
EXCLUSIVE I was overjoyed to marry the handsome love of my life Paul but after 22 years he dropped a bombshell that shattered our family - he was living a double life as a trans woman named Elizabeth... this is what happened next
Then, for more than two decades, the couple appeared to have a normal marriage, raising two children in a pretty home by the Thames in west London.
But one day all that changed.
Paul abruptly told Una and their children that he now identified as a woman.
And after dropping that bombshell Paul - now using new pronouns and going by the new name Elizabeth - moved out of the family home, changing Una Jane's life in a moment.
The experience led her to start a campaign group, TransWidows, to support women who find herself in the same difficult situation.
Elizabeth made her startling admission after her secret was starting to come out.
Una made the discovery about her then husband's new identity one spring afternoon, where she found a Dorothy Perkins dress, a pair of size nine heels and two credit cards - one had Paul's name while the other said Elizabeth, with the surname spelt slightly differently.
'I brought them down and put them on the kitchen table and asked who do these belong to? I was thinking he had a girlfriend, as you do.
'But instead he said "they're mine" and nothing more than that.
'And then, a few days later, we were walking past the Tube station when he just blurted out "It's true, I'm a transexual".
'We had been walking side by side but I stopped. I was absolutly rooted to the ground. I had no idea what those words meant back then. I didn't realise, in his mind, that it was a release, that it was an explanation.'
Sitting next to a half torn-up picture Elizabeth sent their ex-wife a year after they separated, Una said: 'I ripped that up in anger but really there was no point because by then the deed was done.
'I still get upset about it. The thing that makes me the most angry is all the secrecy, I felt completely deceived.'
After years of grappling with how her former husband's bombshell revelation affected her, Una has now created the TransWidows group - for women whose husband's have changed gender.
Una describes herself as a staunch feminist supporting the same gender-critical views that people such as JK Rowling and Maya Forstater.
She wants to see the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which recognises a transgender person's acquired gender, to be removed claiming Tony Blair should 'never have passed it'.
She also wants Gender Reassignment to be removed from the Protected Characteristics of the Equality Act.
The mother-of-two feels most strongly about children being told while still of school age that 'they might be born in the wrong body'.
'Sorry kids, you only have one body for the rest of your life,' the campaigner said. 'You can chop bits off but it will still be the same body every day because every single one of the cells in your body has either got XX or XY chromosomes.'
Her controversial views have, in the past, got her in trouble. Una had plastered pictures of a 13-year-old girl who had just undergone a female-to-male reconstruction, also known as top surgery.
After passersby reported the poster to Hammersmith and Fulham Council, she was handed a Community Protection Notice (CPN).
The Labour-run authority threatened the pensioner with a £2,500 and prosecution last year, however, eventually backed down instead just insisting Una removed the most graphic images.
Now the pinboard, which hangs on the front of her yellow door, is filled with news clippings highlighting wins for activists like Una, such as the Supreme Court ruling that legally the term 'woman' means a biological woman.
It was after seeing the power of campaigning from activists groups like For Women Scotland, who pushed for the definition to be clarified in court, that Una decided to set up her own group.
At 69-years-old, Una told MailOnline, almost two decades after the separation she finally has the courage to speak out about how her husband's changed identity affected her.
'Women are the bedrock of life and this trans-agenda is destroying all that makes women special or different to men,' she said.
Una had met Paul, a budding architect who was 19 years her senior, through mutual friends at their well-to-do sail club.
Paul had been married twice before but Una, then in her mid-30s, had not yet had a serious relationship.
When she met Paul she felt she had finally met her match.
'He was lovely from the first moment I met him,' she said as she looked back on those first hopeful years.
'I met him through sailing friends and Paul was a good handsman and had a part share in a yacht with a childhood friend.
'I wrongly believed at the time that if you met someone who behaved well, who had the same interests of you even if they were impoverished, he had excellent prospects. I did not see any reason not to marry him.'
The first four years of their marriage had been a happy one. Being an older couple, they rushed to have two children, a boy and a girl, within three years.
During those first years of marital life, Una was puzzled as to why Paul's first marriage, which lasted 11 years ended, as well as his second marriage, which last four years.
