logo
‘A.I.' director Steven Spielberg opposed to using AI in front of the camera

‘A.I.' director Steven Spielberg opposed to using AI in front of the camera

TimesLIVE5 days ago
When Steven Spielberg directed the film A.I. Artificial Intelligence, the technology was the stuff of science fiction, a device to tell a story about the ethics of creating sentient machines.
Today AI is a concrete reality in Hollywood, and Spielberg said he has drawn a line in the sand.
'I don't want AI making any creative decisions I can't make myself,' Spielberg said in an interview with Reuters.
'I don't want to use AI as a non-human collaborator in trying to work out my creative thinking.'
Spielberg spoke on Thursday after a ceremony dedicating the Steven Spielberg Theatre on the Universal Studios lot. The event acknowledged the director's decades-long relationship with the studio, which released such films as Jaws, Jurassic Park, Schindler's List and E.T. the Extraterrestrial.
The acclaimed director joked that his career at Universal began in 1967 when he took a tour of the lot as a high school student. He said he hid in the bathroom during a break, and waited for the tour to move on without him, 'then I had the entire lot to myself that day'.
'Our hope and dream is that it's not only the place that is founded on his extraordinary legacy,' said Donna Langley, chair of NBCUniversal Entertainment & Studios.
'It is the place of future hopes and dreams of filmmakers and storytellers who are going to take this company into the next 100 years and the 100 years after that, people who come with a hope and a dream, people who have been inspired by Steven.'
Spielberg's 2001 modest box office hit A.I. Artificial Intelligence was a meditation on love, loss and what it means to be human through the eyes of a discarded humanoid robot. In the Pinocchio-like journey set in a futuristic dystopia, David, the android boy, yearns to be human, searching for love in a world of machines and artificial intelligence. The film hit screens when AI was in its nascent stages and predated the launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT by 21 years.
'It wasn't about artificial intelligence as much as it was about sentient existence, and can you love a sentient entity? Can a mother love a robot child?' said Spielberg.
'It was not where AI is taking us today. Eventually there will be a convergence between AI and robotics.'
Spielberg said AI can be a great tool 'if used responsibly and morally' to help find a cure for cancer and other diseases.
'I draw a line and it's not a line of cement, it's a bit of line in the sand which gives me some wiggle room to say I have the option to revise this thinking in the future,' he said.
'Right now I don't want AI making any creative decisions.'
He said he has witnessed how technology can replace human talent while working on the 1993 film Jurassic Park.
Spielberg initially planned to use renowned stop-motion clay animation artist Phil Tippett to create the dinosaurs roaming the island theme park. Visual effects artist Dennis Muren proposed an alternative method, using Industrial Light & Magic's computer-generated imagery to create realistic dinosaurs. The director is an executive producer in Jurassic World: Rebirth which reaches theatres on July 2.
'That kind of made certain careers somewhat extinct,' said Spielberg, 'so I'm very sensitive to things AI may do to take work away from people.'
Spielberg said he has yet to use AI on his films, though he is open to possible applications of it behind-the-scenes in functions such as budgeting or planning.
'I don't want to use it in front of the camera right now,' Spielberg said. 'Not quite yet.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

African creatives gear up for crucial conversation about the future of storytelling
African creatives gear up for crucial conversation about the future of storytelling

The Herald

timea day ago

  • The Herald

African creatives gear up for crucial conversation about the future of storytelling

The future of African storytelling is stepping into the digital age and artificial intelligence (AI) is taking centre stage. Set to take place on August 8 at the Protea Hotel in Midrand, the AI in Film: Empowering African Filmmakers conference will gather some of the continent's most influential voices in tech and the arts to explore how AI is shaping the future of African cinema. Speakers include actor and producer Tumisho Masha, AI consultant Johan Steyn and media personalities Penny Lebyane and Masechaba Mposwa, who will facilitate discussions with actors' unions, tech experts, broadcasters and industry stakeholders. Under the theme 'AI's Role in African Storytelling's Future', the one-day conference will unpack how AI is changing the way stories are scripted, visualised and distributed while raising critical questions about ownership, authenticity and cultural preservation. 'This is a long overdue conversation for African creatives. Our industry shouldn't sit on the sidelines while global AI trends reshape the creative economy. We must lead with agency and ethical innovation that reflects our cultural voice,' said co-founder Mfundo Ntsibande. The event, hosted by digital consultancy Sci-Thagorus, will feature live demos, panel talks and networking masterclasses. Key topics will cover AI's role in scriptwriting and production, ethical boundaries in human-AI collaboration and the thorny issue of copyright in AI-generated content. Founder and CEO Lwazi Sithole said the conference aims to empower creatives with the tools and frameworks to integrate AI responsibly. 'It's about enabling innovation while safeguarding cultural integrity.'

