California's Yurok Tribe gets back ancestral lands that were taken over 120 years ago
Since time immemorial, his ancestors from the Yurok Tribe had fished, hunted and gathered in this watershed flanked by coastal forests. But for more than 100 years, these lands were owned and managed by timber companies, severing the tribe's access to its homelands.
When McCovey started working as a fisheries technician, the company would let him go there to do his job.
'Snorkeling Blue Creek ... I felt the significance of that place to myself and to our people, and I knew then that we had to do whatever we could to try and get that back,' McCovey said.
After a 23-year effort and $56 million, that became reality.
Roughly 73 square miles (189 square kilometers) of homelands have been returned to the Yurok, more than doubling the tribe's land holdings, according to a deal announced Thursday. Completion of the land-back conservation deal along the lower Klamath River — a partnership with Western Rivers Conservancy and other environmental groups — is being called the largest in California history.
The Yurok Tribe had 90% of its territory taken during the California Gold Rush in the mid-1800s, suffering massacres and disease from settlers.
'To go from when I was a kid and 20 years ago even, from being afraid to go out there to having it be back in tribal hands … is incredible,' said McCovey, director of the Yurok Tribal Fisheries Department.
___
EDITOR'S NOTE: This is part of a series of on how tribes and Indigenous communities are coping with and combating climate change.
___
Land Back is a global movement seeking the return of homelands to Indigenous people through ownership or co-stewardship.
In the last decade, nearly 4,700 square miles (12,173 square kilometers) were returned to tribes in 15 states through a federal program. Organizations are aiding similar efforts.
There's mounting recognition that Indigenous people's traditional knowledge is critical to addressing climate change. Studies found the healthiest, most biodiverse and resilient forests are on protected native lands where Indigenous people remained stewards.
Beth Rose Middleton Manning, a University of California, Davis professor of Native American Studies, said Indigenous people's perspective — living in relation with the lands, waterways and wildlife — is becoming widely recognized, and is a stark contrast to Western views.
'Management of a forest to grow conifers for sale is very different from thinking about the ecosystem and the different plants and animals and people as part of it and how we all play a role,' she said.
The Yurok people will now manage these lands and waterways. The tribe's plans include reintroducing fire as a forest management tool, clearing lands for prairie restoration, removing invasive species and planting trees while providing work for some of the tribe's more than 5,000 members and helping restore salmon and wildlife.
Protecting a salmon sanctuary
One fall morning in heavy fog, a motorboat roared down the turbid Klamath toward Blue Creek — the crown jewel of these lands — past towering redwoods, and cottonwoods, willows, alders. Suddenly, gray gave way to blue sky, where an osprey and bald eagle soared. Along a bank, a black bear scrambled over rocks.
The place is home to imperiled marbled murrelets, northern spotted owls and Humboldt martens, as well as elk, deer and mountain lions.
The Klamath River basin supports fish — steelhead, coho and Chinook salmon — that live in both fresh and saltwater. The Klamath was once the West Coast's third largest salmon-producing river and the life force of Indigenous people. But the state's salmon stock has plummeted so dramatically — in part from dams and diversions — that fishing was banned for the third consecutive year.
'We can't have commercial fishing because populations are so low,' said Tiana Williams-Claussen, director of the Yurok Tribe Wildlife Department. 'Our people would use the revenue to feed their families; now there's less than one salmon per Yurok Tribe member.'
Experts say restoring Blue Creek complements the successful, decades-long fight by tribes to remove the Klamath dams — the largest dam removal in U.S. history.
This watershed is a cold-water lifeline in the lower Klamath for spawning salmon and steelhead that stop to cool down before swimming upstream. That's key amid climate-infused droughts and warming waters.
'For the major river to have its most critical and cold-water tributary … just doing its job is critical to the entire ecosystem,' said Sue Doroff, co-founder and former president of Western Rivers Conservancy.
Altered lands, waterways
For more than 100 years, these lands were owned and managed for industrial timber.
Patchworks of 15 to 20 acres (6.07 to 8.09 hectares) at a time of redwoods and Douglas firs have been clear cut to produce and sell logs domestically, according to Galen Schuler, a vice president at Green Diamond Resource Company, the previous land owner.
Schuler said the forests have been sustainably managed, with no more than 2% cut annually, and that old growth is spared. He said they are 'maybe on the third round' of clear cutting since the 1850s.
