Russian navy Maj. Gen. Mikhail Gudkov killed near Ukraine border
Major General Mikhail Gudkov, deputy head of the Russian military, was killed in an operation near the border. Russian defense ministry said the operation in the western Kursk region was "combat work." It gave no further details. The region borders Ukraine's Sumy region.
It's one of the most high-profile losses by Russia since it invaded Ukraine in February 2022.
Russian President Vladimir Putin appointed Gudkov to his post in March.
Oleg Kozhemyako, governor of the Primorsky region, announced the death on Telegram. He said 10 others also were killed. Kozhemyako described Gudkov as loyal and said he died "carrying out his duty."
Four or more missiles may have struck the base, and several senior officers were killed in the attack. The base was near the village of Korenevo, about 19 miles from the front.
Gudkov had led the 155th Marine Brigade, a unit on the front line that was often replenished because so many in the unit have been killed. The unit has been accused of war crimes by Kyiv, including the execution of nine Ukrainian prisoners of war last summer and possibly two other POWs.
The unit took part in the attempt to take Kyiv, which failed. In 2023, it was in Vuhledar, where it was accused of more war crimes. It then redeployed to Kursk when the Ukraine military moved into the Russian region.
So far, at least 10 Russian major generals or lieutenant generals have been killed in the war.
On June 29, Ukrainian F-16 pilot Lt. Colonel Maksym Ustymenko, 31, was killed when his fighter jet was damaged trying to intercept Russian missiles and drones.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Fighter Jets Intercept Planes Breaching Trump No Fly Zone
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Five aircraft breached restricted airspace over New Jersey on Saturday, the U.S. military said, as President Donald Trump spent the weekend in Bedminster. Why It Matters The U.S. military polices the airspace around the president, including over Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort or his Bedminster golf course, when the Republican is in residence. The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), made up of American and Canadian forces, has frequently intercepted aircraft that violate temporary restrictions in the airspace around the president. What To Know The First Air Force at Florida's Tyndall Air Force Base said in a statement on Saturday that a NORAD fighter jet had intercepted a "general aviation aircraft" over Bedminster at approximately 2:39 p.m. EDT. This is a broad term referring to non-commercial civilian aircraft. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, en route to Bedminster, New Jersey, on July 4, 2025. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, en route to Bedminster, New Jersey, on July 4, 2025. AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin A temporary flight restriction, or TFR, was in place, the military said. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) puts out Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) to air crews, which are enforced by NORAD. TFRs are typically put in place during presidential visits. The fighter jet carried out what is known as a "headbutt maneuver" to get the attention of the civilian pilot before escorting the aircraft out of the area, the military said. This is a fairly typical maneuver for NORAD jets enforcing temporary restrictions in the airspace around where the president is. The NORAD aircraft was an F-16, a spokesperson told Reuters. The U.S. military had already reported three TFR violations earlier in the day, and a further incident later on Saturday brought the total to "five unauthorized incursions," according to the statement. The FAA, as of early Sunday, had restrictions in place from July 4 until July 6. Pilots in the air are responsible for making sure they check Notices to Airmen, or NOTAMs. Shortly after NORAD F-16 aircraft intercepted a civilian aircraft over Palm Beach, Florida, in early March, the command's chief, General Gregory Guillot, condemned what he termed the "excessive number of recent TFR violations." NORAD said at the time that in the less than two months since Trump's inauguration, NORAD had "responded to over 20 tracks of interest entering the Palm Beach, Florida TFR area." What People Are Saying The First Air Force said in a post to social media on Saturday: "These TFRs are in place for a reason. No excuses! Stay sharp, stay legal, and stay out of restricted airspace." What Happens Next NORAD will continue to enforce FAA flight restrictions.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California's resistance to Trump: This could be our finest hour
