logo
Body odour and sweaty pits be gone, thanks to these deodorants

Body odour and sweaty pits be gone, thanks to these deodorants

Vogue Singapore07-07-2025
Courtesy of Anteprima, spring/summer 2021
As anyone living in Southeast Asia can attest, you need only step out of the shower to feel like you're due for another one right after, some days. In our humidity where perspiration is more pronounced, we talk to an expert on why sweat matters, and dish on the tried-and-tested the deodorants we rely on to help keep us fresh and confident throughout the day. Is sweating important?
'Sweating or perspiration is an essential bodily function which regulates temperature. Our sweat glands secrete the salty liquid we are familiar with, to cool down our bodies and prevent overheating,' says Dr Siew Tuck Wah, medical director of Radium Medical Aesthetics. 'It is natural to sweat when the weather is hot. When it is humid, sweat does not evaporate as quickly, which gives us the unpleasant, sticky feeling on the skin which is so commonly experienced in hot and humid Singapore.' This also applies to the scalp, which may become itchy and inflamed due to sweat not being wicked away in our high humidity.
As it's essential to help maintain equilibrium, sweat or lack thereof, comes with a host of symptoms to be wary of.
'Failure to perspire—also known an anhydrosis—can cause dizziness, flushing and even heatstroke. It can happen as a result of skin diseases such trauma to the skin and psoriasis, or illnesses such as diabetes and Sjogren's syndrome,' says Dr Wah. On the other end of the spectrum, hyperhidrosis, or the problem of excessive sweating is a common one here in Southeast Asia. 'This condition affects 1 to 3 per cent of people, most commonly in the under arm region, which contains more sweat glands.' Antiperspirants vs Deodorants: what's the difference?
Deodorants make the skin more acidic, making it more difficult for bacteria to thrive. An antiperspirant blocks the sweating action of the glands, resulting in less sweating. 'Antiperspirants reduce sweating by temporarily blocking the sweat ducts with aluminium-salts, while deodorants reduce body odour by lowering the pH of the skin to discourage bacteria growth,' explains Dr Wah.
In 2019, the global antiperspirant and deodorant market was estimated to be worth about S$102 billion dollars and with a greater focus on personal care comes more options on the market today for discerning consumers. Today, options from traditional drugstore antiperspirants to luxe, 'clean' deodorant sticks abound—the latter in response to concerns that certain ingredients found in antiperspirants may trigger breast cancer. Can antiperspirants and deodorants cause breast cancer?
According to Dr Joline Lim, who is both a consultant at the National University Cancer Institute (NCIS) and assistant professor at the National University of Singapore's Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 'Some scientists have suggested a possible link between antiperspirants and deodorants and breast cancer due to the close proximity of the underarm to the breast, and also potential harmful active ingredients in these products. Several studies from various population groups have been conducted, which have largely shown no increased risk of use of these products to breast cancer. No study has conclusively proven that these products can cause cancer. Due to the conflicting nature of the results, additional research will be required to determine whether a direct relationship truly exist between antiperspirants and deodorants and cancer.'
In Dr Wah's opinion, also echoed by Singapore's Breast Cancer Foundation, 'The biggest myth about anti-perspirants is that it increases the risk of breast cancer. There is no scientific evidence to support this claim.' Thankfully, there are a host of aluminium-free options on the market for those wanting to play it extra safe. Courtesy of Chanel
1 / 8 Chanel Bleu de Chanel Deodorant Stick
The iconic fragrance dubbed as an 'ode to masculine freedom' is also available as a stick deodorant. Perfect for those who favour warm, sensual aromas, its unique fusion brilliantly melds cedar, tonka bean, and—interesting enough—New Caledonian sandalwood.
Chanel Bleu de Chanel Deodorant Stick, $57, available at Chanel Courtesy of Salt & Stone
2 / 8 Salt & Stone Saffron & Cedar Deodorant
Formidable is perhaps the best way to describe this best-selling deodorant from Salt & Stone. Touted as an extra-strength variant crafted without aluminium, alcohol, parabens, or phthalates, it scents the skin with a strong waft of sweet and spicy notes in the vein of saffron, neroli heart, and jasmine. What's more, it also comprises skincare benefits thanks to the inclusion of hyaluronic acid and probiotics. The former helps soothe and moisturise, while the latter further neutralises more pungent odours by balancing levels of bacteria.
Salt & Stone Saffron & Cedar Deodorant, $33, available at Sephora
3 / 8 Aesop Herbal Deodorant
Aesop Herbal Deodorant, $45, available at Aesop
4 / 8 Kiehl's Body Fuel Antiperspirant & Deodorant
They say this is for the guys, but because not every woman wants to smell like sunshine and daisies, here we are. As perspiration and body odour is a daily concern in these hot and humid climes, this roll-on antiperspirant from Kiehl's has you covered. It offers a fresh, energising, ozonic aroma, dries in a flash, and contains caffeine, vitamin C, and zinc to protect the skin.
Body Fuel Antiperspirant & Deodorant, $29, available at Kiehl's
5 / 8 Agent Nateur Holistick No. 3 Deodorant
If you've given up on the commercial, drugstore deodorants and are after a 'cleaner' solution, this luxe, aluminium-free stick deodorant is for you. Swipe under arms and enjoy its scent of honey, with organic lavender and eucalyptus essential oils that keeps you fresh all day long. Note to newbies looking to experience natural baking soda-based deodorants: patch test before use as this may initially irritate the skin under the arms.
Agent Nateur Holistick No. 3 Deodorant, US$26, available at Revolve
6 / 8 Clinique Antiperspirant Deodorant Roll-On
A fragrance-free roll-on that provides lasting protection from B.O. and sweat. This patented two-in-one deodorant and antiperspirant prevents dries quickly and doesn't stain your clothes.
Clinique Antiperspirant Deodorant Roll-On, $29, available at iShopChangi
7 / 8 Drunk Elephant Sweet Pitti Deodorant Cream
This creamy, almond-smelling deodorant is formulated to soothe and moisturise the skin under the arms while absorbing excess moisture to keep body odour at bay. In addition to mandelic acid—an AHA that kills the bacteria that causes a stink—the deodorant contains a blend of replenishing plant oils such as Drunk Elephant's beloved marula, baobab and mongongo seed, as well as marula and shea butters to replenish dry and irritated skin.
Drunk Elephant Sweet Pitti Deodorant, $27, available at Sephora
8 / 8 Dove Whitening Deodorant
Everything you'd expect from this cheap and cheerful drugstore find. It's derm-tested, loaded with Dove's proprietary 1/4 moisturising cream formula, and vitamins E and F to rejuvenate under arm skin that's darkened by plucking, and shaving, while offering all-day protection from sweat and stank.
Dove Whitening Deodorant, $4.35, available at Guardian
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taiwan denies President Lai blocked from US stopover
Taiwan denies President Lai blocked from US stopover

