Contributor: Trump's war on Latinos reaches a new low in abuse of Sen. Alex Padilla
The U.S. population includes an estimated 65.2 million Latinos, nearly a quarter of whom call California home. For over a century, Latinos were absent from the state's two U.S. Senate seats. In 2022, Sen. Alex Padilla reversed the willful neglect of Latino senatorial candidates by both major political parties, winning 61.1% of the vote, more than any other statewide candidate, including Gov. Gavin Newsom.
On Thursday, in the midst of the Trump administration's largest immigration raids to date, Padilla was forcibly removed at a Department of Homeland Security press conference in his hometown, Los Angeles. Manhandled, for daring to exercise his congressional responsibilities. Pushed out of a job-related meeting for asking a question. For many Latinos, the abhorrent treatment of Padilla by the Trump administration is emblematic of a shared grievance: being pushed out of conversations about our lives, our families and our futures.
The Trump administration's immigration raids are squarely a Latino issue. Not because immigration is a Latino issue — all issues are Latino issues — but because Trump's immigration enforcement is and has always been racially motivated. From Trump's campaign announcement in 2015, calling Mexicans rapists and criminals, to his fixation with building a wall across our southern border and having Mexico pay for it, to his 2024 campaign focused on falsehoods about immigrants and criminality, the central narrative has been 'us' versus 'them.'
Immigration is a concern in every city and state, yet Trump's immigration enforcement seems to be exclusively focused on Latino communities. In Los Angeles, Trump's raids are explicitly targeting Latino-majority neighborhoods and cities including Westlake, Paramount and Compton, going beyond data-informed enforcement actions to the racial profiling of Latinos near schools, tending to errands like getting a car washed or sitting in a church parking lot.
Over the last week, Los Angeles has been ground zero for Trump's federal overreach. Padilla's silencing and removal follow refusals to admit four U.S. House representatives at the Los Angeles federal detention center on Saturday and three representatives to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing center in Adelanto on Sunday.
While immigration raids raise serious policy and human rights concerns, the unequal treatment of Latino congressional leaders by the Trump administration represents a different kind of hazard: a test for control of our democratic republic.
America has three co-equal branches: legislative, executive, judiciary. This system of separation of powers and checks and balances is designed to prevent tyranny and ensure a balanced government. For the last five months, the Trump administration has upended our system of governance.
The Trump administration bypassed Congress' budgetary actions by eliminating foreign aid. Trump officials willfully ignored judicial orders. They've blocked sitting members of the House and Senate from entering federal buildings, obstructed them from conducting oversight and undermined their inquiries.
Like Trump's immigration enforcement actions, the administration's overreach is racially motivated. Latinos have long expressed that no one is listening to their needs — that they are left out of the conversation and never at the table where decisions are being made. Research has made clear that Latinos bear the brunt of underrepresentation across important societal institutions such as academia, private enterprise, philanthropy and news media. The list goes on.
Unfortunately, when Latinos achieve positions that ought to wield power — such as Padilla's ascent to the Senate — the positions themselves tend to be diminished, so that — again, like Padilla being silenced at a press conference — the Latinos who gain prominence are denied the power that non-Latinos enjoy in parallel positions. This week's events provide a new chapter in the diminishment of Latino agency and dignity; members of Congress were denied entry to do their jobs, and in the case of Padilla, forcibly removed and detained.
One thing is consistent: the repeated dehumanization of Latinos and their needs. Latinos are not a monolith, but the Trump administration is surely treating us as such. His administration has rolled out a carte blanche attack on Latinos. From Latino community members being stalked and apprehended in Home Depot parking lots, at places of worship or their children's school graduations, to targeted attacks on the sustainability and operations of Latino-led nonprofit organizations, to the physical assault of a U.S. senator. The subjugation of Latinos is currently on full display in Los Angeles, a region that fuels the world's fourth-largest economy (California) and is the global epicenter of media and entertainment. The absence of meaningful Latino participation in shaping narratives, trends and the public imagination is cause for concern.
