Malaysia's commitment to fighting corruption through UNCAC
Since then, Malaysia has introduced significant reforms and implemented measures aligned with international standards as required by UNCAC.
Under UNCAC's Implementation Review Mechanism (IRM), Malaysia completed two cycles of peer review. In the first cycle (2012–2013), the Philippines and Kenya reviewed Malaysia's compliance with Chapter III (Criminalisation and Law Enforcement) and Chapter IV (International Cooperation).
The second cycle (2015–2019), conducted by Timor-Leste and Eswatini, focused on Chapter II (Preventive Measures) and Chapter V (Asset Recovery). From these reviews, Malaysia received 22 recommendations aimed at strengthening its legal framework, institutions, and processes in areas of prevention, criminalisation, international cooperation, and asset recovery.
The reviews also identified 35 good practices, highlighting Malaysia's notable progress and adherence to UNCAC's standards:
• Chapter II: Preventive Measures (6 good practices)
• Chapter III: Criminalisation and Law Enforcement (8 good practices)
• Chapter IV: International Cooperation (5 good practices)
• Chapter V: Asset Recovery (16 good practices)
Malaysia actively participates as a reviewer in the UNCAC review mechanism. In 2019, Malaysia and Burkina Faso jointly reviewed Palestine, with Malaysia reviewing Chapter V (Asset Recovery) and Burkina Faso reviewing Chapter II (Preventive Measures).
In 2020, Malaysia partnered with North Macedonia to review Georgia, where Malaysia assessed Chapter V (Asset Recovery), and North Macedonia reviewed Chapter II (Preventive Measures).
Currently, Malaysia is working alongside Argentina to review Vanuatu. Malaysia, having previously reviewed Chapter V (Asset Recovery) is now reviewing Chapter II (Preventive Measures), while Argentina reviews Chapter IV.
These collaborative efforts demonstrate Malaysia's ongoing commitment to international cooperation in fighting corruption.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is Malaysia's focal agency for UNCAC matters. MACC actively participates in international UNCAC platforms such as the Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Groups on Asset Recovery and Prevention of Corruption, the Implementation Review Group (IRG), and the Conference of the States Parties (CoSP).
Furthermore, MACC officers regularly serve as speakers and panellists and frequently make interventions on thematic topics discussed during these meetings, showcasing Malaysia's strong presence and contributions in global anti-corruption discussions.
From these reviews, Malaysia received 22 recommendations aimed at strengthening its legal framework, institutions, and processes relating to preventive measures, criminalisation, international cooperation, and asset recovery.
Some specific recommendations highlighted by UNCAC reviewers, on which Malaysia has already taken concrete steps, include adopting a coordinated national anti-corruption strategy, enhancing the independence of anti-corruption authorities, and strengthening corporate accountability.
In response to these recommendations, Malaysia launched the National Anti-Corruption Plan (NACP) 2019 – 2023 in line with UNCAC Article 5. This comprehensive plan focused on reducing corruption risks in critical sectors such as political governance, public procurement, corporate governance, law enforcement, and judicial integrity.
Building on this initiative, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has introduced the National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS) 2024 – 2028, whereby the NACS sets out five strategies and 60 sub-strategies to be carried out over its five-year duration on education, public accountability, the people's voice, enforcement, and incentives.
Under UNCAC Article 6, Malaysia is revising the requirements for appointing and dismissing of the MACC chief commissioner, ensuring greater independence and transparency in the perception of this crucial role. Additionally, efforts are underway to propose a MACC service commission to provide MACC with enhanced independence and operational autonomy, including oversight over personnel matters.
On criminalisation and law enforcement (UNCAC Chapter III), Malaysia amended the MACC Act 2009 by introducing corporate liability provisions (Section 17A), effective June 2020. This provision makes corporations accountable for corruption offences committed by their employees or associated individuals, aligning national legislation with UNCAC Article 26 on liability of legal persons.
Throughout these reform initiatives, Malaysia prioritises inclusive engagement, involving government agencies, MPs, civil society organisations, academic institutions, and international stakeholders. This collaborative approach ensures reforms are practical, widely supported, and aligned with both national priorities and UNCAC standards.
As Malaysia advances on its anti-corruption journey, the sustained implementation of UNCAC recommendations and active engagement on the international stage reflect a clear commitment to integrity and reform. While challenges remain, the tangible progress achieved lays a solid foundation for continued improvement.
By maintaining momentum, strengthening institutional frameworks, and fostering a culture of transparency and public accountability, Malaysia has the potential to emerge as a regional and global leader in anti-corruption efforts—setting a compelling example of how consistent, principle-based action can drive lasting change.
