Hillside reopening sign of ‘belief'
The refurbished South Dunedin railway workshops, which were first constructed in the 1870s, were officially reopened yesterday. KiwiRail had closed the facility more than a decade ago.
Mr Peters told media yesterday the reopening of the workshops was a "tremendous day" for Dunedin, the city's workforce and the South Island.
"What you're seeing here will be here for the next 50 years.
"It's very wise expenditure and it's a statement about our belief in the South Island, and our belief in the city of Dunedin."
In a statement, KiwiRail chief executive Peter Reidy said more than 400 new rail wagons had been assembled at the site so far.
Former Hillside Workshops employees Murray McGregor (left) and Kevin Gamble share a joke about oysters and crayfish with deputy prime minister Winston Peters at the site's official opening yesterday. PHOTOS: GREGOR RICHARDSON
Most locals knew someone or had a family member who had worked there, he said.
"With significant government investment, an ageing 19th-century rail plant has been transformed into a modern 21st-century one, which is allowing us to better deliver for our freight customers and grow rail in the South Island and the rest of New Zealand."
The redevelopment was funded with nearly $20 million from the government's former Provincial Growth Fund in 2019, $85m from the 2021 Budget to fund upgrades and wagon assembly, and $23m from wider government investment to replace ageing locomotives and wagons.
It included a multi-purpose 5500sqm workshop with 21 workstations, cranes and jacks able to lift 120tonnes and an improved rail yard layout, which uses fully electric shunt engines to move rolling stock.
One of the original buildings from the 1870s had been restored and earthquake-strengthened to be used for parts storage.
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones holds up a red wrench as he addresses a crowd at the official opening of Hillside Workshops yesterday.
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones held up a red wrench as he addressed a crowd gathered inside the refurbished workshops.
The workforce's skillset was "what New Zealand needs".
He called on workers to "keep loosening the bolts, the screws and the things that hold us back from doing the right thing in the future".
The ministers were greeted at the KiwiRail site by a group of about 30 protesters advocating on causes including pay equity, transgender rights, climate change and the war in Gaza.
Police were forced to intervene as some protesters attempted to block Mr Peters' departing car.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
New Zealand And Southeast Asia Growing Closer
Press Release – New Zealand Government This weeks engagements have enabled New Zealand to commemorate a half-century of dialogue with ASEAN and reinforce our position as a reliable and valuable partner, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. Minister of Foreign Affairs New Zealand's relationships in Southeast Asia have never been more important for our security and prosperity, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. 'As we deal with the current challenging, uncertain and disordered security environment, New Zealand is working ever more intensively with Southeast Asia,' says Mr Peters, who is currently in Malaysia for the East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers Meeting. 'In 2025, we celebrate 50 years of dialogue relations between New Zealand and the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN),' Mr Peters says. 'We are working towards agreeing a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with ASEAN, and this week's meetings in Malaysia have been an important step towards achieving that goal by October 2025. 'This week's engagements have enabled New Zealand to commemorate a half-century of dialogue with ASEAN and reinforce our position as a reliable and valuable partner,' Mr Peters says. Yesterday's meeting was Mr Peters' tenth engagement with the East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers since his attendance at the inaugural Foreign Ministers' meeting in Kuala Lumpur in December 2005. 'New Zealand is honoured to be among the original countries to establish the East Asia Summit as the region's premier ASEAN-led strategic forum. Dialogue and cooperation between partners are more important than ever. New Zealand remains committed to our enduring partnership with ASEAN to shape the kind of region we all want. 'We reiterated our concern about the situation in Myanmar and tensions in the South China Sea, discussed security issues in the Middle East, and the increasingly serious challenges to the stability of the Indo-Pacific.' Mr Peters also held bilateral talks with ministerial counterparts from Bangladesh, Brunei, Cambodia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, the United States and Viet Nam. The Minister also met with alumni of the Manaaki New Zealand Scholarship Programme. 'As New Zealand strengthens its ties with Southeast Asia, it is important we build on our existing people-centred connections. Our Manaaki Scholarship Programme is a key part of this,' Mr Peters says. This week's visit by Mr Peters to Malaysia was the 36th by New Zealand Ministers to Southeast Asia since February 2024. 'New Zealand continues to significantly lift effort and engagement in Southeast Asia in order to enhance New Zealand's security and prosperity. 'We are grateful to ASEAN Chair Malaysia for its hosting of this week's meetings. We look forward to continuing to build our bilateral relationship.' Mr Peters arrives back in New Zealand later today (12 July).
Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
New Zealand And Southeast Asia Growing Closer
New Zealand's relationships in Southeast Asia have never been more important for our security and prosperity, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. 'As we deal with the current challenging, uncertain and disordered security environment, New Zealand is working ever more intensively with Southeast Asia,' says Mr Peters, who is currently in Malaysia for the East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers Meeting. 'In 2025, we celebrate 50 years of dialogue relations between New Zealand and the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN),' Mr Peters says. 'We are working towards agreeing a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with ASEAN, and this week's meetings in Malaysia have been an important step towards achieving that goal by October 2025. 'This week's engagements have enabled New Zealand to commemorate a half-century of dialogue with ASEAN and reinforce our position as a reliable and valuable partner,' Mr Peters says. Yesterday's meeting was Mr Peters' tenth engagement with the East Asia Summit Foreign Ministers since his attendance at the inaugural Foreign Ministers' meeting in Kuala Lumpur in December 2005. 'New Zealand is honoured to be among the original countries to establish the East Asia Summit as the region's premier ASEAN-led strategic forum. Dialogue and cooperation between partners are more important than ever. New Zealand remains committed to our enduring partnership with ASEAN to shape the kind of region we all want. 'We reiterated our concern about the situation in Myanmar and tensions in the South China Sea, discussed security issues in the Middle East, and the increasingly serious challenges to the stability of the Indo-Pacific.' Mr Peters also held bilateral talks with ministerial counterparts from Bangladesh, Brunei, Cambodia, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, the United States and Viet Nam. The Minister also met with alumni of the Manaaki New Zealand Scholarship Programme. 'As New Zealand strengthens its ties with Southeast Asia, it is important we build on our existing people-centred connections. Our Manaaki Scholarship Programme is a key part of this,' Mr Peters says. This week's visit by Mr Peters to Malaysia was the 36th by New Zealand Ministers to Southeast Asia since February 2024. 'New Zealand continues to significantly lift effort and engagement in Southeast Asia in order to enhance New Zealand's security and prosperity. 'We are grateful to ASEAN Chair Malaysia for its hosting of this week's meetings. We look forward to continuing to build our bilateral relationship.' Mr Peters arrives back in New Zealand later today (12 July).
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Analysis: Where Next For Regulatory Standards Bill?
Analysis - With select committee hearings complete, the many submitters who called for the Regulatory Standards Bill to be thrown out - in the compost, as one put it - are destined for disappointment. Unlike the Treaty Principles Bill, National committed to passing it in its agreement with ACT - and by extension, New Zealand First's agreement commits them to do the same. NZ First's Winston Peters publicly voiced a preference for changes, saying the bill was a "work in progress", although it remained unclear exactly what changes he wanted. ACT leader David Seymour - the bill's main proponent - pointedly noted on Monday the commitment was to pass "The" Regulatory Standards Bill - signalling he believed his partners could not demand changes. While some have theorised - perhaps wishfully - such a disagreement could cause Peters to collapse the government, it is very much not in his interests politically to do so, as it would likely tank his electoral prospects. The opposition to the bill has been fierce and accounted for most submitters, running the gamut from current and former politicians to lawyers, unions, environmentalists, iwi, academics, Treaty of Waitangi campaigners, church groups, health groups, local and regional councils, and state-owned enterprises. Even the Regulations Ministry set up by Seymour, and the non-partisan Clerk of the House - which provides administration for Parliament - raised objections. Supporters - both in total submission numbers, and the number of those invited to speak - were comparatively few and far between. They included a former judge, a right-leaning think tank, business groups and the "Rock the Vote" movement. RSB hearings day 3 RSB hearings day 4 Opponents had three main criticisms: that it prioritises the ACT Party's ideology over others (including Te Tiriti o Waitangi, protection for the environment and other collective good); that it could tilt the playing field in favour of big corporations; and that the bill - despite its objective of improving lawmaking - would only add another layer of bureaucracy, increasing cost and making the government's job harder. Seymour on Monday - in a media conference held at the Beehive Theatrette - spent much of the time defending against some of these critiques. "There's been so much misinformation about the bill that you have to really search for a needle in a haystack to find a really constructive criticism about it," he claimed, though he later admitted - under questioning about specific criticisms - he had not