Valparaiso officials: City can keep ARPA funds used to buy land for now-defunct plans for sports complex
City officials say no, a point they emphasized during Monday's City Council meeting, which stretched almost five hours and drew hundreds of people to City Hall with concerns about the potential data center.
Council President Ellen Kapitan, D-At-large, called the issue a 'red flag' during the council meeting, adding it led to a lot of questions, including whether the city would be on the hook for repaying the funds.
'Is this legal?' she asked Patrick Lyp, the city attorney.
'The simple answer is yes,' he said, adding an outside law firm from Indianapolis helped the city work through the details.
If the Redevelopment Commission sells the property, he said, 'there would be no prohibition or covenant on the money.' The funds, he added, would return to the RDC.
The tenets of ARPA funding offer exemptions for paybacks of funds under $10 million, as long as they are used for public purposes, Lyp said. There also is no prohibition on the sale or use of the property.
'There's no obligation that would be tied to ARPA funds,' said Councilman Robert Cotton, D-2nd.
The city received $7,681,979.52, according to an amended resolution for ARPA spending passed by the City Council on July 25, 2022.
That included $4,717,278.92 for land acquisition 'for future Park related activities,' according to the resolution, and includes the parcels for the proposed sports complex.
The breakdown on the use of the rest of the funding, according to the resolution, included $1 million for the demolition of the former Whispering Pines facility and two adjacent residential structures on North Calumet Avenue, as well as site remediation, for a then-proposed adult enrichment center; $663,147.68 in premium pay for eligible city employees; $575,000 for several nonprofit agencies; $500,000 for the replacement of sidewalks, walking paths and other infrastructure; $40,000 for consultant fees and reserve funds for future audits, all related to disbursement of the ARPA funds; and $25,000 each to the police and fire departments, for various upgrades.
The brunt of the spending, including the parkland purchase, fell under ARPA's 'Provision of Governmental Services using Revenue Loss Funds,' per the council's resolution, which is the most flexible of categories for ARPA spending.
In emails to the Post-Tribune before the City Council meeting and Mayor Jon Costas' statement that the city would no longer pursue the data center proposal because of the public outcry, Lyp and George Douglas, the city's development director, offered further insight into the transfer of funds before the 248 acres, comprised of four parcels between County Roads 500 North and 400 North east of Indiana 49, was purchased for parkland.
According to the option agreement signed in January between the RDC and the data center developer, Agincourt Investments LLC, the RDC would have sold 180 acres of that property for just over $9 million, almost twice what the RDC paid for the land.
'The Valparaiso Redevelopment purchased the properties in 2022 with available cash funds. The City Council did approve the use of ARPA funds to reimburse the RDC for the full purchase price in August of 2022,' Douglas said in his email.
He added he didn't believe anything happens to the ARPA funds once they have been used to reimburse the RDC for the land purchase and if the RDC were to sell the property, the commission could use the proceeds for any of its permissible expenditures.
'The ARPA funds were used for an allowed purpose when the City reimbursed the RDC,' Lyp said in his email. 'If the land is sold, the proceeds would be paid to the RDC and used by the RDC consistent with Indiana law.'
Jennifer Hora, a political science professor at Valparaiso University who focuses on state and local government, agreed that the ARPA funds come with flexibility but said that flexibility is supposed to come with accountability and responsibility.
She summed up her concerns as 'the spirit of the law vs. the letter of the law.'
City officials dropped the plans for the park when, according to then-Mayor Matt Murphy, bids for the project, slated for $30 million, came in $7 million over budget. Costas said in an interview with the Post-Tribune last month that the city was going to invest more in its current parks instead and scuttle the plans for the sports complex.
City officials, Hora said, 'threw their hands up' and walked away from the sports complex proposal when it came in over budget and proposed using that land for the data center.
The future of the land purchased with those funds is unknown.
