Five Risks for Stocks That Cloud the Outlook for the Second Half
(Bloomberg) — Some of the world's biggest money managers are wary of chasing the stock rally further in the second half of 2025, bracing for more volatility.
Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares
US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs
Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined
Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer
Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown
Markets are wrapping up a wild six months that saw the S&P 500 plunge 19% from peak to trough, before it recouped those losses. The index closed at a record high on Friday after the ceasefire between Israel and Iran revived the risk-on rally.
The recent bounce is not enough for many institutional investors, who cite a litany of risks confronting equities. The fast-approaching deadline for tariff deals, a mixed outlook for earnings and questions around America's debt and leadership of the Federal Reserve loomed large in interviews with investment firms. They're also mindful of US-China tensions, potentially eased somewhat by the countries' just-announced trade framework.
'We are more cautious than constructive,' said Joe Gilbert, a portfolio manager at Integrity Asset Management LLC. 'The outlook for the second half of the year is always framed by the starting point, and that starting point from the perspective of valuation and earnings growth is not that attractive.'
Gilbert's view is typical of the downbeat sentiment among institutional investors from Singapore to London and New York as June draws to a close. It's also reflected in equity positioning by global asset managers, which remains well below historical levels.
Here's more about five key risk factors that stock investors said they are watching closely for the rest of the year:
Tariff Deadline
An immediate threat to the equity rally lies in the July 9 deadline set by President Donald Trump to reach trade pacts with major US partners. The stakes are high as exporters without a deal will be hit with much higher tariffs than the current 10% level applied to most countries.
The UK is an outlier, having secured an agreement on paper. The European Union and the US believe they can clinch some form of trade agreement in time, Bloomberg News reported Friday, while talks with India, Japan and many others continue. Bloomberg News has also reported that the US is nearing agreements with Mexico and Vietnam.
Still, investors got a reminder of the risks of sudden turbulence in this area of international relations when Trump on Friday said he would terminate trade talks with Canada in response to a 3% digital services tax.
Investors generally agree that a tariff shock for markets on the scale of 'Liberation Day' in early April is unlikely. There are also hopes that the deadline could be pushed out. Still, Anthi Tsouvali, a strategist at UBS Global Wealth Management, said that while 'markets are not complacent anymore, there are risks until a firm deal is announced.'
Tsouvali said she has a neutral stance on equities. 'There's going to be a lot of uncertainty, a lot of volatility,' she said. 'We are not taking active risk.'
Earnings
Corporate resilience has been a key support for the sharp rebound in US stocks since April. Analysts on average expect earnings for S&P 500 companies to rise 7.1% this year before an acceleration in 2026, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence.
That will be put to the test within a few weeks as second-quarter results roll in. The last earnings season saw companies across the world pull forecasts for the year, citing cost increases and weak consumer sentiment.
A June survey by the Business Roundtable showed C-suite executives were more pessimistic than three months earlier, with fewer expecting to ramp up hiring or capital spending. That said, Trump's $4.2 trillion tax-cut package — facing a key Senate vote in the week to come — could provide a boost to companies struggling with tariff hikes and costs to rejig their supply chains.
'Within this more challenging environment, you've got to think that those growth expectations have got to come down,' said Louise Dudley, a portfolio manager at Federated Hermes. For the broader market, 'perhaps the most that we can expect is a sideways move from here,' she said.
Geopolitics
An end to hostilities between Israel and Iran has pulled oil prices lower, easing a worry for equity investors about how this would feed through to inflation and complicate the Fed's path to interest-rate cuts. Still, the boost to sentiment is fragile as uncertainty swirls around the future of Iran's nuclear program.
'Despite this temporary relief, we continue to see geopolitical risk as structurally elevated,' said Francisco Simón, European head of strategy at Santander Asset Management. The firm retains an underweight stance on equities, favoring a 'cautious and selective approach,' he said.
The fraught relationship between the US and China also keeps investors on edge. They will be scouring for details of a trade framework the two sides said this week that they have reached. Among key points are whether the agreement will free up access to Chinese rare earths for American companies and remove obstacles for Chinese tech companies in obtaining cutting-edge US chip technologies.
US Debt, the Fed
The US lost its last top credit rating in May amid deepening investor concerns over its ballooning debt. Meanwhile, Trump's tax-and-spending bill is expected to add trillions to federal debt over coming years.
'We know that the problem is not going away,' said Neil Robson, head of global equities at Columbia Threadneedle Investments. He noted that a market meltdown sending bond yields surging and equity valuations plunging remains a low probability event. 'But we got to be aware,' he said.
For Nicolas Wylenzek, a macro strategist at Wellington Management, the handling of the Fed Chair's succession is also an important issue for investors. Trump said Wednesday that he has three or four people in mind to follow Jerome Powell when his term expires next year.
A risk mentioned by some investors is that the US experiences its own version of the UK's 2022 'Liz Truss moment.' That was 'partly triggered by uncontrolled spending, in combination with some questioning of the independence of the Bank of England,' Wylenzek said.
'Could we see something similar?' he said. 'There's a risk that markets suddenly start to get worried that the next chairman of the Fed is not as independent as they maybe have been in the past.'
Valuations
With stocks trading at 22 times earnings in the next 12 months, the S&P 500's valuation is well above its 10-year average of 18.6 times. Firms like Wellington and AllianceBernstein are among those expecting the multiple to remain elevated due to future rate cuts and the resilience of big tech companies. But others see the lofty price tag as an obstacle to buying more stocks.