seen those specific ones. "I haven't been able to watch them all day," he said. Dr Bryce Wilkinson from the New Zealand Initiative right-leaning think tank has helped work on various iterations of the bill, and was one of the most vocal supporters. He argued the measures already in place to ensure good lawmaking practice were not working effectively, echoing some of Seymour's Monday talking points. "It's just to make executive government give Parliament more information about the nature of things it's wanting Parliament to pass - so it's a transparency mechanism for better informing Parliament, and it's needed because things aren't working well enough with all the existing processes," he said. Seymour's criticisms of the bill's critics in a series of social media posts - and his dismissal of submissions against the bill as having been made by bots, or generated through online campaigns - also came under attack. Māori lawyer and legal academic Ani Mikaere called it a "frankly childish tirade". Constitutional experts laid into the additional powers the bill would grant to Seymour and any subsequent Minister of Regulation and the board he could appoint, saying the reviews they order could interfere with government ministers doing their jobs. Victoria University of Wellington law professor Dean Knight said the bill would change public sector culture "through the exercise of soft power - and the ways it would have real impact on policy and law making process, and without doubt, will have a much greater instrumental effect on laws than merely providing transparency, as it is claimed". Some argued the principles in the bill should more closely resemble the Legislative Guideline principles on which they are based - including, for example, reference to the Treaty. Seymour on Monday dismissed calls to include mention of the Treaty. "This is actually a practical project. It's not a sort of spiritual exercise," he said. "If you can find any person that will give me a practical example of how putting the Treaty into the regulatory standards bill would change the outcome in a way that's better for all New Zealanders, then I'm open minded ... but so far, not a single person who's mindlessly said 'oh, but it's our founding document, it should be there, can practically explain how that makes the boat go faster." Dr Wilkinson suggested the values in the bill were the "fundamental" ones from the Legislative Guidelines, and - facing pushback from Labour MPs - asserted those principles did value the communal, collective good - like indigenous rights and environmental protection. The exchange was brought to an end before he could pinpoint how this would happen, so other MPs would have a chance to ask questions. Some critics with more specific interests - the SPCA, Vision Impaired, and Transpower, for example - feared the bill could override regulations and laws protecting animal rights, braille translations, and overhead lines from people who could assert property rights over abused dogs, copyrighted works, or neighbouring homeowners. Councils raised concerns their bylaws or other rules could also be up for review. Seymour argues such compensation is not enforceable by the courts, merely a guideline for when the government makes legislation. "The legislation is very, very clear. It says nobody gains any actionable legal rights from this piece of legislation. So you would be ... laughed out of court immediately." It should be noted courts would take that comment on how the law should be interpreted - by the minister most closely involved in writing the bill - into consideration, if it ever did make it that far. However, the regulatory reviews could still incentivise more emphasis in legislation and regulation on compensating someone who loses out, and Seymour's comments seem to indicate that is the point. "The Bill of Rights, until very recently, hasn't had any impact in courts of law. However it has, I think, really changed behavior. It has put a bit of a chill on politicians who say 'well, if we do that, we'll get a hostile section seven report' ... and that's kind of the point. This law won't stop politicians ultimately from doing things but it will start to say 'well, this is what good law making looks like, we as a community, place a value on that'." The bill's critics may well object that the values Seymour's bill would set down were not arrived at "as a community". Further frustration stemmed from the process undertaken. The RSB was pushed through all 30 hours of hearings this week, the timeframe having drawn criticism from Labour and several of the submitters. The five minutes for individual submissions and 10 for groups also came under fire, although committee chair Ryan Hamilton pointed out this was standard practice. The group which led protests against the Treaty Principles Bill (TPB) last year - Toitū te Tiriti - has cast the RSB as a continuation of Seymour's Treaty and complained about the initial consultation taking place over the summer holiday - alongside that of the TPB. Now, it will be up to the select committe to suggest potential changes when they report back in late September, taking account of the feedback. No doubt they will consider feedback from all three coalition parties, too. The purpose of the select committee process is to suggest useful amendment, but the RSB's final form may depend largely on politics.
