Black Teen Saniyah Cheatham Dies While In NYPD Custody
For the Cheatham family, the July 4th holiday was initially a time of joy and celebration. The family had gotten together for a cookout, where 18-year-old Saniyah Cheatham was said to be healthy and in good spirits. The evening took a tragic turn only hours later after the family received news that Cheatham had died while in NYPD custody.
Thomasina Cheatham told CBS News her daughter, Saniyah, was her normal self during a Fourth of July cookout at Crotona Park. 'We [were] hanging out, having a good time. 'Mommy, I love you,' giving me a kiss. And now to wake up that she's no longer here with us, it's really sickening.'
At some point after the cookout, the NYPD arrested Saniyah Cheatham for allegedly being involved in a fight. She was taken to the 41st Police Precinct in the Longwood neighborhood of the Bronx shortly before midnight. Anonymous NYPD officials with knowledge of the case told the New York Times that at about 12:15 a.m. Saniyah hanged herself with the sweater she was wearing while in her cell. An NYPD official told the Times she had only been in the cell for two minutes when she hanged herself.
In a statement sent to CBS, the NYPD said they called for Emergency Medical Services at about 12:40 a.m. and attempted CPR while awaiting medical help. Saniyah Cheatham was transferred to Lincoln Hospital, where she was pronounced dead. It's unclear if there were any other detainees in the cell, if anyone witnessed the incident, or if Saniyah called for help.
'How could that happen in a precinct? Was anybody watching her? Was she calling out for help?' Thomasina asked in an interview with CBS.
The NYPD has said that the Force Investigation Division is looking into the circumstances surrounding Saniyah Cheatham's death. Thomasina is hopeful that security cameras in the jail and the medical examiner's autopsy will give a clearer understanding of what led to her daughter's death.
'The cameras should show exactly what happened…I'm praying that it does. I'm really praying. This is very heartbreaking to me and my family. That was my only princess. I have four boys and one girl. And we just … we just [are] really heartbroken right now,' Thomasina Cheatham told CBS.
Saniyah Cheatham's death and alleged suicide have shocked many of her close friends and family. They say she enrolled at Bronx Community College and worked so she could save up money to live on her own. Growing up, Saniyah was active in the church, which initially caused her to struggle with her sexuality. When she came out as gay to her older brother, he accepted her with no hesitation.
'That's what made our bond really close,' her older brother told the Times. 'She knew all of me, and I knew all of her. She just got me.'
Ember Baez, Saniyah Cheatham's friend and former partner, told the Times, 'Everyone who has spoken to her recently knows she's been happy. So when I heard this happened, I called her multiple times to see if it was real, and her phone just kept going straight to voicemail.'
The alleged details of Saniyah Cheatham's death bear a striking similarity to Sandra Bland, a Black woman who died while in police custody. Bland was arrested during a traffic stop and taken into custody at Waller County Jail in Texas. She was unable to post the $5,000 cash bail, and after three days in custody, she allegedly hanged herself in her cell. While Bland's death was officially ruled a suicide, there has long been skepticism over the official narrative.
Bland's death while in police custody helped bring more awareness to the #SayHerName campaign, which was launched in December 2014 by the African American Policy Forum (AAPF) and the Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies (CISPS) 'to cut through this disturbing reality and resist the invisibility of Black women, girls, and femmes by telling their stories of police violence.'
From Freddie Gray, Marvin Scott III, Noni Battiste-Kosoko, and Ta'Neasha Chappell, there has been an alarming trend of Black people dying in police custody in the years since Sandra Bland's death. Sadly, Saniyah Cheatham's name is now added to that list.