'US equity valuations, particularly in market-capitalization-weighted strategies such as the S&P 500 Index, may have further to adjust if US economic conditions deteriorate,' said David Chao, a global market strategist at Invesco Asset Management. 'Markets outside of the US mostly trade at lower multiples, and we think the gap with the US will continue to narrow.'
—With assistance from Kit Rees, Macarena Muñoz and John Cheng.
America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried
How to Steal a House
Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push
Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags
Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Musk Rages as Trump Tax Bill Slashes Electric Vehicle Credits
Elon Musk slammed the US Senate's latest version of President Donald Trump's multi-trillion dollar tax bill Saturday, raging online that the cuts to electric vehicle and other clean energy credits would be 'incredibly destructive' to the country. Musk, the chief executive officer of Tesla Inc. and SpaceX, posted on his social media platform X about the bill, which the Senate was planning to put to an initial vote on Saturday. Musk recently left Trump's side after working for several months as the head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two Workers for SEC's EDGAR System Charged With Insider Trading
(Bloomberg) -- Two men who worked for the Securities and Exchange Commission's EDGAR public filing system were charged with insider trading after allegedly pocketing $1 million by stealing non-public information obtained through their jobs. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Justin Chen and Jun Zhen, both of Brooklyn, New York, were charged in a federal complaint with obtaining material, non-public information about companies like Purple Innovation Inc., Ondas Holdings Inc., SigmaTron International Inc., and Signing Day Sports Inc. through their work at EDGAR, according to Brooklyn US Attorney Joseph Nocella. Prosecutors say that between March and June 2025 the pair engaged in a scheme to obtain information about these companies, which announced they had entered into merger agreements or partnerships 'that resulted in significant increases in the share price of each company's stock.' Chen, 31, and Zhen, 29, purchased shares in the companies before the announcements, 'and sold those shares at a significant profit immediately after the announcement,' according to a complaint filed in federal court in Brooklyn. 'In total, Chen and Zhen have made a profit of more than $1 million from their trading.' Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested Chen and Zhen Friday night at John F. Kennedy International Airport as they were planning to board a flight to Hong Kong, said John Marzulli, a spokesman for Nocella. Chen worked as an EDGAR operator and assistant manager while Zhen worked as an EDGAR operator and typeset manager, prosecutors said. The two had access to the company announcements before they were filed. Both men are charged with securities fraud, which carries a prison term of as long as 25 years, prosecutors said. Chen and Zhen made their initial court appearances in federal court in Brooklyn on Saturday before US Magistrate Judge Vera Scanlon, who ordered them held without bail. Chris Wright, a lawyer for Zhen, and Charles Millioen, a lawyer for Chen, didn't immediately return email messages seeking comment about their clients. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Dividend Stock: Kinder Morgan vs. Enterprise Products Partners
Kinder Morgan is one of the largest midstream operators in North America. Enterprise Products Partners is one of the largest midstream operators in North America. One of these two midstream giants has a better track record of reliably paying investors for sticking around. 10 stocks we like better than Kinder Morgan › If you are looking at Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) and its 4.1% dividend yield, you should also consider Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) and its 6.8% distribution yield. But the reason for preferring Enterprise over Kinder Morgan is only partly to do with the yield, particularly if you are a dividend-focused investor. Here's what you need to know to decide between these two midstream giants. From a big-picture perspective, both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise Products Partners operate in the energy sector. This sector is known for being volatile, thanks to the huge impact that oil and natural gas prices have on the financial results of most energy companies. But not all energy companies, since Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are largely toll takers, charging fees for moving oil and natural gas around the world. Essentially, these midstream players sit between the upstream (energy production) and the downstream (chemicals and refining). The pipelines, storage, and transportation assets they own generate reliable fees, with the price of the commodities moving through their systems far less important than demand for the services they provide. And demand for energy tends to be fairly high even when energy prices are low. So both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise have attractive and reliable business models in what is an otherwise volatile industry. From this perspective, Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are very similar. They are also very similar when it comes to the size of their asset portfolios, which are among the largest in North America. In fact, both businesses have market caps in the $60 billion to $70 billion range. But they aren't interchangeable. Midstream investments are generally considered for the reliable income stream they provide to investors. The lofty dividend yields of both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are part of that story. However, there's a back history that investors shouldn't ignore. In 2016, the energy sector was going through a difficult period. Enterprise increased its distribution. Kinder Morgan cut its distribution by 75%. To be fair, it was the right move for the company, but it was a terrible outcome for income investors. The real problem, however, is that just a couple of months prior to the cut, management was guiding for a dividend increase of as much as 10%. The cash freed up from the dividend cut was used to strengthen Kinder Morgan's balance sheet and to invest in growth opportunities. So the cut made the business stronger, with management eventually getting dividend growth back on track. But even here there was a problem. It set out an aggressive dividend growth schedule and then fell short of that plan during the difficult energy market in 2020, during the coronavirus pandemic. In other words, Kinder Morgan has let dividend investors down during each of the most recent energy industry downturns. Enterprise increased its distribution modestly in 2020, but that is basically what it has done for years. In fact, at this point, Enterprise has reliably increased its distribution year in and year out for 26 consecutive years. Kinder Morgan looks like it is in much better financial and business shape today than it was in 2016. And the 2020 dividend miss was reasonable, too, given the uncertainty at the time. But if being able to trust how the management teams of the investments you own address what's important to you, Enterprise will be the better investment option. And you'll collect a higher yield while you're at it. Before you buy stock in Kinder Morgan, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Kinder Morgan wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Dividend Stock: Kinder Morgan vs. Enterprise Products Partners was originally published by The Motley Fool