NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani draws criticism for ‘intifada' remarks
In an interview with The Bulwark posted Tuesday, Mamdani was asked whether the expression made him uncomfortable. In response, Mamdani said the slogan captured 'a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights.' He said the U.S. Holocaust Museum had used the word 'intifada' in Arabic-language descriptions of the 1944 Warsaw Uprising against Nazi Germany.
Mamdani, a progressive New York State Assemblyman who has forcefully criticized the Israeli government, also addressed the rise in antisemitism since the Oct. 7 terror attack and the war in Gaza, saying anti-Jewish prejudice was 'a real issue in our city' and one that the next mayor should focus on 'tackling.' He added that he believes the city's community safety offices should increase funding for anti-hate crime measures.
In a post on X on Wednesday, the Washington-based U.S. Holocaust Museum sharply condemned Mamdani's remarks: 'Exploiting the Museum and the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising to sanitize 'globalize the intifada' is outrageous and especially offensive to survivors. Since 1987 Jews have been attacked and murdered under its banner. All leaders must condemn its use and the abuse of history.'
The U.S. Holocaust Museum did not immediately respond to a request for comment on how it had translated the Warsaw Uprising into Arabic.
Jonathan Greenblatt, the chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, decried the phrase on X as an 'explicit incitement to violence.' Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., who is Jewish, said in a statement that the term 'intifada' is 'well understood to refer to the violence terror attacks against innocent Israeli civilians that occurred during the First and Second Intifadas.'
'If Mr. Mamdani is unwilling to heed the request of major Jewish organizations to condemn this unquestionably antisemitic phrase,' Goldman added, 'then he is unfit to lead a city with 1.3 million Jews — the largest Jewish population outside of Israel.'
Mamdani has also faced criticism from some of the other candidates in the crowded Democratic primary field — including the frontrunner, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Cuomo's polling advantage has narrowed in recent weeks as Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist, built momentum and nabbed a key endorsement from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
In a statement, Cuomo called on all the contenders in the race to 'denounce' Mamdani's comments and invoked recent violent attacks on Jewish people nationwide.
'At a time when we are seeing antisemitism on the rise and in fact witnessing once again violence against Jews resulting in their deaths in Washington, D.C. or their burning in Denver — we know all too well that words matter,' Cuomo said in part, referring to the killings of two Israeli Embassy employees and an attack on Israeli hostage advocates in Boulder. 'They fuel hate. They fuel murder.'
The war in Gaza and the spike in antisemitism have loomed large over New York City's mayoral primary. Cuomo, 67, casts himself as a fierce defender of Israel and pitches himself to Jewish residents and ideological moderates as the obvious choice in the race. Mamdani, who has characterized Israel's conduct in Gaza as 'genocide,' gained traction partly thanks to enthusiastic support from the city's progressives.
Mamdani, speaking to reporters at a press event in Harlem on Wednesday, addressed the outcry over his interview with The Bulwark and the ensuing pushback, saying in part that 'it pains me to be called an antisemite.'
'I've said at every opportunity that there is no room for antisemitism in this city, in this country. I've said that because that is something I personally believe,' Mamdani said.
He broke down crying as he described the vitriol he has received as he seeks to become the first Muslim mayor of New York City.
'I get messages that say: 'The only good Muslim is a dead Muslim.' I get threats on my life, on the people that I love,' Mamdani said, eyes welling up with tears.
