The Condemnations of Israel Are Half-Hearted
The countries surrounding Iran have condemned Israel's attack today. Some statements were more florid than others, and some were more convincing. Bahrain, whose monarchy Iran has repeatedly attempted to topple, urged Israel to de-escalate. Azerbaijan, whose secular government is constantly at odds with Iran, 'resolutely' reproached Israel for its attack but gave no indication that it would cease being a resolute ally of Israel and the United States. Iraq, whose Shiite-led government in many ways owes its existence to the Iranians, vowed that it would help Iran retaliate by sending a sternly worded letter to the United Nations. Among the quicker and more vigorous denunciations was Saudi Arabia's. 'The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia expresses its strong condemnation and denunciation of the blatant Israeli aggressions against the brotherly Islamic Republic of Iran,' it said, adding that the attacks were 'heinous.'
Green's Dictionary of Slang notes that the word heinous, when used by American teens, has at times meant fantastic, and it is no secret that among the countries that have issued denunciations are many senior officials who would consider the destruction of Iran's nuclear program heinous and rad indeed, an extreeeeeme escalation in the Harold and Kumar sense. Almost all of the countries surrounding Iran have reasons to prefer a weak Iran and to dread a nuclear one. Diplomacy often takes the form of elaborate, staged meetings and statements whose plain meanings differ from what the country's leaders actually feel. What they actually feel is not usually difficult to discern.
This lineup of eager denouncers is like the cast of a drawing-room murder mystery, where everyone is a suspect because everyone has a motive. The fact that Israel actually plunged the dagger into the deceased is incidental. Bahrain is ruled by Sunnis and has a mostly Shiite population permanently restless over its servile condition. Azerbaijan, too, is mostly Shiite, but it is proudly secular in orientation, and welcomes Iranians who come across its border to escape theocracy, get drunk, and take off their veils. Aykhan Hajizada, the spokesperson for the Azerbaijani foreign ministry, told me in Baku last year that Iran would sometimes conduct aggressive military drills across the border and complain about Azerbaijan's friendships with Iran's enemies. 'We are very open with them,' Hajizada said. 'We are building relations based on our national-security interests, and not based on the interests of the neighboring country.' A nuclear Iran would effectively end that independence.
[Read: What Trump knew about the attack against Iran]
But the clearest case of this duplicity (denunciation in public; You know, he kind of had it coming in private) is Saudi Arabia's. 'We don't look to Israel as an enemy,' Saudi Arabia's de facto leader, Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, told me in 2021. 'We look to them as a potential ally' with many common interests. By contrast, he referred to Iran as a neighbor that he 'could not get rid of,' and with whom he would realistically be forced to find a modus vivendi. In 2023, Saudi Arabia and Iran made a deal, brokered by China, that restored diplomatic relations and in theory healed the long-standing divisions between the countries.
But the fundamental facts of their relationship are irreconcilable. Theirs is not a love marriage. Iran's drones and missiles are aimed at Saudi Arabia's oil fields, and the biggest threat to the kingdom is, and has been for at least three decades, the possibility that Iran would destroy or disrupt its energy industry. Saudi Arabia on its own has no way to counter or deter that threat—which is why the United States and Israel are its natural allies. Iran has additionally fomented open revolt against the Saudi monarchy. In cities in the Shiite-majority Eastern province of Saudi Arabia, where much of the oil industry is, one can still see bullet-pocked walls and collapsed buildings where Saudi security services fought and ultimately crushed an Iranian-backed revolt in 2017.
None of these countries wants all-out war. And they certainly do not wish to volunteer themselves to be attacked, should Iran decide that Israel itself is too hard a target, and its allies are safer to pick on. Iran's neighbors have plenty of beef with Israel too, and have populations that would be pleased to watch the Jewish state humbled. But Israel's humiliation, if it must come, can wait. Iran has been unique among regional powers in its tendency to cultivate and arm allies abroad, and to aid those allies in their efforts in order to make trouble for incumbent autocracies, from Cairo to Baku to Sanaa. For Iran to go nuclear, and be able to dictate the terms of these relationships under the leisurely protection of an atomic umbrella, would be catastrophic for them all. Just don't expect them to say so.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump said he'd end Ukraine war in 24 hours. Now his patience with Putin is wearing thin.