But clear cutting creates sediment that winds up in streams, making them shallower, more prone to warming and worsening water quality, according to Josh Kling, conservation director for the conservancy. Sediment, including from roads, can also smother salmon eggs and kill small fish.
Culverts, common on Western logging roads, have also been an issue here. Most 'were undersized relative to what a fish needs for passage,' Kling said.
Land management decisions for commercial timber have also created some dense forests of small trees, making them wildfire prone and water thirsty, according to Williams-Claussen.
'I know a lot of people would look at the forested hillsides around here and be like, 'It's beautiful, it's forested.' But see that old growth on the hill, like way up there?' asked Sarah Beesley, fisheries biologist for the Yurok Tribe, sitting on a rock in Blue Creek. 'There's like one or two of those.'
Fire bans, invasive plants and encroachment of unmanaged native species have contributed to loss of prairies, historically home to abundant elk and deer herds and where the Yurok gathered plants for cultural and medicinal uses.
Western Rivers Conservancy bought and conveyed land to the tribe in phases. The $56 million for the conservation deal came from private capital, low interest loans, tax credits, public grants and carbon credit sales that will continue to support restoration.
Restoration plans
The tribe aims to restore historic prairies by removing invasive species and encroaching native vegetation. The prairies are important food sources for elk and the mardon skipper butterfly, said Kling from the conservancy.
Trees removed from prairies will be used as logjams for creeks to create habitat for frogs, fish and turtles.
The tribe will reintroduce fire to aid in prairie restoration and reestablish forest diversity and mature forests to help imperiled species bounce back.
Members know its going to take decades of work for these lands and waterways to heal.
'And maybe all that's not going to be done in my lifetime,' said McCovey, the fisheries director. 'But that's fine, because I'm not doing doing this for myself.'
___
The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP's environmental coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/climate-and-environment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CNN Panel Erupts Over Trump Attacking Obama: ‘No, I'm Not Gonna Calm Down!'
CNN host Abby Phillip oversaw a heated debate Tuesday over President Donald Trump's recent attacks against former President Barack Obama, which included him sharing an artificial intelligence-generated video of Obama being arrested and in prison. Trump shared the video on Sunday on social media after his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, issued a report Friday accusing the Obama White House of a 'treasonous conspiracy' by stating Russia aimed to help Trump win the 2016 presidential election. 'He's accusing a former president of treason, and on top of that, saying ... 'It may not be right, but I'm gonna go after them anyway,'' Phillip said Tuesday. 'What is he talking about? And what kind of country are we living in that is actually what he is doing?' Her panelists quickly clashed over the subject, as Republican consultant Brad Todd argued in a seeming attempt to excuse Trump's behavior that Democrats have accused him of for several years of rigging the 2016 election with Russia's help. 'Oh my God,' replied Keith Boykin, a former White House aide to President Bill Clinton. 'Why are we talking about this? This is not the issue. You're trying to avoid the subject.' Todd noted that a spokesperson for Obama reiterated Tuesday that Russia tried but failed to manipulate any votes in the election. He appeared far angrier about 'every liberal in America' supposedly believing otherwise, however, than about Trump accusing Obama. 'You're doing everything possible not to talk about the fact that the ... current president of the United States, just accused a former president of treason and suggested a prosecution of that former president with no evidence!' Boykin said. 'That is the problem!' Boykin: The current president just accused a former president of treason and suggested a prosecution of that former president with no You can calm down. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 23, 2025 'You can calm down,' Todd responded. 'No, I'm not gonna calm down!' Boykin replied. 'Why don't you talk about that instead of talking about Obama?' Todd argued, 'Because Obama just undid three years of Democrat mythology.' Todd was referencing a statement Tuesday from Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush, who reaffirmed that Russia indeed 'worked to influence' the 2016 election, but did not successfully manipulate any votes, which has been known since at least 2020. '[Russian President Vladimir] Putin and the Russian Government demonstrated a preference for candidate Trump,' a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Report stated at the time. Gabbard's report and the fake video Trump shared only emerged after his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the late sex offender who died in jail while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, hit fever pitch — leading many to believe these stunts are mere distractions. 'The problem is, this is what Trump does. He distracts everybody. He's talking about President Obama because he doesn't want to talk about Epstein,' said Boykin. 'He's doing everything possible except talking about Jeffrey Epstein because he's trying to throw up distraction[s] so the people like you,' he added, 'Todd, can come on TV and try to diffuse the issue.' Related... Ex-GOP Strategist Flags The Telling Sign Of What Totally 'Scares' Trump 'Now Do Epstein': Martin Luther King Jr.'s Daughter Takes Aim At Trump Over Released MLK Files Trump-Favoring FCC Chair Takes Aim At Democrats 'Wailing' Over Colbert Cancellation
