Zelenskyy approves bill weakening anti-corruption bodies despite big protests
The move on Tuesday puts the president on a collision course with civil society activists and some of its veterans and is likely to dismay Ukraine's European partners.
Earlier on Tuesday Ukraine's parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, passed a controversial bill that effectively removes the independence of the national anti-corruption bureau, known as Nabu, and the specialised anti-corruption prosecutors office.
It gives sweeping new powers to Ukraine's prosecutor general, and makes it easier for the government to control which cases are pursued. Critics say the legislation allows political interference and is a major step backwards in the fight against corruption.
Late on Tuesday Zelenskyy signed the bill into law, rejecting calls for him to use his presidential veto, according to reports. The decision has yet to be posted on the government's website.
View image in fullscreen
A woman chants while holding a banner that reads 'Corruption Applauds' during a protest against a law targeting anti-corruption institutions in central Kyiv on Tuesday. Photograph: Alex Babenko/AP
Hours earlier, about 1,500 protesters gathered next to Zelenskyy's presidential administration complex. They shouted slogans outside his window including 'Shame' and 'Veto the law' and waved homemade banners denouncing the bill.
They were protests in other large cities including Lviv, Dnipro and Odesa. 'If the bill goes ahead it will make it harder for Ukraine to join the European Union. We will go back to dictatorship,' Sasha Kazintseva said, speaking before Zelenskyy reportedly gave his approval.
She added: 'We don't want to be like Russia. Zelenskyy is still our president. But he does the wrong things we will say so.'
Her friend Tetiana Kukuruza held up a cardboard sign with the blunt slogan: 'Are you fucking crazy?' She explained: 'This is the first time since 2022 that we've taken to the streets. We know the names of the deputies who voted for this bill. I'm not saying they are corrupt. But they have interests.'
The protesters gathered in a park immediately below a rococo 19th-century government building, the House of Chimeras. The crowd was made up of students, young activists and army veterans, some of them draped in blue and yellow Ukrainian flags. Kyiv's mayor, Vitalii Klitschko, also took part, together with his brother Volodymyr.
Veronika Mol, an artist, said she worried Ukraine was sliding back to the era of Viktor Yanukovych, the corrupt pro-Russian president who fled to Moscow in 2014, following months of street protests. 'I'm surprised this has happened. It looks like some madness. I don't know what their motives are,' she said.
'People are the power in Ukraine. Not the president or government. It's terrible we still have to remind them,' Mol added.
There has been vocal condemnation of the bill from prominent soldiers, a celebrity chef and Ukraine's media. The writer Illia Ponomarenko said civil society was fighting 'the dark side of its own state' in parallel with the war against Russia.
He criticised 'corruption, abuse of power, lies, lack of transparency, nepotism, impunity, and attacks on democracy and freedom of speech – everything that keeps dragging us back toward the abyss, back into Russia's colonial criminal stable'.
Several of Ukraine's high-profile international supporters expressed concern. They included the former US ambassador to Moscow, Mike McFaul, and Estonian ex-president Toomas Hendrik Ilves. There was also recognition that protesters could freely voice anti-government opinions – unlike in Russia.
Ukraine's application to join the EU is dependent on the progress it makes in fighting corruption. Since 2022 EU countries have provided Kyiv with significant military and economic support running into billions of euros.
The European commissioner for enlargement, Marta Kos, criticised the bill's adoption. 'The dismantling of key safeguards protecting [anti-corruption bureau] NABU's independence is a serious step back,' Kos wrote on social media, saying that the two bodies were 'essential' for Ukraine's EU path.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump is a strain on the force, warns top officer as Scotland prepares for the arrival of the US President
Donald Trump's visit to Scotland this weekend will 'undoubtedly stretch' police resources, a senior officer has warned. Chief Superintendent Rob Hay, president of the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents (ASPS), said the President's stay would require a 'significant operation across the country over many days'. His comments come in the wake of similar concerns from the Scottish Police Federation (SPF) – the body which represents rank-and-file officers – which said the visit was a 'recipe for disaster' as we 'don't have enough cops'. Mr Trump is due to arrive in Scotland on Friday for a five-day private visit to his golf resorts in both Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire, and plans to meet both Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and First Minister John Swinney. Scottish Tory justice spokesman Liam Kerr said: 'This is just the latest siren warning to SNP ministers about the impact of their brutal cuts on Police Scotland's ability to cover the Presidential visit. 'We've already had threats of legal action from the SPF over the demands on rank-and-file officers, as well as a plea from bosses for reinforcements from Northern Ireland – and now we have the representative of senior officers sounding the alarm bell too. 'The buck stops with SNP ministers, who have squeezed police funding to the point where those at the sharp end feel compelled to speak out about the dangerous lack of resources.' There are expected to be major protests, including from the Stop Trump Coalition, which is organising a 'festival of resistance'. Mr Trump's last visit as a serving President, in July 2018, prompted large-scale protests in Aberdeen, Edinburgh and Glasgow, which cost Police Scotland more than £3million and required mutual aid – officers sent to Scotland from other UK forces. Mr Hay said: 'The private visit of President Donald Trump to Scotland will require the Police service of Scotland to plan for and deliver a significant operation across the country over many days. 'This will undoubtedly stretch all our resources from local policing divisions to specialist and support functions such as contact, command and control.' He said police superintendents and chief superintendents will have 'key leadership roles' for the visit, saying they would be taking responsibility for areas such as planning and resourcing, intelligence gathering, command and control communications, armed operations and public order. Mr Hay urged the public to be aware of the 'significant demands that will be placed on policing services during this period' – adding these result from not only the Presidential visit but the 'many popular events that Scotland hosts in the summer months, which bring thousands of tourists to our country and rely upon partnerships with policing to support their safe delivery'. He said ASPS is 'concerned about the capacity and resilience of its members, particularly in times of high demand such as this summer, when leave has been cancelled'. His comments came as SPF general secretary David Kennedy warned the police response to the visit could impact on the service it provides to the public. Asked about the visit, Mr Kennedy told BBC Radio Scotland: 'Anyone who says it won't affect it [policing in Scotland], I can't believe that's the case. 