‘We're in this together': Singapore Malay-Muslim success a collective effort, says acting Muslim affairs chief
Faishal stressed the importance of working closely with the M3, a collaboration between Singapore's Islamic Religious Council (Muis), its Council for the Education of Muslim Children (Mendaki), and the Malay Activity Executive Committees Council, under Singapore statutory board People's Association to promote social, cultural and community cohesion.
'We're in this together,' he was quoted by the Straits Times of telling reporters yesterday during Cyclation 2025, a community cycling event organised by Wisma Geylang Serai where he also serves as lead adviser.
He called on all segments of the community to play a role and 'create closer, more effective networks to work towards the community's success'.
Every individual, he said, should feel they have a stake in shaping the community's future.
'We want to give space for them to share their views, share their aspirations on how we can shape a successful Malay/Muslim community,'Faishal was quoted as saying.
He noted that this engagement is especially vital now as the global climate becomes more challenging.
Faishal took over the ministerial role on May 21 from Masagos Zulkifli, who held the portfolio since 2018.
Cyclation 2025 was part of SG60 Bersama, a series of celebrations marking the Malay-Muslim community's contributions to Singapore on its 60th anniversary of independence.
Some 90 cyclists participated in the 15km route.
Faisal said the Gerak-Gerak Geylang, a free weekend fitness programme, is an example of Muslim success, adding that this kind of engagement is an extension of his political journey, which began in 2006 as an MP for Marine Parade GRC.
Faishal said such inclusive engagement will ultimately benefit all communities in Singapore.
'I would like to listen. I would like to see how your suggestions can contribute to the development of the Malay/Muslim community.
'I think what is key is that we are in this together, and I hope to bring as many people on board this journey,' he was quoted as saying.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Why reasonable diligence? — Hafiz Hassan
JULY 4 — In the case of Datuk Seri Najib Razak v PP [2022] 5 MLJ 143, in his appeal to the Federal Court, former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak (appellant) applied for leave to adduce additional/further evidence to set aside his conviction and sentence on seven criminal charges. The purpose of the application was to show that the trial judge should not have presided over the trial since he was in a conflict of interest position. By his application, the appellant sought to introduce several documentary evidence as well as viva voce evidence of certain individuals, including officers from the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). The appellant claimed that he had acquired the proposed additional evidence only in May and July of 2022, long after his trial was over, and that the evidence could not have been obtained at the trial even if reasonable diligence had been exercised. The appellant said he had satisfied the requirements for admission or adduction of the additional/further evidence. The Federal Court unanimously dismissed the application to adduce additional/further evidence. The apex court ruled, among others, that some of the additional evidence sought to be admitted/adduced was available at trial or, at the very least, could have been discovered or obtained by reasonable diligence. Attorney General of Malaysia, Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar, arrives at the Federal Court in Putrajaya. July 1, 2025 — Picture by Raymond Manuel Accordingly, the appellant had failed to satisfy the requirements for adduction of fresh evidence established by decided cases, in particular, in the English case of R v Parks [1961] 3 All ER 633 which the apex court had previously endorsed and applied. The slew of cases emphasised the point of 'availability' of the evidence and whether it was discoverable by reasonable diligence by the party seeking leave to adduce the additional/further evidence. The test is therefore one of availability. Some of the additional evidence was available to the appellant even if he was not served with the evidence. The Federal Court emphasised that the evidence could have been obtained by reasonable diligence. It was the apex court finding that the first requirement for adduction of fresh evidence had not been satisfied. The court referred to its own decision in the case of Lau Foo Sun v Government of Malaysia [1970] 2 MLJ 70 where an application to adduce additional evidence was dismissed solely on the ground that it could have been obtained by use of reasonable diligence. The above explains the forceful argument of Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar that Datuk Seri Najib Razak did not exercise reasonable diligence to obtain a purported addendum or 'supplementary order' issued by the King for house arrest when the latter took the matter to court. Dusuki argued Najib had failed to demonstrate the supposed addendum could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence before a judicial review hearing at the High Court in July last year. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Singapore's PAP questions Pritam Singh's appearance on ‘Keluar Sekejap', Workers' Party defends move as free speech
