logo
Posts falsely claim court ordered reinstatement of Nigeria's Rivers state governor

Posts falsely claim court ordered reinstatement of Nigeria's Rivers state governor

AFP07-05-2025
'Breaking Court Sacks Ibas as Rivers' Sole Administrator, Orders Tinubu to Reinstate Fubara,' reads the headline of a Facebook post published on April 17, 2025.
'The court's decision, delivered on Tuesday morning, gives the Tinubu-backed appointee 48 hours to vacate the premises, reaffirming Governor Fubara's constitutional mandate as the duly elected leader of Rivers State,' adds the post.
The post attributes the order to 'Justice Boma Diepriye', who purportedly delivered the ruling at the 'federal high court' in the state capital, Port Harcourt.
It further claims that the judge said Tinubu's decision to suspend a sitting governor and appoint an interim sole administrator for the state was 'illegal and void'.
Image
Screenshot of the false Facebook post, taken on April 30, 2025
The claim has appeared in other posts on Instagram and Facebook.
Power struggle
Fubara was elected governor of Rivers state in March 2023, succeeding lawyer Nyesom Wike, who is currently serving as minister in charge of Nigeria's capital, Abuja (archived here and here).
Shortly after Fubara's inauguration, he became embroiled in a battle with his predecessor over control of the state (archived here).
The tussle culminated in a failed impeachment attempt and a dispute with state legislators, which resulted in the demolition of the state assembly complex (archived here and here).
In March 2025, Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers state and suspended Fubara, his deputy, Ngozi Odu and the State Assembly for six months. He subsequently appointed Ibokette Ibas, a retired vice-admiral, as the state administrator for the period of Fubara's suspension (archived here).
The decision sharply divided opinion in the country, with critics highlighting the president's disavowal of a similar emergency declaration by the federal government in the past.
Tinubu said the country's constitution empowered him to suspend the officials, while opposition leader Peter Obi described the move as "reckless" and an "unconstitutional overreach" (archived here).
A lack of legal clarity, however, has given Tinubu room to manoeuvre.
However, the claim that a Rivers state court has ordered Fubara's reinstatement is false.
Jurisdiction and vacation
Hector Igbikiowubo, the spokesperson for Ibas, told AFP Fact Check in a phone interview that the claim is false.
'The National Assembly has created a committee to oversee the sole administration and so the state courts have no jurisdiction over the emergency rule. Only the Supreme Court and the National Assembly can make pronouncements about it,' he said.
In a press release published by local media on April 18, 2025, David Ihua-Maduenyi, the chief registrar of the Rivers State High Court, said the claim surfaced when judges were on a week-long Easter break (archived here and here).
'Hon. Justice Boma Diepiri is on Easter vacation, which began on April 14, 2025. He is not the designated vacation judge and, as such, has not presided over any matters since the vacation commenced,' reads the statement.
The chief registrar also noted that Diepiri is a judge of the Rivers State High Court, and not the Federal High Court as stated in the claim.
Meanwhile, Ibas continues to carry out his official duties as administrator and recently attended the National Economic Council meeting with Vice President Kashim Shettima and other governors (archived here).
AFP Fact Check has previously debunked other claims linked to the power struggle between Fubara and Wike.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Story of dead surgeon linked to Brigitte Macron is fabricated
Story of dead surgeon linked to Brigitte Macron is fabricated

