&w=3840&q=100)
Soham Parekh and moonlighting: Why this is a rising trend among India techies
Moonlighting is once again grabbing headlines after an Indian tech professional was accused of working for multiple startups in Silicon Valley. The case came to light after Suhail Doshi, co-founder and former CEO of analytics platform Mixpanel, called out Soham Parekh on X for his alleged actions.
Moonlighting has been a contentious topic in India, despite the concept being prevalent in other nations. The phenomenon has increased in recent years, especially in the Indian tech sector. But why?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Let's take a closer look.
Rise of moonlighting in the India IT sector
Moonlighting, or holding a second job while having full-time employment, has increased in India since remote work became common during the Covid-19 pandemic.
According to background verification firm AuthBridge, five out of every 100 candidates have two jobs. Roughly 90 per cent of these cases are from the IT services sector, mostly in Telangana, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu, Times of India (TOI) reported.
Background verification firm OnGrid has already conducted 23,000 employment verifications in the first six months of 2025, compared to the total of 26,000 last year. The main factor behind the rise in such checks is moonlighting. The firm's screening found 2,900 such cases in the first half of this year, a jump from 2,201 in the entire 2024, as per TOI.
Randstad India's report in 2023 revealed a 25-30 per cent surge in moonlighting over the past three years in the Indian IT sector.
A 2022 report by job portal Indeed found that 43 per cent of employees in the I ndian tech sector were in favour of moonlighting. However, employees in many other sectors opposed holding simultaneous jobs as most of them considered it 'unethical'.
As per the portal's findings, less than one out of five employees, or 19 per cent, surveyed by Indeed wanted to moonlight in India, while the remaining were not interested in getting an additional job.
Moonlighting has been a contentious topic in India. Representational Image/Pixabay
While employees in other sectors may not approve of the practice, moonlighting remains acceptable among Indian techies.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A 2022 survey by Mumbai-based Kotak Institutional Equities found that nearly 65 per cent of IT employees said they or someone they knew had been moonlighting or pursuing part-time opportunities while doing remote work.
Why do employees moonlight?
Amid job uncertainty and poor hikes, employees are seeking ways to meet their financial needs. Many young tech workers are resorting to moonlighting for the money they are unable to make in their first job.
'The root cause is the money, software developers are not paid proportionate to the amount of work that they are doing. I think a lot of us would not moonlight if we feel we are paid fairly,' Abhishek, a software developer in Bangalore, told CNBC in 2023.
Moonlighting is not new in India, but it has become more common since the pandemic brought job uncertainty.
Speaking to BBC, employment-law expert Veena Gopalakrishnan said that the practice has 'become more rampant post-pandemic, with employees working remotely, infrequent or relaxed employer supervision, and increased time and bandwidth for employees to take up another job'.
As per Indeed's report, techies and a few others who engage in a side hustle do so for two main reasons: to safeguard against job loss and supplement their incomes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'These include the desire to supplement their income due to low salaries and rising inflation, the need for financial independence, the impact of the pandemic on job security, and the quest for entrepreneurial pursuits,' Sashi Kumar, head of sales at Indeed India, was quoted as saying by CNBC.
While salaries are comparatively better in Bengaluru, also known as the 'Silicon Valley of India', the cost of living is also higher.
But money is not always the reason for employees to moonlight. Some are pursuing their passions or upskilling through a secondary job.
Rajan, a full-time employee at a leading software company in Bengaluru, told BBC in 2022 that he has his own YouTube Channel, which he runs anonymously and monetises through advertisements. 'I belong to a middle-class family and have ambitions of studying abroad, and this will help me fund it,' he said. 'The pandemic made me realise that one has to be prepared for the unexpected and have a buffer of savings. I work from home, so I am able to manage both well.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Some are working more than one job to grow their contacts. 'With this (working two jobs), one could earn extra and be prepared for the worst. Right now, the scenario is different, but besides money, one can also make contacts, and you will never be short of jobs,' a Delhi-based techie told CNBC-TV18.
But moonlighting comes at a cost. Some employees face fatigue and sleep deprivation when they log on to their full-time employment while holding a second job. But even that is not a deterrent for moonlighters.
Why employers are unhappy
For many employers, moonlighting is a red flag. In 2022, Wipro fired 300 of its employees who were also working for its rival companies. Rishad Premji, the chairman of the tech and consulting firm, said on X about moonlighting in the tech industry: 'This is cheating - plain and simple.'
Infosys, which warned its employees that 'dual employment is not permitted' in September 2022, later softened its stance on moonlighting. As per reports, India's second-largest IT services company allowed employees to take up 'gig work' with the prior consent of managers.
To curb moonlighting, some companies have started calling back employees to the office or carrying out productivity checks to identify possible slackers.
As per the Indeed report, 31 per cent of employers are of the view that employees moonlight as they are not completely engaged in their work, while 23 per cent believe that workers have ample time to hold a second job.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Some companies, however, have allowed employees to take up a side hustle, given that there is no conflict of interest. However, Gopalakrishnan told BBC that it is uncommon for employers to get on board with employees taking other jobs when 'there is a conflict of interest, a risk to confidential or proprietary information, or likelihood of the employee's productivity being impacted'.
But, at the end, employers may have to bend rules to allow employees to moonlight, at least in the tech sector in India.
India is witnessing a talent crunch, specifically skilled labour. 'Talent is scarce today and … if you need the best talent, you got to embrace what the talent likes,' Viswanath PS, managing director and CEO of Randstad India, said to CNBC.
