Unlicensed lion owner arrested
The lion has been relocated to a secure facility and legal proceedings have been initiated against the suspect.
The arrest follows an overnight incident, when the lion had escaped from a private enclosure and entered a residential neighbourhood, injuring three residents and causing panic, according to officials.
Lahore Region Deputy Chief Wildlife Officer Adnan Virk confirmed that the suspect had neither obtained a departmental permit nor complied with essential safety protocols. "Keeping wild animals in residential areas poses serious risks, and strict action will be taken against such individuals," he said.
The department has filed a case under the Punjab Wildlife (Protection, Preservation, Conservation and Management) Act.
Unauthorised possession of dangerous wild animals without safety measures is a non-bailable offence, punishable by up to seven years in prison and a fine of up to Rs5 million.
Senior Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb ordered a province-wide crackdown against those keeping wild animals unlawfully.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
SC rejects Commissioner IR's plea against LHC order
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court dismissed the petition of Commissioner Inland Revenue against the Lahore High Court (LHC) order, saying the findings on facts does not suffer from any illegality or error. The petitioner department had assailed the LHC, Rawalpindi bench's order dated 26.03.2025, whereby, reference application filed under Section 47 of the Sales Tax 1990 by the petitioner against the order dated 4.01.2024 passed by the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR), Islamabad, was dismissed. A two-judge bench of Justice Munib Akhtar and Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi heard Commissioner Inland Revenue's appeal. The court noted that the show cause notice and the Order-in-Original passed by the Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue in the instant case, against the respondents (M/s Mustafa Enterprises) are based on vague and frivolous allegations and certain conclusions have been made on mere presumptions only, whereas, no material or evidence has been produced to substantiate the same. The court further noted that while passing the Order-in-Original, the Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue exceeded his jurisdiction while travelling beyond the very premises and the allegations made in the show cause notice, whereas, the respondents were never confronted with any such allegations or entries as reflected in the bank statement which were subsequently furnished by the respondents, showing the details of the total amount and the particulars of suppliers from whom purchases were made. It observed that while initiating the proceedings against the respondents, there was no material or evidence available on record to make out a case against the respondents of illegal or inadmissible claim of input tax adjustment, whereas, the entire proceedings and the Order-in-Original passed in the instant case was based on presumptions, whereas, no inquiry or verification was made by the department in respect of alleged fake/flying invoices. The SC judgment said that the ATIR and the Division Bench of LHC were justified to set aside both the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal, while recording concurrent findings on facts which does not suffer from any illegality or error. The proceedings in the instant matter were initiated by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue Unit-IV Cantt Zone RTO, Rawalpindi vide show cause notice dated 10.08.2021, whereby, the respondents were required to submit the record to prove as to whether the purchases made for the (Tax Period July 2019 to June 2020) amounting to Rs323,722,601 against which an amount of Rs55,032,846 was claimed as input tax, were actually made by them. It was further alleged in the show-cause notice that the record submitted by the respondents does not prove as to whether such purchases were actually made by the respondents during subject period, therefore, they have also failed to comply with the requirements of Section 73 of the Act. It was concluded that respondents did not purchase any coal from the local suppliers and unlawfully claimed input tax on the basis of fake/ flying invoices issued by the dubious suppliers, therefore, caused loss to the national exchequer to the tune of Rs55,032,846 by violating the provisions 6,7,8,22,23,26 and 73 read with Section 2(37) of the Act. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
12 PTI workers sentenced for 6 months
ISLAMABAD: Two different courts on Thursday sentenced 12 Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) workers for six months each in cases registered against them under the Peaceful Assembly and Public Order (PAPO) Act, 2024. Judicial Magistrate Ahmed Shehzad Gondal and Judicial Magistrate Mureed Abbas, while announcing their reserved verdicts in cases registered at Ramna and Tarnol police stations, sentenced 12 PTI workers in jail for six months for participating in a protest on November 26without permission. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Definition of ‘Tax fraud' & procedure for ‘arrest': There will be no amendment in Act: MoS
ISLAMABAD: Minister of State for Finance, Bilal Azhar Kayani Thursday said the government will not amend Finance Act 2025 to further change definition of tax fraud or procedure for arrest, but the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) will issue sales tax explanatory circular to address all concerns of the business community. Kayani informed Senate Standing Committee on Finance on Thursday that the prime minister has strictly directed the FBR not to harass the taxpayers, particularly, business and trade. After detailed meetings with the federation and chambers, the government has started internal homework to resolve these issues. 'I will not share specific details as we are in IMF programme. However, all concerns of the business community will be addressed', he said. We have given assurance to the business community that it is our responsibility that the law should not be misused by the tax officials. There is a misunderstanding that law of arrest of tax evaders is a new law, he maintained. Finance Act expands definition of tax fraud Presidents of chambers of commerce and industries are well aware of the developments. A committee has also been formed to resolve issues in 30 days' period, he said. President Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI) Muhammad Jawed Bilwani requested the committee to abolish clause 9 of the Section 37A (power to inquire, investigate offences warranting prosecution under this Act and arrest of a person). The arrest of taxpayer on the basis of 'suspicion' has also been challenged by Bilwani. However, committee members insisted that ample safeguards have been placed to check any misuse of the powers of the tax officials. In case of 'suspicion', there should be definite information of tax fraud for arresting the accused person, they said. Minister of State for Finance stated that there is some kind of misunderstanding between the FBR and business community. The government has placed additional safeguards in Finance Act 2025 to ensure that arrest powers should not be misused. Earlier, arrests were made by officials of the level of Additional Commissioners and now a committee comprising of senior FBR Members will give approval of the arrests. Bilal Azhar Kayani stated that it has also been decided to convene monthly meeting with the business community to review impact of the law on the businessmen. FBR Member (Inland Revenue - Operations) Dr Hamid Ateeq Sarwar said that Finance Act 2025 should not be amended at this early stage of promulgation. We should not create any embarrassment for the Parliament and it would not be appropriate to suddenly change the sales tax law after promulgation of the Finance Act 2025. He said that the purpose of the law is to take action against those involved in fraudulent business of fake/flying invoices. In 2024-25, the FBR prevented revenue loss of Rs837 billion on account of fake invoices. In 2023-24, tax fraud of Rs1,373 billion was prevented. The FBR Member said that the FBR has addressed all concerns of the business community through a sales tax circular. The FBR will clarify that arrest would not be made without clear evidence against the taxpayer. This issue will also be clarified through the circular. The FBR has also consisted Grievance Redressal Committee to address issues of the business community. If any tax officer has made a wrong case against the taxpayer, he would be punished. He dispelled impression that the FBR do not take action against the corrupt tax officials. 'You just simply go through the FBR website (Admin Wing-HRMS), the numbers of tax officials penalized has been made public.' The FBR Member said that both the Senate and National Assembly Standing Committees on Finance read clause by clause the entire Finance Bill and also proposed comprehensive changes in the sales tax law. Due to limited time, there were apprehensions that the anomy committee has not serious considered the issues of stakeholders. The business community has not been targeted in any way through Finance Act 2025. The responsibility to prove tax fraud has now been placed on the FBR, he said. Let the law come into effect as significant improvement in the law has been made to facilitate the business community, the FBR Member added. Chairman of the Finance committee said that the government has no intention to victimise business community. If the FBR's clarification is acceptable to business community then the law should remain in force for 2025-26. There is no need to amend Finance Act 2025 in case all issues are addressed by the FBR. Representative of the Faisalabad chamber of commerce and industry observed that we are not afraid of the law of arrest but we are concerned about the blackmailing by the tax officers in the field formations. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
