logo
India and Asean are growing apart. Blame Trump tariffs

India and Asean are growing apart. Blame Trump tariffs

Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
It's still far from clear what President Donald Trump's tariffs will eventually look like. But the pressures they will put on stable trading relationships — even those that don't directly involve the US — are already visible. Ties between India and the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations are already fraying: They're being pushed into different camps, and the free-trade agreement they signed in 2010 could become an unexpected victim of the turmoil.Trump might be the immediate cause of this rift, but, as always, China's massive manufacturing overcapacity is at the heart of the problem. Even if no country knows what rates they or others will face, everyone can be reasonably certain that the mainland's tariffs will be the highest of all. Unfortunately, this also means that there's a big incentive to help Beijing game the system enough that we all trust each other less.Many Asian countries are reasonably pleased at the thought that duties on their exports will be lower than on those out of China: They've all been searching for a way to regain a sliver of competitiveness, and this might help. But the same nations are also a little scared. They fear a flood of underpriced Chinese goods, once meant for the US, will inundate their fledgling manufacturing sectors.In fact, that's already happening to an extent, and policymakers are responding. Vietnam has introduced anti-dumping tariffs on certain kinds of Chinese steel; Indonesia has banned direct-shipping e-commerce apps like Temu.But, for some, there's also the tempting possibility that China's overcapacity can be turned from an enemy into an ally. Any country that remains integrated both with China and those that are putting up tariff walls could, if it wanted, become a location for the trans-shipment of goods. Instead of paying the higher China levies, importers would pay lower ones imposed on the third country — and share a bit of the take with local partners.Tariff arbitrage could become as profitable in the future as interest rate arbitrage is today. The more countries that impose anti-dumping duties on China, the more money the successful trans-shipper would make. The US, for one, is already very concerned that parts of Asean might take this route — which is why Trump's trade deal with Vietnam included a clause that any goods suspected of being trans-shipped would pay double tariffs.For countries like India, it's an even greater fear. India's commerce minister caused a bit of a stir recently when he described Asean as 'China's B-team.' That was certainly impolitic. But, perhaps, not entirely unjustified.New Delhi has been trying to update its free trade agreement with Asean for a while. Its particular focus has been to tighten rules-of-origin requirements — the way in which you ensure that a free trade agreement only benefits local producers in both countries, not those shipping goods that originate elsewhere.Indian officials feel that Asean has been going slow on these discussions. Meanwhile, news broke in May that the bloc had expanded the scope of its parallel FTA with China. They achieved that in double-quick time — negotiations only started in November 2022 — which raised a few eyebrows in New Delhi.Some in India, clearly including its commerce minister, now seem to think that tariff-free trade with Southeast Asia is the same as opening your market to China. That isn't true — or, at any rate, not yet. But the fact is that member states simply aren't doing enough to reassure their other trading partners, including India.It would be a nightmare for most countries, including India, if closed-off blocs were to replace today's open trading system. Yet Trump's actions, when combined with China's overcapacity, are taking us there. Any country that wants to trade with both sides of the divide — which, clearly, many in Southeast Asia would prefer — will also need to be able to be very transparent about the goods it is exporting, and how much value has been added domestically. In other words, it's Asean's move: They will have to step up and give most of their trading partners, not just India and the US, a clearer view into their supply chains.The US is clearly worried that some countries will evade its tariffs. Those concerns will be shared, especially by India. New Delhi seems to believe that, if world trade blocs form, then Asean has already chosen its side — and it won't be the one India picks. Trade's impossible without trust, and these two partners will have to work to rebuild it.The views expressed are personal and do not reflect the official position of The Economic Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Privacy group files complaint against AliExpress, TikTok, WeChat
Privacy group files complaint against AliExpress, TikTok, WeChat

Economic Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Privacy group files complaint against AliExpress, TikTok, WeChat

Austrian advocacy group noyb on Thursday filed data privacy complaints against China's AliExpress TikTok and WeChat , saying they failed to comply with European Union laws on providing users a full copy of their most tech companies have a tool that allows them to fulfil requests for downloading user information, some Chinese companies have made it difficult to access the information, noyb said."TikTok, AliExpress and WeChat love collecting as much data about you as possible - but vehemently refuse to give you full access as required by EU law," said Kleanthi Sardeli, data protection lawyer at is known for filing complaints against American companies such as Apple, Alphabet, and Meta, leading to several investigations and billions of dollars in January, noyb filed complaints against six Chinese companies and sought to suspend data transfers to China and called for fines that can reach up to 4% of a firm's global revenue.