'This is not transparency,' she said. 'This is definitely not the spirit of ARPA law.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Olympia council votes 4-3 to send $20 minimum wage, Workers' Bill of Rights to public vote
The Olympia City Council voted 4-3 on July 22 against an initiative to adopt a Workers' Bill of Rights and raise the minimum wage across the city to $20. It unanimously voted to forward the initiative along for the people to vote on in November. The decision came after several community members provided testimony both for and against the proposal, and nearly a split vote between council members. Mayor Dontae Payne was the deciding vote. The council voted unanimously in a separate vote to send the initiative to the November ballot. The council will take action on for and against committees for the ballot initiative during its Aug. 4 meeting. The initiative states workers deserve fair and secure scheduling with advance notice of their work schedules. They also want the opportunity to move into full-time work when available, and to be paid fairly for their work. The initiative also outlines workers' right to a safe workplace. If adopted, the minimum wage in Olympia would increase on Jan. 1. A phase-in period is included for small and medium-sized businesses to adapt to paying higher wages. Comments from the public Emily Clouse, a Thurston County commissioner, spoke in favor of the initiative, but not on the behalf of the commission as a whole. Clouse said she grew up in her parents' coffee stand and car wash business, and she respects how hard small businesses work to make payroll and build community. She said she knows from her work at the county and as a service provider in Olympia that the people keeping those businesses running are the same people on housing waitlists, in line at the food bank and trying to piece together child care. 'When pay hours and scheduling are unstable, everything in a family's life becomes unstable: housing, health, school and safety,' Clouse said. 'That instability hits hardest for young workers, caregivers, queer and trans workers, immigrants, disabled folks and people coming home from incarceration, exactly the neighbors we say we want to keep rooted here in our community.' Clouse urged the council to pass the initiative as written and said setting a fair baseline helps good employers who are already doing right by their staff. Alice Rosewater said she's a local library worker and member of the executive board for the Thurston Lewis Mason Central Labor Council. She supported passing the initiative and said ballot initiatives are rare in the City of Olympia. Rosewater said the number of signatures needed in order to put an initiative on the ballot is unreasonably high, and much higher per capita than what's required in other cities in Washington. 'Over 5,700 signatures after ballot collection have to be verified, representing nearly 10% of the entire population,' Rosewater said. 'But in spite of this massive hurdle, Olympians have made their voices clear. We demand a higher minimum wage. We demand basic workplace protections in our city.' Rosewater questioned whether it was democratic to send the initiative to a vote of the people when it gives business lobbyists the chance to pour money into campaigns to sway the public opinion. Tammie Hetrick, the president and CEO of the Washington Food Industry Association, didn't support the council adopting the initiative Tuesday night. She asked that it be moved to a public vote for further consideration and for the public to learn more about its implications. Hetrick said she's concerned there will be unintended consequences on the cost of food for grocers and convenience stores that average a 1% profit margin. 'They would not have a choice but to increase food costs to comply with this mandate,' she said. Mindy Roberts is a staff member at the Union Gospel Mission. She said the morning of July 22, more than 80 men and women woke up on the floor of the mission. Before the end of the morning, the mission had served more than 300 meals. Roberts said most of their employees make at least $17/hr and are provided meals. She said they have subsidized housing and try to do everything they can to make sure employees are cared for. She said if the initiative passes, the mission can't afford to pay its workers. 'We won't be able to keep the shelter open, potentially, or we're going to have to stop serving those meals, or we're going to have to talk to the children that are being served and let them know that the kid's club isn't going to be able to be open in September,' Roberts said. Marisa Wulff, co-owner of the Mud Bay pet store chain, asked the council to forward the initiative to a vote of the people. She said the city needs to find the right balance between great jobs for people and the survival of Olympia's local businesses. 'Our company is owned by our family and we're passionate about being a good employer,' Wulff said. 'We provide schedules three weeks in advance. We provide medical, dental and vision insurance for our full-time employees, a generous staff discount, paid time off and a 401K match. We provide security buttons for employees when they work alone.' Wulff said during the last few years, the complexities of being in business have increased dramatically because of increased costs. 'We have had to make cutbacks, including reducing store staffing levels by more than 20%,' she said. 'We have 140 fewer employees than we did three years ago with the same number of stores; our employees used to be almost all full time. We've had to shorten shift links and hire part time. Many of our stores now open and close with only one person.' Wulff said her company is struggling to compete with goliaths like Chewy and Amazon. 