Paul had always said his second marriage had ended after his ex-wife 'threw plates at him' in a fit of rage.
She said: 'He was physically very attractive to me and we fitted together well so I was very puzzled as to why his previous marriage had failed.
'Four years into my marriage with Paul I know exactly why she threw plates at him.
'He had control over his emotions, he was inherently irresponsible in close personal relationships but couldn't sustain them.'
As the years passed, Una and Paul's relationship became more distant, with the campaigner saying he would relentlessly 'taunt' her and degrade her feelings.
Una said: 'He changed gradually over the years into a totally different person from someone who teased gently into really taunting words that were really hurting me.
'It was like he was trying to drive a wedge in between us and to destroy my thoughts of myself.'
Despite this Una said she wanted to strive to make their marriage work.
'I was very patient with our marriage and I wasn't going to give up until it became absolutely impossible to continue,' she said.
Una claims during most of the final 10 years of their marriage, Paul spent locked away in the dining room on the computer, claiming he was watching pornography.
She claims he would refuse to help pay for various bills around the house and he stopped wanting to do 'normal' things as a family.
'He was just so mean and so hostile at the end,' she said. 'His behaviour towards me was absolutely unbearable. No confidence, no explanation as to why he wanted me out of his life.'
Then suddenly that fateful afternoon in March 2006 where Una stumbled upon her husband's female clothing she finally got an explanation to what had been causing the ongoing, unexplained rift in their marriage.
Three months later, Paul moved out of the family home.
I was in total shock for about a year, a year and a bit,' Una said. 'At first he answered the phone, then didn't. I hesitated to use emails because it was even more of a distance.'
Grappling with the separation, which eventually took four years as Una fought to keep the family home she inherited in her name, the mother-of-two had a few run-ins with her ex-husband.
On one occasion she turned up with the children on Paul's doorstep in hope of catching a picture of him dressed in his new identity on camera.
Paul, at that time, was still dressing as a man but Una rummaged through his house to find female clothes and took pictures of them.
Whilst she was there, Una begged Paul to cut his now long hair, reaching for a pair of small scissors that were in the sink, however, her former husband saw this as a threat.
'I foolishly thought I'd give him one last change and asked him to please get your hair cut,' she said.
'There was a small pair of scissors in the sink and I lifted them up and showed him. I was not threatening him but he flung into an absolute rage, that I had never seen before, from across the room.
'He pushed me against the wall, caused me actual bodily harm, ripped my trousers and said he was going to call the police.
'I said we are going, we are going and I thought I had calmed things down.'
But three weeks later, Una was called down from London to a police station by Sussex Police where she was held in custody accused of assault.
Una said that Paul, a few days after the incident, had gone to the police and filed a report while identifying as Elizabeth.
She said: 'I turned up unprotected in a total state of bewilderment, anger, abandonment, not knowing the first thing about the severity, so they arrested me.
'I was extremely angry as it was a Wednesday afternoon and I had to get back to London to pick the children up from school.
'But they put me in a cell. I had no police record and I thought what the f*** are Sussex Police doing prosecuting the oinly person keeping these kids safe.
'Eventually they arrested me for domestic assault, common assault and forced me to take a caution.
'What I should have done was ask if he could come to court and prove it. Now I have the courage and strength to fight it. It felt like a 10 tonne rock had been dropped on me by Paul.'
A few years later Paul recieved his interim gender recognition certificate to identify legally as Elizabeth and the couple finally legally divorced in 2014.
During the proceedings, Elizabeth had sent Una the copy of the gender recognition certificate along with some harrowing childhood memories.
Elizabeth said they had been sexually abused as a child by a headteacher while attending an all-boys school and that his aunt had told her to dress in his mother's clothes as a child.
She also spoke of the painful, acrimonious divorce, her parents had and how her mother had been kicked out of the family home.
'There were a lot of strong emotions in his life but to say nothing about this. In the years we were married. I had no idea about any of this,' Una reflected.
At age 70, Elizabeth underwent gender reassignment surgery and moved to Brighton, having very little contact with the two children from her marriage to Una.
