LIMA '25 showcases strong US presence, highlights defence ties with Malaysia
US Ambassador to Malaysia Edgard D. Kagan said the presence of American defence and aerospace firms at LIMA '25 further reflects the breadth of US-Malaysia ties beyond the military domain.
'From our aircraft and warships to our companies and innovators, the American presence at LIMA '25 demonstrates our robust military and commercial engagement across the region.
'We are proud to stand with Malaysia as partners, friends, and defenders of a free and open Indo-Pacific,' he said in a statement, published on the official website of the US Embassy in Malaysia.
More than 400 US military personnel are taking part in the biennial exhibition through static displays, aerial demonstrations, and professional exchanges aimed at strengthening regional security and cooperation.
US military units on display include one US Air Force C-130J Hercules from the 36th Airlift Squadron, 374th Airlift Wing, the US Navy's guided-missile destroyer USS Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123), two F/A-18E Super Hornets from Strike Fighter Squadron 137, and one MH-60R from Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 49.
The US Navy's Carrier Air Wing 17, attached to the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, is also involved in aerial demonstrations with two F/A-18s.
Vice Admiral Fred Kacher, Commander of the US 7th Fleet, described Malaysia as a key partner in the Indo-Pacific, citing the countries' continued cooperation through joint naval activities.
'Malaysia continues to be a key partner for us in the Indo-Pacific.
'We conduct numerous exercises and exchanges at sea and ashore between our navies every year to advance our close cooperation and maritime domain awareness that makes both our navies better,' he said.
Rear Admiral Fred Goldhammer, commander of Carrier Strike Group 11, said the reception from Malaysian partners has been exceptional, underscoring the shared commitment to regional stability.
'Our participation in this dynamic showcase of multinational strength is a testament to our ability to operate cohesively across a challenging and evolving maritime landscape.
'Their commitment to regional security and cooperation mirrors our own, and we are honoured to operate alongside them,' he said.
Held from May 20 to 24, LIMA '25 is organised by the Malaysian Defence Ministry and brings together regional and international military, industry, and government leaders to showcase advancements in the maritime and aerospace sectors.
This year's edition marks the largest maritime and aerospace exhibition in Southeast Asia since LIMA was first held in 1991.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
From Laos to Brazil, Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers. But even the winners like Vietnam will pay a price
WASHINGTON (AP): President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught this week left a lot of losers - from small, poor countries like Laos and Algeria to wealthy US trading partners like Canada and Switzerland. They're now facing especially hefty taxes - tariffs - on the products they export to the United States starting Aug. 7. The closest thing to winners may be the countries that caved to Trump's demands - and avoided even more pain. But it's unclear whether anyone will be able to claim victory in the long run - even the United States, the intended beneficiary of Trump's protectionist policies. "In many respects, everybody's a loser here,'' said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at the New York Law School. Barely six months after he returned to the White House, Trump has demolished the old global economic order. Gone is one built on agreed-upon rules. In its place is a system in which Trump himself sets the rules, using America's enormous economic power to punish countries that won't agree to one-sided trade deals and extracting huge concessions from the ones that do. "The biggest winner is Trump,' said Alan Wolff, a former U.S. trade official and deputy director-general at the World Trade Organization. "He bet that he could get other countries to the table on the basis of threats, and he succeeded - dramatically.'' Everything goes back to what Trump calls "Liberation Day'' - April 2 - when the president announced "reciprocal'' taxes of up to 50% on imports from countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and 10% "baseline'' taxes on almost everyone else. He invoked a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency that justified his sweeping import taxes. That allowed him to bypass Congress, which traditionally has had authority over taxes, including tariffs - all of which is now being challenged in court. Trump retreated temporarily after his Liberation Day announcement triggered a rout in financial markets and suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate. Eventually, some of them did, caving to Trump's demands to pay what four months ago would have seemed unthinkably high tariffs for the privilege of continuing to sell into the vast American market. The United Kingdom agreed to 10% tariffs on its exports to the United States - up from 1.3% before Trump amped up his trade war with the world. The US demanded concessions even though it had run a trade surplus, not a deficit, with the UK for 19 straight years. The European Union and Japan accepted U.S. tariffs of 15%. Those are much higher than the low single-digit rates they paid last year - but lower than the tariffs he was threatening (30% on the EU and 25% on Japan). Also cutting deals with Trump and agreeing to hefty tariffs were Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines. Even countries that saw their tariffs lowered from April without reaching a deal are still paying much higher tariffs than before Trump took office. Angola's tariff, for instance, dropped to 15% from 32% in April, but in 2022 it was less than 1.5%. And while Trump administration cut Taiwan's tariff to 20% from 32% in April, the pain will still be felt. "20% from the beginning has not been our goal, we hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Taiwan's president Lai Ching-te told reporters in Taipei Friday. Trump also agreed to reduce the tariff on the tiny southern African kingdom of Lesotho to 15% from the 50% he'd announced in April, but the damage may already have been done there. Countries that didn't knuckle under - and those that found other ways to incur Trump's wrath - got hit harder. Even some of the poor were not spared. Laos' annual economic output comes to $2,100 per person and Algeria's $5,600 - versus America's $75,000. Nonetheless, Laos got rocked with a 40% tariff and Algeria with a 30% levy. Trump slammed Brazil with a 50% import tax largely because he didn't like the way it was treating former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing trial for trying to lose his electoral defeat in 2022. Never mind that the U.S. has exported more to Brazil than it's imported every year since 2007. Trump's decision to plaster a 35% tariff on longstanding U.S. ally Canada was partly designed to threaten Ottawa for saying it would recognize a Palestinian state. Trump is a staunch supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Switzerland