US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump
Democratic President Joe Biden handed out subsidies to chipmakers and electric vehicle manufacturers. Republican President Donald Trump is building a wall of import taxes — tariffs — around the U.S. economy to protect domestic industry from foreign competition.
Yet American manufacturing has been stuck in a rut for nearly three years. And it remains to be seen whether the trend will reverse itself.
The U.S. Labor Department reports that American factories shed 7,000 jobs in June for the second month in a row. Manufacturing employment is on track to drop for the third straight year.
The Institute for Supply Management, an association of purchasing managers, reported that manufacturing activity in the United States shrank in June for the fourth straight month. In fact, U.S. factories have been in decline for 30 of the 32 months since October 2022, according to ISM.
'The past three years have been a real slog for manufacturing,'' said Eric Hagopian, CEO of Pilot Precision Products, a maker of industrial cutting tools in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. 'We didn't get destroyed like we did in the recession of 2008. But we've been in this stagnant, sort of stationary environment.''
Big economic factors contributed to the slowdown: A surge in inflation, arising from the unexpectedly strong economic recovery from COVID-19, raised factory expenses and prompted the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates 11 times in 2022 and 2023. The higher borrowing costs added to the strain.
Government policy was meant to help.
Biden's tax incentives for semiconductor and clean energy production triggered a factory-building boom – investment in manufacturing facilities more than tripled from April 2021 through October 2024 – that seemed to herald a coming surge in factory production and hiring. Eventually anyway.
But the factory investment spree has faded as the incoming Trump administration launched trade wars and, working with Congress, ended Biden's subsidies for green energy. Now, predicts Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, 'manufacturing production will continue to flatline.'
'If production is flat, that suggests manufacturing employment will continue to slide,' Zandi said. 'Manufacturing is likely to suffer a recession in the coming year.''
Meanwhile, Trump is attempting to protect U.S. manufacturers — and to coax factories to relocate and produce in America — by imposing tariffs on goods made overseas. He slapped 50% taxes on steel and aluminum, 25% on autos and auto parts, 10% on many other imports.
In some ways, Trump's tariffs can give U.S. factories an edge. Chris Zuzick, vice president at Waukesha Metal Products, said the Sussex, Wisconsin-based manufacturer is facing stiff competition for a big contract in Texas. A foreign company offers much lower prices. But 'when you throw the tariff on, it gets us closer,'' Zuzick said. 'So that's definitely a situation where it's beneficial.''
But American factories import and use foreign products, too – machinery, chemicals, raw materials like steel and aluminum. Taxing those inputs can drive up costs and make U.S producers less competitive in world markets.
Consider steel. Trump's tariffs don't just make imported steel more expensive. By putting the foreign competition at a disadvantage, the tariffs allow U.S. steelmakers to raise prices – and they have. U.S.-made steel was priced at $960 per metric ton as of June 23, more than double the world export price of $440 per ton, according to industry monitor SteelBenchmarker.
In fact, U.S. steel prices are so high that Pilot Precision Products has continued to buy the steel it needs from suppliers in Austria and France — and pay Trump's tariff.
Trump has also created considerable uncertainty by repeatedly tweaking and rescheduling his tariffs. Just before new import taxes were set to take effect on dozens of countries on July 9, for example, the president pushed the deadline back to Aug. 1 to allow more time for negotiation with U.S. trading partners.
The flipflops have left factories, suppliers and customers bewildered about where things stand. Manufacturers voiced their complaints in the ISM survey: 'Customers do not want to make commitments in the wake of massive tariff uncertainty,'' a fabricated metal products company said.
'Tariffs continue to cause confusion and uncertainty for long-term procurement decisions,'' added a computer and electronics firm. 'The situation remains too volatile to firmly put such plans into place.''
Some may argue that things aren't necessarily bad for U.S. manufacturing; they've just returned to normal after a pandemic-related bust and boom.
