galaxies earlier than we thought that galaxies could exist, changes how we think about how the universe evolved.
Belinda Smith: So the universe's early years are taking on a slightly different form.
Laura Driessen: Yes. And I think this also, I think about like our parents when they were kids, they didn't have many photos. So when we look back, we're trying to work out what happened when our parents were kids and what sort of mischief they got up to and how they turned into the people they are today. We just don't have that much information. So JWST is like adding photos. You found a lost album. And now you can find out what your parents got up to.
Belinda Smith: The universe is about 13 billion years old. What time scales are we talking here for the universe's dark ages? Between that electron fog and the cosmic dawn.
Laura Driessen: Their estimates are a bit iffy, but I think JWST saw a galaxy 400 million years after the Big Bang. So that does sort of put a limit on the dark ages from 400,000 years to 400 million.
Belinda Smith: OK, so what else has the James Webb Space Telescope told us about the universe?
Laura Driessen: So one of my favourite ones, which is not as big in scale, much smaller in fact, is something called a jumbo, which is a Jupiter mass binary object. And these are planets, two planets in a binary, wizarding around each other with no star. So they're just planets existing. So
Belinda Smith: planets, generally we know of planets orbiting some kind of star, like our solar system. But these ones don't. So did they ever have a star? Have they run away from the star? What's happened? Well,
Laura Driessen: we don't know about these ones. So the fun thing is rogue planets are a thing we've already known about. So these are individual planets that through gravity, either a star, you know, say another star coming too near the solar system might kick out some planets through gravity, or planets in amongst themselves sort of having gravity interactions and one end up popping out. So we know about individual rogue planets. But having two planets that are kicked out but somehow stay together? Tricky. And planets don't really form on their own. So maybe these things were flung out, but somehow stayed together with a friend because they found about 40 of them in the Orion Nebula. To call them planets is maybe pushing it. That's why we call them objects. That's sort of an astronomy term for thing in space we don't have a better name for yet. But they look like planets and they're just whizzing around each other on their own. So a little bit of a challenge to planet formation, solar system formation and star formation that they were even seen. This is one of the things we never thought we'd see when we turned on the JWST.
Belinda Smith: Something else the James Webb Space Telescope has shed light on are exoplanets, planets around stars outside our solar system.
Laura Driessen: We just don't get pretty pictures of those. This is where that spectra comes in. And that's one of my other big favourite things of JWST is something called transmission spectroscopy of exoplanets.
Belinda Smith: What is that and why is it important?
Laura Driessen: So spectroscopy is where we can identify chemicals in space. So some of you might remember when you were in high school doing things with Bunsen burners where you sprayed different chemicals on the Bunsen burners so they light up different colours. Basically every element in the periodic table and all the molecules as well, so like carbon dioxide, water, where it's atoms all smooshed together, has their own signature, a little set of colours that every time you see it, they have that set of colours. And we can use that to look into space. We only have light so this is what we've got to work with to identify chemicals in space. And JWST has the instrument on there that can do this. So in the infrared still, identifying these lines, different wavelengths or colours that identify different chemicals and molecules in space. But what we're doing here is we're trying to detect the atmospheres of exoplanets. And that maybe doesn't sound that dramatic but you have to remember it wasn't too long ago that we'd barely detected any exoplanets at all, let alone trying to see their atmospheres. And atmospheres around planets are teeny tiny.
Belinda Smith: Yeah, it's like a thin shell of gas. Or some liquid maybe but it's not much.
Laura Driessen: It's not much at all and this is why we call it transmission spectroscopy. So as the planet passes in front of the star, we see a little dip in the light of the star and that tells us the planet's there. But as the planet passes in, you're also getting light from the star going through its atmosphere. So it's transmitting through the planet's atmosphere. So we're sort of using the star's light as it goes through the planet's teeny tiny atmosphere to see what molecules and things are going on in those atmospheres.
