logo
Trump tax bill brings some big changes to 529 plans

Trump tax bill brings some big changes to 529 plans

Yahoo2 days ago
529 education savings plans are getting a major upgrade under President Trump's massive tax bill, particularly for parents looking to stash away cash for K-12 expenses.
First, a quick overview: 529 plans allow anyone — not just parents — to set aside money in an investment account for certain education expenses. Earnings aren't subject to federal taxes, and withdrawals are similarly tax-free if the money is spent on a qualified category.
The savings plans are typically thought of as being for college students, but they benefit young children too. Right now, due to changes first made in Trump's 2017 tax bill, parents can withdraw up to $10,000 each year to pay for K-12 tuition costs. The new legislation bumps up that benefit even more, allowing up to $20,000 in annual withdrawals while widening the definition of 'qualified expenses' in K-12 to include non-tuition categories like books, tutoring, standardized testing fees, educational therapies for children with disabilities, and more.
Certain professional credential fees will also now be covered as qualified expenses. For example, Andy Whitehair, a director with the advisory, tax, and assurance firm Baaker Tilly, noted that CPAs like him could tap 529 funds to cover things like exams and licensing costs. That means 529 plans are now much more than just a college savings vehicle.
'You're expanding the eligible expenses that you can pay out of this, so I think that just inherently is going to make them more useful,' Whitehair said.
Elyse Germack, an attorney and CPA who does tax and estate planning in Birmingham, Mich., agreed that the wider perks will help parents pay for K-12 costs.
'Many families are interested in having greater options for use of funds, especially when it comes to K-12, and having the ability to pay for private school along with public school-type expenses would be very helpful,' Germack said.
Still, the upgrades will only reach those who are both aware of the plans and have the ability to contribute to them, meaning lower-income families will likely be left out.
Patricia McCoy, a professor at Boston College Law School, wrote in a recent Substack post that 529 plans "primarily are used as tax shelters by the top 10 percent." Many families don't have 529 plans, McCoy wrote, and those that do are typically in higher tax brackets. Lower-income families, McCoy said, would benefit more from Pell Grant funding.
Then there's Trump accounts, a new tax-advantaged investment vehicle for children that has to be established before they turn 18 and can't be tapped until after they turn 18.
'It's basically a kid IRA,' Whitehair said.
He explained: 'Funds would grow tax-deferred; when you take them out they would be taxable to the extent of income that you've earned; if you're waiting until you're age 59 and a half — normal retirement age — you can take out without penalty; if you're taking it out before then it would need to be for certain qualified expenses like under the IRA rules.'
Those qualified expenses include college expenses and first-time home-buying costs up to $10,000, Whitehair said. There's a $5,000-a-year contribution limit, but the government will contribute $1,000 to the Trump accounts as part of a pilot program for children born between Dec. 31, 2024, and Jan. 1, 2029.
Still, 529s remain optimal for those looking to save for education expenses.
'A 529 plan is still going to be the gold standard,' Whitehair said. 'If your sole goal is to save for education, any of the funds that come out of the 529 plan — all the income that you've earned — if you're using it for qualified education expenses, it's going to come out tax-free.'
Emma Ockerman is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering economic and labor issues in personal finance.
Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. Veterans Affairs will cut nearly 30,000 jobs, far fewer than planned
U.S. Veterans Affairs will cut nearly 30,000 jobs, far fewer than planned

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. Veterans Affairs will cut nearly 30,000 jobs, far fewer than planned

By Christian Martinez (Reuters) -The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs will make two-thirds fewer employee cuts this fiscal year than it first targeted, reducing staff by about 30,000 people rather than 80,000, the agency said on Monday. The agency employed about around 480,000 people at the start of the Trump administration and expects to end the fiscal year in September with nearly 450,000 staff. Under President Donald Trump's program to downsize the federal government, the agency had planned to reach just under 400,000 employees. That proposal drew widespread condemnation from military veteran groups and Democrats. The agency said in a statement it was on pace to reduce its staff "through the federal hiring freeze, deferred resignations, retirements and normal attrition." It did not say why it no longer needed to make further cuts. The scale of the original planned layoffs was far greater than proposed cuts at other government agencies and potentially posed a political risk for Trump, who portrays himself as a champion of the U.S. military and its members. Between January and June, the agency shed nearly 17,000 employees and expects "nearly 12,000 additional VA employees to exit" by September 30, the VA said. "A department-wide RIF is off the table, but that doesn't mean we're done improving VA," VA Secretary Doug Collins said in a release, referring to a reduction in force, which means permanent layoffs. Just under 9 million veterans were enrolled in the VA Health Care System in March, according to the VA website.