RASIDAH ABDUL KARIM
Policy, Planning and Research Director,
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
11 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Inspector arrested for rape, demanding sexual favours
SUNGAI PETANI: A 29-year-old police inspector from the Kuala Muda district police headquarters has been arrested for allegedly committing rape and soliciting bribes, including sexual favours. The officer, who is unmarried, was detained following two separate reports lodged on July 3 and 4, one of which was filed with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). Kuala Muda police chief Assistant Commissioner Hanyan Ramlan said initial investigations revealed that the suspect had allegedly abused his authority as an investigating officer to demand sexual favours from individuals involved in a case under his supervision. "I can confirm that the case is still under investigation. "In terms of disciplinary violations, we are conducting a joint probe with the MACC. "The suspect has been remanded for four days to assist with the investigation and will subsequently be handed over to the MACC for further action," he said today. The case is being investigated under Section 376(2)(f) of the Penal Code. Hanyan said the investigation is focused on two possibilities: whether the officer abused his position as an investigating officer to coerce the victim, or whether the sexual act occurred without consent. "We suspect the officer may have used his authority and influence to obtain sexual favours from the victim," he added.
Daily Express
17 hours ago
- Daily Express
Long-awaited truth will soon emerge
Published on: Sunday, July 06, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 06, 2025 By: Datuk Teddy Chin Text Size: SO, finally after more than half-a-year since the so-called Sabah Mining Scandal videos first surfaced – and after months of speculations and gossips – three people were charged in the Court in Kota Kinabalu on the last day of June and just as Sabahans prepared to begin the 2nd half of 2025. The social media have been having a field day since. Advertisement The trio comprised two State Assemblymen and a Selangor-based businessman, Tei Jiann Cheing, also known as Albert Tei. The duo were Assistant Minister cum Tanjung Batu Assemblyman Datuk Andi Suryady and Sindumin Assemblyman Datuk Dr Yusof Yacob. Andi is also Kalabakan MP while Yusof is Chairman of Qhazanah Sabah, a State-owned GLC. All three pleaded not guilty. The Press and social media have wrongly described Andi as a GRS Assemblyman. He actually is from Umno although he has been suspended. He won both his State and MP seats on a BN (Umno) ticket in 2020 and 2022 respectively. Yusof won the Sindumin seat on a Warisan ticket in 2018 and 2020. He even became a Minister in the Shafie Cabinet. He was thought to have applied to join Umno after Warisan lost the 2020 State election. But when he pledged to support CM Hajiji Noor during the failed coup dubbed Langkah Kinabalu in early 2023, Umno clarified that Yusof's application to join the party was not yet approved. Speaking to the Press after posting his bail, Albert asked why only two Assemblyman whom he described as 'Ikan Bilis' were charged when he supposedly exposed 10 (including the Assembly Speaker). Well, it is up to MACC and not Albert or who and when they want to charge. They do not need your permission or concurrence. How do you know when and who else they want to charge, if any? Albert also said should anything happen to him including his sudden disappearance, look for the 10. By the same token or going by his logic, can it also be asked that should anything happen to the 10 Assemblymen, police should look for him? Albert also mentioned the Chief Minister's name while talking to reporters. Hajiji's Special Officer has lodged a police report against Albert. He also hinted that MACC was biased, something which may be subjudice as the matter is now in the courts. Hajiji has said from day one late last year that he would leave it to MACC to investigate and that the GRS government would give its fullest cooperation. He himself even voluntarily gave a statement to MACC. Star president Datuk Seri Panglima Dr Jeffrey Kitingan said recently that there might be a hidden hand in all this as his name also suddenly cropped up although he already had his statement taken when the so-called scandal first surface months ago. Veteran Malaysian journalist Datuk Philip Golingai said late last year that a certain retired senior civil servant with the title of Tan Sri could be the mastermind given the hi-tech used to secretly record the videos. About the same time that the two assemblymen were charged, PKR Sabah Chief Datuk Mustapha Sakmud said the scandal, if true, could change the State's political landscape, adding that his party was on 'standby for any eventuality.' This is certainly not the kind of statement one would expect from the leader of a coalition partner of the State's ruling GRS+. This kind of statement sounds more like from an enemy or an opportunist or, as the Malays would say, 'Musuh Dalam Selimut'. Mustpha should not forget that PKR was in the Opposition in Sabah before Hajiji offered the party a Minister and an Assistant Minister post in early 2023. As they say, man's memory is short. He should also not forget that PKR is supposed to be GRS' partner in the coming election. Even PM and PKR president Anwar never made that kind of statement against GRS and twice defended Hajiji. If Mustapha thinks that Hajiji is someone who can be 'gertak', he can try. Hajiji was not born yesterday. He has