Belinda Smith: So it's kind of like a stained glass window. Yeah,
Laura Driessen: so you're shining a torch through the stained glass window basically to see what colours are going on in there and that's what we're doing. And it had sort of been done at a very basic level before JWST but now it's just sort of happening all the time. The one thing we want to do which hasn't yet been done by JWST, not for lack of trying, is to try and detect an atmosphere around a rocky planet. So we're pretty good at it for things that we call hot Jupiters. So Jupiter's a big gas giant. Neptune's which are also kind of gassy. But for it we want to do like the Earth. We want to see a planet that's kind of like the Earth, a big rock, and we want to be able to detect the atmosphere.
Belinda Smith: Why do we want to look at rocky planets?
Laura Driessen: So when we search for life, we're talking a little bit about aliens here, when we search for life the only model that we have is us. So we sort of think that if we're looking for what we call a habitable planet where there might be life, we're looking for planets that are like ours. Rocky, we sort of think that's what we need. I don't think we'd survive very well on Jupiter. Rocky, not too hot, not too cold, water is wet. Those are sort of the basic things. But we also know that we need an atmosphere. We love our atmosphere. It protects us from a lot of things and also breathing is great.
Belinda Smith: The thing is, for a planet to hang onto its atmosphere, it really needs a magnetic field. This protects that atmosphere from being swept away by stuff spat out by its star. Take Mars, for example. It once had a magnetic field, but that's no longer.
Laura Driessen: So over time, basically the sun has just kind of bombarded it and it had a really nice atmosphere and it's slowly just blown away by the sun. So that's what we want to see. If ours is sort of special for any reason, it can't be that special, the universe is infinite. But how common is it for these sorts of planets that are nice for us to live on? How often do they happen? That's one of the questions. Exoplanets is a great field, looking for life. It's fun. We really are in this era where we're seeing things we've never seen before.
Belinda Smith: That was Laura Driessen, a radio astronomer at the University of Sydney. Thanks for listening to Lab Notes on ABC Radio National, where every week we dissect the science behind new discoveries and current events. I'm Belinda Smith. This episode was produced on the lands of the Wurundjeri and Menang Noongar people. Fiona Pepper's the producer and it was mixed by Tim Symonds. We'd love to hear from you. Send us an email labnotes at abc.net.au. Catch you next week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
16 hours ago
- ABC News
The centenary of quantum mechanics
It seemed such a challenge to commonsense that Einstein claimed it was preposterous. How can something be in two states at once: a cat both dead and alive? How can an object be affected by its twin over galactic distances although there is no direct contact between them? How are particles altered just by being examined, changing their nature when observed? Quantum physics, the science of the very small, may defy logic, but it works. Modern technology, such as the next generation of computers, depend upon it. Also, quantum science proposes that this is not the only universe – there may be millions more. Shelby Traynor traces the birth and irresistible growth of the quantum revolution. Einstein, Bohr and the origins of entanglement – Cosmos October 2017 Guests Robyn Arianrhod Mathematician and affiliate of Monash University Melbourne Eric Cavalcanti Associate Professor in theoretical physicist Griffith University Brisbane Producer and Presenter Shelby Traynor

ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
Can Trump contain China's AI boom?
