SNP punishing voters opposed to independence, claims David Mundell
David Mundell, who served in government under David Cameron and Theresa May, said NHS boards and councils in heavily unionist areas were 'struggling to provide basic services' due to what he suggested was a deliberate 'politically motivated' ploy by nationalist politicians.
He cited Dumfries and Galloway, and the Scottish Borders, as parts of Scotland that were particularly struggling as a result of voters' 'pro-UK' constitutional views.
While a majority of voters in 28 of Scotland's 32 council areas voted against independence in 2014, the idea was opposed in the south of the country, where two thirds supported remaining in the UK.
Mundell made the incendiary allegation that SNP ministers were deliberately punishing pro-UK communities in the Commons, at a session of Scottish questions.
While public services across Scotland have complained of being under financial pressure, Dumfries and Galloway council said in March that it had been forced to plug an 'unprecedented' shortfall of £30 million over three years. NHS Dumfries and Galloway has recently cut back on mowing lawns due to a need to deliver £23 million in savings.
Mundell, the long-serving MP for Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale & Tweeddale, asked Ian Murray, the current Scottish secretary, whether he shared his view that unionist areas were being deliberately targeted.
Mundell said: 'Whatever the budget SNP Scottish government have, they have cynically and systematically deprived funding from areas that do not support independence, leaving councils like Dumfries and Galloway and Scottish Borders and their health boards struggling to provide basic services.'
Following his remarks in the Commons, Mundell claimed that his constituents felt they were being deliberately punished for their 'pro-UK views'.
He added: 'The deeply damaging impact of the SNP's politically motivated decisions can be seen right across my constituency. Our NHS is in a state of permanent crisis, schools are being earmarked for closure and vital roads like the A75 and A76 have been left in a state of disrepair on the SNP's watch.
'I was speaking on behalf of many people in my constituency who are sick and tired of the SNP government ignoring this area and putting money into public services and major projects across Scotland.
'This area is long overdue its fair share and shouldn't be missing out for wanting to keep our close ties with our neighbours.'
According to Audit Scotland, councils across Scotland face a £647 million gap between expenditure and the funding they expect to receive this year.
As a percentage of their total revenue budget, Scottish Borders and Dumfries and Galloway councils did not have a disproportionately large funding gap compared with other local authorities.
However, Glasgow, Dundee and North Lanarkshire, three of the four areas to back independence in 2014, had below average budget gaps. The fourth, West Dunbartonshire, had a slightly higher shortfall than average.
Responding to Mundell in the Commons, Murray said: 'The whole of Scotland voted against independence in 2014. And it seems to me that the SNP government strategy is to starve all of Scotland's public services of the vital funding they require.'
The Scottish government has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
SNP ‘squanders' £20m of public money on ‘woke' jobs and training
SNP ministers have been accused of 'wasting' £20 million of taxpayers' money on 'woke' jobs and training in Scotland's huge public sector. The Scottish Tories said figures showed the sum has been spent on equality, diversity and inclusion (IDE) roles and training since 2019. The total included £2.5 million spent by Scottish councils, £1 million by the justice sector, £8.9 million by the NHS, £5.9 million by universities and £1.7 million by the Scottish Government. The Tories said the real total is likely to be much higher, as many organisations said they could not provide their spending as the figure was not held centrally. Rachael Hamilton MSP, the Scottish Conservatives' deputy leader, said: 'Hard-pressed Scots will be outraged that the SNP have squandered millions on woke training and roles, when they are making savage cuts to vital public services. Examples of the spending uncovered by the FoIs include £3,000 for membership of Stonewall's controversial Diversity Champions Scheme and £1,100 on transgender awareness training. The spending was disclosed after The Telegraph reported in February that there are 46 Scottish Government employees with 'diversity', 'equality' or 'inclusion' in their job titles. Kaukab Stewart, the SNP Equalities Minister, said they were on course to cost the public purse around £4 million in 2024-25, the equivalent of £86,326 for each post. It also emerged that more than 6,000 SNP government staff have taken part in 'mandatory annual inclusive culture training' to ensure they all feel welcome and valued in the workplace. Ms Hamilton said: 'This is yet another example of the SNP prioritising ideological projects over the issues that people actually care about. 