'Chewy is shipping products into our communities, but they are not providing jobs for our residents, and we are,' she said. Comments from the council The proposal to adopt the initiative without sending it to the public to vote on was supported by council members Clark Gilman, Jim Cooper and Robert Vanderpool. Gilman said the measure came before the council with more than enough signatures to qualify it for the ballot. He said the council should pass the measure and use time and resources that would be spent on an election campaign instead to meet with employers and workers and conduct a study to address the council's questions. 'One of the questions we've asked often is, who will this measure benefit? And in my world, the working class is not a temporary phase, it's a lifetime of work,' Gilman said. 'Hourly workers in many different industries, workers in different phases of their life, all would benefit from increased pay and scheduling protection, whether the paycheck comes from a boutique or large, locally owned or corporate employer.' He said the people who would benefit from the Workers' Bill of Rights in the community range from teenagers who have to contribute to the family budget, to many parents with school age children, to elders who must continue to work to pay for their health care concerns and expenses. 'The measure is an important step to leveling the playing field in Olympia and creating a strong Olympia where everybody has a chance to belong and an opportunity to live with dignity,' Gilman said. Cooper said the Workers' Bill of Rights isn't a vague aspiration, but a clear, community-driven mandate. 'Over 13,000 signatures were submitted, far exceeding the threshold required,' Cooper said. 'That's not just a number. That's thousands of our neighbors, constituents and local workers from around the region telling us they want action now.' He said the protections laid out in the initiative aren't radical demands, but baseline expectations of a just and moderate economy. 'Studies consistently show that higher minimum wages do not reduce youth employment,' he said. 'In fact, they often lead to better job stability and more predictable hours, things young people need just as much as anyone else. And for nonprofits, fair wages help retain staff, reduce turnover and improve service delivery.' Cooper said the council often meets to talk about housing affordability, zoning, density and supply, but rarely are wages discussed. He said 44% of households in Olympia fall under the term asset-limited, income-constrained and employed. He said these are people who often work full time but still can't afford their basic necessities. 'Housing costs in Olympia have risen 55% over the past seven years, while wages have only risen 38%,' Cooper said. 'The gap is not just a statistic. It's a trap. It keeps people stuck in the cycle of rent burden, unable to save, unable to move, unable to build wealth, and when people can't move up, they can't move out.' Cooper said the city can't solve its housing crisis without addressing wages. 'We cannot build a thriving city on the backs of underpaid workers,' he said. 'We cannot keep deferring decisions that we have the power and the responsibility to make.' Mayor Dontae Payne said he couldn't be in support of the initiative because there were a number of things he found problematic. He said the initiative isn't written well and he's concerned about the impacts it will have on smaller businesses in Olympia. He said just last week the council had a study session and posed questions to city staff that the council needed answers to before coming to a decision, yet no answers have been provided. 'They're basic questions: what are the current economic conditions of the City of Olympia? Why are we making this decision, and for whom? How many will it impact? Who will be affected? What are the consequences that we foresee and what are the ones that maybe we're not thinking about?' he said. Payne said the city hasn't done its homework, and it shouldn't be passing policies without all the answers. He said Olympia isn't Seattle, and you can't take what's happening there and plot it in a city the size of Olympia. 'Please understand that there will be those who will benefit from this action and there will be those who do not,' he said. 'And it is just not a reality to sit here and say that it's going to be beneficial to the majority of people in this community, because I don't think it will, and so I will not be supporting adopting it as an ordinance to the city tonight.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Election Day is coming soon in Wichita. What's on the ballot, who can vote
Early voting has started for primary elections in Sedgwick County. In Wichita, the Aug. 5 primary will narrow races for city council and the school board. Voters in Maize will decide whether to implement a sales tax. What's on my ballot? Not everyone can vote in the primary election. Each election is limited to people in that particular voting district. There is one primary for a Wichita City Council seat. In District 1, five candidates are vying to replace exiting council member Brandon Johnson. Those candidates are Aujanae Bennett, Darryl Carrington, LaWanda DeShazer, Chris Pumpelly and Joseph Shepard. The two candidates with the most votes will advance to the general election on Nov. 4. District 1 includes much of north-central and northeast Wichita. It generally stretches from Kellogg north to 37th Street between Hydraulic and Woodlawn. Find a map here. Two Wichita school board seats also have primaries. Previously all voters in the school district could participate, but after a change in 2022, voting is limited to people in the specific voting district. District 1 covers the northeast section of the school district. It extends from Central on the south to 69th Street on the north between I-135 and Webb. The District 1 candidates are incumbent Diane Albert, Sarah McMillen, Mackenzi Truelove and Kyle Wiseman. District 5 covers much of west Wichita. It extends north to 17th Street, south to 31st and from Meridian to 119th Street. The candidates are incumbent Kathy Bond, Michelle Cunningham, Amy