US and China strike deal to expedite rare earth shipments amid trade tensions
WASHINGTON/BEIJING: China and the United States have reached an agreement to fast-track the delivery of rare earth elements to the US, a White House official confirmed on Thursday (June 26). Rare earth breakthrough in Geneva
According to The Guardian report, the breakthrough comes amid new initiatives to reduce a years-long trade conflict between the world's two biggest economies. During the trade talks in Geneva this May, Beijing decided to repeal some non-tariff barriers levied since April 2, which had hindered exports of essential materials indispensable to US businesses.
A city in China's Inner Mongolia region, Baotou, recognised as the worldwide centre for rare earth mining and processing, has been the focal point of this geopolitical power struggle. China's control over these materials, crucial for aerospace, automotive, semiconductor, and defence applications, has given it substantial power in trade talks.
A senior White House official disclosed that the latest development marks 'an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement', which intends to re-establish and accelerate rare earth deliveries to the US. See also Vicky Kaushal tests positive for Covid-19, in home quarantine Trump hints at broader deal, including India
President Donald Trump, speaking on Thursday, confirmed that a deal had been reached with China, although details were not mentioned. He also hinted at the likelihood of a separate contract that could 'open up' India to additional trade alliances. Although no official particulars on the India deal have been shared, it indicates a larger plan to expand the US supply chain and reduce dependence on China for essential resources.
In the meantime, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, said, 'They're going to deliver rare earths to us,' adding that the US will scale back countermeasures once deliveries start again. Fragile progress, lingering tensions
Notwithstanding the new development, pressures remain high. China has imposed stringent export controls on rare earths, partly because of concerns about their possible use in US military applications. This has deferred licensing and interrupted global supply chains.
The US has responded with its own set of export limitations, aiming at semiconductor technology and aerospace gear. Earlier, Reuters reported that China had granted provisional export authorisations to rare earth providers doing business with top US carmakers, indicating a probable loosening of restrictions.
Along similar lines, President Trump cited a wide-ranging arrangement under which China would continue shipments of rare earth magnets in exchange for the US welcoming Chinese learners to American universities. This shows how geopolitical discussions now extend well beyond conventional trade issues.
Even though this new agreement signifies a step forward, it accentuates the delicate and multifaceted path ahead as Washington and Beijing try to recaibrate one of the world's most significant economic relationships.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US Senate unveils new Trump tax draft with plans to vote soon
This is as the US moves closer to a vote on the tax cut package with a July 4 deadline set by President Donald Trump. PHOTO: REUTERS US Senate unveils new Trump tax draft with plans to vote soon WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans unveiled a new version of their US$4.2 trillion (S$5.1 trillion) tax cut package, moving closer to a vote as they near a July 4 deadline set by President Donald Trump. The new draft reflects compromises among warring factions of the Senate GOP which has been divided over how much to cut safety-net programs such as Medicaid and how rapidly to phase out of renewable energy tax credits enacted under the Biden administration. A tentative deal with House Republicans to increase the state and local tax deduction is included. The bill would raise the SALT deduction cap from US$10,000 to US$40,000 for five years before snapping back to the US$10,000 level. The new cap applies to 2025 and rises 1 per cent in subsequent years. Republicans plan to start voting on the tax bill on June 28 with final votes coming as soon as early on June 29. Party leaders plan to bring House members back to Washington early next week for what they hope will be final approval of the measure in time for Trump's Independence Day deadline. It is not yet clear if the 50 Senate Republicans needed to pass the bill are all on board. The bill can be further altered on the Senate floor to secure the votes if needed. The House could make more changes if Speaker Mike Johnson has trouble corralling votes for the measure. To win over moderate Republicans, the bill would create a new US$25 billion rural hospital fund aimed at helping some Medicaid providers avoid cuts. Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, however, had demanded a US$100 billion fund. Moderate Republicans also won a delay from 2031 to 2032 for when a new 3.5 per cent cap on state Medicaid provider taxes takes effect. The provider tax is a gimmick by which states boost their federal Medicaid reimbursement rates and many states have come to rely on the practice. Another change in the measure is that a tax credit for hydrogen production wouldn't be phased out until 2028 for projects that begin construction before then. Previous version ended the credit after 2025. The measure would avert a US payment default as soon as August by raising the debt ceiling by US$5 trillion. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may yet lose on birthright citizenship
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Democratic Republic of the Congo's Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner and Rwanda's Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington D.C., June 27, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo Trump wins as Supreme Court curbs judges, but may yet lose on birthright citizenship WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling blunting a potent weapon that federal judges have used to block government policies nationwide during legal challenges was in many ways a victory for President Donald Trump, except perhaps on the very policy he is seeking to enforce. An executive order that the Republican president signed on his first day back in office in January would restrict birthright citizenship - a far-reaching plan that three federal judges, questioning its constitutionality, quickly halted nationwide through so-called "universal" injunctions. But the Supreme Court's ruling on Friday, while announcing