SEE ALSO:
#SayHerName: Black Women And Girls Killed By Police
How #SayHerName Transformed Advocacy For Black Women
SEE ALSO
Black Teen Saniyah Cheatham Dies While In NYPD Custody was originally published on newsone.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Federal judge temporarily halts alleged indiscriminate immigration stops
A federal judge on Friday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from carrying out what advocates allege are unlawful stops and arrests that have terrorized Angelenos, forced some immigrants into hiding and damaged the local economy. The ruling from U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, a Biden appointee, came after a hearing Thursday in a lawsuit filed on behalf of several immigrant rights groups, three immigrants picked up at a bus stop and two U.S. citizens, one whom was held despite showing agents his identification. In her ruling, she said she found a sufficient amount of evidence that agents were stopping people based on their race, language, their vocation or the location they are at, such as Home Depot or a car wash, to form reasonable suspicion to stop someone for possible immigration law violations. Frimpong said in her order that reliance on those factors -- either alone or in combination -- does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. 'What the federal government would have this Court believe in the face of a mountain of evidence presented in this case is that none of this is actually happening,' she said. The judge ordered that federal agents cannot use those factors to establish reasonable suspicion, as required to detain people. And that all those in custody at B-18 must be given 24 hour access to lawyers and a confidential phone line. The plaintiffs argued in their complaint immigration agents cornered brown-skinned people in Home Depot parking lots, at car washes and bus stops across Southern California in a show of force without establishing reasonable suspicion that they violated immigration laws. They allege agents didn't identify themselves, as required under federal law, and made unlawful warrantless arrests. Once someone was in custody, the complaint argues, their constitutional rights were further violated by being held in a downtown detention facility known as B-18, in 'deplorable' conditions without access to a lawyer, or regular food and water. Frimpong firmly agreed with the plaintiffs, and said they were likely to succeed in trial. Since June 6, immigration agents have arrested nearly 2,800 undocumented individuals according to data released by DHS on Tuesday. A Times analysis of arrest data from June 1 to 10 found that 69% of those arrested during that period had no criminal conviction and 58% had never been charged with a crime. The sweeps have paralyzed parts of the city where high numbers of immigrants work. Hours before the order was issued, Tom Homan, Trump's chief advisor on border policy, responded to the tentative ruling, telling Fox News 'If the judge makes a decision against what the officers are trained, against what the law is based upon,' he said that it would 'shut down operations.' He echoed government attorneys who argued that agents, in deciding whether to stop a person, can consider location, vocation, clothing, whether they run, and other factors. 'ICE officers and Border Patrol don't need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them,' he said. 'They just need the totality of the circumstances.' He said agents receive training on the Fourth Amendment every six months. In an hours long hearing Thursday afternoon, Frimpong took issue with Justice Department attorney Sean Skedzielewski and his lack of specific evidence to refute accusations of indiscriminate targeting. When he argued that 'these are sophisticated operations' and seemed to say that arrests stemmed from particular people who were being targeted, she questioned how that could be true. In other cases where local and federal law enforcement are targeting people for crimes, the judge pointed out, there are reports after an arrest 'as to why they arrested this person, how they happened to be where they were and what they did.' 'There doesn't seem to be anything like that here, which makes it difficult for the court to accept your description of what is happening, because there is no proof that that is what is happening as opposed to what the plaintiffs are saying is happening,' Frimpong said. Skedzielewski argued the lack of evidence is why the court should not grant a temporary restraining order. The government, he argued, had only 'a couple days' to try to identify individuals mentioned in the court filings. 'We just haven't had a chance to identify in many cases who the people stopped even were, let alone — over a holiday weekend — get ahold of the agents,' he said. Frimpong didn't seem moved and questioned the government's reliance on two high-ranking officials who have played a key role in the raids in Southern California: Kyle Harvick, a Border Patrol agent in charge of El Centro, and Andre Quinones, deputy field office director for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Their declarations, she said, were 'very general' and 'did not really engage with the pretty high volume of evidence that the plaintiffs have put in the record of the things we have all seen and heard on the news.' 'If there's any one of these people and there was a report about 'this is how we identified this tow yard, parking lot etc' that would have been helpful,' Frimpong said. 'It's hard for the court to believe that in the time that you had, you couldn't have done that.' Skedzielewski said the evidence is replete with instances of stops, but 'it is not replete with any evidence that those stops or that the agents in any way failed to follow the law.' He said agents' actions were 'above board.' Mohammad Tajsar, an attorney with the ACLU of Southern California, told the judge that agents cannot solely use a person's workplace, their location or the particular work they're doing as reason to stop people. Tajsar added that it was because of the government's 'misunderstanding of the law' that they'd made so many stops of U.S. citizens, including Brian Gavidia, a named plaintiff who was detained by Border Patrol agents outside of a tow yard in Montebello. Tajsar said Gavidia, who was present in the courtroom during the hearing, was stopped 'for no other reason than the fact that he's Latino and was working at a tow yard' in a predominantly Latino area. 'Because of this fundamental misunderstanding of the law from the government, we have seen so many unconstitutional and unlawful arrests,' Tajsar said. Tajsar also pushed back on the government attorneys saying they didn't have enough time, stating that 'they had time and they have all the evidence.' This week the city and county of Los Angeles — along with Pasadena, Montebello, Monterey Park, Santa Monica, Culver City, Pico Rivera and West Hollywood — sought to join the suit. In their court filing, the cities and the county countered the raids haven't actually been about immigration enforcement, rather they are politically driven 'to make an example' of the region for 'implementing policies that President Donald J. Trump dislikes.' They cited Trump's post on his social media platform where he calls on immigration officials to do 'all in their power' to achieve 'the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History' by expanding efforts to detain and deport people in Los Angeles and other cities that are 'the core of Democrat power.' U.S. Department of Justice attorneys argued the detentions were legal, and a judge should not grant any relief broadly. 'The government has a legitimate and significant interest in ensuring that immigration laws are enforced, and any limitation would severely infringe on the President's Article II authority,' government lawyers wrote.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
