Prosecutors toss major trafficking case after New Bedford police accused of misconduct with informant
David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
The misconduct cited in the dismissal was first exposed in
While she was secretly seeing Lucas, Medeiros alleges, the detective was using information gleaned from her – without her knowledge – to build a drug trafficking case against Ortiz, her fiance.
Advertisement
In court Friday morning, Bristol County prosecutor Patrick Driscoll told Bristol County Judge Renee P. Dupuis he couldn't 'in good faith go forward' with the case because of the involvement of Medeiros and Lucas.
'Their involvement in the case has tainted the case, they can't be cut out, and it taints the entire investigation and therefore dismissal is the appropriate remedy,' Driscoll said.
Bristol County prosecutor Patrick Driscoll.
David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
Driscoll declined to speak with the Globe following the hearing, and refused to answer several questions as he exited the courthouse.
Advertisement
The New Bedford Police Department's misuse of informants is the focus of a recent Globe Spotlight series,
The state's about-face Friday came after Boston attorney Rosemary Scapicchio, who represented Ortiz, told Dupuis she was prepared to prove extensive misconduct by New Bedford Police -- including that one detective had perjured himself in a previous hearing.
'We were ready to make our case, and we would've made a very strong case, in my opinion, showing the rampant misconduct in that police department,' Scapicchio told the Globe following the hearing. 'The police officers were lying, and they knew we were going to expose their lies. And ultimately the Commonwealth, I think, made a decision that they couldn't go forward based on what had happened.'
The investigation into Ortiz, dubbed 'Operation High Stakes,' initially seemed like a big score for local authorities. Spanning a year and involving agents from at least five local, state, and federal agencies, the case came to a dramatic conclusion in June 2017, when Ortiz was arrested.
In all, authorities arrested 21 people as part of the probe, and seized about a pound of heroin and fentanyl. At the time, Bristol County District Attorney Thomas M. Quinn III called it 'another example of law enforcement agencies working together to investigate drug dealing activity that fuels 'the opiate epidemic.''
But cracks in the case began to emerge several years later, when Medeiros – examining court records – came to believe that she was the confidential informant at the heart of the case.
Advertisement
In 2022, she contacted the Globe, which detailed her allegations in
A New Bedford Police internal affairs investigation – prompted by the Globe's reporting – later confirmed the crux of Medeiros's story: That for years, she'd maintained a sexual relationship with Lucas – even as the detective was using her as a confidential informant.
Friday's dismissal marks the second Bristol County drug trafficking case to fall as a result of Lucas's improper relationship with Medeiros.
Last June, after the Globe story about the Lucas-Medeiros relationship, charges of heroin dealing against Miguel Martinez of New Bedford were dropped after the judge in the case excoriated Lucas for 'gross misconduct.'
In that case, Medeiros testified that she'd been instructed by Lucas and another New Bedford detective, Kevin Barbosa, to plant drugs and cash on Martinez.
'[Lucas's] disregard for police department policy regarding informants lacked the very integrity required for the search warrant process to maintain legitimacy,' Judge Renee Dupuis wrote in her decision.
Judge Renee P. Dupuis.
David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
But until Friday, prosecutors had been undeterred in their pursuit of Ortiz.
In the nearly eight years since his arrest, authorities have fended off numerous legal challenges aimed at undermining the investigation.
Dugan Arnett can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Most cases dismissed because of the work stoppage by lawyers were misdemeanors. Should prosecutors reopen them?
