logo
Bradford man jailed for keeping terrorist documents

Bradford man jailed for keeping terrorist documents

BBC Newsa day ago
A 21-year-old man has been jailed after he admitted having an online library of terrorist material. Leeds Crown Court heard Ondrej Sidelka, of Elwyn Road, Bradford, kept a Dropbox folder on his phone containing manuals on how to build firearms. He also saved racist, homophobic and antisemitic documents, such as Hitler's Mein Kampf and a graphic video of the 2019 attack on a New Zealand mosque by Brenton Tarrant, in which 51 people died.Sidelka was sentenced to two years in prison and will spend a further year on licence.
The court heard Sidelka had been arrested in November 2022 for an unrelated matter when he was 18 years old. When police searched his phone, they found a large quantity of neo-Nazi material, as well as guides on how to manufacture explosives and poisons. Propaganda material from the proscribed extreme far right terrorist groups Atomwaffen, Feuerkrieg Division and Terrorgram were also found in his cloud storage accounts.On 25 May 2023, Sidelka was arrested by officers from Counter Terrorism Policing North East.
'Subjected to torment'
Frida Hussain KC, defending, said Sidelka had moved to Bradford with his family from Slovakia. "He was subjected to torment by others which has led to him being isolated and turning to the internet," she said. "He spent a lot of time gaming and accessing this material, he had no social life."Between the school years of nine to eleven, Ms Hussain claimed Sidelka had been "set fire to, attacked and had his nose broken" by a group of boys. "He felt like an outsider and was paranoid to leave home," she added.A probation officer described Sidelka as immature and of low intelligence, with no real attachment to the mindset identified in the materials. "He does not present as a well-rehearsed, well-connected racist," Ms Wilson concluded.The court heard Sidelka had no connections to or memberships of terrorist organisations.He pleaded guilty to eight counts of possessing information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.Sentencing the defendant, Judge Bayliss said: "You're a man who held racist, antisemitic, homophobic and neo-Nazi views. "You weren't just interested in the manufacture of firearms, you did it in the context of holding extreme right wing views."It is terrifying to think someone with your adherence to that ideology could contemplate having these in your possession."There must be an immediate custodial sentence."Sidelka will be subject to a Terrorism Notification Order for 10 years after he is released.
'Shocking and disturbing'
Det Ch Supt James Dunkerley, head of Counter Terrorism Policing North East, said: "The shocking and disturbing racist material Sidelka downloaded, as well as his interest in extreme violence and manufacturing homemade firearms, show the threat he posed to the community."The efforts he made to disguise his true identity online, and to post opinions on social media which were not as extreme as those he held in private, indicate that he knew how unacceptable his views really were."He added that Sidelka was 18 at the time of the offences and young people were "particularly vulnerable" when it came to being influenced by harmful ideologies."I would urge people to act early and help us to stop young people being drawn into extremism," he said.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mum's 'brutal' murder in her own home still a mystery 20 years on
Mum's 'brutal' murder in her own home still a mystery 20 years on

BBC News

time10 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Mum's 'brutal' murder in her own home still a mystery 20 years on

