Sask.'s mortgage delinquency rate is highest among provinces, but it's getting worse in Ont. and B.C.
Tyler Fransen lost his Saskatoon home this spring after he missed mortgage payments due to financial circumstances and life situations that sent him over the tipping point.
"I just felt a little defeated," said Fransen, whose father recently died from cancer. "I was trying to do this by myself and I didn't want to burden any of my family. We've got a lot going on."
Fransen lost his job as a contractor during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then came inflation on materials, gas and groceries. Paying for his mortgage became more and more difficult.
"I, just like everybody else, am not perfect and so for me to share this, it'll give somebody out there the idea that they're not alone, because that's what I felt for a while," he said.
Fransen isn't alone in his struggle. Many homeowners in Saskatchewan and across the country are falling behind on mortgage payments, according to the latest statistics.
WATCH | Sask. has the highest rate among provinces of homeowners falling behind on their mortgage payments:
Sask. has the highest rate among provinces of homeowners falling behind on their mortgage payments
10 hours ago
Duration 2:13
Tyler Franson is falling behind on his mortgage payments and is not alone in Saskatchewan. But analysts say it's not as bad as it looks for the province.
Sask. has highest rate of all provinces
According to Equifax Canada, Saskatchewan had the highest mortgage delinquency rate (0.37 per cent) in Q1 2025 out of all provinces and almost double the national average (0.19 per cent).
However, experts say Saskatchewan is in a better spot than it might appear.
Rebecca Oakes, vice-president of advanced analytics at Equifax, said fewer people are missing mortgage payments in Saskatchewan than five years ago.
"It's not great news, but it's an improving picture. Whereas areas like Ontario are still seeing significant increases," Oakes said.
"I know for Ontario in particular, I think this is the highest level we've ever seen."
Matt Fabian, director of financial services at TransUnion Canada, agreed.
"Saskatchewan economy continues to grow, it has the lowest unemployment rate in Canada," Fabian said. "I think when we look across Canada, Southern Ontario and British Columbia are still facing severe affordability challenges and higher delinquency."
Fabian said many people are facing payment shock that comes with renewing mortgages at rates that are much high than what was available during the pandemic. Inflation making everything else more expensive is a double-whammy.
"You might be renewing at a double or triple the rate that you've ever had," Fabian said. "That has created this payment shock where we've seen average monthly mortgage payments go up anywhere from 10 per cent to double."
The bigger picture
Both experts said they're watching closely as mortgage renewals continue, banks continue cutting rates, and tariffs from the U.S. remain a key factor in economic stability.
"These kinds of delinquency rates will start to stabilize as interest rates and inflation come down. What we're really looking at is the impact of things like tariffs," Fabian said.
"When you think about where tariffs will be imposed, we don't think it'll be a national increase. We think those regions that have industries that are targeted for tariffs might start to see unemployment rates tick up, which usually is a foreshadowing of some delinquency."
For Fransen, the experience of losing a home he put his time, effort and money into has been painful, but he's trying to look at the bright side. He said he can now focus more on being there for his mother and himself.
For now, the bank has allowed him to stay in the home until the foreclosure and legal processes are complete.
"This situation, it's created movement in my life, and I'm grateful for that," Fransen said.