Factories slashed nearly 1.4 million jobs in March and April 2020 when COVID-19 forced many businesses to shut down and Americans to stay home. Then a funny thing happened: American consumers, cooped up and flush with COVID relief checks from the government, went on a spending spree, snapping up manufactured goods like air fryers, patio furniture and exercise machines.
Suddenly, factories were scrambling to keep up. They brought back the workers they laid off – and then some. Factories added 379,000 jobs in 2021 — the most since 1994 — and then tacked on another 357,000 in 2022.
But in 2023, factory hiring stopped growing and began backtracking as the economy returned to something closer to the pre-pandemic normal.
In the end, it was a wash. Factory payrolls last month came to 12.75 million, almost exactly where they stood in February 2020 (12.74 million) just before COVID slammed the economy.
'It's a long, strange trip to get back to where we started,'' said Jared Bernstein, chair of Biden's White House Council of Economic Advisers.
Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products said that it will take time to see if Trump's tariffs succeed in bringing factories back to America.
'The fact is that manufacturing doesn't turn on a dime,'' he said. 'It takes time to switch gears.''
Hagopian at Pilot Precision is hopeful that tax breaks in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill will help American manufacturing regain momentum.
'There may be light at the end of the tunnel that may not be a locomotive bearing down,'' he said.
For now, manufacturers are likely to delay big decisions on investing or bringing on new workers until they see where Trump's tariffs settle and what impact they have on the economy, said Ned Hill, professor emeritus in economic development at Ohio State University.
'With all this uncertainty about what the rest of the year is going to look like,'' he said, 'there's a hesitancy to hire people just to lay them off in the near future.''
'Everyone,'' said Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products, 'is kind of just waiting for the new normal.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump promised to lower energy costs – his tax bill will raise them for people in red states the most
The cost of electricity is poised to surge across the US in the wake of Republican legislation that takes an axe to cheap renewable energy, with people in states who voted for Donald Trump last year to be hardest hit by the increase in bills. As air conditioners crank up across the US during another sweltering summer amid an unfolding climate crisis, rising energy costs will become even more severe for households due to the reconciliation spending bill passed by Republicans in Congress and signed by Trump, who called it the 'big, beautiful bill', on 4 July. By stripping away support for cheap solar and wind energy production, the legislation is set to cause electricity rates paid by families and businesses, many already struggling to pay their bills, to rise by much as 18% by 2035, according to an analysis by Energy Innovation, an energy and climate policy thinktank. Household energy costs, which span electricity and gas use, will rise by $170 on average every year by 2035, the report finds, with Republican-leaning states bearing the brunt of the increases. Bills in Missouri will spike the most, by $640 a year, with the next largest increases – in Kentucky, South Carolina, Oklahoma, North Carolina and Texas – all also hitting states that voted for Trump in last year's presidential election. Trump won the election, in part, by promising to lower inflation and cut US energy costs in half within a year. In office, he has sought to boost fossil fuel consumption while slashing incentives for clean energy projects and barring them from federal lands. 'I don't want windmills destroying our place,' the president said last month. 'I don't want these solar things where they go for miles and they cover up a half a mountain that are ugly as hell.' But the Republican bill's wiping out of tax credits for renewables will stymie wind and solar projects that are typically now cheaper than gas or coal, forcing utilities to rely more heavily on existing, inefficient gas generators, Energy Innovation said. This will push up energy costs across the US, particularly in states that have not enacted their own policies to boost renewables. 'Demand for electricity is increasing and without renewables we aren't able to meet that new demand,' said Dan O'Brien, senior analyst at Energy Innovation and author of the new study. 