In 2022, Elizabeth, who had now remarried his second wife in a civil partnership, died at age 84 after falling out of a second-floor window headfirst after cleaning a window.
The coroner ruled it had been an accidental death after Elizabeth's partner and son from second marriage argued she had been cleaning insects from a dangerous window.
Una, however, submitted a letter to the coroner detailing why she believed it had been suicide.
In a final twist of the knife, Una revealed how hurt her children had been after being left entirely out of their father's will.
'They did not ask to be born but now they are left with no inheritance from their own father,' Una said.
Una is amongst women who have found themselves in a similar predicament.
Her campaign group has a number of aims, including recognising transwidows 'unique roles as mothers in holding our children's welfare and peaceful development as our first concern – above our own mental welfare'.
The group also calls for prosecution the prosecution of abusive husbands and ex-husbands to include 'psychological torture'.
Another aim of the group includes ending of 'cancel culture' and argues for the 'hate crime' legislation to amended so people discussing 'gender dysphoria' are not criminally prosecuted.
*'Una was not paid for this interview which she gave in order to publicise her group and reach other women who may be affected

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Police arrest dozens of protesters for supporting banned Palestine Action including vicar after activists' vows to go 'floppy' - a week after priest, 83, was among 29 seized
Police have today arrested more than 70 protesters for supporting newly banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action. A vicar was among at least 42 people detained by Scotland Yard officers as activists gathered for a second week in a row beside a statue of Gandhi in London 's Parliament Square, holding placards reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Another 16 arrests were made in Manchester and 13 people were also held in Cardiff at other related demonstrations on Saturday. A briefing document circulated to activists ahead of the action told protesters to 'go floppy' when they are arrested as it 'adds to the visual drama', reported The Telegraph. Five officers were today seen carrying one tattooed protester by her arms and legs, with one supporting her head. Some demonstrators could be seen lying on top of each other on the floor as police searched their bags and took their ID cards and handmade signs. Officers could then be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square. Other standing protesters were also led away from the statues and placed into the vans. The last of the protesters was lifted from the Nelson Mandela statue shortly after 2.30pm. Those held were of mixed ages, from their 20s to 70s and many said they had jobs and had been arrested before. Officers could then be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square. Other standing protesters were also led away from the statues and placed into the vans. The offences mainly related to Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000, an officer said. One protester, an architect called Steve, 59, said: 'I'm terrified. But some things in this world are bigger than fear of arrest. I will do whatever it takes to highlight this problem. 'They (the police) can do whatever they want. I don't care.' This Saturday is the second weekend Palestine Action supporters have protested and been arrested. A small group of protesters sat at the steps of the Mahatma Gandhi statue in Parliament Square for the demonstration, organised by campaign group Defend Our Juries, shortly after 1pm and received a brief applause. The individuals then wrote the message 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' with black markers on pieces of cardboard and silently held the signs aloft, surrounded by Metropolitan Police officers, who formed a cordon, and members of the media. A number of demonstrators were carried away by police by their legs and arms after refusing to walk. A social care worker, who gave her name as Kate, 42, was taken away by police as demonstrators shouted 'free free Palestine around her'. Several people were arrested at Parliament Square in London for supporting newly banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action Around ten people in Parliament Square were held by a group of Met Officers next to a statue of Gandhi after they held placards which said: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action' Officers could be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square Others yelled 'from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free' - a controversial chant which some say is a call for Israel not to exist. Kate was holding a sign which said: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' She said: 'It's shocking. I'm terrified. But the greater risk is genocide. That's more important. I don't have a phone. I've never been arrested before. 'I can't work because I've been trouble before connected to these activities. 