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How to Tell a Friend You Don't Like Their Partner
Credit - Photo-Illustration by TIME (Source Image:) When your friend is in love—and you're writhing in horror at the object of their affection—the first question to ask yourself isn't how to raise the subject. It's whether you should. The decision 'requires a lot of introspection,' says Jordana Abraham, co-founder of the women-focused website Betches and co-host of the dating and relationships podcast U Up? For example: Do you dislike their beau because they have different interests than you, not to mention an off-putting vibe that kills your delusions of double dates? Or are you genuinely worried about the way they're treating someone you care about deeply? 'One is about you,' Abraham says. 'And one is about you protecting your friend.' We asked experts exactly what to say without breaking up your friendship. 'How are things going with Jess?' It's best to enter conversations about your friend's romantic partner with an open mind and a positive attitude. 'Approaching it with curiosity and no judgment will make your friend much more open to hearing your opinions,' Abraham says. If you come across as though you've already made up your mind about their other half, they'll be less likely to confide in you about any issues, because you won't seem like an objective enough source, she adds. Aim to bring it up privately during a quiet moment, rather than in a group setting. 'Your happiness is always my first priority, but I also feel protective of you. There are a few things I've noticed that I'd love to talk to you about—would that be OK?' This approach centers your friend's wellbeing, while gently introducing your concerns in a judgment-free way. 'It tells them you're not trying to control their choices—you're just paying attention because you care,' says Jenny Dreizen, an etiquette expert and co-founder of Fresh Starts Registry, a website that offers scripts for tricky conversations. 'Ask for permission before diving in, and if they say they're not ready to hear it, respect that. It's about planting a seed, not demanding a reaction.' Read More: The Worst Thing to Say to Someone Who's Depressed 'I notice you seem different since you started dating Dan. What's changed for you?' The best thing about 'different' is that it's a neutral term, says matchmaker Aleeza Ben Shalom, who hosted the Netflix show Jewish Matchmaking. You're not telling your friend they seem any better or worse than usual—you're simply noting a change in personality and diving into what's behind it. 'It allows them to do some self-reflection and tell you what's going on—and maybe they'll have that 'aha' moment and see what you've also seen,' she says. 'You don't seem to be at your baseline happiness, and I'd love to see you in a relationship where you're at baseline or above.' It's never a good idea to compare your friend's new partner to an ex. Instead, reference their overall happiness, which could factor in their job, where they live, and their relationships, Ben Shalom says. 'It's acknowledging that the person they're with might be affecting them, but not in a way that makes you smile—in a way that makes you concerned,' she says. Read More: 8 Things to Say When Someone Lies to You Another approach Ben Shalom sometimes recommends: 'I don't know that your best self is coming through when you're with Matt.' Once you say this to your friend, follow up with a question: 'Does this resonate with you? Or am I off-base here?' Then allow them to guide the conversation; you'll be able to tell quickly if they're receptive to talking it out, or if you should back off. 'How was it when they met your family? What did they do to celebrate your birthday?' Asking about the more nuanced parts of your friend's relationship can provide insight. Since you're not phrasing your questions in a judgmental way, your friend is less likely to get defensive or clam up. 'They'll feel more free, if they are having an issue, to say, 'It didn't really go that well,' or 'He didn't get along with my mom,'' Abraham says. Your job after that is to make it clear you're a safe space for them to vent or ask for advice—and that you'll always be rooting for the best for them. 'What are the qualities you value most in a partner?' When you phrase a question like this, it's not taking a dig at one specific person—which makes it an ideal way to open a productive conversation, Ben Shalom says. Once your friend tells you what they value the most, ask a pointed follow-up: 'How in alignment do you feel Mike is with your values?' Then pause and allow them to reflect. 'They might be like, 'Well, we're not really connected in this area, but we're super connected here,'' she says. You'll get to learn more about why they're drawn to their partner—which could help shift your perspective. On the other hand, 'They could see, 'Wait a minute, maybe I'm in it for half the right reasons, but maybe this person as a whole isn't necessarily good for me.'' The best part? Your friend will be making the decision on their own, rather than feeling like you're making it for them. 