'It's difficult to justify this level of spending when the NHS remains in permanent crisis mode, educational standards are plummeting, and Scotland continues to have the highest drug death rate in Europe. 'It's no wonder Scots are fed up with Left-wing politicians at Holyrood. They're wasting taxpayers' money like it's going out of fashion.' The IDE job costs were published amid a landmark employment tribunal brought by nurse Sandie Peggie against NHS Fife and Beth Upton, a transgender doctor who was allowed to use a female hospital changing room. Isla Bumba, the health board's equalities officers, told the tribunal last week that the definition of biological sex was 'far more complex' than whether someone had a male or female body. She said she would 'hazard a guess' that she was female, but she had not had her chromosomes tested to find out 'what my own body is made of biologically.' Ms Bumba also said that she did not need to 'know anything' about the body of Dr Upton, who was born male, before advising that the medic should be given access to the female changing room at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife. JK Rowling took to social media at the weekend to accuse NHS Fife of being 'ideologically captured' but placed blame at the door of the SNP government. 'This is Nicola Sturgeon's legacy: a government that publicly backs the hapless, unprofessional, ideologically captured health board that's persecuting a nurse for asserting her legal right to a single-sex changing room,' she wrote. The tribunal is scheduled to resume on Monday morning after NHS Fife released a controversial media statement on Friday afternoon that accused Sex Matters, a human rights charity which is backing Ms Peggie, of 'steering public opinion' on the row. It also said the debate on the case had led to staff receiving personal attacks, including a threat of physical harm and sexual violence reported to Police Scotland. But the board was forced to amend the statement at least twice after Ms Peggie's lawyers accused it of suggesting that her supporters were behind the attacks. A sentence was added saying Sex Matters had not 'contributed to the behaviour or issues mentioned above.' But Russell Findlay, the Scottish Tory leader, demanded that NHS Fife's board, including chief executive Carol Potter, resign over its 'dire' handling of the case. An NHS Fife spokesman said: 'As this is an active legal case, it would be inappropriate to respond to these comments.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment further while judicial proceedings in an employment tribunal are ongoing.' Ms Sturgeon's spokeswoman was approached for comment.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Police calendar's one day for women… two months for trans
Police officers are being encouraged to mark Pansexual Visibility Day and a host of other dates related to the force's equality agenda as part of a ' woke inclusion calendar'. The list of key days - which also includes Asexuality Day and Lesbian Visibility Day - was shared with officers and staff allowing them to 'seek further information on them if they wish'. Last Wednesday saw International Drag Day and Monday last week was Non-Binary People's Day – while International Pronouns Day is on October 20. Not all of the dates are 'marked nationally by the organisation' - but officers and civilian staff can request more detail about them, potentially allowing them to request permission to mark specific dates in the workplace. Last night Dr Kath Murray, of gender-critical think-tank Murray Blackburn Mackenzie, said: 'Police Scotland's 'inclusion' calendar celebrates just one day for women, compared to two months for transgender causes. 'The force also signposts days celebrating drag queens, pronouns, and fringe gender identities. 'It has no formal representation for women, nor does it recognise the [gender-critical] Police SEEN network.' The calendar opens with LGBT History Month in February, with Purple Friday marked as the last Friday in February, a day when people can show their solidarity with LGBTIQ+ people by wearing the colour purple. Transgender Day of Visibility is on March 31, with Asexuality Day on April 6 and Lesbian Visibility Day on April 26. International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia is on May 17, while Pansexual Visibility Day is on May 24. Pansexuality is defined as a sexual orientation characterised by attraction to people regardless of their gender identity. Transgender Awareness Week runs from November 13-19, while Transgender Day of Remembrance is on November 20. The row follows Police Scotland's decision not to allow officers in uniform to take part in a Pride march in Glasgow on Saturday. It came after a