SINGAPORE, July 4 — A political clash has erupted between the People's Action Party (PAP) and the Workers' Party (WP) over WP chief Pritam Singh's appearance on a Malaysian podcast, with the ruling party questioning his decision to speak about Singapore politics on a foreign platform. In a statement yesterday, PAP said Singh, who is the Leader of the Opposition, had 'strikingly' chosen a non-local outlet to give his most extensive post-election interview, referring to his guest appearance on Keluar Sekejap, a podcast hosted by Khairy Jamaluddin and Shahril Hamdan. 'It raises serious questions about why the secretary-general of the Workers' Party would choose to speak about Singapore's politics on foreign soil, to a foreign audience,' the PAP said. 'This is not merely a matter of platform preference. It touches on a fundamental principle — that Singapore's domestic affairs should be debated and decided by Singaporeans, within Singapore.' The episode, filmed during Singh's family holiday in Malaysia and uploaded on June 24, covered topics such as the WP's strategy for the next general election (GE2025), Singapore's multiracial model, and the party's role as a check and balance to the government. In response, the WP defended Singh's appearance, noting that he is not a member of the executive and 'no legal convention... fetters his freedom of speech, locally or overseas'. 'Should there be such a guideline, it should be made known,' the party said in a Facebook post. It also accused the PAP of 'opposing for the sake of opposing'. The WP added that public reception in Singapore to the interview had been positive. 'It exemplified how a non-government Singaporean politician can speak fairly and frankly about Singapore and its government, without denouncing either,' it said. In defending its leader's media choice, the WP also pointed out that PAP ministers regularly give interviews to international media on both foreign and domestic matters. 'In fact, some of these interviews have gone viral and are well received by an international audience, embellishing the PAP,' the party said. 'In these circumstances, no right-thinking individual would accuse the PAP of 'foreign involvement' to benefit the party.' The WP also noted that several PAP members had posed for photos with Khairy during his recent visit to Singapore and claimed one had commented after watching the podcast that 'Pritam did well'. 'These actions would lead any Singaporean to an irresistible conclusion: that the Leader of the Opposition's appearance on the podcast had no detrimental impact whatsoever on Singapore's national interests,' the party said. But in a late-night follow-up, the PAP stood by its position, noting that while ministers do speak to foreign media, they typically cover a broad range of topics. What made Singh's appearance unusual, it said, was that it was focused 'almost entirely on Singapore's internal politics', and came after he had reportedly turned down invitations from Singaporean podcasters. The statement also revived past concerns over the WP's previous interactions with Malaysian-based Singaporean preacher Noor Deros and online endorsements by politicians from PAS. 'Mr (Pritam) Singh remained silent until the Singapore Government called out these acts of blatant foreign interference. Even then, his response left many critical questions unanswered,' it said. On the podcast, Singh was asked about multiracialism and multiculturalism in Singapore. He said race should not be something to score political points on. The PAP, however, pressed further: 'Does he believe foreign involvement is acceptable when it benefits his party?' it asked. 'The questions we asked... go to the heart of maintaining a clear boundary against foreign involvement in our domestic affairs.' While acknowledging the shared history between Singapore and Malaysia, the PAP stressed that both countries had long upheld the principle of non-interference. 'In the wake of the painful racial unrest of the 1960s, both sides have observed a careful boundary: We refrain from commenting on each other's politics, and from using each other's media to influence public opinion,' it said. 'This is a longstanding understanding that has served both nations well. Maintaining it requires political leaders of integrity who place national interest above partisan gain.'
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Fuziah denies PKR branch dissolutions amid wave of resignations, says party structure remains intact
KUALA LUMPUR, July 4 – PKR secretary-general Fuziah Salleh has reportedly confirmed that no party divisions or wings have been dissolved, despite a recent wave of grassroots resignations. She said the number of resignations remains below the constitutional requirement for dissolution, which mandates that at least two-thirds of a committee must step down, a figure that varies based on branch size. 'The party constitution clearly outlines the requirements, and unless those are fulfilled, the structure remains intact,' she was quoted telling Free Malaysia Today. Using the Lenggong branch as an example, Fuziah noted that 15 members had resigned from a 31-member committee, falling short of the 21 resignations required to trigger dissolution. Fuziah said the party treats all resignations seriously but urged members to use internal mechanisms to address grievances. She added that the leadership is closely monitoring the situation and remains committed to maintaining party stability and discipline. 'There may be those trying to disrupt or discredit the party from within or outside, but we remain focused,' she said. This comes as Ahmad Nizam Noh, who lost the contest for Lenggong branch chief, reportedly lodged a complaint with the Registrar of Societies after all 15 members of his faction resigned in protest. Several youth leaders in the Selayang branch also reportedly stepped down after their allies were defeated in recent internal elections. In May, Fuziah had dismissed speculation of divisions within the party following the results of its division-level elections. The results for all 220 PKR divisions nationwide were recently completed and subsequently confirmed and finalised by the party's central leadership council. Fuziah said PKR had appointed a third-party auditor based overseas to examine the election results, and the findings showed no irregularities.
