Trump Won't Recommend Special Counsel In Epstein Probe: White House
The rejection of a special counsel is part of an effort by the White House to turn the page from continued outrage from corners of Trump's base over the Justice Department's refusal last week to release additional records from the investigation into Epstein, a well-connected and wealthy financier who killed himself in jail in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges.
Officials also said Epstein did not maintain a much-hyped "client list" and said the evidence was clear he had died by suicide despite conspiracy theories to the contrary.
Trump on Wednesday sought to clamp down on criticism from his own supporters about his administration's handling of the Epstein-related records, calling them "weaklings" who were being duped and characterizing the investigation as a "hoax" — even though his hand-picked leaders at the FBI and Justice Department had long stoked public expectations that important information was being hidden.
The news organization Just the News published excerpts Wednesday from a Trump interview in which Trump said he would be open to having a special counsel look into "anything credible" related to Epstein, as well as other long-standing grievances he and his supporters have long raised.
But White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt appeared to close the door Thursday on a special counsel for the Epstein investigation, saying "the idea was floated from someone in the media to the president."
"The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case," she said.
Justice Department regulations allow for the attorney general to appoint and supervise an outside special counsel to investigate allegations of criminal wrongdoing in instances when prosecutors might face a potential or perceived conflict of interest.
The department in recent years has appointed a succession of special counsels — sometimes, though not always, plucked from outside the agency — to lead investigations into politically sensitive matters, including into conduct by President Joe Biden and by Trump.
Last year, Trump's personal lawyers launched an aggressive, and successful, challenge to the appointment of Jack Smith, the special counsel assigned to investigate his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election and his retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
A Trump-appointed judge agreed, ruling that then-Attorney General Merrick Garland had exceeded his bounds by appointing a prosecutor without Senate approval and confirmation, and dismissed the case.
That legal team included Todd Blanche, who is now deputy attorney general, as well as Emil Bove, who is Blanche's top deputy but was recently nominated to serve as a judge on a federal appeals court.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump says there is no ‘smoking gun' in the Jeffrey Epstein files, blames Democrats for controversy
US President Donald Trump on Friday, once again sought to downplay the Jeffrey Epstein controversy that has long captivated his MAGA base, arguing there is no 'smoking gun' in the files linked to the disgraced financier. 'If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had Garland and Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!' Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social. The post followed Trump's Thursday night announcement that he had directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to pursue the release of additional Epstein-related materials. 'Produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' Trump said Bondi had been instructed to 'produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval'. In response, Bondi confirmed she would pursue court action, potentially as soon as Friday. However, any release of grand jury records would require a legal process, including judicial review and consideration of victims' privacy. According to the Wall Street Journal, Trump allegedly sent Epstein a letter for his 50th birthday in 2003 — a claim the President now disputes. The report claimed that Trump contributed a 'bawdy' letter — featuring a typewritten personal message alongside a drawing of a naked woman's silhouette — to an album Ghislaine Maxwell had compiled as a gift for Epstein's birthday. In an interview with the Journal, Trump denied writing the letter and has threatened legal action. 'I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third-rate newspaper,' Trump wrote last night. 'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper, the WSJ. That will be an interesting experience!!!' Trump posted online Friday. DOJ denies Epstein 'client list' theories Trump's order comes amid pressure from MAGA-aligned voices to 'do more' after the Justice Department and FBI issued a memo stating no further disclosures in the Epstein case were 'appropriate or warranted.' The memo concluded there was no evidence Epstein kept a so-called 'client list' or that he blackmailed prominent individuals. It also confirmed, again, that Epstein died by suicide in prison while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Earlier, Bondi had responded to the DOJ memo, saying it 'speaks for itself.' Trump, meanwhile, has tried to distance himself from the growing intrigue that conspiracy theorists and far-right influencers continue to stoke around Epstein's ties to elites. He has repeatedly called the Epstein files a 'Democratic hoax' and dismissed Republican supporters pressing for deeper investigation as 'stupid' and 'foolish.' Despite some media speculation, the White House has ruled out appointing a special prosecutor. 'The idea was floated from someone in the media to the president. The president would not recommend a special prosecutor in the Epstein case. That's how he feels,' said press secretary Karoline Leavitt at Thursday's briefing.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 minutes ago
- Business Standard
President Donald Trump will sign new cryptocurrency bill into law on Friday
The measure is meant to bolster consumer confidence in the rapidly growing crypto sector. Its passage comes as Trump makes it a mission to make the US the crypto capital of the world AP Washington President Donald Trump on Friday will sign into law a new set of regulations for a type of cryptocurrency that are seen as a way to legitimise the burgeoning industry. The GENIUS Act sets initial guardrails and consumer protections for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency that is tied to a stable asset like the US dollar to reduce price volatility. It passed both the House and Senate with wide bipartisan margins. The measure is meant to bolster consumer confidence in the rapidly growing crypto sector. Its passage comes as Trump makes it a mission to make the U.S. the crypto capital of the world. Congratulations to our GREAT REPUBLICANS for being able to accomplish so much, a record, in so short a period of time," Trump wrote on his social media site Friday morning as he announced the bill signing. The House also passed two other bills Thursday that are meant to boost the legitimacy of the crypto industry. One creates a new market structure for cryptocurrency, and the other bans the Federal Reserve from issuing a new digital currency. Both measures now go to the Senate.