'It will affect it. You may be waiting in the past for so many hours for a police officer to arrive, that could double now, you may be waiting for more time for them to arrive. 'Emergency calls will take priority, but it will affect communities in Scotland. 'We've been asking long and weary to have more police officers in our communities in Scotland and all this does is take them away from that.' Asked if the quality of policing will be impacted by the visit, Mr Kennedy added: 'It will be seriously affected. 'There's not enough police officers for it not to be affected.' Concerns have also been raised about the cost of the policing operation, with officers likely to cancel rest days to ensure adequate staffing. Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond said: 'The visit will require a significant police operation using local, national and specialist resources from across Police Scotland, supported by colleagues from other UK police forces as part of mutual aid arrangements.' Today, Mr Swinney said it was important that Mr Trump's visit is 'handled with care'. While the First Minister accepted the need for 'security around the President' he has also said there 'has to be the legitimate right for individuals in our country to make their voices heard, to protest'. Meanwhile, the scale of the security operation required for the visit became ever clearer. Several black SUVs were seen being unloaded from two huge C17 Globemaster Air Force jets at Prestwick Airport yesterday morning with another three planes landing in the afternoon. Some of the vehicles in the presidential motorcade were immediately driven to the nearest garage, a BP in Monkton, for refuelling with serious-looking security detail fully concentrating on the task at hand. It is believed the motorcade then continued its journey to Mr Trump's resort in Turnberry. One onlooker said: 'They did not crack as much as a smile. Obviously they've a job to do but there was nothing that encouraged anyone to approach them let alone speak to them.' Despite stringent security measures, including a number of no-fly zones, planespotters were able to gather near to the Ayrshire airport to zoom in on the action on the runway.
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Iraqi who argued he cannot be deported because he is divorced, wins appeal after legal error
An Iraqi who entered the UK illegally has won an appeal after arguing he cannot be deported because he is divorced. In claims disputed by the Home Office, he said he divorced a 'prominent' politician's daughter and brought 'dishonour' upon their family. The Iraqi said it would breach his human rights to send him back to Iraq because he was at risk of an 'honour feud'. The Iraqi, who was granted anonymity, has won an appeal at an upper immigration tribunal for his case to be reheard after it was initially rejected by the Home Office and lower court. The Iraqi entered Britain 'clandestinely' in 2020 after travelling through Turkey and across Europe before arriving by boat in the UK. He submitted his application for asylum the following day. The court was told that his 'claim for asylum is based upon a claimed risk of being a victim of an honour-based crime'. 'He alleges that he fled Iraq due to threats from his former father-in-law, a prominent and influential politician affiliated with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. 'According to the [Iraqi], he was accused of bringing dishonour upon [his ex-father-in-law's] family by divorcing his daughter,' the court was told. It was accepted that he was married and went through a divorce, but the Home Office 'did not accept that he had experienced problems from his ex-father-in-law'. The Home Office issued a deportation order but the Iraqi, who had a child with his ex-wife, appealed the decision. His challenge was dismissed by a lower tribunal as the judge questioned 'the credibility of the marriage itself'. The First-tier Tribunal said there was a 'disparity in social status' between his ex-wife – the daughter of a powerful politician – and him, a 'minimally educated taxi driver from a marginalised tribe'. A claim by the Iraqi that he had also been the victim of a 'violent' attack linked to the honour feud and stabbed 17 times was dismissed as implausible by the judge, partly because it was 'unsubstantiated' by any medical evidence. The judge said the asylum claim appeared a 'complete fabrication'. The Iraqi appealed to the upper tribunal where the judge Sara Anzani said the lower court was wrong to question the marriage and divorce certificates and said the Iraqi was not given a chance to respond to their doubts. Judge Anzani said: 'These concerns about the reliability and authenticity of the marriage and divorce certificates were not previously raised by the [Home Office], nor were they put to the [Iraqi] during the hearing. 'I find that the Judge's failure to raise his concerns about the authenticity and reliability of the marriage and divorce certificates, concerns not previously identified by the [Home Office], deprived the [Iraqi] of a fair opportunity to address the Judge's doubts. 'The Judge's findings on the marriage and divorce certificates contribute to his overall assessment of the [Iraqi's] credibility, and the ultimate finding that [his] claim was fabricated. 'Consequently, this procedural error is material and permeates the entirety of the Judge's decision'. Judge Anzani concluded that the case must be heard afresh at the First-tier Tribunal again, but not by the previous judge.
Economist
an hour ago
- Economist
Ukraine's leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, should junk a very bad bill
UKRAINE'S WAR effort depends not only on courage and weapons, but on trust: the trust of its own citizens, and that of its Western backers. That compact is now at risk. On July 22nd the Rada, Ukraine's parliament, passed a bill that would place the country's two main anti-corruption bodies—NABU, which investigates wrongdoing, and SAPO, which prosecutes it—under the control of the presidency. This was not the work of rogue MPs. It was orchestrated from the top by President Volodymyr Zelensky and his all-powerful chief of staff, Andriy Yermak. It passed with large numbers of votes from the president's own Servant of the People party. The law is a direct threat to the international support that has sustained Ukraine through the war. At home, it has drawn the first anti-Zelensky protests since the invasion.