Sam Hawley: For so long, the tech bros of Silicon Valley have dominated the AI race. Now there's a boom underway in China, giving them a run for their money and Donald Trump doesn't like it. Today, Kyle Chan from the global policy think tank, the Rand Corporation, on why the president is so desperate for the US to beat Beijing. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. Sam Hawley: Kyle, there's a global race going on right now to be the world leader in AI. This is a race basically to make technologies that rival the human brain, right? Kyle Chan: Yeah. So there really is this global race. And in particular, you have the US and China with many of the world's best AI models. And it's quite impressive to see almost every day, it feels like a new model coming out with new advanced capabilities. So, yes,getting close, if not even beating what we can do ourselves. Sam Hawley: Yeah, it's fascinating to watch how quickly this is moving. Donald Trump, US President: I don't like the name artificial anything because it's not artificial. It's genius. It's pure genius. Sam Hawley: Donald Trump, of course, wants to make sure that America wins this race. Donald Trump, US President: America is the country that started the AI race. And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it. We're going to work hard. We're going to win it. Sam Hawley: He even gave a speech with that title, winning the AI race. Donald Trump, US President: Because we will not allow any foreign nation to beat us. Our children will not live on a planet controlled by the algorithms of the adversaries advancing values and interests contrary to our own. Sam Hawley: He's pretty invested in this, isn't he? Kyle Chan: That's right. Yeah, this has been a big topic throughout his administration so far. I think a lot of what US policy is focused on, including the current Trump administration, is on winning the race to AGI. I think there's a strong sense that this could be a pivotal turning point. Sam Hawley: Remind me, what is AGI? Kyle Chan: So artificial general intelligence. There's this idea that perhaps one day it could reach a point where it could replicate or even exceed the abilities of humans to do, say, certain kinds of office work or certain kinds of research. This could even extend into areas like military capabilities, like autonomous weapon systems, for example. Reaching this stage where AI is as good as, if not better than, human reasoning. Sam Hawley: So we might not be needed actually anymore. We won't need to think anymore, right? Kyle Chan: We'll see. Sam Hawley: Exactly. All right. Well, Kyle, of course, up until now, the US has really dominated this market. All the big tech giants who've developed AI, things like ChatGPT, they're sitting there in Silicon Valley. Kyle Chan: Oh, yeah. So you have OpenAI, currently led by Sam Altman. You have Google, which has been coming out with a number of various sort of cutting edge models with its Gemini series. You have Claude, which is very well known from Anthropic, well known for its coding capabilities. You have Meta as well as xAI. So there's actually quite a quite a large roster of strong American AI companies. Sam Hawley: So for many, many years, America's really led the world when it comes to AI development. But as you say, China has been creeping up on it. And that has the US administration a bit worried. It even tried to stop Beijing's advancement in this space, didn't it? By banning Nvidia from selling advanced chips to China. Just remind me what happened then. Kyle Chan: Yes, that's right. So this was actually in the Biden administration. You had very strong export controls placed on especially Nvidia's more advanced chips. And so here you actually have several rounds of downgrading of what kinds of Nvidia chips could be exported in China. Sam Hawley: So the US, in part, was saying that it was deeply concerned that AI could be used by the Chinese for military purposes. Kyle Chan: That's right. Yeah. And, you know, to be sure, it was also part of this broader idea that advanced semiconductors in general can be used for a whole range of important applications. So in addition to AI, there are also more direct military implications for this ban. Sam Hawley: All right. So Biden brought in this ban to stop these really advanced chips from being exported from the United States to China. But intriguingly, Trump just recently has now removed that ban. Do we know why he did that and how significant is that decision? Kyle Chan: Yes. What's interesting is I think whereas before people expected maybe a continuous ratcheting up of these export controls, Trump has reversed the ban on the H20 chips. Interestingly, a new line of argument has gotten a lot of prominence, which is that Nvidia and other US tech companies who sort of, you know, quote, unquote, sell the picks and shovels, that is, build the infrastructure and build the sort of underlying platforms for AI development, that American companies should be the ones who are dominant in the world and that people should build on the American tech stack as it were, rather than cede, say, the Chinese market to its competitors like Huawei, which is also developing its own AI chips. So the idea here was that rather than block out the Chinese market entirely, that the US should stay engaged, at least in terms of providing some kind of sweet spot of infrastructure, but not not too advanced in order to actually accelerate China's efforts. Sam Hawley: And that's the argument that the Nvidia boss, Jensen Huang, has been making to Donald Trump. Jensen Huang, Nvidia CEO: This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for America to have AI technology leadership. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for China to have AI leadership. And if we want to be a leader, we have to engage developers all over the world. We have to engage markets all over the world. Sam Hawley: So the best way to beat China at AI is to actually help China to compete. Have I got that right? Kyle Chan: Yes. Yes. The logic, it can be hard to parse out sometimes, but yes, this is one of the main arguments. Sam Hawley: All right. So, Kyle, Donald Trump, he's delivered this speech outlining the importance of the US dominating the AI market. Donald Trump, US President: America needs new data centres, new semiconductor and chip manufacturing facilities, new power plants and transmission lines. And under my leadership, we're going to get that job done. Sam Hawley: But as we mentioned, in China, it's full speed ahead. There really is a boom going on there right now, isn't there? Kyle Chan: Absolutely. Yeah. So, I mean, everyone now knows about DeepSeek and the DeepSeek moment. News report: The release of a high performing Chinese rival to chat GPT has sent shockwaves through the global tech sector and caused US tech stocks to fall. Kyle Chan: A Chinese AI model for the first time seemed to be almost on par with the US leading models. And this was done at a fraction of the cost in terms of compute. And this was done sort of in defiance of US efforts to put on export controls and to restrict Chinese compute capacity. But DeepSeek is really the tip of the iceberg. So there's a whole set of very competitive Chinese AI models. You think about Alibaba's Qwen, you think about Tencent, ByteDance. There's Moonshot, a whole host of startups as well. Most of these companies now, they all have their own sort of chatbot like chat GPT, where anyone can download the app or go to the website and just start chatting directly with the AI model, the underlying model itself. And so what's interesting is that it's not just one company or one startup per se. It's actually a whole sort of lineup, in a way, a Chinese team competing with the US one. Sam Hawley: And these AI apps, what they haven't needed, that chip that was banned, I guess, from being exported from the United States. China's done it on its own, has it? Kyle Chan: Well, yeah. So it's complicated because actually many of these Chinese AI companies, they do use Nvidia chips. They do, including the chip that was banned, the H20. At the same time, though, they're trying to experiment and test Chinese domestic alternatives, knowing very well that, you know, in the long run, they may no longer have access to Nvidia's GPUs. So there's a question right now within the Chinese tech community, Chinese AI policy about how hard to push for this domestic alternative versus to continue to rely on what are otherwise better performing Nvidia chips. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Kyle, just unpack for me now. What's actually driving this AI boom in China? Because it has a lot to do with the Communist Party's backing of this, doesn't it, of the government's funding of it. Kyle Chan: That's right. So what's interesting is that Beijing is pouring resources into the entire, what I call the entire AI tech stack. So they're investing in not only chips, as we mentioned earlier, but in the rollout of data centres, often tied to renewable energy. They are investing in the development of foundation models. They have special local government AI labs. And then all the way to applications, especially in so-called hard tech areas like robotics and industrial automation. So you can see sort of this full range of support. And of course, at the very heart of this, I think is ultimately the emphasis on talent development and basic research. So a lot of the universities in China, many of them are producing really world class AI developers. Sam Hawley: And we've seen this before, haven't we? From the Chinese government when it wanted to boost the EV market. It did the same thing. It did the same thing with solar and it works. Kyle Chan: Yeah, that's right. They've tried this playbook before and they're going to try it again. But the funny thing is, yeah, AI is sort of a different beast. And so, you know, for example, just in the past year, we have this shift towards reason models. And that already has thrown a bit of a wrench into some of the industrial policy efforts that China has made in AI. So some of the data centre build out that was government backed. You know, there's a question now about whether that is fit for purpose with the shift towards this sort of new AI paradigm. And it could change again. So it's a fast moving space. Sam Hawley: All right. So, Kyle, there is this race going on between the United States and China to dominate AI development. But tell me, why is that so important? Why does it matter who wins this race in the end? Kyle Chan: So the AI race, I think, is especially important now because it has implications for economic growth, long term productivity. There's a sense both in the US and in China that AI could help boost a whole range of sectors. From education, health care, biotech, drug discovery, manufacturing services. So on the one hand, you have this sort of economic implication. On the other hand, there are military implications. So AI could be used for developing autonomous systems. You think about drones or swarms of drones that are able to navigate on the battlefield on their own. Or you think about missile defence capabilities that might use AI or satellite technology that might use AI. So there are both security and economic repercussions for, you know, the question of sort of who is ahead in the race for AI. Sam Hawley: Yeah. And I note that Sam Altman from OpenAI says he wants to make sure that democratic AI wins over authoritarian AI. What do you make of that? Kyle Chan: Yeah, that's right. I mean, it's an interesting idea because right now there's also this battle over sort of diffusion and who can get their models out into the world. And so it's not just a matter of, you know, who has the best model, but also which model is more widely used. And I think right now what's interesting is a lot of Chinese models are open source or at least open weights. That is people, companies, organisations, individuals can download these models and run them locally, run them themselves. And what this means is that a Chinese type of AI might end up diffusing more broadly, perhaps maybe outside of the U.S. into other countries. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, it's a fascinating battle. Kyle, what do you think? What's your prediction? Who's going to come out on top in the end? Kyle Chan: In a sense, I do see that with some of the industrial policy in China, with some of the government support, as well as perhaps more importantly, different sorts of attitudes towards AI in China. There are some surveys that have shown that people in China more broadly seem to be more open to adopting AI and see it as a more positive force in society. That could play a key role in rolling out and incorporating AI into more areas of life. So that's one area that I would watch very closely. Sam Hawley: Kyle Chan is a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University and an adjunct researcher at the Rand Corporation. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead and Sam Dunn. Audio production by Cinnamon Nippard. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. ABC News Daily will be back again on Monday. Thanks for listening.