"I felt I was a little stuck."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
The chaos at Kamloops council continues as mayor's pursuit of forensic financial audit fails
The divide at Kamloops city council appears to be wider than ever following the recent defeat of a controversial motion put forward by Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson to conduct a forensic audit of all city departments and management practices. Several tense exchanges erupted as the mayor tried to convince at least four of the eight other members of council to support his wish to hire a third-party investigator. Hamer-Jackson has sparred with the rest of council since the fall of 2022, when they were all elected, repeatedly complaining about property taxes being too high and the need to find savings. Early in the debate last week, the mayor accused Coun. Mike O'Reilly of violating conflict of interest rules involving the purchase of land from the city by Comet Industries in 2020, when O'Reilly was two years into his first term on council. He's the president and CEO of that real estate holding and development company. O'Reilly fired back, saying he always recuses himself from any discussions involving his private interests. "Mr. Mayor, you can't speak about me in my professional role with Comet Industries," said O'Reilly. "I completely removed myself from any conversations with the City of Kamloops. We pay people a significant amount of money to act on behalf of Comet. It almost seems like you're trying to get me in a conflict." Replied the mayor: "I had citizens asking me how Comet Industries buys a piece of property for $35,820, appraised for $90,000? I still can't explain it to those citizens. This is not a witch hunt. This is a forensic audit to do the same type of thing the TNRD did." Hamer-Jackson was referring to a 2021 investigation which found several examples of waste at the Thompson-Nicola Regional District. City administrators have confirmed the land sale mentioned by the mayor involving Comet Industries was fair value. The transaction involved the purchase of less than half an acre rather than the full acre assessed price quoted by Hamer-Jackson. Hamer-Jackson also sparred with Coun. Katie Neustaeter, who asked him to focus on the motion instead of raising topics not allowed to be discussed in open meetings. "Are you just gonna continue attacking, or can we debate your motion?" she asked. Hamer-Jackson accused her of violating discussion guidelines. "You're out of order. I'm gonna ask the CAO to ask you to leave." "Then let's go together happily. You step out. I'll step out," Neustaeter replied. The argument escalated to the point where Hamer-Jackson was asked to call the question on the audit before everyone on council had a chance to weigh in. The motion was defeated 8-1. "You guys remind me of a pack of coyotes," said Hamer-Jackson, prompting Coun. Bill Sarai to say: "You sank your own notice of motion." Nearly every past motion from the mayor has failed, but this one got to the point where it was at least considered by the rest of council. After the motion was defeated, O'Reilly told CBC Kamloops the scope of the proposed forensic audit was too wide. "Mayor Hamer-Jackson threw everything off the rails, which again is very much consistent with what he's done since he took office. The way the motion was written, it was in attack mode," said O'Reilly. "I find it rich when we're looking at trying to find cost savings, he doesn't have to look any further than in the mirror. He's cost the city ... it's getting close to over a million and a half dollars." The mayor left the meeting immediately after it was adjourned and didn't take reporter's questions. Neustaeter accused the mayor of being his own worst enemy. WATCH | Kamloops mayor refuses to heed council's call to resign: Kamloops mayor refuses to heed council's call to resign 1 year ago Duration 1:53 City council in Kamloops, B.C., has formally called on Mayor Reid Hamer-Jackson to resign after a scathing report by a provincially appointed municipal adviser was made public on Tuesday. But, CBC's Marcella Bernarndo explains, the mayor is refusing to resign. "We came in there in good faith. We did our homework. He made it absolutely impossible," said Neustaeter. Neustaeter also pointed out the purpose of a forensic audit is to find evidence of fraud, and Hamer-Jackson has shared no evidence of that. Neustaeter has been sparring with Hamer-Jackson — in public and in court — since the spring of 2023. On July 7, they will both go before a B.C. Supreme Court judge at the Kamloops courthouse. That's where Neustaeter will seek the dismissal of a defamation lawsuit filed against her by the mayor in June 2023 after she made a public statement on behalf of council accusing him of crossing personal and professional boundaries. Hamer-Jackson claims that led some people to wrongly believe he may have sexually harassed her. Neustaeter wants the matter tossed out under provincial legislation, which rids the courts of actions considered a drain on time and money. If lawyers for Neustaeter convince the judge that the mayor's case against her is frivolous, it could be dismissed, and he could be forced to cover her legal costs. That impacts taxpayers in Kamloops because they're currently covering Neustaeter's legal fees. The mayor's legal costs must be paid by him. He says it's partially why he's trying to sell his home, his boat and the commercial property he owns on West Victoria Street. For the last year, the rest of council has been asking the mayor to resign. He responded by holding a news conference last summer, declaring he plans to seek re-election. The province has been asked to help resolve the discord at city hall, but Municipal Affairs Minister Ravi Kahlon says there's no way to force the mayor to leave. Kahlon recently confirmed he's trying to update the Municipal Affairs Act, so what's happening in Kamloops — which has been seen in some other — won't be tolerated. WATCH | B.C. government to rein in dysfunctional councils: B.C. government to rein in dysfunctional councils 24 days ago Duration 2:12 The B.C. government says it's looking at how to rein in dysfunctional city councils. A number of communities — most notably Kamloops — have been paralyzed by councillors and mayors investigating and sometimes suing each other, instead of focusing on city business. Justin McElroy has more on what prompted the government's action, and how it could deal with the issue. Kahlon also told CBC Kamloops taxpayers should be concerned that more than a million dollars has been spent on legal issues involving the mayor. "If I were a citizen of Kamloops, I would be pissed, quite frankly, because we elect our officials to treat each other with respect … those are dollars that could have gone to infrastructure. Those are dollars that could have gone to important community services," said Kahlon. "We've seen the situation here in Kamloops, but also in a few other communities, which leads me to believe something more comprehensive is needed."


CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
Christopher Liew: How do I fix a bad credit score?
Christopher Liew is a CFP®, CFA Charterholder and former financial advisor. He writes personal finance tips for thousands of daily Canadian readers at Blueprint Financial. Mistakes happen. Perhaps you've missed a few payments, maxed out a credit card, or have an account that's been sent to collections. Unfortunately, these seemingly small mistakes can be the difference between a great and a problematic credit score. The good news is that your credit score doesn't have to stay stuck. Below, I'll share some simple tips to help you fix your past mistakes, get negative items removed from your credit report, and rebuild a fresh, more positive credit profile. The effect of credit mistakes on your score Marriage and relationship counsellors often quote the 'magic' 5:1 ratio - the idea that for a relationship to be successful, each negative interaction should be balanced by at least five positive interactions. While it's not an exact ratio, the same principle largely applies to your credit profile. You can do everything right (pay your bills on time, keep your credit utilization rate low, etc.), and your score will slowly increase over time. However, the one mistake you make (a 30-day late payment, maxing out your credit card) can cause a drastic overnight drop in your score. Negative marks on your TransUnion or Equifax credit report will typically remain for six to seven years, acting like anchors that hold your score back, even if you've done everything right since your mistake. While negative marks can often be corrected or deleted, this process can often take months or years, making it imperative to avoid them as much as possible. How do I increase my credit score? You'll find no shortage of credit myths on social media designed to give you false hope or fill you with fear. That said, here are the most practical, time-tested ways to help you fix your credit. 1. Check credit report for mistakes Your credit report often isn't as infallible as you may believe. This is why it's important to check your credit reports from both Equifax and TransUnion periodically. Sometimes, lenders or creditors you work with can make mistakes resulting in misreported negative marks on your report, bringing down your score. For example, I've had friends who've made all of their payments early or on time, only to find out later that the lender misreported a late payment due to an administrative error. By law, Equifax and TransUnion are required to provide Canadians with free credit reports (updated monthly) upon request. If you want even quicker updates, both credit bureaus also offer paid credit monitoring services that will update you in real time as your credit report changes. If you find any mistakes on your credit profile, you should contact both the lender and the credit bureaus to clear the issue up and get the negative mark changed on your credit report. 2. Pay down credit card balances Even if you have no missed payments and make all of your monthly payments on time, a high credit card utilization rate can bring your score down, as it shows irresponsible use of credit. Ideally, you should try to keep your revolving credit utilization rate under 30 per cent. For example, if you have a $10,000 credit card, you should avoid carrying a balance of over $3,000 into the next billing cycle. If you have cards with a balance of more than 50 or 60 per cent of their spending power, paying these balances down can be a quick way to get your score back on track. 3. Avoid new credit inquiries New credit inquiries, especially when applied for frequently in a short period of time, can deal a sharp blow to your credit. This is why realtors caution new home buyers to avoid applying for any loans or credit cards until they've closed on their house. Whenever you apply for a new credit card, a loan, or a rental unit, you'll receive an inquiry mark on your credit report that will remain on your report for two years. Ideally, you should try to keep your inquiries to fewer than two or three in a one-year period. 4. Consider a debt consolidation loan If you are in a very difficult situation, such as facing bankruptcy or falling far behind on payments, a debt consolidation loan could be an option to explore. This is a special type of personal loan that combines multiple debts into one more manageable payment. Instead of juggling several high-interest accounts, you would make a single monthly payment, often at a lower interest rate. This simpler structure can help you stay organized and avoid missed payments. Keep in mind that applying for a debt consolidation loan can cause a temporary drop in your credit score because of the hard inquiry and the new credit account. However, if the alternative is bankruptcy, consolidating your debt is often the better choice in the long run. It can help protect your credit from more severe damage and set you up to rebuild your score over time. Debt consolidation loans are usually best suited for serious financial hardship, not minor cash flow issues. It is important to review all your options and speak with a financial professional before deciding 5. Get a secured credit card If you've shot your credit and blown your chance at being trusted with a traditional credit card, the best way to rebuild trust with creditors is to apply for a secured credit card. These work a lot like prepaid debit cards, and you start by 'reloading' them upfront. The difference is that each time you reload your secured card, you'll receive a positive credit card payment mark on your report. How long does it take to fix your credit? Repairing your credit isn't an overnight process, especially if you have accumulated multiple negative marks over a long period of time. In a best-case scenario with just a couple of negative marks on your report, you might be able to get mistakes removed or deleted within a few months. For more complicated cases, credit repair can easily take a year or longer as you go back and forth with creditors and credit bureaus. That said, the alternative is waiting six or seven years for negative marks to gradually fall off of your credit. While credit repair can be tedious, it can also fast-track the process of getting back on top of your personal finances. More from Christopher Liew:


Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
How Trump could make Canada better
As obnoxious as he is, Donald Trump may actually be doing Canada some good. His demands are forcing this country to rethink bad ideas, question sacred cows and brace itself for the challenges of the future. Just this week, the U.S. President gave Prime Minister Mark Carney an excuse to jettison a wrong-headed tax on foreign tech giants. Because just about all of those giants are American, Washington has opposed it from the start, under Joe Biden's administration as well as Mr. Trump's. The heaps of money that were to flow to Ottawa from the tax would have come from the pockets of the millions of Canadians who use Amazon, Apple, Google or other digital providers. Higher taxes inevitably mean higher rates for consumers. Mr. Trump refused to continue trade talks with Canada until Ottawa got rid of the tax, which was about to take effect. Mr. Carney duly killed it. A capitulation? No, a sensible concession. Good policy, to boot. I can think of at least three other ways that Mr. Trump's Blame Canada campaign is forcing us to reconsider the way we do things. Start with national defence. Mr. Trump has said for years that Canada and other countries in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are freeloading off the United States, relying on Washington to keep the Western alliance well armed while scrimping on armaments themselves. To up defence spending, Canada must cut deeper, tax harder and borrow more – all at once It's not your grandfather's war any more, and defence procurement must evolve Canada was one of the worst of the laggards, its rate of spending near the bottom of the pack. By outsourcing our defence to our mighty next-door neighbour, we saved countless billions – money that was freed up for other needs such as hospitals, roads, parks and schools. The generous health care and other social programs that Canadians cherish were in effect underwritten by the U.S. That had to change some time. Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine showed how vital it is to keep NATO strong, united and well armed. Now the alliance itself is calling for all members to increase their defence spending dramatically over the next decade. 'For too long, one ally, the United States, carried too much of the burden,' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said at last month's summit. That is changing, he said, and Mr. Trump 'made this change possible.' That may have been an attempt to feed the ego of the egomaniac in the White House, but it was not wrong. Or consider interprovincial trade. The absurd barriers to the flow of goods, services and labour across Canada have been an issue for decades. Everyone agreed they were absurd. Editorial writers turned blue in the face pointing out their absurdity. Premiers and prime ministers huddled every few years to talk about doing something. Next to nothing actually happened. Try getting one of Quebec's many excellent craft beers in Ontario. Now, at last, we are seeing some progress. The punishing, nonsensical tariffs imposed by Mr. Trump have put a fire under the provinces and the feds. If we cannot have free trade with the United States, we should at least be able to trade freely with each other. Internal free trade by Canada Day? It'll take longer than that Even Canada's system of supply management is getting a second look. Under this Soviet-style scheme, marketing boards, rather than the free market, govern the output of eggs, milk, cheese and poultry. Authorities set minimum prices and impose production quotas. High tariffs on imports of these basic commodities ensure that the cozy little set-up survives. The result for ordinary consumers is far higher prices than they might otherwise pay for simple things such as a brick of cheddar or a carton of yogurt. Mr. Trump attacked the system in his first term and is at it again. He is not alone. Canada's other trading partners complain bitterly about it, too. But the agriculture lobby is so strong, especially in Quebec, that no government has dared to dismantle it. Whether Mr. Carney's will remains to be seen. The recent Throne Speech reaffirmed support for supply management and new legislation attempts to prevent Ottawa from sacrificing it in trade talks. But the system is probably the biggest remaining irritant for Mr. Trump, and Mr. Carney might be forced to make concessions to strike a tariff deal with him. Good. Should we all be giving Mr. Trump a great big cheer, then? Of course not. He is bad for his country, for us and for the world in ways too many to count. He is a bully and blowhard. He has insulted our leaders and threatened our sovereignty. On many issues, pushing back against his demands is the way to go. But some of what he says about the way we do things is right. We do hide under American skirts for our defence. We do coddle our farm producers and hobble foreign competitors. If Canada is to survive the Trumpian onslaught, it must do more than simply put its elbows up and stand strong. It must become more efficient, more productive, more innovative. It must change.