logo
‘Paranoia And Misinformation Spread Faster Than Covid', Inquiry Told

‘Paranoia And Misinformation Spread Faster Than Covid', Inquiry Told

Scoop3 days ago
Article – RNZ
A lack of clear communication from the government may have contributed to the spread of Covid-19 misinformation in the Mori and Pasifika communities, the Royal Commission of Inquiry has heard.
, Journalist
A lack of clear communication from the government may have contributed to the spread of Covid-19 misinformation in the Māori and Pasifika communities, the Royal Commission of Inquiry has heard.
Community and health leaders for Māori and Pasifika have spoken to the inquiry into the Covid-19 response about their struggles adapting to lockdown regulations.
The third day of the week-long hearing took place in Auckland yesterday. This week's hearings are concentrating on the impact of the extended lockdown in Auckland and Northland in 2021, and on vaccine mandates and safety.
Communication and information from health authorities during the lockdown was an issue, with community leaders highlighting that the language used when trying to inform their people about Covid and the vaccine was often very technical and difficult to understand.
Reverend Victor Pouesi, from the Christian Church of Samoa in Manukau, said this may have contributed to the spread of misinformation, with many fearful of Covid-19 and vaccinations.
'People were looking for alternative sources of information other than the government, and that created a lot of problems.
'Paranoia and misinformation spread faster than Covid itself.'
He said their church was able to livestream a broadcast with information from the government and social services to inform their community.
Similar issues were faced by the Māori health and social services organisations that spoke to the commissioners.
Hector Kawai – a director at Te Whānau o Waipareira, a health and social service provider in West Auckland – said online misinformation hampered vaccination efforts.
'Being on the front line we had a lot of whānau who came to us who were saying: 'Oh I don't want to put that poison in my body', you know?
'They had been seeing stuff which they had got from some quote – unquote Facebook expert,' he said.
Raewyn Bhana, deputy director of Whanau ora community clinics, a healthcare provider that focuses on Maori health, said this misinformation often turned into conflict.
Speaking to commissioners through an audio link, she talked about the protests at vaccination clinics.
'When we had our community, our pakeke (older adults), our kaumatua (elderly men) and kuia (elderly women) coming through it was quite fearful for them to be vaccinated when you've got protesters outside who were threatening our people who were coming through,' she said.
Both parties told the commissioners that Māori-led solutions and initiatives had the best reach within their communities, often because Māori had a deep mistrust of government.
Hector Kawai said kaupapa Māori led solutions like those offered by Te Whānau o Waipareira, did well to connect with Māori during the pandemic, but their work was not always well received.
'When we first came on to be an essential service I felt there was a certain amount of institutional racism, because of this you know 'oh there's just a bunch of Māoris out in the community' and the only ones who should be delivering out vaccinations and services should be doctors and nurses, but in fact we can do these sorts of things,' he said.
'People took your loved ones away'
The difficulty Pasifika families faced around funerals during lockdowns was also highlighted yesterday.
Penina Ifopo – a Samoan community leader in Manurewa – said his people struggled with government restrictions that limited how many people could attend funerals and how they were conducted.
'People took your loved ones away, put them in a house you had no idea of, they're alone in there.
'We have a spiritual connection with our loved ones and then you see the hearse taking them to be buried … it was very traumatising,' she said tearfully.
'We don't do counselling when it comes to funerals, the therapy is within us, it's our togetherness, it's both our Christian values together with our Samoan values.'
Ifopo spoke of other difficulties faced in her community, particularly for households with families.
She said many parents were not prepared and did not have the adequate tools for their children to do online learning.
'A lot of families were just living on data, there's no wifi at home,' she said.
'And also, you're lucky if there's a laptop, you'll find phones in every single home but no wifi and then parents just don't know what to do because they were having to be the teachers at the time.'
Lack of hospitality from customers
Meanwhile, a person working in the hospitality industry at the time of the lockdowns told the inquiry into the Covid response that she dealt with intimidating behaviour from customers.
Jodie Rameka told the inquiry she felt like she was being blamed for customers needing to wear masks in her shop.
'Even having to ask them if they had a pass if they came in without a face mask, and just the reactions from a lot of the customers were very scary.'
Rameka said she tried to sympathize with her customers.
'If I'm being honest, I rather them take it out on me than go and take it out on someone else,' she said.
'So I just took it.'
Rameka said she changed her whole career because of the pandemic.
Today the inquiry will focus on vaccine safety and will hear from advocacy groups.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mediawatch: Pandemic Probe Media Focus Flipped To Politicians
Mediawatch: Pandemic Probe Media Focus Flipped To Politicians