The Print
31 minutes ago
- The Print
Cong to support, its MPs will be among signatories: Ramesh on proposed motion against Justice Varma
In an interview with PTI, Ramesh stressed the opposition would strongly push the issue of Justice Shekhar Yadav, against whom 55 opposition MPs moved an impeachment notice in the Rajya Sabha last December for allegedly delivering a hate speech at a gathering last year. He asserted that the then Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna, had 'forced our hand' in the matter by writing to the president and the prime minister. New Delhi, Jul 18 (PTI) The Congress will extend support and its MPs will be among the signatories to a motion to be brought against Justice Yashwant Varma in the Lok Sabha, senior party leader Jairam Ramesh said on Friday. A fire incident at Justice Varma's residence in the national capital in March, when he was a judge at the Delhi High Court, had led to the discovery of several burnt sacks of banknotes in the outhouse. Though the judge claimed ignorance about the cash, the Supreme Court-appointed committee indicted him after speaking to a number of witnesses and recording his statement. The then CJI Khanna had written to the president and the prime minister, recommending the removal. Asked about the government's move in gathering signatures for moving the motion against Varma, Ramesh said, 'The Government cannot impeach. The Constitution, in article 124, very clearly states that it is the MPs who move a motion — 100 MPs in the Lok Sabha or 50 MPs in the Rajya Sabha. 'We are supporting; our MPs are also signing the motion in the Lok Sabha, and this is not for an impeachment but for setting up of a three-member committee by the Speaker under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968,' he said. 'The committee will be set up, and it will investigate the matter, submit its report and on the basis of that report, presumably in the Winter Session of Parliament, there will be the process for the removal of the judge first in the Lok Sabha and then in the Rajya Sabha,' Ramesh told PTI. He emphasised that there should be a proper investigation, citing that the action against Justice Varma was initiated based on an in-house committee report. 'We are concerned about it, and there should be a proper investigation. The former CJI has forced our hand; he has submitted a report, there was no FIR and an FIR which should have been registered. He has virtually forced the hand of MPs by submitting the report to the president and to the PM based on an in-house committee report,' the Congress leader said. Referring to the Justice Yadav issue, Ramesh said, 'He (Justice Yadav) violated his oath, and he violated all principles of the Constitution. Now, seven months have passed, and we still don't know. I have met (Rajya Sabha) Chairman (Jagdeep Dhankar) repeatedly, and still that motion is pending.' 'Whether he is sitting on it on his own or he is made to sit on it, I don't know. I respect the Chairman. I expected him… to give the go-ahead,' he said and added, 'The least we expect is that a committee is set up to examine the behaviour of Justice Yadav.' His remarks came on a day Justice Varma moved the Supreme Court seeking to invalidate a report by an in-house inquiry panel, which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery row. Varma has sought quashing of the May 8 recommendation by then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, urging Parliament to initiate impeachment against him. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said on Friday that all political parties are on board on the issue of the impeachment of Justice Varma. 'I have spoken to all the senior leaders of different political parties. I will also get in touch with some of the single-MP parties because I do not want to leave out any member. So it becomes a unified stand of the Parliament of India,' Rijiju said. The government plans to move a motion to remove Varma in Parliament's Monsoon session beginning July 21. A report of the inquiry panel probing the incident had said that Justice Varma and his family members had covert or active control over the store room where a huge cache of half-burnt cash was found, proving his misconduct, which is serious enough to seek his removal. The three-judge panel headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana High Court conducted the inquiry for 10 days, examined 55 witnesses and visited the scene of the accidental fire that started at around 11.35 pm on March 14 at the official residence Justice Varma, then a sitting judge of the Delhi High Court and now in the Allahabad High Court. Acting on the report, former Chief Justice of India Khanna had written to President Droupadi Murmu and Prime Minister Narendra Modi recommending the judge's impeachment. PTI ASK ASK NSD NSD This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