New York City's Democratic mayoral primary is on June 24. The scandal-plagued incumbent mayor, Eric Adams, won election as a Democrat in 2021, but he is not participating in the party's nominating contest. He is reportedly petitioning to run on two independent ballot lines: 'EndAntiSemitism' and 'Safe&Affordable.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on proscribing Palestine Action: blurring civil disobedience and terrorism is a dangerous step
When the Labour government introduced anti-terrorism legislation 25 years ago, it stressed that it was targeting extreme crimes. 'Terrorism involves the threat or use of serious violence for political, religious or ideological ends. It … aims to create a climate of extreme fear,' said Jack Straw, the then home secretary. Some MPs still feared that a group like Greenpeace, which had destroyed genetically modified crops and temporarily halted nuclear weapons production at Aldermaston, might be proscribed. Mr Straw reassured them that such bans would be used only when absolutely necessary; he knew of 'no evidence whatever' that the actions of the environmental group 'would fall remotely under [its] scope'. UN experts warned this week that 'acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism'. Yet on Wednesday, MPs voted – by 385 to 26 – to proscribe Palestine Action under the 2000 legislation. The Lords were expected to approve the order on Thursday. Unless a high court judge orders its suspension at a hearing on Friday, from Saturday, being a member of or simply expressing support for the group will carry a maximum penalty of 14 years. The ban was announced days after Palestine Action claimed responsibility for breaking into an RAF base and spraying paint on to planes that it claimed were supporting the Israeli military campaign. Four people have been charged. Hundreds of lawyers, cultural figures and groups such as Amnesty International have condemned the ban. It is lamentable that MPs backed it. But cynically listing two white-supremacist organisations on the same order – Maniacs Murder Cult, whose members have claimed violent attacks globally, and Russian Imperial Movement, which seeks to create a new Russian imperial state – made it harder for legislators to vote it down. The British state has plenty of legislation to deal with direct action. Palestine Action activists have been arrested and charged with criminal damage, violent disorder and burglary. The suspicion is that frequent acquittals have led to this order. Pouring paint over military aircraft and buildings, and tossing smoke bombs, does not sound like the kind of extreme act that the public rightly reviles as terrorism. Rather, the ban appears designed not only to silence supporters but to reduce public sympathy by placing the group on a par with Islamic State and the extreme-right group National Action. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, alleges that Palestine Action's methods 'have become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence'. The public will need to see evidence of this – rather than take such claims on trust – if their faith in the state is not to be undermined. Palestine Action has targeted property to challenge a war in which tens of thousands of civilians have been killed. The group's protests embarrass the government: the UK continues to supply equipment to Israel's military as it slaughters Palestinians. Despite overwhelming evidence that war crime is piling on war crime in Gaza, and reportedly contrary to the advice of its own lawyers, the British government will not say that Israel has broken international law. The government should be doing all it can to end this conflict, not to criminalise protests against it. But you do not need to sympathise with Palestine Action's aims to believe that its proscription sets a chilling precedent and undermines democracy.
The National
39 minutes ago
- The National
Keir Starmer's authoritarian tendencies are on full display
EVEN before Keir Starmer became Prime Minister, his authoritarian tendencies were already apparent in the ruthless purge he conducted of his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn and the left wing of the Labour Party. Starmer's authoritarian intolerance is starkly clear today following his government's decision to proscribe the direct action protest group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. It beggars belief, but in the UK today, non-violent direct action involving trivial damage to property by throwing paint is now classified as being on a par with planting a nail bomb in a crowded pub and killing and maiming innocent people. So just so we are clear, chucking red paint on an RAF plane which was suspected of taking British-made munitions to Israel, where they would be used to perpetuate the genocide which the Israeli Government and its armed forces are currently inflicting on the people of Gaza, is a terrorist act according to the Labour government. READ MORE: Petition to have Israeli military branded terrorist group gains traction On the other hand, actual genocide, including dropping a 230 kg bomb on a crowded seaside cafe and killing dozens, flattening civilian infrastructure, bombing hospitals, restricting food aid as a weapon, and mowing down starving civilians desperately