AFP

time2 days ago

  • AFP

Story of dead surgeon linked to Brigitte Macron is fabricated

"Surgeon linked to Brigitte Macron transgender speculation found dead," says a July 3, 2025 post on X. "Solidifies suspicion that Macron is married to an XY Groomer." The video opens by showing first responders parked below a Parisian building, with a voiceover and subtitles claiming it is the site where the surgeon, François Faivre, fell to his death. The clip goes on to depict what purports to be an interview with the dead man's sister, Anne Dupont. Then it claims to show a portion of an initial interview the surgeon gave about Brigitte Macron to the magazine Closer before his death. "According to Ms. Dupont, her brother is a colleague of the famous doctor Patrick Bui," the subtitles say. "François Faivre had promised journalists he would shed light on the controversial surgical operations of Mrs. Brigitte Macron." The rumor that a surgeon died before releasing further information on Brigitte Macron spread in articles and in posts across Facebook, Instagram, Threads, TikTok and YouTube. The claims were widespread in French and also appeared in Catalan, Spanish, Italian, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese and Russian. Many posts reference the "Enquête du jour" website, where the video and an accompanying article appear to have originated. Image Screenshot of an X post taken July 25, 2025 Image Screenshot of an Instagram post taken July 25, 2025 The claims followed years of transphobic disinformation targeting the French first lady. In January, Owens released the "Becoming Brigitte" series, which claimed without substantive evidence that Brigitte Macron was not only formerly a man, but also Emmanuel Macron's blood relative. It also alleged Emmanuel Macron became France's president as part of CIA mind-control program, reigniting longstanding French conspiracy theories. On July 23, the Macrons filed a defamation suit against Owens in the US state of Delaware. More iterations of the dead-doctor narrative followed. "Of course they waited until now the file this lawsuit," says one July 24 Facebook post. "The doctor who did Brigitte's surgeries conveniently died last month." But like Owens's allegations about Brigitte Macron's gender history, the online claims that her surgeon died under suspicious circumstances are unfounded. The doctor referenced in the claims does not appear to exist, and the purported news reports cite evidence that is manipulated or entirely invented. The fabricated "François Faivre" The video claims François Faivre worked at the American Hospital of Paris alongside Patrick Bui, who supposedly spoke to him about Brigitte Macron undergoing a transgender surgery operation. While Bui does appear on the hospital's website, the medical center told AFP July 8 it had "no record of a cosmetic surgeon named François Faivre being able to practice there" (archived here). Searches of the French health insurance directory surfaced no matching results for a doctor named "François Faivre." Image Screenshot of the French state health insurance directory taken July 25, 2025 The video's depiction of the alleged doctor further suggests his identity was invented. The rail moulding on the wall disappears abruptly, and one of the hanging certificates trails off into illegible gibberish -- both common indicators of images generated be artificial intelligence. Image Screenshot of a YouTube video taken July 25, 2025 with highlights added by AFP AFP attempted to identify "François Faivre" by plugging the video's visuals into the facial-recognition tool PimEyes. The results uncovered an image of an individual on the iStock photo bank of Getty Images, published May 28, 2017 (archived here). Image Screenshots of an X post and the iStock photo library both taken July 25, 2025 The same face appears in different pieces of commercial content that are otherwise disconnected (archived here, here, here and here). AI technologies can create deceptive content based off existing photos. Further inconsistencies Other elements of the supposed report showed evidence of manipulation. For example, the images of the alleged crime scene are actually footage of Paris that AFP published October 15, 2022, nearly three years before the surgeon was claimed to have died (archived here). Image Screenshot of a Facebook post taken July 25, 2025 Image Screenshot of an AFP YouTube video taken July 25, 2025 The deepfake detector in the Verification Plugin, also known as InVID-WeVerify, assessed that the voices in the video were "very likely generated by AI." Image Screenshot of the results accessed via the Verification Plugin tool on July 25, 2025 The shot of the doctor's supposed sister also shows signs of manipulation. The size of her eyes changes frequently, while her blinking appears irregular, again pointing towards the use of . Image Screenshot of a video on the Enquête du jour website taken July 7, 2025 Invented reports, impersonated journalists Closer, the magazine alleged to have interviewed the surgeon, confirmed to AFP July 11, 2025 that none of its journalists had ever spoken to the supposed doctor. The "Enquête du jour" website that laundered the claims, meanwhile, was created June 25 -- just one week before the article appeared -- according to domain registration data (archived here). The site was registered in Delaware under the name "Ano Nymous." As of July 25, the site is no longer available. Image Screenshot of search results for the site taken July 7, 2025 The site's articles also appropriated the identities of at least six French journalists. Audrey Parmentier, whose byline accompanied the report about the surgeon's death, confirmed to French media she did not author the stories on the website. Freelance journalist Aurélien Defer told AFP July 3 he was "completely taken aback" to discover he had been impersonated. "From what I understand, almost all of the published articles serve to give this site the appearance of a reliable and general information source in order to be able to spread false information about Brigitte Macron," he said. Image Screenshot of Enquête du jour taken July 3, 2025 Defer said the method of impersonating journalists resembled Russian disinformation campaigns, a connection also made by the misinformation monitoring service NewsGuard. NewsGuard wrote the "François Faivre" claim used similar tactics to the Russian influence operation Storm-1516 (archived here). Brigitte Macron is among a group of influential women -- including former US first lady Michelle Obama and Canada's Diana Fox Carney -- about whom AFP has debunked gendered disinformation.