Scoop

time3 hours ago

  • Scoop

Mediawatch: Pandemic Probe Media Focus Flipped To Politicians

, Mediawatch Presenter "It's the big one. The inquiry into the Covid response kicks off this morning. It looks at lockdowns. It looks at all of the things you hated most," Ryan Bridge told viewers of NZME's streaming show Herald Now last Monday morning. But the public hearings which ran all week turned out not to be such a 'big one' for the media. "I saw the Covid inquiry in the news this morning and I just thought: how long does this have to go on for?" an exasperated Lara Greaves - an associate professor in politics - told Bridge later in the same show. She's not the only one who feels that way. But the hearings were barely in the news after they got under way on Monday. On Tuesday the inquiry was well down the running order in morning and evening news shows, long after coverage of the mushroom poisoning trial in Australia. On Wednesday the possibility of moa being regenerated with the backing of Sir Peter Jackson was a bigger story for most outlets. There was a little more coverage on Thursday when anti-vaccine and anti-lockdown groups appeared, ahead of anti-conspiracy theory group FACT and immunologist Professor Graeme LeGros later on. But by the time they wrapped up on Friday the hearings had virtually vanished from bulletins. And what was said over the five days generated less coverage than questions about whether politicians would appear at hearings in future. As for "the things you hated most" - people hated different things. Asthmatic Annie Collins told the inquiry on the first day she thought lockdowns worked and saved lives, and vaccine misinformation online was the real problem. "I think that was a major flaw in our system. All those social media streams should have been blocked. They were disgusting and they were basically lies," she said. Shutting down social media channels was out of scope for this inquiry, but the chairman Grant Illingworth KC told Ryan Bridge on Monday the big decisions made at the time were certainly not. Putting the heat on the decision-makers When the Herald Now host pressed the chairman about getting the big political decision-makers in front of the inquiry he said they would be invited to come and give evidence at a second set of hearings next month. When asked if former PM Jacinda Ardern would be one of them, Illingworth replied: "There are issues in relation to our powers when people are out of the country. If she's in the country, we will consider her position." He would not reveal details of specific communications, but he did say "those things are being worked through" and that "we will be fair, open and transparent at the appropriate time." That response was misinterpreted by many in the media as meaning Jacinda Ardern had been asked to attend - and either had not yet responded or that the chair would not say if she had or not. RNZ amended its reporting to make it clear the Commission said no decision had yet been made about who would appear at the August hearings. But Ryan Bridge continued to press for Ardern's appearance on Herald Now and Newstalk ZB. David Seymour - appearing as the acting PM - told Ryan Bridge the former PM should front up to answer questions about "the most significant political and economic event of this century so far." But Seymour was also at pains to point out that the inquiry is independent, and would make its own decision. That was the reason Labour leader Chris Hipkins - health minister during the period covered by the inquiry - gave on Morning Report the next day for not giving a view on Ardern's attendance. Hipkins also dodged a question about whether he'd discussed the issue with Jacinda Ardern herself. On Herald Now on Tuesday, Chris Hipkins confirmed he was cooperating with the inquiry, but equivocated on whether he himself would appear before it in August. He also made it clear he really didn't fancy what he thought had become a political process. "The terms of reference specifically exclude decisions made when New Zealand First were part of the