'I was in social care. I had a good job. Nobody will employ me now. They'll think I'm a terrorist after this as well.' An elderly man - believed to be in his 70s - looked visibly unwell as he was taken into the back of a police van. A woman in her 40s was also taken away. Scotland Yard said its stance remains that officers will act where criminal offences, including support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed. A spokesperson for the Met police said: 'We are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action. Officers are in the process of making arrests.' This is the second round of protests in London in support of Palestinian Action and the group have said they will continue to take to Parliament Square every week. Last Saturday police arrested almost 30 people on suspicion of terrorism offences after protesters gathered in Parliament Square also holding signs supporting Palestine Action, just hours after a ban on the came into effect. One of those arrested was an 83-year-old priest and the Met said: 'The law doesn't have an age limit'. Around two dozen people, including a priest, professor and an emergency care worker who is just back from Gaza, sat in front of the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square on Saturday expressing support for the group, which is now a proscribed terrorist organisation. They held signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Shortly after their arrival, police officers could be seen engaging with the protesters and the Met said it had began making arrests. Several people were seen being carried away by officers. A spokesperson for the force said: 'Officers are responding to a protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square. 'The group is now proscribed and expressing support for them is a criminal offence. Arrests are being made.' They later added: 'A total of 29 arrests were made during this afternoon's protest in support of Palestine Action in Parliament Square. They remain in custody.' It comes after the Home Office today last week the ban on Palestine Action, with the group failing to block its proscription as a terrorist organisation in a late-night legal bid. Lawyers representing co-founder Huda Ammori, whose father is Palestinian, asked for the decision to be delayed at least until July 21. The designation as a terror group means that membership of or support for Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. This includes chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos. Palestine Action argues it is a protest group that has never incited or encouraged violence, but does support civil disobedience. Activists protest against the continuing war in Gaza, which has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians since October 7 - when 1,200 Israelis were killed by a Hamas incursion into the country. One of those protesting last week is former government lawyer Tim Crosland. He said: 'There are already 18 Palestine Actionists held in UK prisons without a trial, following lobbying by the Israeli government and Elbit Systems, the leading supplier of the machinery of genocide. 'If we cannot speak freely about the genocide of Palestinians, if we cannot condemn those who enable it and praise those who resist it, then the right to freedom of expression has no meaning, and democracy in this country is dead.' In a post shared on X, Defend Our Juries said the protesters had been arrested 'for holding cardboard signs' and that further arrests had been made at the Manchester demonstration. Scotland Yard said its stance remains that officers will act where criminal offences, including support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed. The force added that this includes 'chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos'. The terror group designation means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move to ban the organisation came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
TikTok troublemaker 'Mizzy', 20, insists he's turning his life around after the birth of his second child
TikTok troublemaker ' Mizzy ' has declared that he is turning his life around and looking to the future following the recent birth of his second child. The 20-year-old Londoner sparked outrage for his vile 'pranks' shared online which included walking into strangers' houses, stealing an elderly woman's dog, ripping up library books and asking random passers-by, 'Do you want to die?'. In 2023, he was sentenced to 18 weeks in prison for breaking a court order that blocked him from filming people without their consent, with a judge informing him that his social media stunts were 'not funny'. But now the notorious TikTok terror, whose real name is Bacari-Bronze O'Garro, has revealed his hopes to make a better future for both himself and his two children - the youngest of whom was born a month ago, with the elder now aged two. Sharing that he is now focused on 'growth, responsibility and having a purpose', O'Garro insisted he had 'learned' from his 'past mistakes'. Speaking to The Star, the content creator said: 'The main thing I'm motivated by is my family, especially my newborn and my first child, because I'm focused on building a better future for myself and them. 