'What's your gut telling you?' Especially in the early stages of a relationship, people often ask their friends: 'What do you think about so-and-so?' Ben Shalom likes to flip the question: 'What does your gut feeling tell you?' 'You don't have to point the finger and tell them—their insight is the most valuable thing to motivate whatever change needs to happen,' she says. 'And the truth is, they have to live with the decision. You don't have to. People pick their own person.' 'I just want to make sure you're up for handling a challenging relationship.' Some situations call for a more direct approach. Ben Shalom recalls the time someone asked her what she thought about their partner, and she replied: 'If you're asking me honestly, I don't think it's a great match. I don't think it's necessarily a smart match, and I don't think it's an easy match.' Then she added that, if they chose to move forward, she hoped they were prepared to navigate a challenging relationship. She recalls telling her friend: 'If you were working out, you could lift about five pounds. Maybe if you work out for a couple years, you'll work your way up to 50 or 100. I think you're trying to lift 500 pounds, and I just don't think you're ever going to be able to bench press that and hold it.' 'You know I'm always here, and always on your side.' Sometimes, the most powerful thing you can do is remind your friend that they're safe with you, Dreizen says. If they're in a dynamic that feels even slightly off, they might already be struggling with isolation or other challenging emotions—so a simple reassurance can help them feel grounded and loved. Read More: 14 Things to Say Besides 'I Love You' 'That's exactly what they need if they ever do want to open up or start questioning their relationship,' she says. 'Say it often. Not just once, not just when you're worried—make it part of your regular friendship language.' Repetition builds a safety net, and your friend will know who to turn to when they're ready. Wondering what to say in a tricky social situation? Email timetotalk@ Contact us at letters@ Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Senator Gives Trump A Warning About The 2026 Midterms
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) on Wednesday urged the Trump administration to release the Jeffrey Epstein files, warning that the White House's handling of the issue could affect the GOP's performance in the 2026 midterm elections. In an interview with Axios' Stef Knight, Tillis said the best thing the administration can do at the moment to address the Epstein controversy is 'just release the damn files.' 'The promise to release the files during the campaign was either overplayed and we got a nothingburger if the files get released, or it's something really disturbing, and that's actually even a more compelling reason to release [them],' Tillis said. A memo co-authored by the FBI and the Justice Department earlier this month alleging there was no evidence to suggest Epstein was killed or that he held a client list to blackmail people angered Trump's base as it undercut claims made by members of his team, including Attorney General Pam Bondi. Bondi told Fox News in February Epstein's client list was 'sitting on [her] desk right now to review' under the direction of Trump. The Republican senator warned his party's leaders that trying to sweep the issue under the rug by resorting to tactics like House Speaker Mike Johnson's (La.) call to adjourn the lower chamber earlier than planned to block a vote on a bipartisan effort forcing the release of the files will have the opposite effect. 'If anybody thinks that this is going to go away because the House left a day early or something, it's going to be like those zombies in 'The Walking Dead.' Every time you think you've killed it, another one's just going to come running out of the closet after you,' he said. 'This is going to be an issue all the way through next year's election,' he added. .@SenThomTillis on Epstein: "Release the damn files." # — Axios (@axios) July 23, 2025 Democrats have already been using the issue to hammer Republicans. Trump has tried to downplay his relationship with Epstein, dodging questions about the disgraced financier, while reports continue to surface about the ties between the two men. CNN on Tuesday released photos showing Epstein attending Trump's wedding to Marla Maples in 1993 as well as footage from a Victoria's Secret event in 1999 where the two men appeared together. This follows an earlier report by The Wall Street Journal detailing a sexually lewd letter Trump allegedly wrote to Epstein as part of a surprise for his 50th birthday in 2003. The president has denied he wrote the letter and has sued the Journal over that article. Last month, Tillis announced he won't be seeking reelection next year after he faced Trump's wrath for voting down the president's so-called 'big, beautiful bill.' Still, Tillis has repeatedly said he doesn't necessarily intend to oppose the president during the remainder of his term ― though he's eager to call out what he's described as 'bad advice' from those who have his ear. Related... GOP Sen. Thom Tillis Announces He Won't Seek Reelection MAGA Is Probably Going To Be Pretty Disappointed By Trump's Latest Promise Oath Keepers Founder Pardoned By Trump Warns Of 'Trouble' Over Lack Of Epstein Files