New Straits Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New Straits Times

Taiwan denies President Lai blocked from US stopover

TAIPEI: Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te has not been blocked from visiting the United States, Taipei's foreign ministry said Tuesday, insisting he has no plans to travel overseas "in the near future." The remarks came after US President Donald Trump's administration reportedly denied permission for Lai to transit in New York as part of an official trip to Latin America next month. Lai's office had never confirmed his travel plans, but Paraguay, Taiwan's only diplomatic ally in South America, said in mid-July that Lai would visit the country in 30 days. Such a visit would likely mean Lai would need to fly through US territory. "There has been no postponement, cancellation, nor any denial of permission for the transit by the US side," spokesman Hsiao Kuang-wei told reporters in Taipei. "Given the ongoing post-disaster recovery efforts in southern Taiwan, the ongoing reciprocal tariff negotiations with the US, and the relevant international situation, the president has no plans for overseas visits in the near future." In Washington, asked about the report, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told a media briefing that there had been no travel plans presented for Taiwan's president and therefore "nothing canceled." She reiterated Washington's policy that "transits by high-level Taiwan officials, including presidents, are fully consistent with our long-standing policy and practice. This has not changed." The Financial Times, citing unnamed sources, reported Tuesday that the Trump administration had denied permission for a Lai stopover in New York, after Beijing objected. China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and opposes any international exchanges with the democratic island. Asked about the reports on Tuesday, Beijing's foreign ministry reiterated its opposition to Taiwan's leaders visiting the United States. "This position is consistent, clear, and firm," spokesman Guo Jiakun said. The Financial Times said Lai decided not to travel after he was told he couldn't enter New York. Chinese and US officials held trade talks Tuesday in Stockholm, in a bid to extend a fragile truce in the face of Trump's global tariff war. While the United States does not recognise Taiwan as a country, Washington remains the island's most important partner and biggest arms supplier. Commenting on the Financial Times article, the former US House speaker Nancy Pelosi said the decision "sends a dangerous signal." "But once again, (Chinese) President Xi has achieved a victory over the values, security and economy of the United States in the Trump Administration blocking the democratically elected president of Taiwan from making a diplomatic trip through New York," Pelosi wrote on Facebook. "Let us hope President Trump's denial of this stopover in New York is not indicative of a dangerous change in US policy on Taiwan." Lai had originally planned stopovers in New York and Dallas as part of the trip to Paraguay and Central American allies Guatemala and Belize next month, Bloomberg News previously reported. They are among Taiwan's 12 remaining diplomatic allies. --AFP

