logo
South Dakota man hears Russian drones at night, hopes for peace

South Dakota man hears Russian drones at night, hopes for peace

Yahoo21-03-2025
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — Brian Bonner grew up in Mitchell and moved to Ukraine in 2008 to run the Kiev Post, an English-language newspaper. He says Ukrainians are not very optimistic that Russia wants peace.
'Vladimir Putin dug in, showed no interest in compromising at all,' said Bonner. 'And the cease-fire, the so-called temporary, partial cease-fire never held even for an hour. They were flying drones outside my window in the dead of the night and it's a very scary time.'
U.S. Senator Mike Rounds says everyone wants the war to end.
Lawsuit claims hotel negligent in toddler's death
'I think the president has made it clear he is going to try to get between Ukraine and Russia and act as a mediator. He was pretty tough on Ukraine a couple weeks ago. I expect him to be just as tough on Putin,' said Rounds.
But Bonner isn't confident that will happen. He says Ukrainians are afraid President Trump has already given in to Putin.
'Vladimir Putin is going to drag this out, as he continues to kill Ukrainians,' said Bonner. Now there are going to be gestures, like we had that prisoner exchange today, the Kremlin called it a sign of good will but these are pretty cosmetic in terms of brings an end to the war.
Tom: 'As an American, as a South Dakotan, how does this make you feel?'
'Deep depression today Tom, because I don't see, and if you do let me know, but I don't see where this is going,' said Bonner.
Senator Rounds says many in Congress feel the same way he does about the invasion of Ukraine.
'Let's begin by remembering that Putin is the aggressor that caused this war, it never would have happened. He is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths, and millions of people being displaced, this is on Putin, he is not a good person,' said Rounds.
Rounds say any deal with Putin should include guarantees and a peacekeeping force made up of Europeans. he also says there should be an American presence.
'America has to have a business interest established in Ukraine with civilians working there. And a lot of that has to do with minerals that are available there that can help perhaps pay back some of the costs that we've been incurring,' said Rounds. 'It also more importantly provides an American presence in that country, makes it a lot more difficult for an authoritarian like Putin to come in and attack again.'
Rounds say there should be a long-term plan to arm Ukraine so if Ukraine is attacked in the future it can defend itself. 'Time will tell how this works out, but I can tell you that within Congress, Ukraine has a lot of allies,' said Rounds. 'We want to see this ended as well. We don't want to see the violence continue on, nobody does, except for Putin. And you have to recognize that. So if we can get a deal done. Ukraine has to be protected.'
As for Bonner, he says all Ukrainians can do is hope, but right now there's not much of that.
'I think the world should understand very clearly that it's the Ukrainians who want the peace, Vladimir Putin wants to continue the war and he's going to continue the war,' said Bonner.
Senator John Thune and Representative Dusty Johnson have voiced their support for Ukraine and a peaceful resolution of the invasion of that country.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zohran Mamdani Not 'The Best' to Lead NYC, Ex-Democratic Governor Warns
Zohran Mamdani Not 'The Best' to Lead NYC, Ex-Democratic Governor Warns

Newsweek

time39 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Zohran Mamdani Not 'The Best' to Lead NYC, Ex-Democratic Governor Warns