Advertisement While the mounting number of dismissals prompted prosecutors to warn of risks to public safety, a Globe analysis of the dropped cases shows a more mundane reality: the high proportion of low-level crimes clogging the court system, particularly the district courts where the work stoppage is concentrated. About three-quarters of the 100 dismissed cases involved misdemeanors rather than felonies, closely mirroring the most recent statewide data of all charges filed in district courts. A little more than one-quarter of the cases involved assaults, including 12 that allegedly included a dangerous weapon and nine involving allegations of domestic violence. Now, as the Suffolk district attorney's office begins an effort to reopen those cases, defense attorneys say there needs to be a balance struck between public safety and due process. Advertisement The cases were dismissed without prejudice, meaning prosecutors can recharge them. The Suffolk district attorney's office has vowed to re-prosecute the accused and the office said Friday it's already begun to file motions to reopen some cases. 'The past week saw escalating threats to public safety through additional dismissals and releases, continued disruption of our ability to secure justice for victims, and ongoing inaccessibility of Constitutionally mandated representation for indigent defendants,' Suffolk District Attorney Kevin Hayden said in a statement Friday. 'This is an unprecedented — and deeply disturbing — moment for our prosecutors and victim witness advocates, who come to work each day intent on helping victims and protecting the public from dangerous offenders.' The Committee for Public Counsel Services, the state public defender agency, said prosecutors and the courts should take a cue from the pandemic years, when the various sides worked together to reduce the number of prosecutions and people sent to jail. 'We are once again facing a crisis, and to get through this, we can't pretend that the same old processes are either effective or reasonable,' said Chief Counsel Anthony Benedetti in a statement. 'Clogging the system with cases that do not need to be there only exacerbates a crisis that we are working to remedy. When public safety is discussed, what gets lost is the fact that our clients are members of the public, and they are presumed innocent and merely accused of crimes.' He continued, 'Public safety requires due process, and it's harder to provide that when the system is full of cases that don't belong there.' The analysis of the dismissed cases illustrates a longstanding truth, lawyers said: Many people churning through the criminal justice system are facing charges involving petty offenses that carry little punishment. Advertisement 'For the most part, these folks would ultimately not serve any time,' Boston College Law professor Robert Bloom said. Before being told of the results of the Globe's analysis, Bloom predicted that simple drug possession, disorderly conduct, shoplifting, and motor vehicle charges such as driving on a suspended license would be heavily represented. Indeed, they are: The most common one was drug possession, alone accounting for 16 dismissed cases. Eight more are shoplifting alone, and eight are for allegations of motor vehicle infractions. 'The truth of the matter is, the ultimate disposition of most of these crimes will be probation, suspended sentence, continued without a finding,' he said. All of those typically don't involve jail time unless someone reoffends. The justice system is entering a third month of In total, 49 people have been released through the protocol over multiple hearings over the past month. The tensions caused by the work stoppage play out in court documents and hearings for dismissals and releases. On one hand, there's the reality that hundreds of people charged with crimes of addiction and poverty do not have access to a lawyer, and, at times, have sat in jail while the courts sought to find them one. Advertisement 'Very, very depressing,' said Edith Otero, 52, who had just been released at Lowell District Court after 12 days in custody. She was arrested for a probation violation related to a 2019 drug conviction. In jail, said Otero, who uses a wheelchair, 'I did nothing. I just waited. I just waited.' In other instances, prosecutors have stressed that a broad approach to culling cases creates a public safety risk. The public defenders office is prioritizing lawyers for the most troubling charges, which allows those cases to proceed as normal. Many serious felony cases involving sexual assault or major violence are moved to Superior Court, where court-appointed attorneys are paid a higher rate and are generally still taking cases. No cases involving allegations of sexual assault were dismissed, though one included a charge of open and gross lewdness. But allegations of violence and abuse were included among some of the dismissed cases. And once dismissed, officials cannot impose conditions intended to protect public safety, such as GPS monitoring or orders to stay away from alleged victims or witnesses. The dismissed cases include 28 alleged assaults, half of which are felonies; four involve allegations of assault and battery on a police officer. Nine cases included