Cloned - Researchers say using ChatGPT can rot your brain. The truth is a little more complicated
Cloned - Researchers say using ChatGPT can rot your brain. The truth is a little more complicated

IOL News

time2 days ago

  • IOL News

Cloned - Researchers say using ChatGPT can rot your brain. The truth is a little more complicated

Can Chat GPT lead to the demise of critical thinking, or is it simply that users don't put any critical thinking into their use of Chat GPT? Image: Supplied Vitomir Kovanovic and Rebecca Marrone Since ChatGPT appeared almost three years ago, the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on learning has been widely debated. Are they handy tools for personalised education, or gateways to academic dishonesty? Most importantly, there has been concern that using AI will lead to a widespread 'dumbing down', or decline in the ability to think critically. If students use AI tools too early, the argument goes, they may not develop basic skills for critical thinking and problem-solving. Is that really the case? According to a recent study by scientists from MIT, it appears so. Using ChatGPT to help write essays, the researchers say, can lead to 'cognitive debt' and a 'likely decrease in learning skills'. So what did the study find? The difference between using AI and the brain alone Over the course of four months, the MIT team asked 54 adults to write a series of three essays using either AI (ChatGPT), a search engine, or their own brains ('brain-only' group). The team measured cognitive engagement by examining electrical activity in the brain and through linguistic analysis of the essays. The cognitive engagement of those who used AI was significantly lower than the other two groups. This group also had a harder time recalling quotes from their essays and felt a lower sense of ownership over them. Interestingly, participants switched roles for a final, fourth essay (the brain-only group used AI and vice versa). The AI-to-brain group performed worse and had engagement that was only slightly better than the other group's during their first session, far below the engagement of the brain-only group in their third session. The authors claim this demonstrates how prolonged use of AI led to participants accumulating 'cognitive debt'. When they finally had the opportunity to use their brains, they were unable to replicate the engagement or perform as well as the other two groups. Cautiously, the authors note that only 18 participants (six per condition) completed the fourth, final session. Therefore, the findings are preliminary and require further testing. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Does this really show AI makes us stupider? These results do not necessarily mean that students who used AI accumulated 'cognitive debt'. In our view, the findings are due to the particular design of the study. The change in neural connectivity of the brain-only group over the first three sessions was likely the result of becoming more familiar with the study task, a phenomenon known as the familiarisation effect. As study participants repeat the task, they become more familiar and efficient, and their cognitive strategy adapts accordingly. When the AI group finally got to 'use their brains', they were only doing the task once. As a result, they were unable to match the other group's experience. They achieved only slightly better engagement than the brain-only group during the first session. To fully justify the researchers' claims, the AI-to-brain participants would also need to complete three writing sessions without AI. Similarly, the fact the brain-to-AI group used ChatGPT more productively and strategically is likely due to the nature of the fourth writing task, which required writing an essay on one of the previous three topics. As writing without AI required more substantial engagement, they had a far better recall of what they had written in the past. Hence, they primarily used AI to search for new information and refine what they had previously written. What are the implications of AI in assessment? To understand the current situation with AI, we can look back to what happened when calculators first became available. Back in the 1970s, their impact was regulated by making exams much harder. Instead of doing calculations by hand, students were expected to use calculators and spend their cognitive efforts on more complex tasks. Effectively, the bar was significantly raised, which made students work equally hard (if not harder) than before calculators were available. The challenge with AI is that, for the most part, educators have not raised the bar in a way that makes AI a necessary part of the process. Educators still require students to complete the same tasks and expect the same standard of work as they did five years ago. In such situations, AI can indeed be detrimental. Students can for the most part offload critical engagement with learning to AI, which results in 'metacognitive laziness'. However, just like calculators, AI can and should help us accomplish tasks that were previously impossible – and still require significant engagement. For example, we might ask teaching students to use AI to produce a detailed lesson plan, which will then be evaluated for quality and pedagogical soundness in an oral examination. In the MIT study, participants who used AI were producing the 'same old' essays. They adjusted their engagement to deliver the standard of work expected of them. The same would happen if students were asked to perform complex calculations with or without a calculator. The group doing calculations by hand would sweat, while those with calculators would barely blink an eye.

African creatives gear up for crucial conversation about the future of storytelling
African creatives gear up for crucial conversation about the future of storytelling

TimesLIVE

time2 days ago

  • TimesLIVE

African creatives gear up for crucial conversation about the future of storytelling

The future of African storytelling is stepping into the digital age and artificial intelligence (AI) is taking centre stage. Set to take place on August 8 at the Protea Hotel in Midrand, the AI in Film: Empowering African Filmmakers conference will gather some of the continent's most influential voices in tech and the arts to explore how AI is shaping the future of African cinema. Speakers include actor and producer Tumisho Masha, AI consultant Johan Steyn and media personalities Penny Lebyane and Masechaba Mposwa, who will facilitate discussions with actors' unions, tech experts, broadcasters and industry stakeholders. Under the theme 'AI's Role in African Storytelling's Future', the one-day conference will unpack how AI is changing the way stories are scripted, visualised and distributed while raising critical questions about ownership, authenticity and cultural preservation. 'This is a long overdue conversation for African creatives. Our industry shouldn't sit on the sidelines while global AI trends reshape the creative economy. We must lead with agency and ethical innovation that reflects our cultural voice,' said co-founder Mfundo Ntsibande. The event, hosted by digital consultancy Sci-Thagorus, will feature live demos, panel talks and networking masterclasses. Key topics will cover AI's role in scriptwriting and production, ethical boundaries in human-AI collaboration and the thorny issue of copyright in AI-generated content. Founder and CEO Lwazi Sithole said the conference aims to empower creatives with the tools and frameworks to integrate AI responsibly. 'It's about enabling innovation while safeguarding cultural integrity.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store