'We've seen US power prices generally fall over the past 75 years, but with this bill for the first time we will see sustained increases in power costs. Lower-income folks in rural areas in red states will have compounding impacts from this bill – their states voted to pass this but it will really harm them in the long term.' Environmental groups were scathing of the Republicans who voted for the reconciliation bill. 'After an election where cost-of-living was the driving issue that pushed millions of working-class Americans to check the box for Donald Trump, it's mind-boggling that Republicans just passed a bill that will raise costs across the board,' said Lena Moffitt, executive director of Evergreen Action, a climate change advocacy organization, who called the legislation 'one of the most catastrophic bills in a generation'. Electricity prices for American households have already increased above the rate of inflation since 2022, with a slew of new data centers for artificial intelligence helping push up overall demand for power. This trend has placed further strain upon 'energy insecure' people who struggle to meet the cost of heating, cooling and lighting their homes. Around 34m households, more than a quarter of all dwellings in the US, reported difficulties in paying energy bills in 2020. 'A lot of people are struggling and it's a hardship that's often not highlighted,' said Michelle Graff, an energy policy expert at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Lower-income people, as well as those who are Black, Hispanic, elderly, have young children or live in poorly constructed and badly insulated homes, are most at risk of this sort of energy insecurity. 'For a lot of these folks, even $10 extra on their bill each month will result in difficult trade-offs, such as forgoing medicines or food for their families,' Graff said. 'Increasing those bills month after month will have a big impact upon households on the margins.' Electricity price rises are regulated by the states and some jurisdictions offer help to residents struggling to pay their bills, as Maryland did last month. But such assistance is now being stripped away at the federal level, with the Trump administration seeking to eliminate the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (or Liheap), which aids around 6m US households with their bills. The reconciliation bill also deletes subsidies for the construction of energy-efficient homes and upgrades to home cooling, heating and insulation systems. 'That is a lifeline for many, many Americans,' Graff said of the Liheap program. 'There is this mismatch where the hardships are getting worse while we are cutting assistance for people to address that hardship.' Across the US, utilities have pushed for $29bn in higher rates so far this year, which is 142% more than the same period in 2024, a recent report found. At least 16 states, meanwhile, allow utilities to cut off power to people during extreme heatwaves if they have not paid their bills. Such cutoffs can prove deadly – last month, Shauna Thomas, a 55-year-old woman, was found dead in her stiflingly hot St Louis, Missouri, apartment after her electricity was halted for non-payment. 'Air conditioning and access to electricity is life-saving, but in most states there are very limited protections for these shut-offs,' said Diana Hernandez, a researcher of energy and health inequities at Columbia University. 'People are reluctant to put on their AC because of the fear of a high bill. It's easy for them to get into a debt spiral and hard for them to get out of it. This can end up as a life-or-death matter.' Extreme heat is the leading weather-related cause of deaths in the US, with advancing global temperatures due to the burning of fossil fuels causing longer and fiercer heatwaves. This summer in the US is expected to be hotter than the long-term norm for the season, with explosive demand for cooling causing a strain upon the grid in some places – in June, 110,000 people in New York City lost power due to a surge of electricity use during a hot spell. In the hottest parts of the US, lengthy power blackouts could prove catastrophic. If a prolonged heatwave and a blackout hit Phoenix, Arizona, at the same time, half of the city's 1.6 million residents would require urgent medical help and 1% of the population would die, a 2023 study warned. 'Climate change is upon us and as it gets hotter and hotter, there will be more hardship that people face in trying to keep themselves cool,' said Hernandez. 'It used to be that people thought about energy access in the winter months, to help keep them warm, but that has changed now. As we keep getting hotter years, this problem isn't going away.' The White House was contacted for comment.