Any conversation on the fragility of American democracy, the resurgence of fascism and authoritarianism and the future of the Constitution is, inherently, a discourse about Latinos — and about all Americans. So long as Latinos remain silenced, ostracized and relegated to the periphery in conversations about the future of this nation, that future remains bleak. The test of how America responds in real time to the wholesale attack on its second-largest demographic group is now a shared assignment. And the group's leader is Padilla.
Sonja Diaz is a civil rights attorney and co-founder of the Latina Futures 2050 Lab and UCLA Latino Policy & Politics Institute.
If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Musk Rages as Trump Tax Bill Slashes Electric Vehicle Credits
Elon Musk slammed the US Senate's latest version of President Donald Trump's multi-trillion dollar tax bill Saturday, raging online that the cuts to electric vehicle and other clean energy credits would be 'incredibly destructive' to the country. Musk, the chief executive officer of Tesla Inc. and SpaceX, posted on his social media platform X about the bill, which the Senate was planning to put to an initial vote on Saturday. Musk recently left Trump's side after working for several months as the head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's latest trade threat looms over Wall Street as investors celebrate stock market's return to record territory
Major equity indexes including the S&P 500 tallied their first record closing highs in months on Friday — but something happened on the way to the closing bell that left a bad taste in some traders' mouths. Just a couple of hours before trading was set to conclude for the week, President Trump surprised investors with a Truth Social post that briefly sent stocks skittering into the red. 'He doesn't seem to care': My secretive father, 81, added my name to a bank account. What about my mom? My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him? My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life? Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos Tech stocks are powering this record-setting rally on Wall Street — but how long can it last? The president announced that the U.S. would immediately end all trade talks with Canada in retaliation for Ottawa imposing a digital-services tax on American technology giants. 'Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately. We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,' Trump said in the post. Although it may have been incidental, the timing of the post didn't sit well with some on Wall Street. Even though stocks had shaken off most of the losses by the closing bell, some investors couldn't help but wonder whether the market's remarkable comeback rally might have emboldened Trump to once again take a more aggressive tack on trade. If that was in fact the case, it could go a long way toward undoing much of the progress that has been made in markets over the past couple of months. Trump blamed turmoil in financial markets for his decision to walk back many of his most troublesome 'liberation day' tariffs in April after the S&P 500 tumbled right to the edge of bear-market territory, while ructions in the bond market stoked widespread alarm. Ultimately, the decision to hit the pause button helped inspire the concept of the 'TACO' trade. In this case, TACO stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' See: The 'Trump always chickens out' trade is the talk of Wall Street. Here's one way to play it. But now that things have calmed down, could the TACO trade return — but this time, in reverse? 'If you think about it, he shifted when the market fell,' said George Cipolloni, a veteran portfolio manager, during a phone interview with MarketWatch Friday afternoon. 'He probably feels like he has a bit of wiggle room because the stock market has done so well over the past couple of months.' It isn't just markets. Cipolloni also pointed out that inflation has remained relatively tame since Trump imposed the first tariffs of his second term earlier this year, defying the expectations of many economists. That price pressures have yet to significantly surface in the data could also encourage Trump to consider taking a hard line on tariffs as he seeks political victories he can bring home to his base. Additional tariff revenue, in theory, could help offset the budgetary impact of his signature budget plan to extend tax cuts passed during his first term in office — unless parts of the economy, like farmers, require another round of significant federal bailouts due in part to tariffs. To be sure, the latest official economic data released this week included some signs of weakness that investors might want to consider, according to Mike O'Rourke, chief market strategist with Jones Trading. Revised first-quarter GDP, released earlier in the week, showed the economy contracted by more than previously believed between the beginning of January and the end of March. Then on Friday, new data showed personal spending declined in May for the first time in four months, while a reading on core inflation came in slightly hotter than expected. Although the inflation reading didn't exactly move the