Traditional public service media should be more discoverable on YouTube
Its report, Transmission Critical: The Future of Public Service Media, says the Government should bring forward legislation to help 'ensure that PSM content is prominent and easy to find on the platforms, and on fair commercial terms.'
The regulator and competition authority has made a number of recommendations in its action plan that is seeking 'urgent clarity from the Government on how TV will be distributed to reach audiences in the future.'
Group director for broadcasting and media at Ofcom, Cristina Nicolotti Squires, told the PA news agency: 'We've called it (the report) Transmission Critical because we think that public service media is under real threat.
'Broadcasters are experiencing quite tough financial challenges. The business model changes with audiences fracturing everywhere.'
According to research from Barb, which is responsible for calculating UK TV official viewing figures, viewing on linear channels has fallen significantly in recent years and this decline is expected to continue.
The report says that public service broadcasters (PSBs) will have to work 'much harder to create content that audiences want to watch' on platforms like YouTube as 'they are competing with every other content creator in the world.'
Ms Nicolotti Squires said: 'We're not saying they have to go on YouTube, but we're just saying that public service broadcasters have got to make great content where audiences are, and audiences are increasingly going onto YouTube.
'They all have different deals with YouTube in terms of commercial returns, and that's down to them. But I just think it's important that the programmes that they're making, public service programmes, are available where people are.
'So just delivering on the linear channels, obviously, we're seeing that viewing has fallen significantly in those areas. So it's a question of, as I said, pretty much putting these great programmes where people are watching them.'
A key objective of the Media Act, passed in 2024, was to make it easier to find content from PSBs like the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 on smart TVs.
Ms Nicolotti Squires said Ofcom is now calling for 'a logical next step on video sharing platforms'.
She added: 'It might require some further legislative changes to regulation. We're starting the conversation rather than finalising it all.'
The report says that stable and adequate funding is needed from the Government and emphasises that discoverability on online platforms is particularly important for news and children's content.
It also recommends that online platforms invest in media literacy skills while forging ambitious strategic partnerships that can compete with global streaming platforms.
On top of this, Ofcom is launching a review of its regulation of broadcast TV and radio that will seek input from stakeholders about the priority areas for reforming regulation.
Sarah Rose, president of Channel 5, said: 'We are pleased that Ofcom's review highlighted the challenges producing specialist children's content and called for commercially viable funding models among its recommendations.
'Channel 5's Milkshake! continues to navigate those challenges to remain the only public service broadcaster offering a daily programming block which targets preschoolers with original content rooted in the UK's Early Years Foundation framework.'
A spokesperson for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) said: 'We welcome Ofcom's Public Service Media Review and we will now consider its recommendations.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wiltshire's new council leader calls solar plans 'monstrosity'
A new council leader has called proposals for a 2,000 acre solar farm "a monstrosity that is a step too far". Councillor Ian Thorn, Liberal Democrat leader of Wiltshire Council since May, told the BBC he is "very concerned" about the controversial plans for the Lime Down Solar Park on farmland in the north of the previous Conservative administration was also against it, but the application will be decided by the government due to it's have been protesting outside Wiltshire Council on Tuesday - developers Island Green Power (ICP) have always said it would power 115,000 homes. The company said the project would "support national and regional aims to decarbonise our electricity systems and bolster our energy security".ICP finished a consultation earlier this month and hopes to submit a planning application in September. Thorn said: "We're not talking about an everyday solar farm. It will have an enormous, irreparable effect on our county."While the authority will not make the final decision, he said the council will be feeding back and sharing it's views."We are supportive of renewable energy, of traditional solar farms, but this is a monstrosity that is a step too far," he said. Many agree - plenty were stood outside Wiltshire Council's HQ, County Hall in Trowbridge, Michael Pitt from Stop Lime Down Solar Park said: "People are very passionate - right from day one when it was first announced, there was an eruption of anger about the proposals. "We are supporters of solar but it has to be in the right place. It has to be in places that don't damage the environment." Richard Skeffington, a retired environmental scientist and professor, is also against the project: "I never knew they were contemplating something so silly as this."He said his main worry is in relation to large battery fields where the energy would be stored. He explained that while fires are rare, they were "devastating" when they do said: "They can't be put out so they have to leave them to burn out. "They release toxic gases. They wet the adjacent batteries so they don't set on fire and that gets into he groundwater." Lesley Bennet is a local resident and supports the said: "I think it's really good. We're lucky we have a suitable site and build something that will improve the world for our grandchildren."I'm certain it'll do good. We want to produce our own energy and be independent." She mentioned it will allow alternative species to thrive and give land a rest from ploughing."This isn't the whole countryside - it's only a part of the countryside. I would be against it if it was - but it isn't," she said. The solar park would be spread across six locations around Hullavington, Stanton St Quintin, Sherston, and would be connected to the National Grid's Melksham substation through underground cabling – which would have to be channelled under the have said it was "grateful for all the feedback received from members of the public and interested parties during our statutory consultation and the recent targeted consultation". The company said it was considering feedback as they refine the plans before submitting to the Planning Inspectorate. As the capacity of the proposed development is over 50 megawatts, the project is classified as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure government's energy security department has said solar farms cover 0.1% of the land area in the UK, "while bringing huge benefits for the British public and our energy security".The department said there is a rigorous planning process."Solar is at the heart of our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower," it reporting from Local Democracy Reporter, Peter Davison.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Asylum seeker bill leaves Tory council in £17m deficit