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former New York Governor David Paterson has publicly challenged Democratic mayoral primary winner and state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani's candidacy, saying he doesn't believe the progressive assemblyman is "the best person to lead New York City." Paterson released the statement following a morning news conference, expressing concerns about Mamdani's ability to govern during "extremely turbulent times" and questioning whether his platform addresses the needs of hardworking families struggling economically. Newsweek reached out to Mamdani's campaign via email Monday for comment. Why It Matters Paterson's criticism highlights a significant rift within Democratic Party leadership as New York City approaches its November mayoral election. The former governor's statement comes as Mamdani leads recent polling with 35.2 percent support, ahead of independent candidates Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Eric Adams. This internal party tension could influence voter perceptions and hinder Democratic unity heading into the general election, where Mamdani faces challenges from centrist and independent opponents. What To Know From 2008 to 2010, Paterson served as New York governor, accepting the seat after Governor Eliot Spitzer stepped down amid a prostitution scandal. Paterson became New York's first Black governor and the second legally blind one in American history. Paterson's tenure was marked by scandals. In February 2010, reported The New York Times, he was accused of witness tampering in a domestic violence case involving his close aide, with questions raised about whether he and State Police inappropriately contacted a woman who had obtained a restraining order against the aide. While Paterson was not criminally charged, according to NBC News, investigations determined he had spoken to the complainant the day before she was set to appear in court, she failed to show up and the case was dropped. Paterson was also scrutinized over accepting free New York Yankees World Series tickets. The New York State Commission on Public Integrity found that he had lied about accepting five free tickets and fined him $62,125. Pressed by the Obama administration and Democratic Party leaders, Paterson announced that he would not seek election to a full term. In his formal statement, Paterson acknowledged Mamdani's successful primary campaign but expressed deep reservations about his readiness for the mayor's office. "I have been very clear in my position that I simply do not believe Zohran Mamdani is the best person to lead New York City during these extremely turbulent times," Paterson said. "We just saw a federal budget passed and signed that will create havoc on New Yorkers in the coming years in our education system, our health care system, our community and our hard-working families already struggling to make ends meet. We cannot afford ideas without a plan for implementation or funding," the former governor added. According to an American Pulse poll conducted from June 28 to July 1, Mamdani maintains a lead over former Governor Cuomo (29 percent) and Adams (13.8 percent). But Cuomo received the highest percentage among likely New Your City voters when asked who would do the best job running the city, with 33.5 percent compared to Mamdani's 32.5 percent. Adams received 12.4 percent. The assemblyman has built his campaign around affordability measures, including rent freezes, no-cost child care, free buses and city-owned grocery stores. His platform also includes implementing a Department of Community Safety with outreach workers in subway stations, contrasting with Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul's police partnership. Mamdani has secured endorsements from Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, but lacks formal support from Hochul and two other prominent New York lawmakers, Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Hakeem Jeffries. Political analyst Nate Silver has suggested Mamdani could face vulnerability in the general election as voter turnout increases beyond the primary base. What People Are Saying Paterson's statement: "Mr. Mamdani ran a successful Primary campaign, with tremendous ads and a well-done social media strategy that engaged young voters in a way we have not seen to date. However, the General Election is a very different fight that encompasses the entirety of the city. I truly believe my fellow Democrats will be doing a disservice to the people they wish to serve if they do not come together and decide to support whichever candidate has the most support among them in advance of November 4th." He continued: "We are living in a critically important time in our country's history and the most populous city in America will need true leadership to navigate this moment. That leadership will need to show itself in the coming months, before ballots are printed and voters start returning ballots by mail." Paterson concluded his statement with his final wish for the election: "As public polls and surveys are revealed over these coming weeks, it is my hope and belief that the other candidates still in the race will come to the logical conclusion that New York City needs the most effective leader to navigate what comes next and that cannibalizing each other's support will be doing a disservice to the millions of people who call New York 'home.'" Mamdani posted his latest endorsement to X on Monday: "It's a profound honor to receive the endorsement of @ManhattanDems and its Leader Keith L.T. Wright, who has worked for decades to build a fairer, more just New York. We are uniting this party around a vision to make our city affordable for all. Onward to November!" Former New York Governor David Paterson attends the New York Yankees' World Series victory celebration at City Hall on November 6, 2009, in New York City. Former New York Governor David Paterson attends the New York Yankees' World Series victory celebration at City Hall on November 6, 2009, in New York Happens Next New York City voters will decide their next mayor on November 4, with the race drawing national attention as a test of progressive versus centrist Democratic visions.