was clobbered with a 39% import tax - even higher than the 31% Trump originally announced on April 2. "The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington'' to make a deal, said Wolff, now senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "They're clearly not at all happy.'' Fortunes may change if Trump's tariffs are upended in court. Five American businesses and 12 states are suing the president, arguing that his Liberation Day tariffs exceeded his authority under the 1977 law. In May, the U.S. Court of International Trade , a specialized court in New York, agreed and blocked the tariffs, although the government was allowed to continue collecting them while its appeal wend its way through the legal system, and may likely end up at the U.S. Supreme Court. In a hearing Thursday, the judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sounded skeptical about Trump's justifications for the tariffs. "If (the tariffs) get struck down, then maybe Brazil's a winner and not a loser,'' Appleton said. Trump portrays his tariffs as a tax on foreign countries. But they are actually paid by import companies in the U.S. who try to pass along the cost to their customers via higher prices. True, tariffs can hurt other countries by forcing their exporters to cut prices and sacrifice profits - or risk losing market share in the United States. But economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that overseas exporters have absorbed just one-fifth of the rising costs from tariffs, while Americans and U.S. businesses have picked up the most of the tab. Walmart, Procter & Gamble, Ford, Best Buy, Adidas, Nike, Mattel and Stanley Black & Decker, have all hiked prices due to U.S. tariffs. "This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those who have lower incomes,'' Appleton said. "Sneakers, knapsacks ... your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to up because none of those are made in America.'' Trump's trade war has pushed the average U.S. tariff from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3% now, the highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. And that will impose a $2,400 cost on the average household, the lab estimates. "The US consumer's a big loser,″ Wolff said. -- AP Economics Writer Christopher Rugaber contributed to this story.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Brazil's COP30 call to action
BRAZIL has a noble reason to host COP30, the United Nations annual climate summit, aka Conference of the Parties: to showcase to the international community that multilateral action is the only way to keep the planet liveable. Earlier in July, when hosting the 17th BRICS summit, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva put forward his formula: multilateralism, not the law of the strongest, is the only equitable way to solve global problems. He is right at many levels, but let's take climate change. It recognises no boundaries. What gets burned in one country doesn't just stay there; it heats up the rest of the world. The action of a few nations won't work; it must be the collective effort of all. That means multilateralism must trump the law of the strongest. But by hosting COP30, Brazil has taken on three humongous challenges, all the result of failures caused by preceding COPs. First is the failed promise to triple the capacity of renewable energy, a pledge made at COP28 in Dubai. Second is climate finance, which COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan failed to do much about. Finally, arguably the toughest challenge for Brazil, is to ensure that the 196 countries expected to attend COP30 in the Amazon forest city of Belem put a brake on new investments in fossil fuels so that net zero can be achieved in 2050. Start with the renewable energy pledge made at COP28. Last year, the International Energy Agency (IEA), made media headlines when it warned that its analysis of close to 150 nations' climate action plans led it to conclude that the pledge to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030 will not be met. Meeting the Dubai promise means the world must hit 11,000 gigawatts (GW) by 2030, but IEA's best-case scenario is 8,000GW. The gap may be bridgeable, but worse things have happened since the report was issued, which may widen the gap further. It may not be a bridge too far for Brazil, but to marshal some recalcitrant states would not be easy. Climate finance is equally a mammoth task. It has been an unfulfilled promise for the longest time. According to the 2025 Climate and Catastrophe Insight Report, published by Aon, an insurance company, the world lost US$368 billion to natural disasters last year. The amount is at best an underestimate. Baku, the host of COP29, will be remembered for the wrong thing on climate finance, though it badged itself as a climate finance summit. Instead, it will be remembered for walkouts and protests on climate finance, though a paltry US$300 billion every year for developing countries was eventually agreed. Belem's challenge is to beat Baku to reach US$1.3 trillion that many analysts say is needed. Finally, a giant of a challenge for Brazil: to get the world to do everything needed now to get to net zero by 2050. A tough one for Belem, given that governments around the world are spending trillions of dollars subsidising the fossil fuel industry. What is worse, some countries are putting aside their pledge not to approve any new investments in fossil fuels. This is not the way to slow climate change.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Kuching to have longest riverfront and new landmark garden
Kuching North mayor Hilmy Othman said a 16-hectare floral garden will be developed near Jalan Astana and would be a major public attraction and eco-tourism destination. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The Kuching Waterfront is to be extended and will be Malaysia's longest river waterfront under a development plan by the Kuching North City Hall which includes a 16-hectare floral garden, inspired by Singapore's Gardens by the Bay. Kucing North mayor Hilmy Othman said the extended Kuching Waterfront will run from Sungai Bintangor to the Satok Bridge, the Borneo Post reported. The project is part of plans by the city hall (DBKU) to transform Kuching into a low-carbon, globally competitive capital city under Sarawak's development strategy. The 16-hectare floral garden, one of the headline projects, is to be developed near Jalan Astana. Hilmy said the floral garden would serve as a major public attraction and eco-tourism destination, drawing both tourists and plant lovers. Complementing this is the upcoming Bamboo Gallery, a 25-hectare green architecture and sustainability education centre near Jalan Crookshank. 'These projects aim to preserve the site's natural greenery and heritage,' Hilmy said. He said DBKU would continue investing in infrastructure that blends sustainability with public benefit. The city has already installed more than 2,000 smart streetlights to cut energy use and reduce maintenance costs, along with over 300 CCTVs to boost security. A smart parking system, set to replace the coupon model, is expected to be fully operational by the end of 2025 and integrated into the iDBKU digital platform.