US tells automakers they face no fuel economy penalties for last three years
US tells automakers they face no fuel economy penalties for last three years

Time of India

time8 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US tells automakers they face no fuel economy penalties for last three years

Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a letter to automakers seen by Reuters it is working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules. The decision is one of a number made by Washington to make it easier for automakers to build gasoline-powered vehicles and to make electric vehicle sales more costly. Last year, Chrysler-parent Stellantis paid $190.7 million in civil penalties for failing to meet U.S. fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 after paying nearly $400 million for penalties from 2016 through 2019. GM previously paid $128.2 million in penalties for 2016 and 2017. Trump last month signed a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to bar California's landmark plan to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. Last year, Tesla said it received $2.8 billion in global revenue from regulatory credits it earns from selling zero-emission EVs and sells to other automakers seeking to meet vehicle emissions targets. Republican Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio said the costs automakers paid Tesla to be in compliance were "outrageous". Trump NHTSA Administrator nominee Jonathan Morrison said Wednesday at a Senate hearing "at the end of the day a consumer is going to pay for that." The law signed by Trump this month specifies that vehicle fines would be eliminated for any year that NHTSA had not finalized. Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign, criticized the decision. "The Trump administration is reaching back in time to give an obscene gift to pollution law violators GM and Stellantis at the expense of the American taxpayer," Becker said. "The automakers lobbied hard for this 'get out of jail free' card. They get hundreds of millions in fines canceled." GM and Stellantis did not immediately comment. Senate Republicans estimated the law would save automakers $200 million. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing nearly all major automakers, thanked congressional leaders for addressing concerns about fuel economy rules saying "given current market conditions, the existing standards were challenging for many auto manufacturers to achieve." In 2023, under former President Joe Biden, NHTSA said its proposal to hike fuel economy standards through 2032 would cost the industry $14 billion in projected fines including $6.5 billion for GM, $3 billion for Stellantis and $1 billion for Ford Motor. The final rule adopted in 2024 eased requirements and said the auto industry would face no more than $1.83 billion in fines from 2027 through 2031.>

European yields drift higher; focus on Trump and supply
European yields drift higher; focus on Trump and supply

Mint

time8 minutes ago

  • Mint

European yields drift higher; focus on Trump and supply

LONDON, - Short-dated euro zone bond yields edged up on Thursday, as investors regained a sense of calm after U.S. President Donald Trump the previous day denied media reports suggesting he would fire the head of the Federal Reserve. A Bloomberg report on Wednesday saying that Trump was likely to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who is due to step down next May, had sparked a drop in stocks and the dollar, and a rise in long-dated Treasury yields, in particular. Trump's denial helped reverse some of those moves, but investors were left with a sense of unease. By Thursday in Europe, two-year German Schatz yields were last up 1 basis point on the day at 1.84%, rising in line with a pickup in yields on short-dated Treasuries, which witnessed a rush of buying on Wednesday, while the long end of the curve sold off. Benchmark 10-year Bund yields, which touched their highest since late March earlier this week, were roughly unchanged on the previous close at 2.695%. Longer-dated bonds showed little response to the European Commission on Wednesday proposing a 2 trillion euro EU budget for 2028 to 2034. The Commission said its proposal amounted to 1.26% of the 27-nation bloc's gross national income - a measure of the size of the economy - compared to 1.13% for the current seven-year budget. Thirty-year German yields were trading 1 bp higher on the day at 3.24%, narrowly below Wednesday's late-2023 high of 3.26%. The curve, as reflected by the difference between two-year yields and those on 30-year German debt, has reached its steepest since early 2019 this week, as concern about long-term government finances and uncertainty around Fed independence have prompted investors have sold longer-dated paper in favour of the short end. On the supply front, Spain and France come to market on Thursday, ahead of a heavy week for issuance next week. Spain will auction 5.5 billion euros in five-, 10- and 23-year paper, while France will sell 12 billion euros in 3-, 5- and 6-year OATs, as well as another 1.5 billion euros in a range of green and inflation-linked bonds, spanning maturities from nine years to 14 years. "With an increased focus on the ongoing budget discussions, the auction results could be interesting to watch," strategists at ING said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store