Only last month the American president called Russia's Vladimir Putin 'very kind.' Now Donald Trump says Putin's words are 'meaningless.' President Donald Trump said he would end the war in Ukraine within his first 24 hours in office. But now, more than 4,000 hours in, Trump's patience with Vladimir Putin, whom the U.S. president only last month called "very kind," appears to be wearing thin. Relations have hit a wall as Russia's leader has pushed forward with intensifying drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities while appearing to repeatedly rebuff Trump's attempts to broker a ceasefire. "We get a lot of b**shit thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth," Trump told reporters on July 9, summing up what Ukrainians and other seasoned Russia watchers have been saying for two decades. "He's very nice to us all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless." Here's how the Trump-Putin geopolitical love affair turned sour. Trump and Putin got off to a good start Trump initiated direct talks with Putin shortly after taking office, saying − much to Putin's delight − that he was effectively ready to let Russia keep the Ukrainian territory it had already taken when Moscow invaded Kyiv in February 2022. Trump also said that Ukraine's Crimea region, which Putin seized in 2014, "will stay with Russia." At the same time, Trump said he was not interested in spending more on Ukraine's defense, an issue that exploded out into the open when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky visited the White House in February. "You don't have the cards right now," Trump told Zelensky in remarks that were carried live on TV and appeared to belittle Ukraine's leader. Trump said Putin had been the victim of a "phony" American "witch hunt." He said Ukraine would need to make concessions and started pressing Kyiv to sign an agreement over its mineral wealth. 'My favorite president': Donald Trump and the art of world leader bromances Putin escalates Ukraine attacks American intelligence agencies and officials have for years struggled to understand Putin's precise foreign policy goals. In Ukraine, their best guess is he wants to weaken it as much as possible as part of an effort to keep it out of the NATO military alliance and retain or restore Russia's cultural and economic sphere of influence around its borders. That means grabbing Ukraine's land and wearing down the morale of its people and communities through wave after wave of drone and missile attacks that have killed thousands of civilians, according to the United Nations. War crimes in Ukraine: Kyiv's push for swift justice What Putin has made clear, at least in the timeframe that he's renewed talks with the White House, is that he's still intent on pounding Ukraine to deadly effect. In fact, according to an analysis by the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War, Russia's drone and missile strikes on Ukraine have increased following Trump's January inauguration. It has appeared to take Trump some time to publicly acknowledge this. But he did eventually, saying in April, "I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP!" One Ukrainian who lives in Kyiv said in a WhatsApp message that he, his wife and kids are "going completely mad" with having to repeatedly run to bomb shelters, metro stations and underground parking garages to seek shelter at a rate they have not had to do since the start of the 3.5-year-old war. An evolving policy to meet an evolving relationship Trump has spent years praising and appearing to carefully avoid criticizing Putin. The origins of this admiration are not well understood. Both men say they first met face-to-face on the sidelines of a 2017 international summit in Germany during Trump's first term. But Trump has also gone on the record saying that he met Putin for the first time in 2013 on a visit to Moscow for the Miss Universe pageant. Whatever the case, five months ago, Trump said that he knows Putin "very well" and believes he "wants peace" in Ukraine. Still, two rounds of Trump-brokered, indirect ceasefire talks between Ukraine and Russia have come to nothing. And after multiple phone calls with Putin since taking office, Trump now appears to be shifting his thinking − and actions − on Putin and Russia. After a brief pause, he's ordered the Pentagon to restart shipping weapons to Ukraine. The White House is ramping up pressure on European countries to pitch in more to support the air defense supplies that Ukraine most needs. Some countries have complied in recent days. Momentum is building for bipartisan legislation that would impose severe sanctions on Russia − amounting to a 500% tariff − on any country that buys, sells or supplies Russian oil, gas and petroleum if Russia refuses to negotiate a peace agreement with Ukraine. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said that the bill could be ready for a vote as soon as this month. 'We need a Russia sanctions bill that puts some real constraints on the ability of the president to play on again, off again, with Vladimir Putin,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said in an interview. Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters on July 10 in Malaysia that Moscow had presented a "new concept" that could open the door to peace during a meeting he had with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Rubio said they shared some ideas and information that he would take back to Trump. Trump, for his part, has teased a "major" statement on Russia early next week. Is the bromance finally over? Did it ever really start? Putin is a former KGB officer who has long trafficked in misinformation, disinformation, propaganda and outright lies. Trump often makes false or misleading claims in his speeches and social media posts. 'Trump," former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Bill Taylor said in a media appearance this week, "has now figured it out that Putin is the problem."


Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Palestinian American killed in Israeli settler attack in West Bank
Two Palestinians, one of them an American citizen, were killed on Friday when Israeli settlers attacked the village of Sinjil in the occupied West Bank, the Palestinian Authority's ministry of health said. The big picture: It's the first time a Palestinian American was killed in the West Bank since President Trump assumed office in January. On his first day in office, Trump lifted sanctions imposed by the Biden administration on settlers involved in attacks on Palestinian civilians in the West Bank. Such attacks have been on the rise in the West Bank since the war in Gaza began in 2023. A State Department official said: "We are aware of reports of the death of a U.S. citizen in the West Bank." Driving the news: Florida-born Saif al-Din Kamel Abdul Karim Musallat, 23, was assaulted and beaten to death, according to the Palestinian Authority statement. A second Palestinian was shot during the settlers' attack. He was missing for hours and his body was eventually found dead. Palestinian sources said the attack happened after Palestinians from Sinjil tried reaching their private land near a settler outpost. The other side: The Israel Defense Forces claimed in a statement that "terrorists" threw stones at Israeli civilians near Sinjil, resulting in two Israeli civilians being lightly injured. "Shortly afterward, a violent confrontation developed in the area between Palestinians and Israeli civilians, which included the vandalism of Palestinian property, arson, physical clashes, and stone-throwing (against the Palestinian civilians)," the IDF said. The IDF said it was aware of "claims" that a Palestinian was killed and several others wounded, and said police were investigating. State of play: The Trump administration has paid close to zero attention to the escalating situation in the West Bank. Secretary of State Rubio has taken steps to decrease the authority of the U.S. security coordinator in the West Bank and eliminated the direct reporting channel the Palestinian Affairs unit at the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem had to the State Department in Washington. The White House and the State Department have refrained from expressing any criticism about Israeli policies in the West Bank.