NYC Sheriff's academy graduation delayed because instructors weren't certified
Training for dozens of recruits hoping to be New York City deputy sheriffs was thrown into chaos after the Department of Investigation determined the academy's instructors responsible for investigation and firearms training weren't certified by the state, The New York Daily News has learned. After being delayed for more than three weeks, the graduation for more than 80 sheriff cadets — ballyhooed as the largest academy class in the agency's history — is scheduled for Saturday at the NYPD Police Academy in Queens. But with graduation a day away, the sheriff's office was still trying to finalize recruit background checks — since the sheriff's office swore in their academy class in February, the DOI received three complaints that academy instructors weren't certified by the state Division of Criminal Justice Services. The DOI began its investigation on March 12 and asked the sheriff's office for a copy of the academy curriculum and a list of instructors. 'Despite numerous follow-ups, the sheriffs office did not provide the requested documents,' the DOI said in its letter, adding that they finally had to get them through the state Division of Criminal Justice Services. Following its investigation, which included interviewing the recruits and the instructors and checking the instructors credentials, DOI determined the instructors were not trained 'in the presence of a master instructor, rendering the certifications issued to them invalid,' according to a letter the DOI sent to New York City Sheriff Anthony Miranda and city Department of Finance Commissioner Preston Niblack dated June 17. At the time the DOI rendered their findings, recruits were expected to graduate on June 24, officials said. The date was extended as the agency scrambled to get the appropriate accreditations, get certified instructors and retrain the recruits, agency sources told the Daily News. More than a dozen of the recruits spent this past week at the New York Police Department range in Rodman's Neck to make sure they're certified on firearms before the graduation, the sources said. Some will also continue training after the graduation ceremony. In their letter to the sheriff's office, the DOI recommended that the agency conduct audits of their academy training to make sure it's up to DCJS standards, immediately recertify its instructors and 'work with DCJS to ensure that the deputy sheriffs in the 2025 training academy are certified in accordance with the DCJS requirements.' The agency should also 'require written approval from the DCJS confirming eligibility for both instructors and course methods.' 'Verbal authorization should no longer be accepted,' the DOI said. The sheriff's office took the DOI recommendations to heart, and are 'taking all necessary steps to ensure compliance with all regulations set by the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services,' an agency spokesman said. 'Thanks to this administration the Sheriff's Office will be graduating the largest class of recruits ever,' the spokesman said. 'The Sheriff's Office and the Department of Finance are committed to upholding the highest standards of law enforcement training.' DCJS spokeswoman Janine Kava said that the sheriff's office 'retrained its recruits to ensure that they received the proper training to graduate.' 'DCJS will issue certificates of completion for those recruits upon receiving final documentation from the Sheriff's Office,' Kava said. Deputy sheriffs are responsible for executing eviction notices, orders of protection, and investigating financial and tax fraud. When Mayor Eric Adams appointed Miranda, the sheriff's office was tasked with also inspecting illegal cannabis shops in the city but a recent court ruling has curbed that work. Questions about the sheriff's academy class came as the NYPD took steps to terminate 30 of its probationary officers who should have been disqualified by background checks.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani said NYPD shouldn't respond to domestic violence calls in resurfaced podcast interview
Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani suggested in a resurfaced podcast appearance that the NYPD shouldn't be responsible for responding to domestic violence calls. The 33-year-old democratic socialist said that the NYPD shouldn't respond to domestic violence calls due to fears of 'escalation' by New York's Finest in a 2020 interview on the Immigrantly podcast, as first reported by the Washington Free Beacon. 'If somebody is surviving, going through domestic violence – there are so many different, different situations that would far better be handled by people trained to deal with those specific situations as opposed to an individual with a gun who has received quite a limited amount of training in general, but also in regards to these specific situations,' the Queens pol said. Advertisement While on the Immigrantly podcast in 2020, Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani said the NYPD shouldn't be responsible for responding to domestic violence calls. Matthew McDermott Mamdani also noted that the NYPD shouldn't similarly respond to situations involving homeless people on the train or jaywalking due to fears of 'escalation' that could have fatal results. The candidate ran successfully for state Assembly in 2020, years before his Democratic Party primary victory in the crowded mayoral race last month. Advertisement 'We find so many people who are having a mental breakdown, or people who are just trying to sleep on the train, or people who are just suffering through something in their lives,' Mamdani said in the podcast. 'And instead of receiving a helping hand they were shot, they were Tased, they were killed.' The resurfaced clip reveals Mamdani saying, 'there are so many different, different situations that would far better be handled by people trained to deal with those specific situations,' in regards to handling domestic violence. Advertisement Mamdani's campaign platform advocates for a new $1 billion Department of Community Safety that would respond to mental health crises and other situations usually handled by the police. A representative for the campaign did not respond to a request for comment.