The family of a mother who was shot in her home 20 years ago have renewed their appeals for anyone with information to come Hargreaves, 22, was asleep on the sofa when three men burst into her home in Walton, Liverpool, on 3 August 2005 and killed murderers then set fire to the home on Lambourne Road, with Ms Hargreaves' partner and two-year-old daughter, who were upstairs, having to escape through a arrested 21 people as part of their investigations, but no-one has been convicted. Two decades on, her family released a previously unshared photograph of the mother-of-three, taken at said: "Over the past 20 years, people will have talked with family and friends."A number of people were contacted by males using a phone that was stolen, along with a vehicle used in Lucy's murder."The people who received those calls, along with others, could have information which could be crucial in achieving justice for Lucy, her parents, sister, children and all her extended family and friends."We appeal directly to them to please come forward. "Now is the time." 'Time is no barrier' A comprehensive review into her murder launched by Merseyside Police two years ago is still Rubbery, head of the Serious Case Review Unit, said: "It is now 20 years since Lucy was taken from her family in the most brutal of circumstances."After carrying out the killing, the offenders ignored the cries of a toddler upstairs as they poured petrol around the house and set fire to it."Their callous and reckless actions could have claimed the lives of two more people that night, had they not escaped the flames by jumping from a window upstairs."We are as determined as ever to get justice for Lucy, whose death robbed her family of a loving mother and daughter."As with any unsolved murder, time is no barrier to our pursuit of justice for Lucy and we appeal to anyone with any information, no matter how small it may seem, to contact us."Detectives are continuing to appeal for anyone with information about a gold Lexus car, believed to have been dumped shortly after the shooting on Richard Kelly Drive, Clubmoor, by a number of men who then ran in the direction of Normandale previously said they wanted to speak to Kevin Thomas Parle, who was believed to be living abroad, and was also wanted in connection with the murder of Liam Kelly, 16, who was shot in the early hours of 19 June 2004 in Dingle, Liverpool. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Unmasked: the man behind one of the fastest growing far-right YouTube channels
Unmasked: the man behind one of the fastest growing far-right YouTube channels

The Guardian

time41 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Unmasked: the man behind one of the fastest growing far-right YouTube channels