Trump administration moves to revoke key climate science ruling
Trump administration moves to revoke key climate science ruling

New Straits Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New Straits Times

Trump administration moves to revoke key climate science ruling

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday moved to reverse a foundational scientific determination that underpins the US government's authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles and, more broadly, to combat climate change. Speaking at an auto dealership in Indianapolis, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin argued that the 2009 Endangerment Finding was based on flawed reasoning and had inflicted serious economic harm. "If finalised, today's announcement would amount to the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States," said the former Republican congressman. He was joined by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, a former fracking company CEO, whose department published a climate science study cited in the EPA action. The proposed reversal – first announced in March – will be subject to a 45-day public comment period and is certain to face legal challenges. While Zeldin cast the move as a way to undo what he called the "Biden-Harris administration's electric vehicle (EV) mandate," revoking the Endangerment Finding could also unravel the legal basis for a wide array of climate regulations, including those on power plants and oil and gas operations. In his remarks, Zeldin accused the EPA under former president Barack Obama, a Democrat, of making "mental leaps" in determining that heat-trapping gases posed a threat to public health and welfare. The EPA said in a press release that the finding had "been used to justify over US$1 trillion in regulations" and undoing it would save US$54 billion annually. A 302-page document outlining the rationale for the revocation makes a number of bold claims around climate science, including the assertion that "extreme weather events have not demonstrably increased relative to historical highs," citing the Energy Department report. It also speaks about the "beneficial impacts" of carbon emissions on plant growth and agricultural productivity. The Endangerment Finding was grounded in overwhelming scientific consensus and peer-reviewed research. It followed a landmark 2007 Supreme Court ruling that found greenhouse gases qualify as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act and directed the EPA to revisit its position. Transportation accounts for 28 percent of US greenhouse gas emissions – more than any other sector. If it were a country, the US transportation sector would rank as the fourth largest emitter of greenhouse gases globally, while the power sector would be fifth. Environmental groups and states are expected to swiftly sue. The case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court, which may need to overturn its own 2007 precedent to side with the current Republican administration. Dan Becker of the Centre for Biological Diversity told AFP the Endangerment Finding has survived multiple legal challenges by industry over the years, "but this time, it's the government itself mounting the attack." "Hopefully they will recognise that this is science and not politics – that there was a good reason for that precedent and no good reason to revoke it," said Becker. "But this is a very political court." He added that the administration's cost-saving arguments were misleading, pointing to official data showing that rules now targeted for repeal saved the average American driver US$6,000 in fuel and maintenance over the lifetime of vehicles built under the standards. Camille Pannu, an environmental law specialist at Columbia University, told AFP the Trump administration had failed to present robust legal arguments grounded in scientific evidence in its proposal. "I think they're hoping they can just refuse to regulate for four years and do crazy things during that time while it's all tied up in court," she said. Since returning to office, Trump has withdrawn the US from the Paris Agreement and launched a sweeping campaign to expand fossil fuel development. The announcement comes as tens of millions of Americans are baking under a brutal heat dome in the Southeast, while climate-fueled flooding earlier this month killed more than 100 people in Texas.--AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store