Bill would allow some Maine teens facing adult charges to stay in youth detention
Current Maine law requires juveniles who are being tried as adults to move to an adult jail when they turn 18, even if they are appealing the adult charges. But LD 42 would let the department ask the court to keep the teen at the state's only juvenile detention facility, Long Creek Youth Development Center in South Portland, until their appeal process is complete — at least until they turn 21.
The Legislature's Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee heard testimony on the bill at a hearing Monday.
Rep. Sue Salisbury, D-Westbrook, said in a phone interview last week that the department brought this bill to her with hopes of meeting the needs of juveniles currently in custody.
She said while the department is the only entity that can submit such a request to the courts, the process would be collaborative.
"In my impression of the process and how this works, they work together. This is a team effort," Salisbury said.
The proposal would also allow the Department of Corrections to rescind its request at any time and send the teen to adult jail.
"In any situation, the department needs to make sure that they're doing what's best for that juvenile, as well as the other juveniles that are currently in their custody," Salisbury said. "So, if there's ever a concern about the safety for staff or other residents of the facility, then they have to take the appropriate action."
Christine Thibeault, the associate commissioner for the Department of Corrections' juvenile services, told the committee Monday that only teens under this category who pose no risk to their peers could stay at Long Creek, so they can keep receiving behavioral health services and programming, such as taking Southern Maine Community College Classes.
"If a youth was particularly disruptive, by default, they would go to the county jail," Thibeault said during the hearing. "But if DOC felt that that youth was engaged in treatment, was pro-social, not disruptive to the rest of the residents, we could request that they remain at Long Creek."
While the new law would only apply to a small number of residents who are facing adult charges, Thibeault said it would benefit their well-being, especially if they have particular behavioral or mental health needs.
Jeremy Pratt, who is the president of the Maine Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, submitted testimony to the committee in support of the bill, saying it would ensure the juvenile isn't moved from Long Creek to an adult facility, and potentially back again, while their case is being "bound over" from juvenile to adult court.
"The flexibility offered by LD 42 would allow for a juvenile to be placed in the best environment for that particular juvenile while the juvenile's appeal of their bind-over order is pending," Pratt wrote.
Juvenile defense attorney Sharon Craig said while the bill would be a positive change by keeping the teen from adult jail as long as possible, it should also state that the juvenile and their attorney can submit the request themselves, not necessarily through the Department of Corrections.
The department's ability to rescind its request to keep the teen at Long Creek is also unfair, she said, because at that point, the decision to allow the teen to stay at Long Creek would have already been litigated.
The bill also doesn't spell out the reasons why the department could rescind its request, something Craig said should be added.
"There should be a hearing on whether the order is going to be rescinded," Craig said in a phone interview last week. "The juvenile should be able to litigate that."
Salisbury didn't know whether the juvenile would be able to appeal the department's rescission.
Craig said it's important that the young adult to stay in the juvenile facility for as long as possible because even when they turn 18, they're still children and "haven't really been out in the world as adults."
So, being sent to live in custody among other adults with criminal histories could have a negative influence on them, she said.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Texas Democrats dig in as Abbott promises fines, extradition and arrests
A White House official told POLITICO Trump's team is taking 'a pretty hands-off approach' to the brewing battle, deferring to Texas Republicans. 'We made our case and now we're counting on them to get it done,' added the person, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss a matter being privately negotiated. State Rep. Ana-María Rodríguez Ramos, chair of the Texas Legislative Progressive Caucus, captured her group's predicament in an interview. 'We really do not have a choice,' she said. 'What is our alternative? Rolling down and rolling over for Trump's economy to continue to destroy America?' The risks are big for Texas Democrats — from $500-a-day fines, to extradition, to the more unlikely scenario of Abbott replacing them with hand-picked legislators, to facing civil arrest for violating the Legislature's rules. They do not, however, face any civil or criminal charges and can only be forced back into the Capitol to take votes. It's unclear who would foot the bill for the hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines members are collectively racking up by abstaining from the legislative session. There are also political risks. Texas Democrats are not just missing votes related to redistricting, but also on legislation that would provide relief following last month's devastating floods. 'No one is fooling around this time in Texas,' said Dave Carney, an adviser to Abbott. 'In the past, it was like, they came back. Everything was forgiven. It was like kumbaya. That's not happening. There's no appetite to say, 'Okay, never mind. We're going to let you do this anytime you fucking want.' Abbott also threatened to arrest Texas Democrats in 2021 when they used the same walkout tactics. If Abbott chooses to call multiple special sessions to pass the redrawn map that would net five GOP-friendly seats, lawmakers could run into time constraints: New lines must be adopted by early December in order to take effect for the 2026 midterm cycle. The Legislature could collide with filing deadlines for the midterms. Under state law, candidates can declare their intent to seek office from Nov. 8 through Dec. 8, but the state legislature has the authority to extend the deadline. Each side lacks good options to resolve the stalemate. Earlier in the day, appearing on the MAGA influencer Benny Johnson's show, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton acknowledged the struggles ahead for Abbott and his fellow Republicans, saying his 'first move would have been to chain them to their desk and not let them out of the door,' before adding, 'I think the governor is going to be forced into calling several special sessions.