Jensen, Phillip Samuels and Caleb Smith. Voters in Maize will decide whether to approve a proposed 1% sales tax for the city. Maize would use the sales tax revenue to fund maintenance and improvements to streets, sidewalks and related drainage projects, as well as to lower property taxes. When and where to vote Tuesday, July 29 is the last day to apply for an advance mail ballot. Fill out the form to apply here. Ballots must be mailed to the Sedgwick County election office, or turned in to a polling place or secure drop-off box by 7 p.m. on the primary date, Aug. 5. A map of ballot drop-offs is at There are also several options to vote early in person. Early voting started July 21 at the Sedgwick County Election Office. It's from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays until August 1 and from 8 a.m. until noon on August 4. Early voting is also available at five satellite locations next week. They are the Bel Aire City Building, Maize City Hall and three Wichita churches — Grace Presbyterian Church, Progressive Missionary Baptist Church and Westlink Church of Christ. On July 31 and Aug. 1, voting at the satellite locations is from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. On August 2, it's from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Registered voters in one of the districts with a primary can go to any of the early voting locations, regardless of where they live. On Election Day, voting is open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. People can vote only at their assigned voting location. You can locate your polling place at Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
13 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Costa Mesa Council approves 40-unit Victoria Place, after planning commission denial
Perhaps not willing to let perfect be the enemy of the good, the Costa Mesa City Council last week approved plans for Victoria Place, a 40-unit complex near Newport Boulevard and Victoria Street previously rejected by the city's planning commission. During its earlier consideration of the condominium complex — which would be included in a rare and never-initiated residential overlay district allowing commercial properties to be used for housing — the planning commission denied the proposal in a 5-2 vote during a June 9 meeting. Commissioners contended the 1.77-acre parcel qualifies for rezoning under the voter-backed Measure K initiative and, as such, could potentially be more thoroughly developed to meet Costa Mesa's housing needs than what they regarded as the archaic mish-mash of alternative approaches and deviations placed before them. There's just one hitch. The citywide rezoning of certain commercial corridors under Measure K, passed in 2022, hasn't happened and is only now in the visioning stages. So while a transformation of the partially vacant site, currently home to a lighting store and boat storage facilities, into needed housing might be a welcome one, ideas on how to optimize that shift differ. Furthermore, the City Council initially reviewed the plan in a screening nearly one year ago, providing feedback on open space, landscaping and pedestrian safety, suggestions that were incorporated into an amended version of the plan. 'You were responsive to what we said in August,' Mayor John Stephens told applicant WMC Partners' Tony Weeda ahead of the July 15 vote. 'And it wouldn't be fair play, in my opinion, to lay some other objectives on you that we wouldn't express in August.' The approval of Victoria Place — named after the small side street it fronts — allows for 18 duplexes and four detached residences, each comprising roughly 2,700 square feet in three stories with a ground-floor work space, two-car garage, balcony and rooftop deck standing 39 feet, 6 inches in height. Although they are ownership dwellings, nothing would prevent an owner from renting out a unit. Fitting those units on the smallish lot requires setback reductions, a shrinking of space in between buildings and in garage width and a reduction in parking spaces, from the 150 required to just 103. Those entitlements and others will be codified in a site-specific master plan under the city's residential incentive overlay district, created in 2016 but never applied until now. Don Lamm — a consultant for WMC who also served as Costa Mesa's deputy city manager and developmental services director from 1986 to 2009 — told the council what planning commissioners saw as too-abundant 'deviations' might be instead viewed as viable alternatives for breathing life into an underutilized area. 'This is simply a very nice [40-unit] condominium project on a property that really needs to be recycled or redeveloped,' Lamm said. 'In reality, these deviations are good because it's the incentive the applicant needs to build this project to provide these new housing units.' Two people who spoke during the public comments portion of the meeting criticized the project as an inefficient use of the land and for the potential increased vehicle traffic it could present for residents. 'There's no clear expectation, either for the public or developer, no ideal to conform to that reflects what the city and public would like to see in the future,' said Costa Mesa resident and City Hall critic Cynthia McDonald. 'The planning commission got it right — this needs to be rethought.' Council members, however, favored the project, making minor modifications so that a landscaped peninsula out front, to remain under the city's purview, would be protected from vehicle traffic and steps would be taken to add architectural elements to the ends of the units fronting Victoria Place. Stephens said the development will transform a site that is currently blighted. 'It's exactly on point with language we had in Measure K, which we all fought so hard to get passed to change our kind-of outdated land use into housing,' he said. 'Could it be better? I don't know. [But] it's going to be a huge improvement when we drive by.'