Trump Pledges to Send More Weapons to Ukraine
Trump Pledges to Send More Weapons to Ukraine

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Trump Pledges to Send More Weapons to Ukraine

President Trump said on Monday that the United States would send more weapons to Ukraine to help it fend off Russia's invasion, arguing that Moscow's recent assault on Ukrainian cities left him with little choice. Mr. Trump's comments appeared to signal a reversal from the president after his administration paused some arms transfers to the country just last week, raising fears that the United States was retrenching its support. Instead, Mr. Trump said on Monday that he had grown unhappy with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, who has frustrated Mr. Trump's hopes to broker a cease-fire. 'We're going to send some more weapons,' Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House. 'We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard. Now they're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons, defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard. So many people are dying in that mess.' Those statements were a remarkable turnaround for Mr. Trump, who has often expressed skepticism of U.S. aid to Ukraine and just months ago dressed down President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine in the Oval Office, claiming he had been insufficiently grateful for America's support. The White House acknowledged last week that the administration had paused the delivery of some air defense interceptors and precision-guided bombs and missiles to Ukraine, citing Pentagon concerns that U.S. weapons stockpiles were dwindling. The decision was described at the time by a White House spokeswoman as an assessment of munitions provided around the globe. Two people briefed on the pause, who were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said that Mr. Trump had directed the Pentagon to review available munitions stockpiles around the time the United States conducted surgical bombing attacks on three Iranian nuclear weapons sites. From there, someone at the Pentagon — classifying the munitions in different categories — halted at least some of what was scheduled to be sent to Ukraine, one of the people briefed on the matter said. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

U.S. to send more weapons to Ukraine after Trump's remarks
U.S. to send more weapons to Ukraine after Trump's remarks

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

U.S. to send more weapons to Ukraine after Trump's remarks

U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Pete Hegseth, U.S. secretary of defense, seen during a dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, not pictured, in the Blue Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Monday, July 7, 2025. During the meeting, Trump said they have to send Ukraine weapons to defend itself against Russia. After the dinner, the Pentagon announced additional U.S. weapons would be sent to Ukraine. Photo by Al Drago/UPI | License Photo July 7 (UPI) -- The United States will send additional weaponry to Ukraine, the Pentagon announced late Monday, hours after President Donald Trump said they "have to" provide Ukraine with more defensive capabilities. Though the specifics of the package were not revealed, the move by the Department of Defense and Trump's comments appear to be an abrupt about-face by the administration, which had announced on Wednesday that it was pausing delivery of some weapons, including air defense systems, to its war-torn ally. "We're going to send more weapons. We have to," Trump told reporters during a dinner at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. They're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons, your defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard. So many people are dying in that mess. Trump, who campaigned heavily on being able to end the Ukraine-Russia war within 24 hours of returning to the White House, has been seeking to secure a cease-fire deal, while his pause of weapons deliveries to Ukraine occurred as the Kremlin was hammering its neighbor with air barrages. The future of U.S. support was uncertain under the Trump administration, as Trump has been critical of sending weaponry to the country and is known for praising Putin. On returning to office on Jan. 20, the administration proclaimed that an end to the war would not see Ukraine return to its old borders, an announcement that was criticized as a capitulation to Russia. Last week when asked about the decision to halt some weaponry to Ukraine, Trump responded by blaming his predecessor, former President Joe Biden, for having "emptied out our whole country" of weapons. "We have to have enough for ourselves," he said. Trump spoke with Russian leader Vladimir Putin over the phone on Thursday, after which the American president remarked he "didn't make any progress" toward securing a potential cease-fire. The next day, Russia bombarded Ukraine with a record number of airstrikes. The statement late Monday from the Pentagon said that at Trump's direction, the Department of Defense is sending "additional defensive weapons to Ukraine so it can defend itself "while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops." "Our framework for POTUS to evaluate military shipments across the globe remains in effect and is integral to our America First defense priorities," it said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store