The speech a California leader should give. Apologies to Winston Churchill. From the moment President Donald Trump's raids began, it became clear that the U.S. regime has declared war against California. It's hard to accept this truth. Because we Californians have done nothing — not one thing — to justify the national government sending secret police and thousands of military personnel to attack us. Trump is offering no conditions and proposing no negotiations to end this war. That's because the war itself is Trump's goal, a realization of his violent delusions and desire for unchecked power. He is invading California for the same reason Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine — because the Golden State is a sovereign entity that won't accept dictatorship. Our existence threatens his tyranny. Trump is following Putin's playbook. Both lie the same way, blaming imaginary invaders for wars they themselves started. Trump, like Putin, has launched a war using deceit. In 2014, Russia sent its soldiers into Crimea with their faces masked, wearing unmarked uniforms and without identification, creating confusion about who they were. Trump's Homeland Security agents are also masked, favor unmarked vehicles, refuse to identify themselves and lie about their attacks on local people (even those captured on video). Trump, like Putin, is targeting regional and local elected leaders with violence, arrest and removal from office. Trump also seeks to destroy our economy — he arrests and disappears vital workers, cuts off funding for disaster and imposes illegal tariffs. And, just as Putin systematically takes Ukrainian children from families and sends them to Russia, Trump separates children from parents. Californians are underdogs in Trump's war, just as Ukrainians are in Russia's war. We face the world's largest military, and we have no army. Trump has lawlessly seized control of our California National Guard, which is supposed to defend us in emergencies. The courts don't help. While judges rule in California's favor in some cases, Trump ignores some orders and delays response to others. Congress won't save us. Trump's secret police assaulted our senior U.S. senator in a federal office building, and Trump-aligned colleagues falsely blamed the victim. Our very own local police seem to side with the regime. In Los Angeles, the sheriffs and police departments have fired their 'less lethal' weapons not against lawless federal agents kidnapping our people — but against Californians protecting our neighbors. The good news is that you and I can win this war. In some ways, we are already winning; Trump has sent his secret police and his troops, and still we are not conquered. Indeed, I declare here and now that we will win, because we have no other option than victory. As Albert Camus wrote: 'The moment despair is alone, pure, sure of itself, pitiless in its consequences, it has a merciless power.' We Californians must channel our despair at being attacked into winning a war not of our choosing. Collectively, we ought to muster our discipline to remain nonviolent. We will need to answer federal punches and tear gas with songs and prayers, even when the reward for our nonviolence will be more lies and violence from the Trump regime. We must play defense until this invading enemy loses heart and begins to retreat. Then we must do more: We must seize ground. We should march upon any federal facility where we expect our fellow Californians are being held in conditions that may constitute torture. We are Americans and taxpayers, and those buildings belong to us, and those detained are our neighbors. And when federal officials threaten us, let us protest more, insist more, demand more. These are our rights, and no one can take them away. In this fight, we will need allies. Trump is alienating most of the world, so we should send emissaries abroad to ask for help. We need money and trade to blunt the effects of Trump's economic war. We need tech and intelligence to monitor federal forces. We must convince other countries to exert economic, diplomatic and even military pressure until the secret police and troops are out of California. All this will not be enough. Californians must use seduction, too. While we loathe the regime, we must befriend individual federal agents and soldiers. When safe, we should invite them to our parties, barbecues and ball games. Trump tells them lies about Californians, so let these federal occupiers get to know us. Some may join our side. We shall defend our California, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches. We shall fight on the freeways and the surface streets. We shall fight in the car washes and the Home Depot parking lots. We shall fight at food trucks and on farms, in bars, restaurants and dispensaries. We shall never surrender. This may be the most dangerous time in California history. Let us bear ourselves so that, if our Golden State lasts another thousand years, future Californians will look back and say, 'That was our finest hour.'
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
NATO is pouring new spending into much-needed air defenses. Money alone won't fix the West's problems.