needle, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell did say during congressional testimony earlier in the week that he expected tariffs to start to show up in the inflation data some time this summer. So far, investors have been mostly happy to tune out the constant noise regarding the administration's trade agenda as the Trump team pursued its goal of '90 trade deals in 90 days' as first touted back in April, O'Rourke said. In late May, Trump announced plans to slap a 50% tariff on E.U. imports, before quickly backing down after European leaders promised to speed up talks. Pain for stocks during that episode was pretty short-lived. On Friday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said during an interview that the U.S. and China had completed an accord negotiated last month in Geneva, and added that deals with 10 major trading partners would be announced imminently. Investors will be keeping a close eye on how things go with Canada, and a deal with the E.U. remains top of mind as well, O'Rourke said. Given Trump's unpredictable nature, it is impossible to say with certainty what might happen next. O'Rourke thinks there is almost no chance that Trump will allow the 'liberation day' levies to return. Indeed, Trump himself said earlier that he might not stick to the deadline. But with so much about Trump's trade agenda still up in the air, investors may want to consider taking some chips off the table. 'It's very easy for the tariff situation to come back into play, and this could be the first shot across the bow here,' O'Rourke said about Trump's decision to end talks with Canada. 'The way investors have to look at this is: Do you want to roll the dice here?' The S&P 500 SPX gained 32.05 points, or 0.5%, to finish at 6,173.07 on Friday — a record close, and the index's first since Feb. 19, Dow Jones Market Data showed. The Nasdaq Composite COMP rose by 105.55 points, or 0.5%, to 20,273.46, its own first record close since Dec. 16. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA also finished higher, although it remained shy of record territory. The trade truce between the U.S. and China, strong consumer-confidence data from the University of Michigan, and investors' positive reaction to earnings from Nike Inc. NKE were just some of the factors that helped push stocks higher on Friday, according to Farzin Azarm, a managing director at Mizuho Securities USA. Reports about a coming U.S.-E.U. trade deal and an administration plan to boost energy availability for the purpose of powering the expansion of artificial-intelligence technology also helped, Azarm noted. 'I am horrified': My company won't allow me to tip more than 15% for Ubers. Do I explain this to the driver? JPMorgan has a new way of forecasting the stock market — and there's a surprising finding My cousin died before claiming his late father's $2 million estate. Will I be next in line for this inheritance? S&P 500 scores record high for first time in 4 months. What could push stocks higher from here? Coinbase's stock is up over 40% this month as Wall Street projects amazing profit growth


UPI
26 minutes ago
- UPI
Proposed federal budget would limit access to student loans
Students take photos in their caps and gowns at Columbia University in New York City on April 26, 2024. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 28 (UPI) -- The latest version of the Senate's federal budget reconciliation bill would limit the availability of student loans for future borrowers by revising federal student loan programs and regulations. The budget bill that already has passed the House of Representatives and the Senate version would place a maximum amount on how much people could borrow through the federal Parent PLUS and graduate student loans to help them pay for their college educations. The House-approved version would limit undergraduate borrowing to $50,000, while the Senate version would limit that amount to $65,000. Graduate students would see limits of $100,000 for most master's programs, while the borrowing limit for professional degrees would be $150,000 in the House version and $200,000 in the Senate bill. Supporters of the proposed limits say they could save taxpayers more than $300 billion and make it harder for college and university administrators to raise tuition costs and fees. Opponents say it would make it harder for disadvantaged students to attend college. "It's abundantly clear that the budget reconciliation package would reduce access to higher education and healthcare and jeopardize [the University of California's] ability to carry out its public service mission," Chris Harrington, U.C. associate vice president for Federal Governmental Relations, said on Monday in a letter to the state's House delegation in May. The House-approved bill would eliminate Pell Grants for part-time students, subsidized loans for undergrads and Graduate PLUS loans for graduate and professional students, according to the University of California. It also would limit eligibility for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid benefits for low-income students. The Senate's version of the proposed fiscal year 2026 budget reconciliation bill numbers 940 pages and might be voted on as soon as Saturday night.