'If I was going the way I was going, I probably would have ended up in jail for how long. Having these two young ones, I'm going to prove to myself and others I can do things the right way.' Adding that his extreme pranks were due to his once 'impulsive' nature, O'Garro said that he previously believed he would get online fame from going viral, but had failed to consider the consequences. The 20-year-old Londoner sparked outrage for his vile 'pranks' shared online which included walking into strangers' houses, stealing an elderly woman's dog and ripping up library books He did, however, insist that he has no regrets, stating that to harbor regret 'means I'm regretting my past, my life story'. Last April, the father-of-two announced that he had returned to college to 'change my life around'. He did not, however, issue an apology to any of the individuals he tormented and ominously declared that he would be 'returning to social media'. Taking to social media platform X to share the news, O'Garro wrote: 'The day I came out of jail I told myself I am never going back and that imma do whatever it takes to change my life around so I can do better for my child and the people around me. [sic] 'So I went back to college, started looking for loads of jobs and signed up to a CSCS course.' He added: 'Now I'm trying to progress further in different aspects of my life and change any negative perceptions on me and of course I won't be able to change everyone's mind due to how I've portrayed myself in the past on social media, but I hopefully resonate with the people who understand. 'Yes, I will be returning to socials and posting videos eventually but only in a way that will prevent me from being in risk of harm and anyone else. 'So make sure your following up because the return of Mizzy could be sooner than you think*' In May 2023, O'Garro was ordered by Thames Magistrates' Court 'not to upload directly or indirectly, any original video content on social media, without prior documented consent of the people in that content' In May 2023, O'Garro was ordered by Thames Magistrates' Court 'not to upload directly or indirectly, any original video content on social media, without prior documented consent of the people in that content'. The content creator shared a photo of him leaving HMP Thameside on X. Then, just a month later, MailOnline revealed how the troublemaker, of Hackney, east London, had been taken to Thames Magistrates' Court on suspicion of a tag breach. A spokesman for the Met Police confirmed that the case was withdrawn by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), and that Mizzy was released with no further action. Releasing a video that showed the moment he was arrested by police officers captioned: 'The Matrix sent their agents', Mizzy appeared to refute allegations that he was not home when police tried to install his tag. An officer claimed that on June 12, just after midnight, police visited the residence and Mizzy did not appear to be in. The teen claims he was asleep. The video was posted just one day after he shared footage of himself sneaking through an open flat door while its residents sit on the balcony. Mizzy was then seen opening two bedroom doors and laughing until the homeowners notice, running towards him. He is then chased out the flat by a barking Alsatian. Mizzy previously shared footage of himself sneaking through an open flat door while its residents sit on the balcony. He was then seen opening two bedroom doors and laughing until the homeowners notice, running towards him In November 2023, a court ruled that he 'deliberately and intentionally' flouted the order requiring documented consent just hours after it had been imposed. During a trial at Stratford Magistrates Court, it was heard how O'Garro began sharing videos of people without their consent at Westfield Stratford, a location he had been banned from under the court order, 'within hours' of the criminal behaviour order being passed. Other videos shared on O'Garro's Snapchat account, which were also in breach, showed him grabbing hold of a schoolboy by his uniform and another showed him fighting a man with dwarfism, which O'Garro claimed were hoax videos made with their prior agreement. O'Garro's claim that one of his friends, who had access to his login details, posted the Twitter videos without his consent, was dismissed by Judge Matthew Bone as 'inconceivable'. Judge Bone also highlighted the fact that on May 24, the same day the criminal behaviour order was imposed, O'Garro had appeared on Piers Morgan's TalkTV show Uncensored and slated the UK's criminal justice system. Later that evening, in the video posted from Westfield Stratford, O'Garro said to the camera: 'I'm banned from this place, I can't go in here. The UK law is a joke.' District Judge Bone found him guilty 'on two occasions of an intentional and a deliberate challenge to this order' - for the video filmed at Westfield, and for footage in which he 'roughed up' a schoolboy and a man with dwarfism and posted the video to Snapchat on July 7, 2023. O'Garro was found not guilty of breaching the order for two videos – one, posted to X, of him cycling around a Sainsburys, and another which showed him doing the same through a Jobcentre. O'Garro was found not guilty of breaching the order for two videos – one, posted to X, of him cycling around a Sainsburys (pictured), and another which showed him doing the same through a Jobcentre The youngster was sentenced to 18 weeks at a young offenders' institution due to the age at which he committed the offence. As he sentenced him, Judge Bone said O'Garro's actions had been motivated by a desire to 'receive money and designer clothes from sponsors'. He continued: 'Your further offending was motivated by your desire to be famous. Your actions caused innocent members of the public significant harm and distress. 'You claimed on national television the law was weak. Put bluntly, your pranks are not funny.' He added: 'I concede that there may be some prospect of rehabilitation in the community, and I accept the mitigation. 