been a YB since 1990, Mustapha only since late 2022. I don't know how old Mustapha was or what he was doing in 1990. I don't know why Albert Tei mentioned Hajiji as the CM was never charged by MACC. In fact months ago Sabah MACC already cleared Hajiji. Albert must have been disappointed. To me, Hajiji is one of the best, if not the best, CM Sabahans have seen. He never uttered a four-letter word in the State Assembly as a Sabah MP infamously did in Parliament. He never uttered offensive words against women as one Sabah MP did in Parliament. He never challenged a fellow lawmaker in the Assembly to a fist fight outside as a Sabah MP did. If Sabahans want that MP to be their next CM, then God helps Sabah, just like the British national anthem God Save the Queen (now King). A Sabah DAP leader also threatened to review his party's position in the GRS+ government soon after the video scandal broke out. Review lah. Nobody is going to stop you. But make sure your party secretary general agrees with you. As GRS deputy secretary-general cum Federal Minister Datuk Armijan Ali rightly pointed out, GRS never resorted to mentioning the many cases faced by Malaysian politicians, be them in the opposition or the government, including the present Madani government. By not mentioning any name, Armijan was just being polite and diplomatic. Mustapha should not forget that the many politicians referred to by Armijan include thoses in the Madani Government which includes PKR. Mustapha should not forget that a very senior PKR leader went to jail not once but twice. As people say, look at yourself in the mirror before you criticize others. A Malay proverb says Don't simply spit towards the sky as your saliva may fall on your face. PGRS Information Chief Datuk Nizam AB Titingan also asked Mustapha to look into the mirror. Mustapha should not forget that former Umno president and former PM 'Bossku' Najib is still in jail. He should not forget that BN/Umno was already rejected by Malaysians and Sabahans in 2018. Mustapha should not forget that Najib's successor as Umno president also faced court cases. He was never found guilty by the courts. His representation to the AG was accepted. That's all, and it was questioned by legal circles. Mustapha should not forget that a senior Sabah Umno leader is also facing corrupt charges in court and has been asked by the courts to defend himself. The Chinese press described someone who has been asked to defend himself as 'primarily guilty'. And yet we never heard of Mustapha saying that PKR will review its cooperation with Umno. Neither have we heard DAP wanting to review its relationship with Umno. In fact, Umno's slogan just before the 2022 election was 'No DAP, No Anwar'. Now swallowing their own pride? Being charged in court does not necessarily mean one is guilty. One is innocent unless proven guilty, as Armizan pointed out. A former Sabah Chief Minister was held by MACC for about a week a few years ago. He was brought to court by MACC wearing the Orange T-Shirt and it was widely publicized including on TV. Does this mean he was guilty? In conclusion, I would like to quote the heading of Daily Express' front page on Wednesday: 'Never jump to conclusions'. The Bible says Judge Not So You Won't Be Judged. Amen. I would also like to quote Thursday's DE frontpage headline which says Sabah's Financial Position Solid. It says that Sabah recorded one of the highest State revenues in Malaysia in 2023, reaching RM1.6 billion. Need I say more? I would also like to quotes Senator Tan Sri Anifah Aman's recent statement that Sabah attracted the 3rd highest investments of RM10.9 billion for the first quarter of 2025 alone, after Selangor and FT of KL. Out of the amount, RM6.6 billion is from Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) while RM4.29 billion is from Domestic Direct Investments (DDI). Anifah is the Chief Minister's Advisor on Foreign Relations and Investment. He is also Chairman of Invest Sabah. Lastly, all this threat by PKR and DAP, go ahead. No one will stop you. Don't forget, almost half of the coalition partners in GRS prefer that the coalition go it alone in the coming election. If you push GRS to the wall, what do you expect oh? If GRS goes it alone, Tan Sri Pandikar, Dr Jeffrey and Yong Teck Lee will be most happy. So don't behave as if GRS cannot do without you. Hajiji is just being polite when he repeatedly said GRS will work with PKR as it is the PM's party. He was just being diplomatic. Even some of the PGRS' own Divisions have publicly stated their preference for GRS to go it alone. So don't count your chicken before they hatch. In 1985, the well-equipped and well-funded BN leaders from Kuala Lumpur campaigned for Berjaya in full force. The result? Berjaya lost, despite Dr M's 'Swim or Sink with Berjaya' statement while campaigning at the KK padang just days before polling. Next day of course all the local papers put it on their front pages with banner headlines. One Berjaya leader at that time even proudly proclaimed No Need to Campaign Anymore. The BN especially Umno leaders who campaigned for Berjaya in 1985 were unpopular with Sabahans, describing them as 'Orang Malaya'. But after the election, only BN 'Swim' while Berjaya 'Sank' as PBS which defeated Berjaya was accepted into BN. The 'Unseen Hand' should understand that if it bullies Sabahans too much, there may be a repeat of 1985 whereby Sabahans will stand solidly behind GRS. 'Rumah Kita, Kita Jaga'. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
The Star
20 hours ago
- The Star
The Sabah scandal: is it about minerals or power?
