Financing the blue frontier: Why SMFCL is India's big maritime bet
For years, these structural characteristics made the sector unattractive to traditional lenders. SMFCL has been designed to reverse that by acting as an anchor financier, de-risking investment and standardising a maritime-specific financing architecture.In its new role, the NBFC can issue both rupee and foreign currency bonds, structure green or blue finance instruments, and offer blended finance arrangements combining equity windows, subordinated debt and guarantees. It can lend not only to public agencies and special purpose vehicles (SPVs) but also to private players, PPP (public-private partnership) consortia, maritime start-ups and port-linked infrastructure developers.This flexibility is key. Shipping and coastal projects are often too complex or niche for large banks and too risky for pension and insurance funds. SMFCL is being positioned to fill that void.Already, port authorities and developers in Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala are recalibrating their investment pipelines in light of the new financing window. A senior official in the Sarabanada Sonowal-led Union ministry of ports, shipping and waterways told INDIA TODAY that multiple projects, including shore power infrastructure, hydrogen-ready bunkering stations and refrigerated container hubs, were waiting in the wings for a credible institutional lender. 'The pipeline was always there. What we lacked was a dependable financing platform. SMFCL will now be that anchor,' the official said.advertisementEarly-stage proposals under the SMFCL's review include a cold storage logistics park near Tuticorin, green retrofits for vessels in Kochi, and capex support for inland ferry operators along the Brahmaputra and Ganga waterways. The NBFC is also being tasked with structuring new financial instruments, including a maritime-specific infrastructure investment trust (InvIT) and a 'Blue Bond' aimed at global ESG ((environmental, social and governance))-focused investors. Conversations are underway with multilateral institutions to co-finance some of these instruments through guarantee mechanisms.Officials familiar with the internal planning say that the new institution has been carefully insulated from bureaucratic overreach. SMFCL will operate under the administrative oversight of the shipping ministry but will be governed by an independent board that includes financial sector veterans, maritime professionals and infrastructure finance specialists. Its initial authorised capital is set at Rs 1,000 crore, with the option to scale up rapidly through bond issuances and third-party equity participation. 'It's not meant to lend like a PSU bank,' explained another official. 'It's meant to crowd in capital through credit enhancement and policy-backed financial innovation.'That innovation is crucial, because India's maritime infrastructure ambitions intersect with a range of frontier policy agendas—logistics efficiency, renewable shipping fuels, port-led industrialisation and even geopolitics. And yet, the financing ecosystem remains deeply underdeveloped. The maritime sector contributes nearly 95 per cent of India's trade by volume, but less than 2 per cent of infrastructure finance goes to it.advertisementWith commercial banks still risk-averse after a decade of NPAs (non-performing assets) and DFIs like NaBFID (National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development) focused more on roads and energy, a sector-focused financial body like SMFCL fills a critical gap.Its creation is part of a wider trend. After two decades of relying on private capital and multilateral assistance for infrastructure finance, the government has begun to aggressively build a new generation of development finance institutions: NaBFID for large-scale infra, IREDA (Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited) and SECI (Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited) for renewables, NIIF (National Investment and Infrastructure Fund Limited) for blended strategic capital, and now SMFCL for maritime and coastal logistics. It's a strategy that recognises both the limitations of market finance in long-gestation sectors and the risk-aversion of public banks post-2014.These new institutions share a common design philosophy: stay lean, avoid political interference, use modest public funds to unlock far larger pools of capital, and enable sectoral transformation through financial architecture. SMFCL may end up being a test case for whether that model can work in complex, multi-stakeholder, slow-moving sectors like ports and coastal infrastructure.advertisementGlobally, India is hardly the first to recognise the need for specialised financial institutions to support maritime ambitions. China, for instance, has long deployed the China Development Bank (CBD) and Export-Import Bank of China to underwrite massive port infrastructure—both domestically and under the Belt and Road Initiative.The CDB's Maritime Silk Road Fund has offered concessional loans and equity to Chinese state-owned port operators, enabling strategic acquisitions, from Sri Lanka's Hambantota to Greece's Piraeus. Crucially, China didn't rely on one institution but created an entire financial ecosystem tailored to maritime power projection.In the United States, the Maritime Administration (MARAD) runs the Federal Ship Financing Program, more commonly known as Title XI, which provides loan guarantees to US shipyards and operators building or retrofitting vessels. While modest in scale, it functions as a critical lifeline for preserving maritime industrial capacity in a highly capital-intensive sector. Additionally, the US Department of Transportation supports port projects through discretionary grants under programmes such as the Port Infrastructure Development Program (PIDP), aligning infrastructure finance with national logistics goals.advertisementEurope has leaned