government. So I think that the terms of reference have been deliberately constructed to achieve a particular outcome, particularly around providing a platform for those who have conspiracy theorists' views," he said. NZ First demanded the inquiry when forming the coalition government in 2023. The party even invoked 'agree to disagree' provisions in that agreement when National persisted with the first Royal Commission the Labour government had already launched. The second phase opened this week with new commissioners and expanded terms of reference, which meant that fringe voices opposed to the vaccine mandates, and in some cases the vaccine itself, would be heard this time and heard but not cross examined. "It seems to have been specifically written into the terms of reference that they get maximum airtime," Hipkins told Herald Now, adding that some of those given a platform had inspired the occupation of Parliament in 2022, where platforms for gallows were built - including one with his own name on it. One of the groups that prompted the occupation was the anti-vaccine, anti-lockdown group Voices for Freedom. The group's Facebook page was taken offline in 2021 for what the platform said was "misinformation that could cause physical harm." "You seriously expect the people of New Zealand to accept that deaths being reported internationally (in 2020) were not genuinely from Covid?" Grant Illingworth KC asked them on Thursday. "We're not disputing that there were deaths. We're simply saying that it gets very complex, especially when people are being funded in order to tick a box to say that a death was caused by Covid," VFF co-founder Claire Deeks replied. Voices for Freedom is also promoting a Face the Music campaign pressing the inquiry's commissioners to summon Jacinda Ardern and others and "hold them accountable for their COVID abuse." Their online petition depicts Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Sir Ashley Bloomfield all shoulder-to-shoulder in a courtroom dock. It's not exactly in tune with the evidence-gathering and non-adversarial approach of this Royal Commission's mandate. But others in the media weighed in behind the idea. "It is actually bizarre that we are having a Covid inquiry without Dame Jacinda's participation. She owes it to Kiwis to front up," Stuff's 'good news' correspondent Patrick Gower declared on Wednesday. That was triggered by Sir Ian Taylor's open letter to Jacinda Ardern last weekend - also published by Stuff - accusing Ardern of turning her back on the nation of five million for "a waka for one." But the same day The Post had reported a spokesperson for Dame Jacinda Ardern said she would provide evidence to the Covid-19 inquiry if asked - and "discussions were ongoing about the best way for it to occur." "Fact: Ardern has agreed to give evidence to phase two of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Government's response to Covid-19," The Herald's Fran O'Sullivan stated bluntly this weekend. "There is room to examine all of this dispassionately - not try to (figuratively) hang her again as the more deranged attempted when they wheeled out their noose on Parliament's grounds." For all the urging in the media, the story has actually been the same since March when the inquiry issued a minute, making it clear it could not take a legalistic or adversarial approach. "The commissioners expect that individuals will be prepared to attend interviews with them and or officers of the inquiry on a voluntary basis," the minute stated, regarding interviews with decision makers. "The interviews may be conducted online or in person, recorded and may be transcribed for the public record." In the end opinions about a point that was mostly moot overshadowed the coverage of what the commissioners were actually told in five days of public, livestreamed hearings.

Not all prepared for another pandemic, inquiry told
Not all prepared for another pandemic, inquiry told

Otago Daily Times

time2 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Not all prepared for another pandemic, inquiry told