AND just like that, the Sabah minerals controversy took a twist. It was a classic Langkah Billiards, which is my theory of the unintended consequences of creating a political plot to bring down Chief Minister Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor, and his Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) government. On June 28, less than 48 hours before two Sabah YBs and the so-called whistleblower were charged with corruption, six politicians from GRS were implicated. It seemed to me that the intention of revealing their names was the extension of a plot to make the Sabah-based coalition guilty in the court of public perception. In November last year, the plotters released allegedly doctored videos to implicate 1) Umno assemblymen who did not support ousting Hajiji in January 2023; and 2) the top five leaders of Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah (PGRS) – the backbone of the GRS coalition – in an alleged Sabah minerals corruption. The insider story behind the November 2024 'exposé' is that it was 1) revenge against the Umno assemblymen who supported Hajiji as CM; and 2) to weaken the PGRS leadership (president Hajiji, the deputy president, and the three vice-presidents were implicated). Those in the know knew that there were other supposedly doctored videos featuring leaders of GRS component parties such as Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) and Sabah Star. The question was why the plotters did not release the names of the people implicated in those videos. What's whispered about is that the exposé was the execution of a blackmail plot against Hajiji for not 'behaving' – ie, 'don't approve our prospecting license applications, face a political earthquake'. The plotters used the same tactic on PBS and Sabah STAR leaders: 'behave' – ie, 'ditch Hajiji and GRS and join us, or be dragged into the Sabah minerals scandal'. Last week, six top leaders – three from PBS and three from Sabah Star – were dragged into the situation. An anonymous source released their names and alleged their involvement in the controversy. Since these leaders (one of whom is no longer active in politics) refused to be blackmailed, it looks like the plotters decided to bring down the CM by 'exposing' the two major parties in his coalition. Now these leaders are being judged in the court of public perception on whether they were involved in receiving bribes or shady political donations. So what's the latest twist to the PBS and Sabah STAR revelation? The unintended consequence of the Langkah Billiards is that a new narrative has emerged. It is something that those in the know knew about but did not discuss in the media. The narrative is personified by Sabah STAR president Datuk Seri Dr Jeffrey Kitingan, who doesn't fear political plots as he is a previous Internal Security Act detainee. Kitingan, who is also Sabah's deputy Chief Minister, told the media that the corruption allegations levelled against his party and himself are part of a broader political conspiracy aimed at destabilising the state government and derailing efforts to strengthen Sabah-based coalitions. Without naming specific individuals behind the conspiracy, Kitingan said he did not discount the possibility of hidden political motives. 'There appears to be a hidden hand moving and planning things behind the scenes. Only those interested in destroying the government and taking over would resort to such tactics,' he said. 'This is not new, it has been going on for the last 10 years. Same game, nothing surprising.' For those who have been covering Sabah politics since the rise of PBS in the 1980s, the game has been played by Kuala Lumpur (Putrajaya, nowadays) ever since. Kitingan's comments to the media has brought to light what was whispered about: that the powers-that-be at the Federal level allegedly want to install a 'Putrajaya-compliant chief minister' – a CM who is supposedly less of a Sabah for Sabahans leader fighting for state rights, including the complete restoration and implementation of the Malaysia Agreement 1963. The unintended consequences of the charges against the two assemblymen is that the other side released information that a Singapore tycoon is under investigation by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) for his alleged involvement as a financier in the Sabah mineral scandal. The tycoon is linked to politicians from a national party. Those in the know know that these non-GRS politicians are involved in the mining controversy, but the plotters have conveniently left them out. They say the scandal is not about corruption per se, it is a political game to wrest power in the state. If the Sabah CM had 'behaved', we would not be hearing anything about Sabah minerals. It would have been business – and politics – as usual. Now that Sindumin assemblyman Datuk Dr Yusof Yacob (who won the seat under the Warisan ticket and jumped to PGRS), Tanjung Batu assemblyman and Kalabakan MP Datuk Andi Muhammad Suryady Bandy (a suspended Umno leader) and a businessman have been charged with corruption, it will be the actual courts (not the courts of public perception) that will decide their innocence or guilt. Their case will probably be heard only after the dissolution of the Sabah state assembly – automatic dissolution is on Nov 11. However, the game played in the court of public perception will continue until the Sabah polls, for which the assembly will probably be dissolved in September. In the hands of a spinmaster, the Sabah minerals controversy will be shaped to be a Sabah versus KL fight.
