Asian stocks steady ahead of tariff deadline, Fed rate decision
SINGAPORE : Asian stocks rose modestly on Wednesday, with investors cautious after trade talks between the US and China ended without any substantive agreement and ahead of the Federal Reserve's policy announcement.
MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan was up 0.3%, led by gains for Taiwanese stocks, after US stocks ended the previous session with mild losses as traders braced for a slew of corporate earnings.
Australian shares were up 0.7%, while Japan's Nikkei stock index slid 0.03%, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index skidded 0.4%. The euro edged up from a one-month low, rising 0.2% to US$1.1564, as markets weighed the EU's trade deal with the Trump administration.
Traders are preparing for several central bank decisions, key economic reports and corporate earnings during the next few days, culminating in US President Donald Trump's Aug 1 tariff deadline.
The Federal Reserve is expected to leave interest rates unchanged at its policy meeting later on Wednesday, though it could see a rare dissent by some central bank officials in favour of lower borrowing costs.
'With labour market conditions near full employment, most Fed officials want to wait and see how tariffs impact inflation,' said Tom Kenny, senior international economist at ANZ in Sydney.
Some officials are concerned that tariffs could drive higher inflation expectations, leading to more persistent price pressures rather than a one-off hit, he said on a podcast. 'Our expectation is that the Fed should be in a position to cut rates at the September meeting.'
US Treasury bonds advanced ahead of the Fed's meeting, pushing yields to the lowest in almost four weeks following a strong auction of seven-year notes that quelled concerns about diminishing demand for government debt.
The yield on benchmark 10-year Treasury notes was last 4.328%, the lowest level since July 3. The two-year yield, which rises with traders' expectations of higher Fed fund rates, was little changed at 3.873%.
Tariffs, corporate earnings
The Bank of Japan is expected to hold steady on Thursday and the focus will be on its comments to gauge when the next rate increase will come after a trade deal between Japan and the US cleared the way for the BOJ to resume its rate-hike path.
Ahead of Trump's deadline to reach a deal to avert imposition of the 'Liberation Day' tariffs, some countries' talks with the US looked set to go down to the wire.
US and Chinese officials agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce on Tuesday, though no major breakthroughs were announced.
US officials said it was up to President Trump to decide whether to extend a trade truce that expires on Aug 12 or potentially let tariffs shoot back up to triple-digit figures.
India is also bracing for higher US tariffs – likely between 20% and 25% – on some exports as it holds off on fresh trade concessions ahead of the Aug 1 deadline, two Indian government sources said.
Meanwhile, three South Korean cabinet-level officials met with US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick in a last-ditch push for a deal.
Oil prices rose as potential supply shortages came into focus after Trump gave Moscow an abbreviated deadline toward ending the war in Ukraine. Brent crude futures rose 14 cents, or 0.19%, to US$72.65 a barrel.
US tech megacaps Microsoft and Meta are due to report earnings on Wednesday that will set the tone for the rest of the week and the earnings season.
'It's been a solid US reporting season so far, but these megacap names need to run it hot and blow the lights out, given the bar to please has been sufficiently raised,' said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone.
The Singapore dollar strengthened 0.2% after Singapore's central bank kept its monetary policy settings unchanged on Wednesday following stronger-than-expected economic growth in the second quarter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
In figuring out why the United States tariff shock hasn't sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook — and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They didn't, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' currencies. But, to some extent, the steep drop in sterling after the referendum vote and the dollar's plunge on President Donald Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact, at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no "big bang" economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right, even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020 and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly GDP print — confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. What's more, it's taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy. One academic study by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalised. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell three per cent and overall exports fell 6.4 per cent, largely because of the 13 per cent hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared with the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector over the next 10 years continues to worry the City. The US tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5 per cent to one per cent off US gross domestic product over time. That's a US$150 billion to US$300 billion hit, which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that's growing at a roughly two per cent annualised rate, where imported goods represent just 11 per cent of GDP and where tech and AI trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman said in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5 per cent of GDP, he argued, is "the equivalent of every household in America taking around US$1,000 and lighting it on fire, then doing it again every year. Forever." In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes don't necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex economies. The latest YouGov opinion poll shows 56 per cent of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU, some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Trump proposes 250% tariff on imported pharmaceuticals
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump revealed plans to impose tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals that could escalate to 250%, alongside new duties on foreign semiconductors. The move aims to push for domestic manufacturing of critical goods. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150 percent,' Trump said in an interview on CNBC. 'And then it's going to go to 250 percent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' The announcement follows earlier tariffs on steel, aluminum, and auto parts, part of Trump's broader trade strategy targeting imports deemed a national security concern. The administration has conducted investigations into pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, signaling upcoming policy shifts. Trump also indicated an imminent increase in tariffs on Indian imports, citing the country's purchases of Russian oil. 'I expect to raise the US tariff on Indian imports very substantially over the next 24 hours,' he said. The proposed pharmaceutical tariffs mark a significant escalation in trade measures, potentially disrupting global supply chains. Industry analysts warn of higher drug prices, while supporters argue it will strengthen US self-sufficiency. - AFPpix
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Trump says he will ‘substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases
US President Donald Trump said he will substantially raise tariffs on India. - Photo: Reuters WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said he would raise tariffs on Indian goods "over the next 24 hours' in response to New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. Trump announced a 25% duty on India's exports to the US and has threatened repeatedly to increase that rate to punish the country for buying Russian energy, an effort to pressure Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. "We settled on 25% but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil,' Trump said Tuesday (Aug 5) in a CNBC interview. "They're fueling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy.' Trump has escalated his fight with India over trade, unilaterally imposing a tariff rate after months of negotiations failed to secure a deal. He accused New Delhi of refusing to ease access for American goods and criticizing its membership in the BRICS group of developing economies. The US president has also set an Aug. 8 deadline for Russia to reach a truce with Ukraine, with the administration threatening so-called secondary sanctions on countries that purchase energy from Moscow. Ukraine's allies say those purchases prop up Putin's war effort. Trump in the interview said that if energy prices went down it would undercut Putin's ability to continue his invasion of Ukraine - now in its fourth year. "If energy goes down low enough, Putin's going to stop killing people,' Trump said. "If you get energy down another US$10 a barrel, he's going to have no choice, because his economy stinks.' The Indian government has indicated it intends to continue talks with the US in hopes of securing lower tariffs. It has also called Trump's threat over energy purchases unjustified. India is considering ramping up natural gas purchases from the US and increasing imports of communication equipment and gold. - Bloomberg