Veterans Affairs Dept. drops plan to lay off thousands in August
Veterans Affairs Dept. drops plan to lay off thousands in August

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Veterans Affairs Dept. drops plan to lay off thousands in August

The Department of Veterans Affairs has dropped plans revealed in a memo earlier this year to lay off tens of thousands of personnel in August, a news release from the department indicated Monday. The VA announced it's currently on pace to reduce its staff by about 30,000 employees by the end of this fiscal year, in September, thereby "eliminating the need for a large-scale reduction-in-force," or RIF. The department originally planned to reduce its staff to 2019 levels, or just under 400,000, according to a memo obtained by CBS News in March. The VA said in its release that it had "roughly 484,000 employees on Jan. 1, 2025" — meaning the initial plans would have required the VA to cut upwards of 80,000 jobs. In a statement included in the release, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins said that as a result of a "holistic" department-wide review, the VA "is headed in the right direction — both in terms of staff levels and customer service. A department-wide RIF is off the table, but that doesn't mean we're done improving VA." The VA acknowledged in the release that the agency "had been considering a department-wide RIF to reduce staff levels by up to 15%," but said "employee reductions through the federal hiring freeze, deferred resignations, retirements and normal attrition have eliminated the need for that RIF." A spokesperson for the VA said in a statement Monday that it spent "nearly four months conducting a holistic review of the department to see what needs to be changed." The department claimed that in recent months, the VA has improved services for veterans, citing "huge drops in the number of Veterans waiting for disability benefits, sizeable increases in claims processing productivity, and extraordinary progress regarding our electronic health record modernization." The spokesperson said the original number of 80,000 staff cuts "got employees thinking outside of the box to come up with new and better ways of serving Veterans," and the "main goal all along has been creating the best possible experiences and outcomes" for veterans and their families. Under the Biden administration, the VA hired tens of thousands of workers, in part to help administer the PACT Act, which addresses toxic exposures veterans suffered while serving in the military. The Trump administration initially looked at cutting staff levels to pre-Biden administration levels. The Trump administration imposed a broader hiring freeze on many government jobs earlier this year, part of a push to cut the size of the federal workforce. The VA exempted some roles from that freeze, including many health care jobs at the agency's hospital network. The administration also offered a voluntary "deferred resignation" deal that allowed thousands of federal workers to leave their jobs in early February and get paid until September. Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut took note of the reversal of the planned mass layoffs at the VA and blamed the work environment at the department. "This announcement makes clear VA is bleeding employees across the board at an unsustainable rate because of the toxic work environment created by this Administration and DOGE's slash and trash policies," Blumenthal, the top Democrat on the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, said in a statement. "This is not 'natural' attrition, it is not strategic, and it will inevitably impact veterans' care and benefits — no matter what blanket assurances the VA Secretary hides behind." Blumenthal noted the VA workforce usually expands by about 10,000 "in a typical year," and its statement that it was losing 30,000 this year means the VA "still stands to lose tens of thousands more employees than ever before." He complained that the administration "repeatedly refused to share any additional information about this plan to cut 83,000 VA employees and what positions would be targeted." Death toll rises as desperate search for Texas flash flood survivors continues Sabrina Carpenter on the biggest misperceptions about her How Lady Liberty became a beacon for immigrants

Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally's third party push
Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally's third party push

Fox News

time22 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally's third party push

As Elon Musk moves forward with forming a third party in hopes of rocking the nation's longstanding two-party system, the world's richest person is reaching out to a one-time presidential candidate who has started his own independent party. Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX who spent the first four months of President Donald Trump's second administration as a special White House advisor steering the recently created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), spoke with Andrew Yang, Fox News has confirmed. A source familiar with the conversation said that the two discussed Musk's push to create the "America Party," which Musk aims to field some candidates in next year's midterm elections. "I'm excited for anyone who wants to move on from the duopoly," Yang said in a statement to Fox News. "And I'm happy to help give someone a sense of what the path looks like." News of the conversation was first reported by Politico. Yang grabbed national attention in the 2020 election cycle, as the entrepreneur went from an extreme longshot to briefly being a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination. But Yang soured on the two-party system after an unsuccessful 2021 run for New York City mayor. He then formed the independent Forward Party, which has been recognized in a handful of states and aims to eventually gain ballot access from coast to coast. Yang and Musk are far from strangers. Musk in 2019 supported Yang's unsuccessful presidential bid. Musk became the top donor of the 2024 election cycle, dishing out nearly $300 million in support of Trump's bid through America PAC, a mostly Musk-funded super PAC aligned with Trump. Trump named Musk to steer DOGE soon after the November election, and the president repeatedly praised Musk during his headline-making and controversial tenure at the cost-cutting effort. But a feud between Musk and Trump broke out days after Musk left the White House in late May, as Musk dubbed the administration's massive landmark spending bill - which Trump called his "big, beautiful bill" - a "disgusting abomination," which he said would sink the nation into unsustainable debt. Musk also argued that Trump would not have won last year's presidential election without all of his support. Musk announced the launch of the "America Party" on his social media platform X on Saturday, a day after Trump signed the sweeping domestic policy package into law. The measure narrowly passed the Senate and House last week along near party-line votes in the Republican-controlled chambers. Trump on Sunday ridiculed Musk's move. "I think it's ridiculous to start a third party," Trump told reporters. "It's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion. The president added that "third parties have never worked. So, he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous." Starting an independent or third party, and gaining ballot access in states across the country, is extremely difficult.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store