The Guardian has identified the self-described 'national socialist' behind an openly extremist YouTube channel that in just over two months has accumulated 50,000 subscribers, seen more than 2.3m views, and likely made thousands of dollars from YouTube's revenue-sharing monetization program. Johnathan Christopher 'Chris' Booth, 37, lives in the unincorporated community of Coral, a part of Maple Valley Township in Michigan's Montcalm county, and is married to a senior local Republican official. Booth has published more than 70 YouTube videos since May on his Shameless Sperg account, whose graphic design elements feature stylized SS bolts. Titles of his videos – generally a recording of him delivering his views direct to camera – include: 'Why I Dislike Jews. It's not complicated', 'Black Crimes Matter: Never Relax' and 'Jews and FBI hate you and your free speech'. Typically the videos attract hundreds of comments from like-minded YouTube users. His channel has seen such remarkable success that it has drawn apparently baseless allegations from other far-right creators that he is a 'fed'. On an X account that frequently advertises his videos, his posts include antisemitic comments and in one response to a post about actor Jim Carrey he writes: 'All of them deserve rope. I advocate for national socialism though, under which idiots like this would not fare too well.' Despite YouTube's stated policies against hate speech and content that promotes violence against individuals or groups based on race, religion or other protected characteristics, Booth's channel appears to be monetized through the YouTube Partner Program. The channel displays ads and Booth has thanked subscribers for their financial support through the platform. YouTube's community guidelines explicitly prohibit content that 'promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization'. A YouTube spokesperson said: 'Upon review, we terminated the channel for violating our community guidelines. Content that promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on their ethnicity, nationality, race or religion is not allowed on YouTube.' According to YouTube, another account associated with Booth was terminated, and creators are no longer entitled to earn any revenue if their channel is terminated. The terminations happened after the Guardian reached out to YouTube with questions about Booth's activities. Also according to YouTube, content that promotes violence or hatred against individuals or groups based on their ethnicity, nationality, race or religion is not allowed on the platform. In the wake of the ban, Booth took to X to say that he would move his content to 'alt-tech' platforms such as Odysee. Booth is married to Meghyn 'Meg' Booth, the Republican treasurer of Maple Valley Township. Meg Booth has 'liked' several posts with extremist themes on Chris Booth's Facebook account with her personal account. Chris Booth's Facebook page also features extensive racist propaganda along with iconography often employed by neo-Nazis. The revelations raise questions about the extent to which YouTube, whose parent company Alphabet also owns Google, Waymo and other tech companies, has backslid on monitoring extremism on its platform. Jeff Tischauser, a senior research analyst at the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), said Booth's operation across YouTube, X and merchandising platforms was a 'boilerplate Nazi grift'. 'He may be earning money from YouTube, as well as hawking these racist and antisemitic items on his website like cups and T-shirts,' Tischauser added. He said that YouTube is 'the premier site that these guys look to in order to expand their following and to make money off of that following'. The Guardian retrieved a Coral, Michigan, street address from EU-mandated General Product Safety Regulation compliance information on the Shameless Sperg merchandise page on the merchandising platform Printify. The property at that address is owned by Meg Booth, according to property records. Data brokers indicate that Chris Booth lives at the same address. Sites including show exterior views of the house at the property. The property's color and cladding match those visible in videos published to YouTube on 14 and 15 May. Chris Booth appears to have made some efforts to remove photographs of himself and other potentially identifying information from his own social media accounts and other online spaces. However, he is visible in 'shorts'-style videos posted by Meg Booth to Facebook. This video of Chris Booth depicts the same person visible in Shameless Sperg videos. The Guardian emailed both Chris and Meg Booth for comment. In an email, Meg Booth appeared to repudiate her husband's views. 'I am not involved in my husband's content or political views, and I do not share or support any form of racism, antisemitism, or hate speech,' she wrote, adding: 'My values are my own and are grounded in respect, inclusion, and service to the community.' Meg Booth concluded: 'As an elected official, I've always acted independently, with integrity, and in line with the expectations of my office. I respectfully decline further comment.' Chris Booth did not directly respond, but in the day after the email he took to X to reaffirm his views, including a post in which he wrote: 'I've come to believe fascists are born, not made. Discovering real fascism in my early thirties was like looking into a mirror and finally realizing why commies have called me a fascist for so long. They spotted it before I could, but then I wholeheartedly embraced it.' In his videos and on X, Booth explicitly embraces neo-Nazi ideology and promotes antisemitic conspiracy theories. On his Shameless Sperg X account, Booth writes: 'I am the Shameless Sperg, I am a National Socialist, and I do sperg rants here,' with a link to his YouTube channel. On the YouTube channel, he writes: 'This channel is a collection of sperg rants and commentary on the news & issues of the day, or whatever else is on my mind, from an autistically dissident and NS perspective.' 'Sperg', an abbreviation for Asperger syndrome, is used pejoratively in far-right circles for those whose obsessive and open extremism might put off normal people or draw unwanted attention. 'NS' is commonly used as an abbreviation for 'national socialist' in far-right circles. His videos almost all contain neo-Nazi perspectives, enunciating conspiratorial antisemitism, anti-Black racism and claims that white people are superior to all other races. In a June video titled 'There is no Anti-Semitism without Semitism', Booth states in relation to interwar Germany: 'Extreme sadism and humiliation towards Gentiles is a Jewish tradition … Now, you might begin to understand why, after 14 years of seeing their people tormented by the Jews, millions of Germans organized, gained political power and broke the chains of Jewish tyranny in Germany.' The video continues with Booth arguing that antisemitism is a just response to the behavior of Jews, and sarcastically dismisses the idea that it is 'just some ancient mental pathogen in the minds of the goyim, it just springs to life for no reason just to make things harder for the Jews'. In a July video, Booth defended recent attempts to create a whites-only community in Arkansas. He said: 'White people are allowed to congregate together without being accompanied by some fucking Black person or some Jew.' In another July video Booth said: 'Black people oppress themselves. I don't do it. I have no interest in it. I, you know, I just want them away from me. You know, I want them away from me, my community, my state, my country. I don't know. Just, I don't know, get the fuck away from me.' In a May video supporting Trump's program of allowing Afrikaner refugees into the country on the basis of a fictional 'white genocide' in South Africa, Booth said: 'You know, I'm hoping that they don't completely lose South Africa to the Black plague, but, um, but in any event, uh, things are going to fall apart for them and go shit sideways.' Tischauser, the SPLC analyst, said that the themes of Booth's videos mix 'crass racism, basic historic white power talking points' and 'pseudo-academic kind of takes on Black criminality or Black behavior'. Meg Booth, Chris Booth's wife, was in November elected as the treasurer of Maple Valley Township running as a Republican. Her public social media profile does not feature the kind of extremist messaging that Chris Booth offers on his platform, though she has interacted with posts on his Facebook account, which is also freighted with racist messaging and neo-Nazi imagery. Chris Booth also 'liked' posts in which his wife discussed her candidacy.