seeking food and water, count as Israel's legitimate right of self-defence and the British Government will continue to supply Israel with armaments, military intelligence, and spare parts for the aircraft used to bomb Gaza into the stone age. Meanwhile, the British establishment and media are far more exercised about chanting at Glastonbury than they are about the ongoing genocide in Gaza, mass murder and starvation, and the Israeli Government's openly aired plans to ethnically cleanse the entire population of the territory and effectively annexe it. A spot of chanting is the really offensive thing here. Any hope that the election of a Labour government might see an end to the erosion of civil liberties and the right to protest have been well and truly scuppered now. Expressing support for a direct action protest group which has never caused physical harm or committed violence against any individual is now classified as supporting a terrorist organisation, a criminal offence which potentially carries the risk of fourteen years in prison. Cynically, the Labour government sought to minimise opposition to its authoritarian anti-protest ban by bundling the measure classifying Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation in with the banning of three deeply unpleasant extreme right groups, the "Maniacs Murder Cult", a Moldovan neo-Nazi group, the Russian Imperial Movement – a violent white supremacist far-right group aiming to rebuild the Russian Empire – and its paramilitary wing the Russian Imperial Legion. Classing Palestine Action along with violent Nazis and far right Russian nationalists is an obvious nonsense, but it succeeded in reducing opposition to the measure as MPs did not want to be accused of voting against classing violent Nazi groups as terrorist organisations However, a group of around twenty people, including a former government lawyer, have announced that they intend to defy the Government's proscription by holding Palestine Action signs in protest this weekend, despite the risk of criminal conviction and jail time for doing so. The campaign group Defend Our Juries has said the action will be the first in a series, and every week, "more people will show their support for freedom of expression". The protest will take place on Saturday, July 5, at 1pm, in front of the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square in London. Activists will hold signs saying, 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action." The Government's decision to proscribe the direct action protest group as a terrorist organisation has been widely condemned as an authoritarian over-reach which infringes on freedom of expression and the right to protest, which are vital to democracy. Thousands of people and organisations, including the Network for Police Monitoring and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers, four UN special rapporteurs, and 266 solicitors, barristers and legal academics, have condemned the decision from the Home Office. (Image: Supplied) Defend Our Juries hopes to create a dilemma for UK law enforcement, calling the law change "unenforceable". The group stated: "If they are arrested and charged with Terrorism Act offences, for a statement opposing the genocide of Palestinians, and supporting those who resist it, it will expose the end of democracy and free speech in the UK. "If they do not get arrested, they demonstrate that you cannot, in practice, proscribe a popular organisation like Palestine Action and stop hundreds of thousands of people across the country from supporting them." Tim Crosland, a former government lawyer and director of Plan B, a charity that supports strategic legal action against climate change, is one of those set to take part. He said: 'There are already 18 Palestine Actionists held in UK prisons without a trial, following lobbying by the Israeli government and Elbit Systems, the leading supplier of the machinery of genocide. "If we cannot speak freely about the genocide of Palestinians, if we cannot condemn those who enable it and praise those who resist it, then the right to freedom of expression has no meaning, and democracy in this country is dead.' If the Government can proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, they open the door to doing the same to any other protest organisation which the British Government considers a nuisance, climate activists, disability rights organisations, Scottish and Welsh independence groups, and anti-monarchy campaigners, all could potentially face similar treatment. MP Zarah Sultana, who was suspended from the Labour party for voting against the two-child benefit cap, said: "Let us be clear: to equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn't just absurd, it is grotesque. It is a deliberate distortion of the law to chill dissent, criminalise solidarity, and suppress the truth." (Image: PA) Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK, slammed the move as 'unprecedented legal overreach', pointing out that it gave the authorities 'massive powers to arrest and detain people, suppress speech and reporting, conduct surveillance and take other measures." Deshmukh added: Using [anti-terrorist powers] against a direct-action protest group is an egregious abuse of what they were created for."