Atlantic
10 hours ago
- Atlantic
Going to Space Is Overrated Anyway
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Sure, NASA is set to reduce its workforce by at least 2,145 employees, most of them senior-level and with expertise that will be extremely hard to replace. Sure, Sean Duffy, the former Real World cast member currently serving as secretary of transportation (which seems like a more-than-full-time job already) is now also the interim head of NASA. Sure, the Trump budget aims to slash NASA's funding to the level it was several years before we sent anyone to the moon. The Senate is trying to preserve the budget, but—must it? It's okay! We didn't need to go to space again anyway! What's in space? Nothing. Void, vacuum, Laika's vengeful ghost, dust, gas, rocks, old Voyagers, a couple of gold records, thousands of Starlink satellites blotting out the view of the stars. It's not like we haven't been up there before. Going to space is much too '60s. The whole theme of the Trump administration is undoing things we did in the 1960s, such as 'end polio' and 'enforce the Fourteenth Amendment.' To anyone who says, 'I don't think a former reality-TV star should be in charge of NASA,' I say: Why does NASA deserve any better than the rest of the country? Indeed, there might be some benefits associated with bringing Real World sensibilities to NASA. Previous administrators would have wasted money trying to actually get to space, instead of entertaining cost-saving ideas such as faking it on a soundstage and giving a press conference where you belligerently insist that you have already landed on Mars but the Fake-News Media just didn't see it. (The saved money can be used to deport people, preferably people who came here hoping to do science for us because we were a 'nice place' with 'freedoms.' In a sense, deportation is a kind of space travel. El Salvador is in space.) It's not like we're putting Sean Duffy in charge of a NASA that is going to try to go somewhere. He just needs to sit with it, hold its hand, and make it comfortable. 'Do you remember when we used to go to space, Sean?' 'Shhhh, grandpa.' Indeed, I got a look at new missions being contemplated by Duffy's combined Department of Transportation/NASA, and they are, frankly, a little bleak: Fake a moon landing, but on a much worse, dinkier soundstage this time. Communicate with extraterrestrial life, but in a hostile, careless way that compels them to immediately attack Earth. Space tariffs??? For the next mission, astronauts will fly to Cincinnati and back, coach class. Instead of the planned mission, astronauts will have a sleepover and watch Jupiter Ascending. Astronauts will simulate zero gravity by using a bounce house. Astronauts will journey to Jupiter, Florida. NASA will take over International Star Registry but accept payment in $TRUMP coin only. Search for life in the universe, but not intelligent life. All astronauts will be routed through Newark Liberty International Airport. Light rail will be announced and not built, but for the moon this time. All astronauts will be dropped off at the International Space Station, and then NASA will announce that it has to go out to buy cigarettes. Speed of light will be revised down to 47 miles an hour to honor Donald J. Trump and make the rate of travel more impressive. The team monitoring large asteroids that are coming dangerously close to Earth will start encouraging them to 'just come.' It's fine. There are some endeavors that are too great for any one individual, goals that require us to come together as a nation and pool our resources to achieve something bigger than any one of us could hope to do alone. And then there is space travel, which is for billionaires. Besides, if Star Wars has taught us anything, it is that space is full of Nazis. That is the absolute last thing we need: more Nazis. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News President Donald Trump is touring the areas in central Texas where a flash flood over the weekend killed at least 121 people. The FBI is investigating a possible shooting on a cannabis farm in California, where footage appears to show a man firing a weapon at federal agents during an immigration raid yesterday that drew hundreds of protesters. The State Department has begun firing more than 1,300 people, according to an internal notice. The agency is expected to lose approximately 3,000 workers after layoffs and voluntary resignations. Dispatches The Books Briefing: What happens anywhere—including moves toward authoritarianism—can also happen in America, Boris Kachka writes. Evening Read The End of Airport Shoe-Screening Is Populism Theater By Ian Bogost Air travelers in America shall no more doff their chukkas, their wedges, their wingtips, their espadrilles, or their Mary Janes, according to a rule-change announced by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Tuesday. It's been more than two decades since the Transportation Security Administration started putting people's footwear through its scanners, after a man named Richard Reid tried and failed to detonate his high-top sneakers on a flight to Miami in December 2001. Indeed, the requirement has been in place so long that my adult children, who were born just before and after the September 11 attacks, didn't even know its rationale. Feeling the cold airline-terminal floor through socks has been, for them, a lifelong ritual. More From The Atlantic Culture Break Watch. This season of Love Island USA (streaming on Peacock) is a romance competition with very little romance. What it reveals is the current state of Gen Z dating, Faith Hill writes. Log off. AI will never be your kid's friend, Russell Shaw writes. Chatbots will rob children of important lessons in how to be human.