Regret, resentment and Reform UK: jailed Rotherham rioters one year on
Regret, resentment and Reform UK: jailed Rotherham rioters one year on

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Regret, resentment and Reform UK: jailed Rotherham rioters one year on

It was a scene that became the defining image of the year for many. Flames licking up the side of a grey breezeblock hotel with balaclava-clad men jostling around, kicking, smashing windows, throwing debris on the fire. Protests were not uncommon outside the Holiday Inn in Manvers near Rotherham, which housed 200 asylum seekers, but there would be something different about Sunday 4 August 2024, coming after the murder of three young girls in Southport by 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana days earlier. It was not the first riot of the weekend instigated by the far right but it would be the biggest and it would bring to a close a week of violent clashes between communities and with the police. The demonstration was supposed to be peaceful – at least, from the point of view of many of those who had gathered there to make a stand, as they saw it, against their town becoming a dumping ground for people the country did not want or know what to do with. But from the very start it was clear there was a contingent who had planned to cause harm, to drive out the asylum seekers at any cost, perhaps even to kill them. Later, authorities would be reeling from how close the events came to being deadly, with police only just gaining control after rioters smashed their way into the hotel. It was a 'dark day', according to South Yorkshire police's assistant chief constable, Lindsey Butterfield. Ahead of the first anniversary of the violence, the Guardian spoke to a dozen men, aged 20 to 64 at the time, who received prison sentences for their part in the riot. Most lived a few miles away from the scene and none considered themselves to be racist, though most demonstrated a readiness to believe racist lies spread on Facebook about the refugees living in their area raping women or children. And they were quick to take matters into their own hands, blaming all asylum seekers. Though each of the rioters had their own motivations, there was a common theme of mistrust in authority and the media. Some said they'd seen Rotherham decline steadily over the years. 'Everybody's just fed up aren't they? You can't get a dentist, it's hard work,' said one rioter. Reform UK is gaining ground in this part of South Yorkshire, with the anti-establishment rhetoric of Nigel Farage having strong appeal. Perhaps surprisingly, most were eager to talk, glad to be given the opportunity to voice their feelings about unfair sentences and the public misunderstanding of the kind of people they were. For some, the violence had been a 'wake-up call', with the partner of one rioter saying he had PTSD from going to prison and had 'completely changed'. He had been on drugs and alcohol – there were numerous alcohol monitoring tags among the released men – but 'he has turned himself around, it was the catalyst that stopped it all'. Wives and girlfriends spoke of how tough it had been for them, particularly looking after children without the support of their spouse. Christmas had been especially challenging for young children with a parent behind bars. 'It has been the worst experience of my life,' she said. 'It was the first time I've ever known anyone go to prison.' Glyn Guest, a 61-year-old retired window cleaner, said he was walking his dog Ollie near the hotel when he was drawn in, having not known there was going to be a protest. 'I heard a load of shouting and bawling and that were it,' he said. He was sentenced to two years and eight months for violent disorder after continually walking up to the police line and being pushed back – getting his nose broken – and at one point grabbing a riot shield. His version of events was that a police officer 'lost her footing' but the court interpreted the video as him pulling her over, which she said had left her 'terrified for her safety'. 'I didn't agree with them when they were setting fires and that. I thought that were a bit harsh like, chucking house bricks and that. I didn't go down for trouble. 'But the judge just wouldn't listen. It was bad. I can't weigh it up,' he adds, about the length of his sentence. He said being locked up was 'hard' and he lost a lot of weight – his face looked drawn compared with the mugshot taken when he handed himself into police. All the men who spoke to the Guardian wanted to make it clear they were not far-right – a label that had made prison dangerous and terrifying, serving their time alongside gangs of non-white offenders who 'were after us because a screw grassed us up'. 'They were waiting for us, with the riot – but it was wrong, they got it all wrong.' Those who were sentenced to two or three years served about a third of their sentence before they were released on licence, wearing ankle tags that require them to be home between the hours of 7pm and 7am. The scene in Manvers last summer – with lines of officers pushing back groups of men – was reminiscent of another era, when striking miners were subjugated in clashes with police. 