Meta to ban political ads in EU due to bloc's 'unworkable' rules
Meta to ban political ads in EU due to bloc's 'unworkable' rules

France 24

time2 days ago

  • France 24

Meta to ban political ads in EU due to bloc's 'unworkable' rules

The EU has a bolstered legal armoury to rein in Big Tech, against which Meta has hit out with the support of the US administration under President Donald Trump. "This is a difficult decision -- one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation," the company said. Political, electoral and social issue advertising will no longer be allowed from October in the bloc, it said, because of "unworkable requirements" under the new rules. "Unfortunately, the TTPA introduces significant, additional obligations to our processes and systems that create an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU," Meta added. The EU says its political advertising rules seek to increase transparency in online advertising after Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal, which came to light in 2018. Cambridge Analytica was a consulting firm that was found to have improperly accessed personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, particularly during the 2016 US election and Brexit referendum. The change is set to impact Meta's flagship platforms Facebook and Instagram, as well as WhatsApp -- which is largely ad-free but announced in June it would be introducing new advertising features in some parts of the app. Meta said it was "not the only company to have been forced into this position". Google last year announced it would also prevent political advertising in the EU from October 2025 because of the "significant new operational challenges and legal uncertainties". Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been highly critical of European rules, accusing Brussels in January of "censorship" and equating EU fines against the company to tariffs. The latest row between Meta and the EU has been over the firm's "pay or consent" system. The EU imposed a 200-million-euro ($235-million) fine in April after concluding Meta violated rules on the use of personal data on Facebook and Instagram. The company faces additional daily penalties if it does not make changes, with Brussels yet to decide whether Meta has modified the platforms enough to avoid more fines.

Meta halts political advertising in the EU due to ‘unworkable' rules
Meta halts political advertising in the EU due to ‘unworkable' rules

Euronews

time3 days ago

  • Euronews

Meta halts political advertising in the EU due to ‘unworkable' rules

US social media company Meta has said it will stop all advertisement about politics, elections and social issues on its platforms in the EU as of October, due to the incoming legislation on political advertising. Meta – which owns Instagram, Facebook, Threads and Whatsapp – said in a statement that the EU's Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising regulation (TTPA) 'introduces significant operational challenges and legal uncertainties' and 'unworkable requirements'. The EU's TTPA – aimed at countering information manipulation and foreign interference in elections – entered into force in April 2024, but most of the provisions will become fully applicable on 10 October this year. Under the rules, political ads must carry a transparency label and clearly identify key information such as sponsors, the election to which they are linked, the amounts paid and targeting techniques. Legal uncertainty Meta said that it's had tools in place since 2018 that provide transparency for ads about politics and elections. They required advertisers to complete an authorisation process, and Meta stored this data in its publicly available ad library. However, the new TTPA obligations 'create an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU,' the company said. It added that because of the restrictions, 'people will be seeing less relevant ads on our platforms.' Meta said people or candidates in the EU can still post and debate politics on its platforms. The tech giant's announcement comes after Google said in November last year it would also ban political ads due to the incoming rules. The changes only apply to Europe. DSA probes The European Commission has introduced several initiatives to counter foreign interference and disinformation in elections. It began, for example, several probes under the Digital Services Act (DSA), which obliges online platforms to address illegal content, related to disinformation. Meta's Facebook and Instagram were hit with formal proceedings in April 2024 on suspected infringements related to their policies and practices on deceptive advertising and political content on its services. The investigation is still ongoing. Several EU elections have been targeted by disinformation. On 6 December, Romania became the first EU country to cancel an election over foreign interference, following reports about information manipulation on video-sharing app TikTok.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store