High Court judgment south of the Border last week which found this was a breach of impartiality, following a judicial review. Last month Police Scotland was accused of promoting trans ideology by putting up virtue-signalling gender posters in a station. The placards explain the words and phrases by going through each letter of the alphabet - for example 'G' is for 'gender identity'. Police Scotland has also been criticised over delays in implementing a separate Supreme Court judgment in April which stated that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. Last year Chief Constable Jo Farrell said the public and MSPs should be 'assured' that a man who commits rape or serious sexual assault will always be recorded as male. In March, the Mail revealed that this stance, which campaigners said was a major policy U-turn, was not communicated to officers, sparking claims that police may have misled parliament. And last week the Mail revealed that no one will face action over a 'deeply offensive' police document which compared gender-critical feminists to Nazis. Police Scotland was at the centre of a row in May after staff were told the concept of 'gender binary' - the belief there are only two genders - was a 'key feature' of the Nazis' ideology. The document was posted on the force's intranet by a serving constable who did not need authorisation to do so at the time. Last night Scottish Tory equalities spokesman Tess White said: 'Hard-working Scots expect Police Scotland to be focused on tackling crime, not a woke inclusion calendar. 'It's just common sense that keeping people safe should be the top priority for the force.' Commenting further on the calendar row, Dr Murray said: 'There are serious questions here as to whether Police Scotland would pass the impartiality test set out in the judgment against the Chief Constable of Northumbria Police issued this week, in relation to its participation in a Pride march.' A Police Scotland spokesman said: 'These dates are part of Police Scotland's inclusion calendar and, while not all are marked nationally by the organisation, listing them allows colleagues to seek further information on them if they wish.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN DAISLEY: Of course the SNP has never been in politics for Unionists... now it seems not to care for Nationalists, either
The older you get the grumpier you become about repeats, and not just on television. In the world of public policy, you begin to notice that the same bad ideas keep coming round and round. The sales pitch might be altered, the window dressing rejigged, but the goods being flogged remain unchanged. Albert Einstein said repeating the same action while expecting a different outcome was the definition of madness, but it's also an uncanny description of politics. John Swinney 's new independence plan, announced at the end of last week, proposes a three-pronged approach. First, it commits to building up support for separation so that it becomes the settled will of the vast majority of Scots. Next, it undertakes to ramp up pressure on Westminster to concede that will and permit another referendum to confirm it. Finally, it asks the voters to give the SNP another term in charge at next year's Scottish Parliament elections. The word 'new' is doing a lot of heavy-lifting here. Swinney is not submitting any novel tactics or strategies; he offers no answers to impediments economic or constitutional. He is simply rewrapping the same hollow pledges in a shinier bow, and he is doing it for cynical reasons. A growing faction inside the SNP wants Swinney gone and replaced by a younger, more aggressive leader like Stephen Flynn, whom they believe can regain momentum on the constitution. Swinney is looking out for his own skin, not Scotland. In his defence, he's hardly the first SNP leader to string along the party faithful with empty promises. There is an Indyref 2 panic button at Bute House and, little more than a year into his leadership, Swinney has punched it. It's a wonder this button still works given the scale of overuse in the past decade. In March 2016, Nicola Sturgeon hit the alarm and announced 'a new initiative to build support for independence' that summer. Once summer was over, she unveiled a 'new conversation' on independence, then, the following month, a consultation on an Indyref2 Bill. In March 2017, Sturgeon said autumn 2018 would be a 'common sense' time for a new referendum and, later that month, that she planned to request a Section 30 order from Westminster. The following May, the panic alarm was back in use when Sturgeon published the report of her Sustainable Growth Commission into 'the economic opportunities of independence'. In April 2019, she confirmed her government would be 'giving people a choice on independence later in this term of parliament'. That October, she told SNP conference there would be a referendum in 2020. In January 2021, Sturgeon