'I used to work at Manvers colliery, half a mile underneath the hotel,' said Mick Woods, who was sentenced to two years. 'We were on strike for a year and what did British people do? Nowt.' Unlike the other rioters, all of whom said they had never been to a demonstration before, Woods has spent a good deal of time at protests and on picket lines in his 65 years. He cannot tolerate the way British people, especially the working class, do not stand up for themselves, he said, and is 'proud' that he protested. 'My conscience is very clear. Very clear. The people what don't go down there [to protest], they are proper criminals.' Though Woods appeared to be anti-immigration generally, his protest had been against 'atrocious terrorist acts' in Southport. He had sympathy for the asylum seekers, he said, and had not wanted them to be hurt. 'I don't blame people coming here. We're sticking us nose in people's business, all over the planet,' he said. In footage played in court, he was standing next to a man with a dog and told police officers if they hit him, the dog would get them. He called an officer a 'disgrace to society'. But the court agreed there was no physical violence from Woods, nor did he do anything to encourage it from anyone else. 'I was shouting at the coppers saying, 'You should be ashamed of yersens.' And I went, 'You want a bumming by Gary Glitter.'' He laughed. He'd been a nuisance, but on any other day his behaviour may not have been considered criminal. Others referenced his case as an example of a particularly harsh sentence, though he said prison was on his 'bucket list' and he saw himself as a 'political prisoner'. 'It wasn't violent disorder, it was threatening behaviour, and I ought to have not admitted to it,' he said. Almost all of the men said they felt under pressure from their solicitor to plead guilty to violent disorder, a serious offence that virtually guaranteed prison time. 'Post office workers, they did the same to them and some of them took their lives,' said Woods. 'You can say this, that and t'other, and they'll make people into summat they're not, and that's what they did with me.' At least 100 people have been charged by South Yorkshire police for the riots and 85 of those have been sentenced to a combined 213 years in prison. The force is continuing to arrest perpetrators of the violence. In reality, for most of those individuals jailed, what they saw as harsh treatment only entrenched their beliefs. The father of two rioters who were sentenced for throwing objects at police, said he had gone down a far-right 'rabbit hole' online trying to understand why his sons were imprisoned for seemingly minor crimes. He believed his sons received such harsh sentences because they were 'protesting immigration' and that it was the prime minister, 'two-tier Keir' Starmer, who was responsible. 'It were all [the] press that got us in jail,' said Jordan Teal, 35, who was identified despite wearing a balaclava, and sentenced to two years and eight months for shouting at police that they were 'protecting paedophiles' and ripping off fence panels that were used as weapons. 'I hope you're proud of yourselves,' he said to the Guardian. In fact, South Yorkshire police had its own evidence gatherers, officers deployed with videocameras, as well as bodycam and aerial footage taken from two helicopters. Largely, though, it was the hundreds of hours of footage posted on social media by the rioters themselves that got them convicted. Joel Goodman, a photojournalist, refused to hand over any photos from the Rotherham riot, despite legal threats from South Yorkshire police. Michael Shaw, now 27, has the footage on his phone of the kick against a riot shield that was part of a clash that landed him two years and six months. 'They absolutely battered me that day, did the coppers.' Under the helmets and body armour, and behind the polycarbonate shields on one of the warmest days of the year, there would not be a lot of patience for those who did not do as they were told. A former soldier from the Yorkshire regiment, Shaw had gone 'with no mask or gloves or anything', there was 'no intent' he said. Like others, he said: 'I'm not racist, I just don't like it when people are raping women and children. It would be exactly the same if it were white lads.' He left the riot as the hotel was set on fire – did he feel bad for the asylum seekers trapped inside the hotel? 'No comment.' It was clear, he said, the big sentences handed down for Rotherham and the other riots a year ago hadn't worked as a deterrent: 'Just look what's happening now in Epping.' So would he do it again? 'One man's not going to make a difference. I wish I'd have stayed in bed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store