heavily on public-private structures and green mandates. The European Investment Bank (EIB) has emerged as a key backer of climate-aligned port infrastructure, channeling billions into electrified shipping lanes, hydrogen port hubs and offshore wind-linked maritime assets. Port authorities in Rotterdam, Antwerp and Hamburg work closely with dedicated green financing vehicles to fund retrofitting, digitisation and decarbonisation—often through blended finance that derisks private capital using public guarantees.Even Russia has created specialised maritime finance channels through Vnesheconombank and targeted sovereign support for Arctic shipping and Far East port development—aligning maritime finance with strategic goals in contested regions.What sets SMFCL apart, at least for now, is its hybrid nature. Unlike China's state-heavy model or the US's security-focused interventions, India's effort appears geared towards creating a commercially viable but developmentally anchored financial institution. If executed well, it could blend the discipline of a DFI with the flexibility of market-aligned finance—something few countries have pulled off in the maritime domain.What will determine SMFCL's legacy is its ability to move swiftly, build institutional depth and avoid the bureaucratic drift that has plagued many PSU (public sector undertaking) initiatives in the past. For that, the ministry is reportedly pushing for private sector hiring, independent credit appraisal teams and partnerships with tech-led maritime firms to ensure deal flow. The NBFC will also explore co-financing arrangements with sovereign wealth funds and blue economy accelerators based in Singapore, Norway and the UAE.If successful, SMFCL could become a proving ground for blue finance innovation in India. Think tanks have already proposed the creation of a Blue Credit Market—where verified coastal restoration and marine biodiversity projects can trade credits like carbon. SMFCL could become the financial backbone of that ecosystem. There are also proposals to support India's global port ambitions through a new Bharat Ports Consortium, using SMFCL as a sovereign anchor investor in overseas maritime assets.Ultimately, SMFCL is not just a financing body—it is a strategic bet on India's coastal future. It signals a shift from fragmented port policy to integrated maritime development. And more importantly, it places capital architecture at the centre of that vision. As the first set of projects come to market, the industry is watching closely. So are investors. And so, quietly, is the rest of the world. India's maritime sector may finally have found its ballast. Not with fanfare. But with purpose.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
After Ramanagara became Bengaluru South, Bengaluru Rural district renamed Bengaluru North
Over a month after renaming Ramanagara district as Bengaluru South district, Karnataka's cabinet on Wednesday cleared a proposal to rename Bengaluru Rural district as Bengaluru North district. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah announced the decision while addressing a news conference following a special cabinet meeting at Nandi Hills in Chikkaballapura district. This was among the two name change proposals approved by the cabinet; the other was to rename Bagepalli in Chikkaballapura district as Chikkaballapur. In May, the state government renamed Ramanagara district, located southwest of Bengaluru district, 'to benefit from the international reputation enjoyed by Bengaluru'. This was after the Ministry of Home Affairs refused a no-objection certificate for the name change, for which the state government submitted a proposal in July 2024. The proposal to rename Bengaluru Rural district was based on petitions from legislators representing the district, including Food and Civil Supplies Minister K H Muniyappa. The change was sought to attract more investors, as Bengaluru International Airport, Foxconn's iPhone assembly plant, and several business parks are located in the district. The cabinet also decided to rename Bengaluru University after former prime minister Manmohan Singh. During the cabinet meeting, projects worth Rs 3,000 crore were cleared. The cabinet meeting at Nandi Hills dealt primarily with the Bengaluru division. In the last two months, cabinet meetings were held at Kalaburagi (Kalaburagi division) and MM Hills (Mysuru division). A special cabinet meeting is also scheduled at Vijayapura, to clear proposals related to the Belagavi division.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sonia, Rahul Gandhi wanted to usurp ₹2,000 cr AJL company: ED to court
The Enforcement Directorate on Wednesday alleged Sonia and Rahul Gandhi wanted to usurp the assets of Associated Journals Limited (AJL), a ₹2,000 crore company, the publisher of National Herald newspaper. Special judge Vishal Gogne was hearing the submissions on the point of cognisance in the National Herald case. Additional solicitor general S V Raju said a conspiracy was hatched to form Young Indian Private Limited in which the Gandhis held 76 per cent shares to usurp the assets of AJL, which took a₹90 crore loan from the All India Congress Committee (AICC) despite having assets worth in crores. Explaining the conspiracy, the ASG said, "AJL was not making profits but had assets worth ₹2,000 crore. But they were finding it difficult to manage their daily affairs. If you are doing reasonably well, you cannot say, I am in loss, etc. You have to build a facade.