'But it must be clearly understood by all that for such an immediate breach of the criminal behaviour order, detention is what is appropriate. 'The defendant caused ordinary members of the public harassment, alarm, and distress – and then profited from that. I want to ensure this does not happen again.' District Judge Bone also strengthened O'Garro's already existing criminal behaviour order, banning him from posting videos on social media for the next two years. He said: 'Following application by the prosecutor, I am satisfied that the criminal behaviour order you were subjected to should be strengthened. 'Your allure to fame is clear, meaning you need further help so as to not reoffend. 'Therefore, for two years starting from today, you must not publish or share or attempt to publish or share any video footage; you must not act with anyone else to publish or share or attempt to publish or share any video footage; and you must not contribute to any social media account other than your own. 'You must not trespass on any private property, or enter the E20 postcode area of London, unless travelling on public transport for pre-arranged child arrangements.' In mitigation remarks, Barrister Paul Lennon, defending O'Garro, urged the court to consider his young age and his personal circumstances, insisting that he was 'actively trying to better himself'. He added: 'Mr O'Garro was 18 at the time of the offending. 'He is currently studying at Haringey Sixth Form College. At the end of the course, which I am told he is performing extremely well on, he will have the opportunity to move on to higher education. 'He is predicted to achieve a distinction. He is very academic, very hands-on, and his timekeeping is good. 'He has recently gained employment as a waiter at a restaurant in Islington. 'In terms of his family relationships, his relationship with his mother is both good and bad. He has not had any contact with his father since he was two years old. 'He has two sisters, who he has good relationships with. One sister is in court today. 'His relationship with the mother of his child is difficult, but he still attempts to have as much time with his child as he can. 'The clear factor in mitigation here is his age, his immaturity. But he is in college, he is employed, he is actively trying to better himself.' But District Judge Bone refused to hand O'Garro only a community sentence, although he did say he had taken mitigation into account – in particular his age, the fact that 'he did not have the best start in life', and the 'helpful character statement provided by Haringey College for the pre-sentencing report.' Speaking outside court, Yasmin Lalani – Detective Chief Inspector at the Central East Command for the Met Police, said: 'I think it is appropriate sentence when you have disregard for the law. 'I hope that he gets some help in the Youth Offenders Institution. Hopefully he will get some help that will prevent him from reoffending. 'I think this is a loud and clear message that nobody is above the law and that you have got to be held accountable.'


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Met police drops probe into man accused of wearing 'Hamas' parachute at pro-Palestine protest
Police have dropped an investigation into a pro-Palestine protester accused of wearing a parachute in support of Hamas, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. Furious campaigners have branded Scotland Yard's decision not to charge the suspect in line with terror laws as 'remarkable'. The Metropolitan Police had warned 'anyone displaying symbols, wording or otherwise indicating their support for a proscribed organisation risks arrest' ahead of a central London protest on October 5 last year commemorating one year since the start of the conflict following the 2023 October 7 massacre. Yet the Met closed its investigation into the unnamed man accused of wearing the parachute – interpreted as support for terrorists who used paragliders to enter Israel from Gaza in the attack – despite the force even publicising his arrest on social media. It said on its X account the suspect was 'wearing what appeared to be a parachute' and shared a clip showing him being taken away by officers in Whitehall during the protest. The force said he was 'arrested on suspicion of wearing or displaying an article indicating support for a proscribed organisation', but the case was quietly dropped earlier this summer due to 'evidential difficulties'. A Campaign Against Antisemitism spokesman told the Mail: 'This kind of imagery glorifies a proscribed terrorist organisation and its lethal antisemitism. 'The reported decision to drop the investigation is remarkable and the public is entitled to an explanation.' A Met spokesman said: 'The findings from our investigation did not meet the evidential threshold for any charges to be brought against the individual.' On Saturday police arrested more than 70 protesters for supporting newly banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action. A vicar was among at least 42 people detained by Scotland Yard officers as activists gathered for a second week in a row beside a statue of Gandhi in London's Parliament Square, holding placards reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Another 16 arrests were made in Manchester and 13 people were also held in Cardiff at other related demonstrations the same day.