A Conservative-led council has been forced into a deficit after the Government failed to provide adequate funding for the migrants it housed there. Hillingdon council, responsible for the area around Heathrow airport, is in discussions with the Government to receive exceptional financial support (EFS) to deal with a £17m deficit. According to the local authority, there are almost 3,000 asylum seekers in the borough, with around 2,800 currently housed in hotels near the airport. This is twice the recommended amount under the Home Offices fair shares scheme, which attempts to proportionally allocate asylum seekers based on local population numbers. Last year, Hillingdon received only £2,278,000 from the Government to house claimants locally, despite costs exceeding £4,000,000 over the same period. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, criticised Labour for letting councils go 'bankrupt' trying to 'mop up' the Government's mess. Hillingdon council also expects a cost of £1.2m to house Chagossians, following Sir Keir Starmer's deal to pass the islands to Mauritius. Since the deal, which is set to cost at least £30bn, Hillingdon has seen a significant number of families from the Chagos Islands arriving at Heathrow and seeking housing support. In one week in July, 120 Chagossians arrived, with the council claiming that the cost was not being 'fully met by the Government'. Asylum seekers facing eviction from hotels by the Home Office must be housed in local council funded temporary accommodation, as many are not being deported. The council explained this has placed a 'spiralling strain' on finances, as they have a legal requirement to house asylum seekers that arrive through the borough. Mr Philp told The Telegraph that 'councils are going bankrupt trying to mop up this government's mess and Starmer's plan is to shove the problem onto private landlords, turning Britain's limited housing stock into permanent accommodation for illegal immigrants'. He added: 'British taxpayers are footing the bill for hotel rooms, three meals a day, and numerous benefits for people who broke into this country, all while families in Hillingdon can't get a GP appointment. 'The Conservative Party's Deportation Bill would bring this circus to an end. We would detain illegal arrivals on the spot, deport them without delay. If the ECHR stands in our way, we will leave it.' Cllr Ian Edwards, leader of the council, said: 'The pressure on our finances has never been greater, and the scale of the financial challenge and demand for our services has continued to mount with no sign of abating.' Migration Watch, a think tank calling for lower migration criticised the Government's 'abject failure' to deal with the crisis, with Alp Mehment, the chairman, saying: 'This is another shocking consequence of the Government's abject failure to deal with this growing crisis. 'Migrants and their traffickers know that once here they'll be looked after royally at taxpayers' expense and few will ever be removed.' A government spokesman said: 'This government inherited a broken asylum system, with tens of thousands stuck in a backlog and claims not being processed, wasting millions in taxpayer money. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so we can end the use of hotels, and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026.'
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Epping is a warning to complacent Britain
While Britain's ship of state drifts serenely towards the rocks, the captain and crew are arguing about the precise order of the deckchairs. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Sir Keir Starmer's spokesman have both said that the Government must address 'concerns' over migration, without specifying how. Away from Downing Street, the mood is febrile. Protests outside asylum hotels by locals furious at the sudden imposition of large numbers of young men in their towns have been exploited by far-Right agitators, leading to clashes with the police. The observation from one MP that the country is a 'tinderbox' seems close to the mark. Yet beyond a vague sense that something isn't quite right, the Government carries on as normal. Ms Rayner is continuing her project on social cohesion; the people smugglers continue their trade across the Channel; borrowing continues to rise as the population shoulders the burden of the new arrivals. There is no sense of urgency, and no sense of a plan ready to be put into action. Nor is there any real willingness to discuss the precise issues in question. Ms Rayner's comments still appeared to focus on economic insecurity as a primary factor in explaining dissatisfaction, instead of finding solutions to the primary issue of uncontrolled immigration. There is an echo of the political correctness that silenced conversation in the towns where grooming gangs operated. Nor does there seem to be much prospect of imminent change. The potential fiasco of a Tommy Robinson-led demonstration in Epping may well grab headlines should it come to pass, and indeed may be welcomed by those desperate to pretend that the only issues are those created by troublemakers; it will do nothing to address local unease at the changes imposed on the area. Nor will it do so in places experiencing similar shifts. The decision to disperse asylum seekers into hotels around the country remains a baffling one, and it is almost certain that a detention estate separate from the general population would see far fewer potential flashpoints for unrest. So, too, is the unwillingness to slap down judges undermining our borders, or to speak frankly about the long-term costs of our asylum policy. Instead, the ship drifts. There is no indication that anyone in Government has any plan for regaining control over our borders or addressing the concerns of the population. And there is no indication, either, that one is on the way.
