Oxford Zero Emission Zone 'not about attacking motorists'
Mr Jarvis said the plans were "not about attacking motorists or making motorists' life more difficult"."Disproportionately the people who drive the most polluting vehicles are at the richest ends of society, and those who suffer the worst effects are at the poorest ends of society," he added.
'Attempted gotcha'
The Independent Oxford Alliance motion requested an analysis of nitrogen oxide (NO2) air pollution in the proposed expanded ZEZ, and for any future reports to include an in-depth analysis of pollution levels in the proposed expanded zone.Independent councillor Dr Amar Latif said: "At heart the motion is about getting more information.""If we as an authority vote against this motion, residents will ask what we are trying to hide," he said.David Henwood, who put the motion forward, added: "We want to see what those levels are, and we want to be accountable to our public and show them what that data is."But Lib Dem party leader Chris Smowton called the motion "an attempted gotcha", adding it "ignores that any level of NO2 pollution is hazardous to health" and that it is not the only pollutant emitted by motor vehicles.The current ZEZ scheme, which involves charging non-electric vehicle drivers with the aim of improving air quality, is being delivered by Oxfordshire County Council - though the city council previously oversaw it.The zone is supported by the Liberal Democrats and Green Party coalition-run county council, as well as the Labour-run city council.It was Labour that initially developed the scheme, although the idea was first proposed in 2015 by the then Conservative-run county council.The Tories now oppose the scheme though, questioning its impact on businesses.
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
23 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Anas Sarwar 'cannot win Holyrood election without Labour ending oil licence ban' warns union boss
One of the UK's leading trade union chiefs has warned Keir Starmer's ban on new oil and gas developments is halting Anas Sarwar's chances of becoming first minister. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scottish Labour will not win next year's Holyrood election if the party does not reverse its opposition to new oil and gas, one of the UK's top union chiefs has warned. Gary Smith, the general secretary of the GMB union, has told Anas Sarwar he will not become the next first minister without his party at Westminster having a change of heart on its pledge to ban new North Sea oil and gas licences. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad An oil platform standing amongst other rigs. PIC: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire The UK government has pointed to scientific evidence that new oil and gas licences are not consistent with global efforts to tackle the climate crisis and that continuing to drill for oil and gas will do nothing to cut energy bills. But the vow has left Labour open to criticism over jobs and claims that Britain will have to import fuels from overseas. Speaking to the New Statesman, Mr Smith starkly warned that 'on the current policies, I don't believe that Labour can win in Scotland'. READ MORE: Rosebank and other North Sea oil and gas fields could be given green light under new guidelines Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added: 'People don't get that energy is an emotional issue in Scotland. We went hundreds of miles out in this inhospitable sea and built this incredible, groundbreaking energy infrastructure. Labour 'will need to rethink' oil field ban 'If you're on the west coast of Scotland, most people of a certain age have a drop of oil from Sullom Voe because there are so many families who were involved in building that project when they landed the oil in Shetland. 'This was an emotional story about Scotland. It's important to its sense of self and the economy, and I don't think people have really got that.' The GMB's Gary Smith (Picture: Andrew Milligan/PA) Mr Smith has insisted that 'they will have to rethink' the position on oil and gas 'because the consequences in terms of energy prices, in terms of national security, in terms of the economy and jobs, are so profound'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added: 'What we should be doing is taking a public stake in what is left of the oil and gas sector and using the profits for that sector, or part of them, to invest in a new green future. 'We should be talking about North Sea Two, how we're going to collaborate with Norway – not just decarbonising the North Sea, but what comes next. Oil and gas is not the enemy: it's actually the gateway to whatever comes next, and we've got to stop seeing it as a threat.' Mr Smith attacked the UK's industrial strategy and net zero policies, claiming that 'for too long, we were exporting jobs and importing virtue, so we closed down British industry'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Squandered opportunities' He added: 'That was great for emissions, not great for communities. Our notional emissions have fallen but all we've done is export jobs and industry to China, where they burn coal to produce the goods we then import on diesel-burning barges and ships – and that includes the vast bulk of all renewables industry.' Pressed by The Scotsman over his position on oil and gas, Mr Sarwar said there 'have been too many squandered opportunities', adding that 'all the big promises on green jobs have failed to materialise'. Keir Starmer and Anas Sarwar (Photo by Jeff) | Getty Images The Scottish Labour leader added: 'We've got to get the balance right, which is recognising oil and gas has got a significant role to play for decades to come, making sure we have a policy around oil fields that's right.' Mr Sarwar said that the UK government needs to have 'a fiscal regime that attracts investment but also maximises potential tax receipts for the Treasury'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The union concerns come as the UK government announces a £900,000 transition training fund that will help around 200 Aberdeen oil and gas workers to move into the clean energy sector. The programme is open to current and former oil and gas workers who live in or are employed in Aberdeen or Aberdeenshire, and are interested in moving into roles within clean energy. Successful applicants will receive careers advice and funding towards training courses - supporting local people into opportunities in sectors such as offshore wind, hydrogen and carbon capture and storage, which could include roles in welding, electrical engineering and construction. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fund to help green jobs transition It is hoped that up to 100,000 direct and indirect jobs could be supported by the offshore wind sector across the UK by 2030. UK Energy Minister Michael Shanks, said: 'Aberdeen has been the energy capital of Britain for decades and while oil and gas will be with us for decades to come, we are determined to make sure that workers are supported to access the thousands of jobs in industries such as offshore wind and carbon capture. Energy Minister Michael Shanks with Cerulean Winds' alliance partners on a tour of the Port of Ardersier near Inverness hearing about the Aspen floating windfarm which will create over 1,000 jobs. | Contributed 'This funding will help deliver a fair and prosperous transition in the North Sea, unlocking the full potential of renewable energy and reaping the economic benefits from the skills and experiences of Aberdeen's workforce.' The fund will be delivered by Skills Development Scotland and has been supported by an additional £40,000 from the Scottish Government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad SNP Climate Action and Energy Minister, Gillian Martin, said: 'The North East has long been a titan in the oil and gas industry and the valuable expertise within our workforce must be at the heart of the transition to new fuels and sustainable energy. SNP Energy Secretary Gillian Martin | PA 'I am determined to ensure a positive impact and powerful legacy of Scotland's clean energy revolution which benefits communities across the North East of the country.' But Scottish Conservative energy and net zero spokesperson, Douglas Lumsden, claimed the SNP and Labour 'boasting about this scheme' was "frankly embarrassing'. He added: 'This 'support' for 200 workers amounts to a drop in the ocean when compared to the projected 400 jobs a fortnight being lost thanks to their decimation of the oil and gas sector. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Kemi Badenoch: I want to be Britain's Javier Milei
Kemi Badenoch has said she wants to be Britain's Javier Milei. The Conservative leader compared herself to Argentina's president, who has slashed state spending and regulations since being elected in 2023. She described Mr Milei as 'the template' as she attempted to sharpen her party's economic message. When asked by the Financial Times whether Britain needs a 'Milei' and whether she is such a politician, she replied: 'yes and yes.' She said Mr Milei was being rewarded by voters because he has a clear and consistent message even if his approach is not always initially popular. The comments are an attempt to draw clear blue water between her party and Reform UK, as well as Labour on the economy. Nigel Farage's party has moved to the Left on the economy in recent months, by calling for policies such as scrapping the two-child benefit cap and reopening coal mines. Mrs Badenoch claims her party can win back support from traditional supporters who will tire of Farage's 'bull----ting'. The Tories have spoken more about the economy in recent months as growth continues to be sluggish and polls suggest it is one of the few issues where the party is more trusted than Labour or Reform. The party is the only major one to have defended the two child benefit cap and bounced Labour MPs into voting to scrap it last week, despite ministers having said doing so is unaffordable. Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, used a speech last month to promise his party will 'never again' make the type of unfunded spending commitments that sank Liz Truss's mini-budget. 'People are hearing more about the economy because I am being very, very relentless in pursuing this particular case, almost to the exclusion of everything else,' the Tory leader told the newspaper. Mrs Badenoch said she was 'terrified' that government debt is so high and the sight of the state 'spreading its tentacles everywhere' at the expense of wealth creators. She added that she is worried high taxes mean 'wealth is being driven out of the country', including that of young people. Her party is using a series of policy reviews to work out where the government can do less and how taxpayers money can be spent more wisely. Mrs Badenoch said the reviews are 'not about cutting bits of the state' by 'top slicing' spending but instead 'looking at what the state does, why it does it'. She also dismissed speculation she may face a leadership challenge as soon as November if the Tories position in the polls does not improve. The Tories lost control of all the councils they were defending in May's local elections, placing pressure on the Tory leader. 'I can't spend all my time worrying about regicide. I would lose my mind,' she said. 'I'm so thick-skinned to the point where I don't even notice if people are trying to create harm. That's extremely useful in this job.'
Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Complete bunkum': Lord Lilley dismantles claims the ECHR reflects UK values
Peter Lilley, the former cabinet minister, has called for the UK to leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), arguing its influence has undermined parliamentary sovereignty. 'Attlee was extremely reluctant to sign up,' Lilley said, 'and only did so on condition that the jurisdiction of the court it created didn't apply in the UK.' He claims the convention has since evolved into 'a transfer of the power to make laws and make political judgments from parliament to the courts'. While some Conservatives remain divided over the ECHR's role, Labour has not fared any better in the past. ' Blair himself asked John Reid, his Home Secretary, I think Blunkett, another Home Secretary to look into ways of overriding it or leaving bits of it. So, the Labour Party has found it as problematic as the Conservatives have when they've been in power,' he said. On Kemi Badenoch's leadership, Lilley offered a measured endorsement, praising her approach to evidence-based policy and democratic principle. 'She does in some ways [remind me of Thatcher],' he said, recounting her 'pure common sense' during their work together. Lilley warned against internal manoeuvring, stating clearly: 'If [opponents] are manoeuvring to displace her… it's not good for the party and therefore it's not good for the country.'