'Previously, the second job was a need for employees, now it has become a want. Once it becomes a want, it's about how employers can pave the way in making accommodations and ensure that both parties' interests are equally protected.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Nitin Gadkari's app-cab reform: Drivers to get care, customer is the king
In India's booming app-based cab economy, often the only thing that matters for the consumer is not the technology or the car but the most-ignored cog in the wheel: the driver. Whether you step out grinning or groaning from an Ola/Uber ride depends on that crucial factor—how was the driver?Now, the Union ministry of road transport and highways, under Nitin Gadkari, seems to have finally accepted this elementary truth more than ever before. The newly revised Motor Vehicles Aggregator Guidelines 2025, published recently, take into account mental health reviews for drivers as well as how much their work schedules can be stretched, among other things. For an industry defined by long hours, fickle pay and frequent confrontational customers, it can be a game new guidelines, revised from an earlier set in 2020, say drivers will also get better insurance cover: Rs 15 lakh as term insurance and Rs 7.5 lakh for health, a big jump from the earlier Rs 10 lakh and Rs 5 lakh, respectively. It's a long overdue correction for a workforce that hasn't had access to the safety nets available to employees in the more formal bottomline: when drivers are safer, healthier and more secure, they are better able to serve customers; the roads get safer too. This has been underpinned by a growing acceptance within government that it is the people, as opposed to the infrastructure, that shape passengers' experience. That said, the refreshed and forward-looking 2025 regulations are not exactly mandatory. Transport may be on the Concurrent List of the Indian Constitution, but there's precious little the Centre can do to compel a state into legislating on transport matters. So it would be for each state government to either accept or adjust the recommendations. BJP-ruled states will probably fall in line, but others may hesitate, stall or even ignore the changes. It is, therefore, a wishlist with all the good there are several good upgrades in the guidelines as well, such as the way data is to be treated by the aggregators, as per the new Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Aggregators are now required to keep for a finite time—mininum three months, maximum two years—data generated by the Indian app on Indian servers and in compliance with the Indian data laws. It is part of a shift away from casual data-governance practices that used to be the norm, especially in the gig also a green nudge. Previously, states had the option to offer incentives for electric vehicles purchased within aggregator fleets. The rules now require action: at least 5 per cent of an aggregator's fleet must be electric within the first year of the notice, and that number must double in the second year. It's an aggressive play in a sector that has been slow to see EV adoption, largely because of the erratic charging infrastructure and higher out-of-pocket costs. Also, the demise of BluSmart has been a may finally have some bite. For instance, customers can now know the break-up of fares before booking their rides, ending opaque pricing that often left riders in the dark. If it takes the driver more than five minutes past promised time, riders will have a clear right to cancel the ride without penalty. Also, passengers are meant to be compensated if a driver cancels for no good training and safety protocols are improved as well. The old guidelines addressed gender sensitisation only. But the new ones say drivers have to learn about sexual harassment and how to protect the vulnerable—children and seniors and women. The guidelines stress there should be a clear way to escalate complaints in the the gulf between policy and practice remains wide. Aggregator platforms, known for finding ways to sidestep worker protections in the gig economy in the name of technological neutrality, are likely to slow down on implementing the more stringent rules. And unless state governments have the political will for enforcement, these may well remain on all in all, by making the driver the centerpiece of the ride-hailing equation, the government is signalling a new norm. While it could still be a bumpy ride, a lot of the potholes look set to be filled should the states play to India Today Magazine- EndsTune InMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
India ready to sign deals that protect its interests, says Piyush Goyal
India is negotiating trade agreements with countries on its own terms, and 'national interest will always be supreme', Union Minister for Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal asserted on Friday, even as the country's trade negotiators returned from Washington after extensive nearly week-long parleys with their US counterparts in a bid to seal an interim bilateral trade deal. An official team led by India's chief negotiator, Department of Commerce Special Secretary Rajesh Agrawal, was in the US from June 27, and had extended its stay till Thursday to resolve key issues of contention between the two countries. However, India hasn't signalled the finalisation of an interim deal yet, and the 90-day pause on US' reciprocal tariffs expires on July 9. If an agreement is not firmed up by then, Indian exports to the US could be laden with a 26 per cent duty as per US President Donald Trump's country-specific reciprocal tariff plan unveiled on April 2. India is pushing hard to avoid the reciprocal tariff levies, while securing lower tariffs for labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, leather and automobile components. Washington has signalled that there is unlikely to be any relief on the additional tariffs on steel and aluminium products, a government source said. The US had imposed a 25 per cent import duty on steel and aluminium products in March, which was doubled to 50 per cent in June. 'Negotiations are not contingent on any date… Our interest is that we should get a sustained preference over other competing countries in areas of our interest. If we get that, we will be happy to do a deal,' the official source said. During the latest round of talks, the Indian side is learnt to have hardened its stance on issues related to the 'sensitive' agriculture sector and reiterated, as it had earlier, that agriculture and dairy remain major 'red lines' for India's trade negotiations with the US. Earlier this week, external affairs minister S Jaishankar said: 'There will have to be a give and take. Just like the US or people in the US may have views about India, people in India have views about the US too. We'll have to find a kind of meeting ground. I believe it's possible.' On the other hand, officials from the US administration, including President Trump, have been saying over the past few days that a trade deal with India will be finalised soon.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Air India crash compensation row: How should the airline allay fears? Experts debate
India Today has accessed Air India's compensation forms for families of victims in the Ahmedabad plane crash. The forms seek information about the victim's employment status and financial dependency of family members on the deceased. Some families, represented by a UK-based law firm, allege coercion in submitting these financial disclosures. Air India denies these charges, stating that all compensation will be done as per established procedures. The airline has already paid interim relief to 47 families. The controversy raises questions about the fairness of the compensation process and the potential for enhanced compensation claims. So, how should the airline allay the fears of the families of crash victims? Legal experts discuss this and more on the show.