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas Gov. Abbott orders arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott ordered the state's Department of Public Safety to arrest Democratic legislators who failed to appear for a special redistricting session on Monday. State-level Democrats have fled the state to deny the GOP-controlled legislature a quorum as they consider new congressional maps. Abbott's order follows a motion passed by Republicans in Austin that allowed civil arrest warrants to be issued for their colleagues. Abbott asked the DPS to 'locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans' and said the order 'will remain in effect until all missing Democrat House members are accounted for and brought to the Texas Capitol.' Abbott's statement is in line with one issued by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton earlier in the day. Paxton accused the Democrats of 'a cowardly desertion of their responsibilities as elected officials.' 'These jet-setting runaways abandoned Texas, abdicated their duties in the House, and sacrificed their constituents for a publicity stunt,' Paxton said in a statement.'It's imperative that they be swiftly arrested, punished, and face the full force of the law for turning their backs on the people of Texas.' The arrest warrants and Abbott's order are largely for show. The governor and state police do not have the authority to arrest the absent Democrats, as they have fled to other Texas GOP is pushing a Trump-approved redistricting map that could add five Republican seats to the state's delegation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Redrawing congressional maps in the middle of the decade is extremely unusual, as redistricting typically occurs around the time of the U.S. Census. The draft map packs Democratic voters into more condensed districts while pushing some voters in safely Republican districts into contested areas currently held by Democrats. The Texas Democratic Caucus spent Monday taunting Abbott and frustrated Republicans. When the governor threatened to remove the absent lawmakers from office, the minority party issued a four-word statement: 'Come and take it.' The post Texas Gov. Abbott orders arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state appeared first on
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
The Great Gerrymander War: California fires back at Texas power play
'I know the last thing Riverside County residents want is to eliminate the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and replace it with insider Sacramento politicians gerrymandering district lines behind closed doors,' Calvert said in a statement. When Newsom initially floated a California gerrymander to neutralize Texas, the reaction last month was a mix of enthusiasm and deep skepticism about the legal and political hurdles, given California's use of an independent redistricting commission. But as it became clear that Texas Republicans were unlikely to back down, Newsom pressed the issue, making California the tip of the spear for a counteroffensive embraced by Democrats at all levels of the party. Those dynamics make it likely the Democratic-dominated Legislature votes this month to put a new map on the ballot. While some expressed misgivings Sunday about a rushed process — to secure a November election, lawmakers will need to act quickly — several statehouse Democrats predicted they would muster the necessary two-thirds votes in each house. 'It's not a fight any of us want to be in, but we're in it, so we're going to fight,' said Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, a Democrat from Oakland. 'Nothing,' she added, 'unites the California Democratic caucus quite like Donald Trump.' But getting Sacramento Democrats on board is one thing. Persuading California voters will be entirely different — particularly because they would be asked to return line-drawing power to politicians, letting the Legislature craft new lines until the commission takes over again in 2031 after the next census. 'Voters want to weigh in on redistricting because they don't trust politicians,' said Chris Lehman, a political consultant who has worked on redistricting ballot initiatives. A survey conducted by Newsom pollster David Binder found that 52 percent of California voters would approve of state lawmakers redrawing its congressional district lines if Texas Republicans pulled off a similar gambit. The measure becomes more popular if the fight becomes more overtly partisan; 60 percent of voters back 'rejecting Trump's power grab.' Roughly eight in 10 Democrats and six in 10 independents are in favor of the effort, according to a person who was briefed on the poll's findings. The messages tested in the poll underscore how California Democrats will portray this as a fight they have no choice but to take on. The proposed ballot measure would be contingent on Texas' new districts being enacted. 'The polling shows that Californians overwhelmingly reject Trump's blatant power grab in Texas and want to fight back. The basic components of the program we are considering has strong support,' said Los Angeles-area Assemblymember Rick Chavez Zbur, another Democrat. A successful ballot campaign would still require a titanic political effort. Assuming the Legislature acts, Newsom and allies will have just a few months to raise tens of millions of dollars and educate voters on a sudden, off-year election. Republican foes could be motivated to throw down. With little else on the ballot, that could yield an enormously expensive showdown. 'That'll be the big question mark,' said Brandon Castillo, a political consultant who specializes in ballot initiatives. 'Does that national money pour in, on both sides?'