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Fed's inflation fears may start to be realized with June CPI data
WASHINGTON, July 15 (Reuters) - The U.S. is expected on Tuesday to report that rising costs for imported goods lifted overall consumer prices in June, kicking off what might be several months at least of such increases and giving Federal Reserve officials highly awaited data on whether the Trump administration's tariffs are boosting inflation. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has pinpointed this summer as the time when the U.S. central bank will likely learn if inflation is responding to the tariffs applied by the Trump administration on trading partners and various industrial sectors. So far the levies have had only a limited impact on inflation, a fact that President Donald Trump has used to excoriate Powell and demand that the Fed lower interest rates. But that doesn't mean higher inflation isn't on the way as businesses run down inventory bought before the tariffs took effect or use up other tools at hand to avoid raising prices for their customers. "We know there is a lag between implementation and the inflationary effect," said Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon. "Businesses manage imports using different processes ... We have not seen the full-blown effects of tariffs on CPI data ... I would expect to start to see more." The U.S. Labor Department is scheduled to release the latest CPI data at 8:30 a.m. EDT (1230 GMT). The consensus forecast in a Reuters poll of economists has the index, excluding volatile food and energy prices, increasing at a 3% annual rate last month, slightly faster than in May. That reading would likely leave the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index the Fed uses for its 2% inflation target far enough above that goal to keep the central bank's benchmark interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range at the end of its July 29-30 policy meeting. Investors expect the Fed to resume cutting interest rates in September, though U.S. central bankers say any such move will hinge on how inflation and other aspects of the economy behave. The final U.S. tariff levels are not even fixed, with levels of 30% or more now threatened by Trump on Mexico, Canada and the European Union, higher levies on autos and many industrial metals already in place, and more actions likely. For the Fed, the way the process is unfolding feeds into concerns that the extended debate, policy reversals and uncertainty, and the potential for Trump to settle on higher levels than currently expected all add up to more inflation risk. The PCE index outside food and energy rose at a 2.7% annual rate in May; recent Fed policymaker projections see it hitting 3.1% by the end of 2025; and the most recent round of tariffs threatened by Trump for August 1 could push it even higher. The new rates "if fully passed through, would add about 0.4 percentage points to the PCE price level," Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JP Morgan, estimated. "Given imperfect pass-through, margin compression, a more likely estimate is 0.2-0.3 points. We think this bolsters the case for the Fed to take a very cautious approach to rate cuts." Economists will be watching the data for signs of the pass-through to retail prices from tariffs imposed so far, most notably on goods from China, the third-largest U.S. trading partner after Mexico and Canada. Daco said there was already "divergence" beginning across a wide swath of goods where prices are rising faster than they did before Trump's initial rounds of tariffs. One area that warrants watching for price acceleration is household furnishings, he said. Prices of those products had been dropping, but reversed course in the spring. Other economists have pinpointed different items that could show where the new import taxes are starting to hit consumer prices. Omair Sharif, the head of Inflation Insights, said the broad category referred to as "recreational commodities," which includes things like toys and audio and visual equipment that are often imported from China, also bears watching. In his press conference following the June 17-18 policy meeting, Powell noted that electronics were an area where "we're beginning to see some effects. And we do expect to see more of them over coming months." Outdoor equipment and tools are also items that are heavily imported, and the pace of their price increases picked up in the spring. "Evidence suggests many retailers are hiking prices to claw back tariff costs," wrote Samuel Tombs, chief U.S. economist with Pantheon Macroeconomics, a trend that he estimates will help push the rise in CPI to 3% in June, a result that "likely will wipe out" any chance of a Fed rate cut later this month.
South Wales Argus
19 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
FTSE 100 touches above 9,000 for the first time
The FTSE 100 Index briefly rose above the record high, hitting 9,016.98 at one stage in morning trading on Tuesday, having recorded a fresh closing high on Monday just shy of the milestone. The top tier later eased back to stand 3.34 points lower at 8994.72 by mid-morning. Markets across Europe lifted tentatively with the Dax in Germany and France's Cac 40 up 0.3% and 0.2% respectively. Investors were optimistic that a deal can still be reached between the US and EU, despite the latest tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Mr Trump said on Saturday that major trading partners Mexico and the EU would face a 30% tariff starting next month, piling on the pressure for deals to be struck. Some stocks were struggling on the FTSE despite the record being reached, with Barratt Redrow plunging to the bottom of the top tier, shedding 7% after a disappointing update, which also dragged rival housebuilders Persimmon and Berkeley Group lower. Victoria Scholar, head of investment at Interactive Investor, said a speech by Chancellor Rachel Reeves later will also be in sharp focus. She said: 'UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves prepares to deliver her closely watched Mansion House speech tonight when she is anticipated to outline a series of financial reforms including measures to improve mortgage access.'