News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
'Star Wars' creator George Lucas to hit Comic-Con for first time
Comic-Con kicks off Thursday in San Diego, California, with expectations running high among devoted fans keen to catch a glimpse of George Lucas at his first-ever appearance at the convention. Other expected highlights of the gathering -- one of the world's biggest celebrations of pop culture -- include the world premiere of the prequel series "Alien: Earth." Comic-Con began holding events in San Diego in 1970, as a low-key and rather niche huddle, but has now grown to an annual get-together that attracts 130,000 people eager to hear behind-the-scenes tidbits from Hollywood stars and directors unveiling their latest projects. This year's edition will be marked by the presence of legendary filmmaker Lucas, who has never visited the convention before despite Comic-Con culture being deeply rooted in his "Star Wars" and "Indiana Jones" franchises. In a session on Sunday set to be moderated by Queen Latifah, Lucas will discuss the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art with Mexican director Guillermo del Toro and Oscar-winning artist Doug Chiang, who has shaped the iconic "Star Wars" universe for decades. The museum, scheduled to open in Los Angeles next year, will be dedicated to illustrated narratives and will house the Lucas archive. "Nearly five decades ago, Star Wars made one of its earliest public appearances at our convention, along with a booth featuring (comic book artist) Howard Chaykin's now legendary Star Wars poster as a promotional item," said David Glanzer, Chief Communications and Strategy Officer. "Now, to have Mr. Lucas... is a true full-circle moment. His lifelong dedication to visual storytelling and world-building resonates deeply with us and our community." - Alien, Predator, and the End of the World - Marvel Studios will have a smaller presence at the convention this year, skipping its eagerly awaited annual presentation in Hall H. According to Variety, changes to the premiere of the new "Avengers" installment complicated logistics for the studio, whose cast is currently filming in Britain. Despite this notable absence, events at coveted Hall H still promise great excitement for fans of science fiction, a core genre of the convention. On Friday, it will host the world premiere of the pilot episode of the prequel "Alien: Earth," directed by Noah Hawley and slated to hit streaming platforms in August. The series takes place a couple of years before the events depicted in Ridley Scott's 1979 film "Alien," offering an expansion of the venerated franchise. Another fan favorite that will have its moment in the spotlight is "Predator: Badlands," with a panel Friday set to include director Dan Trachtenberg, who revitalized the brand with "Prey" (2022). Joining him will be stars Elle Fanning and Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi, who plays the predator Dek. The panel is expected to reveal more from the production, which centers the predator as prey, not hunter, for the first time. On Saturday, award-winning actor Ryan Gosling and directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller (behind the new "Spider-Verse" trilogy) will present their "Project Hail Mary," which is due in theaters next year. The film, based on the book by Andy Weir ("The Martian"), follows Ryland Grace (Gosling), a former science teacher who wakes up on a spaceship to discover he's on a mission to save the Earth. Another buzzed-about presentation is for the highly anticipated second season of "Peacemaker," in which James Gunn ("Superman") and his cast are expected to offer sneak peeks. But it won't all be deadly serious -- thousands of those in attendance will come dressed as princesses, warriors, aliens and other characters from the pantheon of pop culture. Comic-Con runs from Thursday to Sunday, July 27.