JAMnews
an hour ago
- JAMnews
"Outrageous condolences" - Georgian opposition slams Foreign Ministry for attending Iran embassy ceremony
Georgian Dream expresses condolences to Iran Deputy Foreign Minister from Georgian Dream, Aleksandre Khvtisiashvili, attended a memorial event at the Iranian embassy in Tbilisi dedicated to those killed in the Iran–Israel war and left a message in the book of condolences. Israel's embassy stated it was shocked by the gesture and called it immoral. The incident has sparked debate in Georgian society over which side the ruling Georgian Dream party is aligning with—and what consequences the Iran–Israel conflict might have for the party. What happened? Aleksandre Khvtisiashvili signs the book of condolences at the Iranian embassy. Photo: Iranian Embassy The deputy minister's participation in the event became known through a statement by the Iranian embassy, which said the ceremony was held 'in memory of the martyrs killed during the armed attack by the Israeli regime on Iran's territorial integrity.' According to the embassy, in addition to the Georgian deputy minister, the event was attended by the ambassadors of Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, the chargé d'affaires of Iraq, and the military attaché of China. 'They left messages [in the book of condolences], expressing their sympathy and solidarity with Iran. We deeply appreciate our friends and partners for their support and compassion during this difficult time,' the Iranian embassy said in a statement. Israel's embassy, meanwhile, told Radio Liberty it was shocked by the incident: 'At a time when the West is condemning Iran's attacks on Israeli civilians and supporting efforts to stop its nuclear and genocidal ambitions, it is deeply disappointing that a Georgian deputy foreign minister would attend such an event. This is morally wrong.' There was no mention of the deputy minister's visit to the Iranian embassy on the Georgian Foreign Ministry's official Facebook page. However, once the information became public, the ministry was forced to respond to media inquiries. 'On June 26, 2025, the Iranian embassy sent an official note to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs regarding the opening of a book of condolences, and an appropriate message was entered in the book in Tbilisi in connection with the deaths of Iranian citizens,' the ministry stated. What does it mean? Reactions Georgia's opposition viewed the deputy minister's gesture as a move against the country's national interests. 'Yet another immoral act by the Ivanishvili regime and its Foreign Ministry does not reflect the will of the Georgian people and directly contradicts Georgia's national interests,' stated the opposition group Coalition for Change. 'When a country is formally led by a prime minister who attended a ceremony in Iran where people chanted 'Death to America, death to Israel,' nothing should surprise Israel anymore. Israel must take decisive measures against Georgian Dream,' said Levan Sanikidze, member of the United National Movement. He was referring to Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze's attendance at the funerals of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian in May 2024. Several Georgian experts believe that Georgian Dream views alliances with authoritarian countries as a way to maintain its power. At the same time, this signals a clear move toward authoritarianism. International security expert Theona Akubardia emphasized in an interview with JAMnews that Iran (like China) has never supported Georgia's territorial integrity against Russia at the UN. Consequently, this path weakens Georgia's sovereignty and strengthens Kremlin influence in partially occupied Georgia, aiming for full control. 'Back in 2024, by attending the Iranian president's funeral, Kobakhidze, following instructions from [Georgian Dream's informal leader] Ivanishvili, turned away from strategic partnership with the U.S. and the declared commitment to Georgia's sovereignty and territorial integrity. It was, in a sense, a slap in the face to then-U.S. President Joe Biden's administration and a signal of a move toward authoritarianism.' Akubardia believes Kobakhidze no longer counts on 'making peace' with America: 'Georgian Dream openly opposes Georgia's interests and stubbornly follows the path of authoritarian states, which is a major risk for the country,' the expert said. Political analyst Gia Nodia told JAMnews that since Georgian Dream is in poor relations with the West, it is tempted to improve ties elsewhere: 'They neither accept nor perhaps understand the norms, values, and policies of the West, America, Europe, and especially Israel. Their position — less a strategy than a stance — is that good relations with Iran need to be built.' At the same time, Nodia noted that authoritarian governments are, firstly, closer to Georgian Dream, and secondly, they share with Iran problems in their relations with the West. Regarding the impact of the Iran–Israel war on Georgian Dream, Nodia believes the effect may not be very significant but still negative: 'This war showed that the West is strong. In Georgian Dream' terms, what happened is a victory for the 'deep state.' From their perspective, Iran was pushed back by the 'deep state' represented by the West. The strengthening of the 'deep state' is bad for Georgian Dream because they bet on weakening the 'deep state' and strengthening countries like Russia, China, Iran, etc. What is happening contradicts their vision. But, like Iran, they are still in denial.' News in Georgia