By Victor Waters of RNZ The week-long Royal Commission of Inquiry into the government's Covid-19 response has finalised its first session of public hearings in Auckland. The inquiry aimed to look at lessons learned from the government response in order to prepare for future pandemics. Friday's fifth and final day of evidence in Auckland included testimonies from mandated industries, nursing and midwifery sectors and researchers. Autism New Zealand research and advocacy adviser Lee Patrick said today the impacts on disability support staff for the autistic community were still being felt. Patrick said while there were some resignations due to the mandate, other staff left due to the pressures of childcare and lockdown. However, she said Autism New Zealand was in favour of vaccine mandates. "Where I think the vaccine mandate did hit quite hard was disability support workers - and that's because there weren't enough to begin with. "It's an understaffed area. The few disability support workers that chose to resign or who couldn't keep their jobs after refusing to be vaccinated had an enormous impact. "These are people who work intimately with disabled people - [they] come into their homes, in some cases help them bath and use the toilet, in other cases help them cook meals and clean their homes - it's a very close relationship. "Losing that relationship particularly for an autistic person or a person who struggles to communicate, who relies on that predictability and routine is an enormous blow." Patrick said many in the community wanted exemptions for their support workers and were willing to accept the risk of having an unvaccinated person in their home because of that important relationship. Many of those workers who left the sector during the pandemic had not returned, she said. Johnny Mulheron, general manager of ambulance operations for Hato Hone St John, said they lost 1% of their front-line staff during the pandemic. He said in general, most workers within the ambulance service were supportive of the vaccine and mandates. "Prior to the mandate we have 65 percent of our people get vaccinated - that's over 8000 people. "Our technical advisory group supported that mandate and its not unheard of in health to have vaccination and immunisation evidence... we have a policy and immunisation schooled and an expectation." St John had since re-engaged with the majority of those people who had left because of the mandates, he said. But others within the health sector issued warnings to the commissioners. Anne Daniels, president of the New Zealand Nurses Organisation, said they were not prepared should another pandemic hit. She said she had concerns around resourcing levels in public health, especially considering there were suggestions within the sector another pandemic could arise in the coming years. "It seems we might have a pandemic within the next two years and we're not ready for it. More recently, the funding of our health infrastructure has been decimated in my opinion - particularly in public health." Daniels believed it could be difficult to implement findings and recommendations from this inquiry in time, considering they were not expected to be released until next year. Claire Macdonald, of the New Zealand College of Midwives, said Health New Zealand was not prepared for the end of the vaccination mandate in September 2022, despite the government emphasising that the mandates were a temporary measure. Macdonald said it caused the health service to be "starved unnecessarily of staff". "There was no policy in place within Health NZ to re-employ those who had left - midwives or any other health profession - under the mandate and it was advised that so-called mandate would remain in place until a national vaccine policy was put in place. "That was initially expected to take two to three weeks. It took nine months and there was no re-employment in just about every hospital of unvaccinated health workers until that national vaccination policy was put in place in July 2023." Macdonald said they provided intensive support for some midwives "to be able to go back into those facilities and work as locums or contractors or anything that meant they could provide midwifery care but not be under an employment contract which is a work around and completely ridiculous". The inquiry would continue next month in Wellington and provide a second session of public hearings. These would gather evidence from key decision-makers who led and informed the government's response to the pandemic.

Nurses vote to go on 24-hour strike, citing safe staffing concerns
Nurses vote to go on 24-hour strike, citing safe staffing concerns

RNZ News

time2 days ago

  • RNZ News

Nurses vote to go on 24-hour strike, citing safe staffing concerns

Health New Zealand told RNZ it was committed to reaching an agreement. Photo: RNZ More than 36,000 Te Whatu Ora nurses, midwives, health care assistants and kaimahi hauora have voted to strike for 24 hours of what they say is a failure by Health NZ to address their safe staffing concerns. The Nurses Organisation took a ballot of its members on possible industrial action, that would start with a 24-hour strike on July the 30th. A series of other actions would follow. Health NZ is offering a 3 percent pay rise over two years, plus two payments of $325. The union said the agency was refusing to provide safe staffing levels in its latest contract offer. Health New Zealand's latest pay offer was a "massive backward step" for the health system and patients, and there were "very strong indications" members will want to strike, the union said. Health New Zealand told RNZ it was committed to reaching an agreement, but it was also "operating within tight financial constraints". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store