₹90 crore loan was taken from the AlCC. They (AJL) said we cannot repay you (AICC). Ordinarily, any prudent person would have sold their assets. (Rs) 90 crore is child's play." Raju further said, "The conspiracy was creation of Young Indian to usurp ₹2,000 crore in exchange for a ₹90 crore loan. Sonia and Rahul Gandhi wanted to take over this ₹2,000 crore company." Within six days of Rahul's appointment as the director of Young Indian, Raju said, it sent a representation to AJL to repay the loan or convert it into equity. Judge Gogne posed a question to Raju about the possibility of the AICC writing off AJL's loan, similar to public sector banks. The ASG said banks wrote off loans of defaulters in the absence of assets as collateral but in this case AJL had assets worth ₹2,000 crore which they gave away for a loan of ₹90 crore. Raju alleged that the AICC distanced itself from a direct transaction to avoid "creating ripples" and instead created Young Indian. The judge again asked Raju if it was peculiar for political parties to own a newspaper. "Political parties acquire running newspapers and channels. The main question is how can they acquire an asset for peanuts," Raju said adding that AJL was acquired by Young Indian, in which 76 per cent shares were held by Sonia and Rahul Gandhi. "Taking by the left hand and taking by the right hand. Buying and selling of shares. All bogus transactions." he added. The hearing would continue on July 3. On May 21, the ED alleged that the proceeds of crime in the case were obtained on "instructions of some senior party leaders" towards "protection, tickets to contest elections, and securing positions in the party". The ED had filed its chargesheet against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others under Sections 3 (money laundering) and 4 (punishment for money laundering) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The ED accuses the Gandhis, late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes aside from Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda and a private company Young Indian of conspiracy and money laundering over the fraudulent takeover of properties valued over ₹2,000 crore belonging to the AJL. The chargesheet names the Gandhis, Dudey, Pitroda, Sunil Bhandari, Young Indian, and Dotex Merchandise Private Limited.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
First eligibility list for Dharavi redevelopment released
The Dharavi Redevelopment Project (DRP) has released its first eligibility list, with over 75 per cent of tenement holders qualifying for new homes under the ambitious slum redevelopment scheme, according to data released by the DRP. All bona fide residents who settled in Dharavi before January 1, 2000, are eligible for a 350 sq ft flat within Dharavi. All such residents will qualify for the resettlement unless they do not provide documents. Those who settled between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2011, may receive 300 sq ft units outside Dharavi at alternative locations. The first list identifies 505 households from Meghwadi and Ganesh Nagar in Mahim as eligible for rehabilitation. In the first list published for 505 households of Sector 6 (Meghwadi and Ganesh Nagar in Mahim), over 75 per cent of tenement holders have qualified for new homes under the redevelopment scheme, according to data released by the DRP. The balance would get qualified, based on additional checks and documents sought. Live Events Out of a total of 505 tenements, 31 tenements are yet to submit any documents, 137 cases are pending verification by BMC, which the DRP is pursuing, and the remaining 38 are amenity structures. Among the remaining 299 tenements, 229 have been found eligible for new homes under various criteria. The remaining 70 are in the process of submitting additional documents to validate their eligibility. DRP CEO SVR Srinivas assured that every resident will get a house either inside or outside Dharavi, basis their eligibility status. "I would like to reiterate that the Dharavi redevelopment is the most inclusive project ever contemplated in SRA history, where every resident is going to get a house. Not just that, all commercial units, whether eligible or ineligible, will get spaces inside Dharavi itself." He further explained that commercial units that are eligible will, in any case, get free in-situ spaces inside Dharavi. In fact, a proposal has been made to the government to accommodate ineligible commercial units as well, on a rental basis, inside Dharavi. "The 10 per cent commercial space reserved in every society can be given on a rental basis to ineligible commercial units so that they can sustain their livelihoods in Dharavi itself. We have already made this proposal." As per the Annexure-II data, 170 ground-floor tenements, including residential, commercial and residential/commercial, have all met the eligibility criteria and are entitled to new homes either within or outside Dharavi. Of these, 157 tenements came into existence before January 1, 2000, and are entitled to 350 sq ft homes within Dharavi. The remaining 13 are considered Shashulk Eligible, meaning they are entitled to 300 sq ft homes outside Dharavi at a subsidised cost of Rs 2.5 lakh, having settled in Dharavi before January 1, 2011. In a significant step, the inclusion of upper-floor tenement holders, typically disqualified under all other slum rehabilitation schemes, provides inclusivity. As per the data, 59 upper-floor tenements have qualified for new homes under the DRP's unique 'hire-purchase' scheme. These residents will receive 300 sq ft homes on rent for 12 years, after which they will become legal owners. They may also choose to buy the home outright at a government-decided rate at any time during the 12-year period. Typically, under other slum rehabilitation schemes, those who settle in the ground floor after 2011 are excluded from redevelopment benefits, and all upper-floor residents face outright eviction. However, DRP has ensured that all such residents are also provided new and modern homes outside Dharavi, but within the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR). These colonies will be modern and will be maintained free of cost for 10 years. The DRP has invited tenement holders to submit their suggestions or objections regarding the Draft Annexure-II. Submissions can be made to the DRP office by July 5.