NATO plans to invest money from soaring alliance defense spending into a fivefold increase in air defenses, but revitalizing capabilities ignored since the end of the Cold War is easier said than done. NATO sorely needs air defenses. Secretary General Mark Rutte said Europe does "not have enough," outlining "clear gaps" in command and control, long-range weapons, and sensor systems, all while Russia's military growth is "really threatening." The way Russia is fighting in Ukraine and the reconstitution of its military have led to greater urgency in NATO. Defense experts say higher spending is warranted, especially on ground-based air defenses, but the alliance can't expect a quick fix from money alone. The West needs air defenses and big missile stocks Russia's invasion, specifically its relentless attacks on Ukrainian cities, shows air defenses are needed in a major conflict. For the West, worried about Russia and China, it's a wake-up call. The West scaled back air defenses in recent decades as it battled weaker adversaries that posed no major air threat. However, Russia's bombardments, sometimes using hundreds of missiles and drones, show the West must be ready for the same. It's not yet. "NATO faces a significant shortfall in ground-based air defense systems," both with the number of systems and ammunition supplies for them, Justin Bronk, an airpower expert at the Royal United Services Institute, said. NATO is acting, but investments don't mean weaponry can actually be made quickly. Bronk said fixing the issue "is much more a question of building production capacity at every stage in the supply chain as rapidly as possible as part of a crisis response rather than just spending more money." "Currently, there just isn't enough production capacity in the world of Patriot interceptors, SAMP/T interceptors," he said, referring to surface-to-air missiles for eliminating air threats. Struggling with production woes not easily fixed Following the Cold War, the West's defense manufacturing and industrial prowess atrophied. Companies consolidated, specialized production lines closed, workforces shrank, and inventories decreased — all crippling the ability to surge weapons. Work is underway to boost production. For instance, Lockheed Martin expanded PAC-3 interceptor production for the Patriot system to 500 missiles in 2024, then a new production high, with plans to grow production further. Boeing upped seeker production, and Raytheon is boosting PAC-2 interceptor output, though it grapples with massive backlogs. Rheinmetall and Lockheed Martin plan to establish a European missile production hub, including the PAC-3 used by Patriots. Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger told German newspaper Hartpunkt that Europe has struggled getting missiles from the US because of production shortfalls there. He said the wait could sometimes be 10 years, describing that as far too long. It won't start full missile production until 2027, and Papperger said he expects its engine producing capacity will be quickly used up. For the Patriots, demand pretty consistently outpaces supply. And clearing backlogs isn't quick. European defense company MBDA, which makes ASTER air defense missiles and other products, saw orders double since Russia's invasion. In April, Fortune reported that its backlog was projected to take up to seven years at current capacity. The Financial Times reported the company's plans to double the number of hours worked and hire more, but CEO Éric Béranger also wants more action. He called this a "moment of truth" for Europe and said: "We need to be much more industrial." Decreased production capacity has been "a tremendous problem in the United States," said Mark Cancian, a senior advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "You can sign all the contracts you want, but the production capability is lacking." It takes time to make top-of-the-line interceptors Even if more companies boost production, manufacturing sophisticated weaponry simply is not quick. Thomas Laliberty, Raytheon's president of land and air defense systems, told Politico last year that it takes 12 months to build a Patriot radar, just one part of an operational battery. Sophistication is a key issue. Bronk said missiles designed to attack are easier to build: "It's much, much cheaper to build offensive missiles than it is to build defensive interceptor coverage." The price reflects that sophistication: Naval interceptors, like the SM-series, can cost up to almost $30 million a missile. Defense systems are "some of the most sophisticated bits of hardware that militaries have, and producing them takes time with pretty skilled labor," former Australian Army Maj. Gen. Mick Ryan, a warfare strategist, explained. Increasing production enough "will be a challenge," he said. There are steps forward, but challenges remain The alliance is taking steps in the right direction. Retired Air Commodore Andrew Curtis, an airfare expert with a 35-year career in the Royal Air Force, said countries speaking confidently gives the industry the reassurance it wants to invest. "Governments are now talking the right language," he said. The industry saw investing in production facilities during the Cold War as "a sound business," as demand was there. But that changed. He said the industry would not invest long-term in expensive facilities that require skilled workers "with no guaranteed orders at the end of it." Increased cooperation is also needed. NATO has cultural problems, with countries working separately. Jan Kallberg, a security expert at the Center for European Policy Analysis, said "the major challenge in NATO is not money, it's coordination." Multiple companies working on similar systems means doubling up on some expenses, and makes scaling up harder, Kallberg said. Fixing that "would free up a tremendous lot of resources." Military officials want greater collaboration. A US general last month urged defense firms to coordinate more and "stop selling us pieces of the puzzle." Progress is happening: More companies and countries are working together. The Nordic countries are integrating their air defenses to act as one, and with joint air defense planning. Changes are taking place at the top level. The European Commission is proposing new measures to cut red tape, encourage joint purchases, and facilitate billions of investments. But challenges remain. Kallberg warned: "Culture takes far more time to change than just buying hardware."