promised a referendum if the SNP won that May's Holyrood elections and then, in September, commissioned a 'detailed prospectus' on the case for independence. Two months later, she told SNP conference that her independence campaign would relaunch in 2022. In June 2022, the Indyref button was jabbed again, as Sturgeon set out plans for a referendum in 2023. Then, that November, she declared the 2024 general election a 'de facto referendum'. Come October 2023, her successor Humza Yousaf stated that election would in fact be an opportunity to give the SNP a mandate to enter negotiations for a second referendum. Then last June, his successor John Swinney said voting SNP in the following month's election would 'intensify the pressure to secure Scottish independence'. For a decade, party members have been left waiting for a referendum that was never coming and perhaps never will. The SNP has enough financial woes as it is, but its constitutional strategists ought to be paying royalties to the estate of Samuel Beckett. The secret to the SNP's success in the Alex Salmond and early Sturgeon years was its positioning as a big-tent, New Labour-style party. By being all things to all people, the Nationalists were able to cobble together a formidable electoral coalition. Independence supporters could back the SNP safe in the knowledge that secession was its chief priority, while Unionists could back them knowing they were in no hurry to secede. That tent has been stretched to breaking point. Swinney's latest ruse will have been greeted with horror by pro-Union voters and people of all constitutional persuasions who want to see the Scottish Government focused on the economy, services and public safety for the time being. He was supposed to be different. A fresh start. A first minister who would move beyond division and get Holyrood back on track. Instead, he has revealed himself to be every bit the political tribalist that Sturgeon and Yousaf were, more fixated on internal party disputes than on the concerns of ordinary Scots. Swinney has made clear that he puts party before nation. How can he expect voters who put Scotland before the SNP to lend him their votes? And while he disregards the interests of pro-Union voters, he doesn't do so to serve the interests of pro-independence voters. He puts party before nation but also puts self before party. All Yes voters get from Swinney is pandering. He has no intention of doing anything for them. He talks independence to get them riled up and out to the polls to vote SNP but, once the ballots are in, the constitution tumbles back down the hierarchy of priorities. Unionists decry the contempt in which they are held within the senior ranks of the SNP, but they should spare a thought for the grubby, exploitative way in which Yes voters are treated. Set aside your own thoughts about independence. It is something half the people in this country believe in, many of them passionately and some of them their whole life long. Time and again they were assured by Sturgeon, then Yousaf, and now Swinney that it was coming yet for a' that. One more plan, one more push. It's within reach, almost there. Vote here, donate there. But it wasn't coming, it still isn't, and it won't be any time soon. At this point, there are two paths to independence. Convince Westminster to allow a repeat of the 2014 vote. Granting another referendum would be an act of unparalleled stupidity, sure to do grievous harm to Britain, and would require a prime minister with the strategic nous of a baked potato. You can see why the SNP might harbour hopes for Keir Starmer, but it is still highly unlikely that Westminster would take the risk. Alternatively, you could go down the route of a unilateral declaration of independence, but it's fraught with risk, has no guarantee of success and might even make some important nations ill-disposed to Scotland. (They have their own separatist movements and it would not be in their interests for a Scottish UDI to be a success.) If Holyrood declares independence, there is no mechanism to compel Westminster or any foreign state to recognise it. Instead of being honest with their voters, the SNP leadership spins out fantasies like Swinney's three-pronged plan and tries to gull ordinary Nationalists into thinking independence is imminent, so they keep voting and donating. Giving people false hope is one of the cruellest things you can do in politics but the SNP does it to its own voters without compunction. The SNP has never been in politics for Unionists, of course, but it's no longer in it for Nationalists either. It has ceased to be a big-tent party and has become a narrow elite that exists only to serve its own interests and maintain itself in power. No plan, no matter how many prongs it has, is going to change that. The only way forward is for all Scots, Unionists and Nationalists alike, to declare their independence from the SNP at the ballot box.