a dramatic shift in how judges have operated for years deploying such relief, left enough room for the challengers to Trump's directive to try to prevent it from taking effect while litigation over its legality plays out. "I do not expect the president's executive order on birthright citizenship will ever go into effect," said Samuel Bray, a Notre Dame Law School professor and a prominent critic of universal injunctions whose work the court's majority cited extensively in Friday's ruling. Trump's executive order directs federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also called a "green card" holder. The three judges found that the order likely violates citizenship language in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. The directive remains blocked while lower courts reconsider the scope of their injunctions, and the Supreme Court said it cannot take effect for 30 days, a window that gives the challengers time to seek further protection from those courts. The court's six conservative justices delivered the majority ruling, granting Trump's request to narrow the injunctions issued by the judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. Its three liberal members dissented. The ruling by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who Trump appointed to the court in 2020, emphasized the need to hem in the power of judges, warning against an "imperial" judiciary. Judges can provide "complete relief" only to the plaintiffs before them, Barrett wrote. A HOST OF POLICIES That outcome was a major victory for Trump and his allies, who have repeatedly denounced judges who have impeded his agenda. It could make it easier for the administration to implement his policies, including to accelerate deportations of migrants, restrict transgender rights, curtail diversity and inclusion efforts, and downsize the federal government - many of which have tested the limits of executive power. In the birthright citizenship dispute, the ruling left open the potential for individual plaintiffs to seek relief beyond themselves through class action lawsuits targeting a policy that would upend the long-held understanding that the Constitution confers citizenship on virtually anyone born on U.S. soil. Bray said he expects a surge of new class action cases, resulting in "class-protective" injunctions. "Given that the birthright-citizenship executive order is unconstitutional, I expect courts will grant those preliminary injunctions, and they will be affirmed on appeal," Bray said. Some of the challengers have already taken that path. Plaintiffs in the Maryland case, including expectant mothers and immigrant advocacy groups, asked the presiding judge who had issued a universal injunction to treat the case as a class action to protect all children who would be ineligible for birthright citizenship if the executive order takes effect. "I think in terms of the scope of the relief that we'll ultimately get, there is no difference," said William Powell, one of the lawyers for the Maryland plaintiffs. "We're going to be able to get protection through the class action for everyone in the country whose baby could potentially be covered by the executive order, assuming we succeed." The ruling also sidestepped a key question over whether states that bring lawsuits might need an injunction that applies beyond their borders to address their alleged harms, directing lower courts to answer it first. STATES CHALLENGE DIRECTIVE The challenge to Trump's directive also included 22 states, most of them Democratic-governed, who argued that the financial and administrative burdens they would face required a nationwide block on Trump's order. George Mason University constitutional law expert Ilya Somin said the practical consequences of the ruling will depend on various issues not decided so far by the Supreme Court. "As the majority recognizes, states may be entitled to much broader relief than individuals or private groups," Somin said. New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin, a Democrat who helped lead the case brought in Massachusetts, disagreed with the ruling but sketched out a path forward on Friday. The ruling, Platkin said in a statement, "recognized that nationwide orders can be appropriate to protect the plaintiffs themselves from harm - which is true, and has always been true, in our case." Platkin committed to "keep challenging President Trump's flagrantly unlawful order, which strips American babies of citizenship for the first time since the Civil War" of 1861-1865. Legal experts said they expect a lot of legal maneuvering in lower courts in the weeks ahead, and the challengers still face an uphill battle. Compared to injunctions in individual cases, class actions are often harder to successfully mount. States, too, still do not know whether they have the requisite legal entitlement to sue. Trump's administration said they do not, but the court left that debate unresolved. Meanwhile, the 30-day clock is ticking. If the challengers are unsuccessful going forward, Trump's order could apply in some parts of the country, but not others. "The ruling is set to go into effect 30 days from now and leaves families in states across the country in deep uncertainty about whether their children will be born as U.S. citizens," said Elora Mukherjee, director of Columbia Law School's immigrants' rights clinic. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Former head of China Eastern Airlines under graft investigation
BEIJING: The former head of China Eastern Airlines is under investigation for "serious violations of discipline and law" - a common euphemism for corruption - according to China's top anti-graft watchdog on Saturday (Jun 28). The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission made the announcement in a statement, without giving further details. Liu Shaoyong headed China Eastern Airlines from 2009 until his resignation in 2022. He also previously held the position of party secretary at the airline. The Shanghai-based airline, primarily owned by the Chinese government through its parent company, is one of the three largest Chinese airlines. Liu was credited with turning the carrier around after it posted record losses before he was appointed. China Eastern Airlines under his leadership merged with Shanghai Airlines and joined the SkyTeam airline alliance, strengthening its position in domestic and international markets. Liu also led another one of China's major airlines, China Southern, before taking the reins of China Eastern. Chinese President Xi Jinping has waged an unrelenting crackdown on corruption since coming to power over a decade ago.