allegations of assault and battery by a family member, one of a Dorchester man accused of telling his pregnant girlfriend he'll 'personally do an abortion' and then punching her in the stomach. The woman could not be reached for comment about the dismissal. Advertisement In another case, a woman was accused of using cologne and a lighter to create a makeshift flamethrower to burn her nephew. She was reported to police by her mother, who did not respond to a message seeking comment about the dismissal. Sometimes the realities are complex: Prosecutors had sought to instead find a lawyer for a domestic assault and battery case in Dorchester that was up for dismissal, stressing it was a 'a very upsetting and frustrating situation.' But they couldn't, and the case was dismissed. Reached by phone Friday, the woman who was allegedly struck in the incident said: 'I'm happy that the case is dismissed. We're a happy couple. We had an argument. I didn't want it to become a big thing.' In Boston Municipal Court central division downtown, a woman anxiously awaited a hearing in her son's case. He'd been in custody for more than seven days on a probation violation, she said, and did not have a lawyer. 'Honestly, people in the public seem kind of glad about it,' she said of people remaining in jail. 'But they've gotta have due process.' Sean Cotter can be reached at
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
American freed from Venezuela in prisoner swap was convicted of triple murder
One of the 10 Americans released from Venezuela in a prisoner swap last week was convicted of killing three people in Spain and was serving a 30-year sentence in a Venezuelan prison before his release, Spanish and Venezuelan officials told ABC News. Dahud Hanid Ortiz, 54, was convicted in Venezuela of killing three people in a Madrid law office in 2016, according to the Spanish Interior Ministry and the Venezuelan vice president's office. Spanish authorities said Ortiz stabbed to death two female employees and a client of the law firm in June 2016. Authorities said Ortiz was looking for the lawyer who ran the office, who was away at the time. MORE: Migrants sent to El Salvador's CECOT returned to Venezuela in prisoner swap, 10 Americans freed: Officials Speaking on Venezuelan TV on Thursday, Venezuela's Justice Minister Diosdado Cabello said U.S. officials were told about Ortiz's conviction but said they still wanted him released. The U.S. was aware of Ortiz' past but made the decision to bring him out in the swap anyway, according to a U.S. official familiar with the matter. The swap involved the exchange of 10 Americans held in Venezuela for the release of more than 200 Venezuelan migrants who had been deported from the U.S. and sent to El Salvador's CECOT prison. MORE: Venezuelan migrant files claim over deportation to notorious CECOT prison The U.S. official said the administration's focus was getting Americans out of Venezuela's notorious prisons. All told, eight of the 10 Americans freed last week were officially classified by the U.S. government as "wrongfully detained." Ortiz was not classified as such, the official said. As part of a previous 2023 prisoner swap between the U.S. and Venezuela, Ortiz was supposed to be sent to Spain to be tried for the killings -- but that never materialized. Ortiz, who had been arrested in Venezuela in 2018, was sentenced for the 2016 killing on Jan. 9, 2024 in Caracas.
3 days ago
American freed from Venezuela in prisoner swap was convicted of triple murder
One of the 10 Americans released from Venezuela in a prisoner swap last week was convicted of killing three people in Spain and was serving a 30-year sentence in a Venezuelan prison before his release, Spanish and Venezuelan officials told ABC News. Dahud Hanid Ortiz, 54, was convicted in Venezuela of killing three people in a Madrid law office in 2016, according to the Spanish Interior Ministry and the Venezuelan vice president's office. Spanish authorities said Ortiz stabbed to death two female employees and a client of the law firm in June 2016. Authorities said Ortiz was looking for the lawyer who ran the office, who was away at the time. Speaking on Venezuelan TV on Thursday, Venezuela's Justice Minister Diosdado Cabello said U.S. officials were told about Ortiz's conviction but said they still wanted him released. The U.S. was aware of Ortiz' past but made the decision to bring him out in the swap anyway, according to a U.S. official familiar with the matter. The swap involved the exchange of 10 Americans held in Venezuela for the release of more than 200 Venezuelan migrants who had been deported from the U.S. and sent to El Salvador's CECOT prison. The U.S. official said the administration's focus was getting Americans out of Venezuela's notorious prisons. All told, eight of the 10 Americans freed last week were officially classified by the U.S. government as "wrongfully detained." Ortiz was not classified as such, the official said. As part of a previous 2023 prisoner swap between the U.S. and Venezuela, Ortiz was supposed to be sent to Spain to be tried for the killings -- but that never materialized. Ortiz, who had been arrested in Venezuela in 2018, was sentenced for the 2016 killing on Jan. 9, 2024 in Caracas.
