Supply risk identified for some UK animal medicines shipped to North
Northern Ireland
will continue to have post-
Brexit
access to animal medicines from the UK in the 'vast majority of cases', the UK government has said.
However, it warned of a 'risk of disruption' remaining for a small number of critical products.
The comments were contained in a policy paper on Britain's approach to veterinary medicines in Northern Ireland, published by Northern Secretary, Hilary Benn, on Thursday.
From January 1st, 2026, veterinary medicines from Britain distributed in Northern Ireland must comply with EU rules agreed between London and Brussels as part of the
Windsor Framework
.
READ MORE
Concerns had been raised by vets and politicians that up to half the veterinary medicines used in Northern Ireland could become unavailable because firms in Britain would choose to stop supplying them rather than carry out the additional retesting and relabelling required to sell them in the North after the cut-off date.
[
DUP leader: Windsor deal is an opaque mess
Opens in new window
]
The paper said London's current expectation was that there would be 'very limited disruption, with fewer than 20 products due to face discontinuation that we consider are likely to result in significant adverse impacts if not addressed.'
It announced two schemes which it said would provide additional resilience and 'plug any emerging critical gaps' by allowing vets to continue to access medicines from Britain.
The UK government said these were within the scope of the Windsor Framework so did not require negotiation with, or approval from, the EU. It is understood the bloc is aware of, and comfortable with, the move.
From January 1st, the Veterinary Medicines Health Situation Scheme will 'permit the use of suitable alternative products from outside Northern Ireland' by professionals without any additional red tape 'if the situation of animal or public health so requires'.
A separate Veterinary Medicines Internal Market Scheme will allow vets use specific individual medicines not authorised or available in Northern Ireland when needed, again without any additional administrative burden or certification.
The UK government also said any veterinary medicines already on the market in Northern Ireland can remain so until their expiry date, even if it is after the cut-off from January 1st.
The move was strongly criticised by some unionist parties. DUP MP Carla Lockhart said the 'stark reality' was that the UK government had 'chosen to prioritise placating the EU' over protecting the interests of animals, vets, farmers and the wider agri-food sector in Northern Ireland.
Instead of resolving the problem, she said, London had 'simply issued another paper and acquiesced to EU law that does not deal substantively with the concerns raised by the industry and does not enjoy cross-community consent'.
Traditional Unionist Voice leader, Jim Allister, said that 'instead of standing up for Northern Ireland, the [UK] government has largely rolled over, devoting its energy to encouraging reorientation of our supplies so that they come from the EU, not GB.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Russia denies stalling peace efforts amid claims it has made fresh gains in Ukraine
The Kremlin rejected allegations from a US envoy that it is delaying attempts to end its war on Ukraine , amid claims that Russia's invasion force now controls the whole of its neighbour's Luhansk region and has seized territory in Dnipropetrovsk region for the first time. Keith Kellogg, a special envoy appointed by Donald Trump , decried as 'Orwellian' the claims from Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov this week that the pace of peace efforts depended on Washington and Kyiv. 'Russia cannot continue to stall for time while it bombs civilian targets in Ukraine,' Mr Kellogg said. But Mr Peskov said on Tuesday: 'No one is stalling anything.' READ MORE Using Russia's official term for its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, he also said: 'Naturally, we are primarily interested in achieving the goals we have set for the special military operation through diplomacy. That is why we are not interested in stalling. 'Naturally, we are thankful for the efforts that Washington and the Trump team members are making to promote talks on the Ukrainian settlement.' The US president's administration has put intense public pressure on pro-western Ukraine to accept the need for painful concessions to Moscow, while showing deep reluctance to criticise the Kremlin or strengthen sanctions on Russia. [ Russia grooms Ukrainian teens as spies, saboteurs and unwitting suicide bombers ] US senator Lindsey Graham said on Sunday that Mr Trump had encouraged him to seek a vote in Congress on a new sanctions Bill that would impose 500 per cent tariffs on countries that continued to buy Russian oil. Mr Peskov said of Mr Graham: 'His position is well known to us, and it is well known to the whole world. He belongs to a group of inveterate Russophobes, and if it were up to him these sanctions would have been imposed long ago. Would that help the settlement? That is a question for those who initiate such actions.' Kyiv continues to urge the US and European states to impose and enforce stricter economic sanctions on Russia and to expand and accelerate provision of weapons, ammunition and air defence systems to the Ukrainian military. Despite high losses in troops and equipment, Russia continues to grind forward in parts of eastern Ukraine and has seized about 200 sq km of the northern Sumy in recent months. Moscow-installed officials in occupied eastern Ukraine have now claimed that all of Luhansk region is under Russian control and that the village of Dachne has become the first territory in Dnipropetrovsk region to fall to the invasion force. Kyiv has not confirmed either claim. Ukrainian forces have held only small parts Luhansk for several years, but if Russia has established full control there it would be the first entire region to fall to Moscow's troops since they seized Crimea in 2014 with barely a shot being fired. Ukrainian towns and cities are also coming under intense nightly bombardments from Russian missiles and drones. Data from the country's air force showed that Russia launched 5,337 Shahed-type drones against Ukraine last month, more than 1,100 more than in March, which was the previous record month. The Shahed is a 'kamikaze' drone with a warhead of between 15kg-50kg that explodes on impact. Russia received large numbers of them from Iran , but now makes its own version. The warring neighbours traded missile and drone strikes early on Tuesday. Sources in the Ukrainian security service said its long-range attack drones had hit Russia's Kupol military plant in the city of Izhevsk, more than 1,000km from the front line. Local governor Alexander Brechalov said three people had been killed and 35 injured in a drone strike on a factory that he did not name.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Keir Starmer forced by his own MPs into embarrassing climbdown on disability cuts
UK prime minister Keir Starmer 's Labour government was forced to capitulate to its own backbench rebels on Tuesday evening, by offering further last-minute concessions to stave off a damaging defeat in a vote due on cuts to disability benefits. With barely an hour to go before what was set to be a knife-edge vote in the House of Commons, Stephen Timms, Britain's welfare minister, announced that the government was prepared to give in on a key demand made by rebels. He told the Commons the government would delay implementation of new, tightened eligibility criteria for claimants of personal independence payments (Pip), top-up cash payments paid to disabled people to cover costs associated with their disabilities. The new criteria will now be delayed until a review of Pip that he leading is published. READ MORE Following the concession to rebels, the government's Bill passed the vote by 335 votes to 260. Meanwhile, House of Commons voting records show about 42 Labour MPs still chose to back a rebel amendment, which did not pass. The Labour rebels had been angry that their party was seeking cuts to disability benefits. Many also complained that Downing Street wasn't listening to their concerns. One rebel who had spoken to The Irish Times about the direction of the administration said they just wanted their party to 'govern like a Labour government'. Several rebels on Tuesday argued with their own front bench all afternoon in the Commons chamber that it made no sense to tighten Pip criteria until Mr Timms's review was complete. 'We have heard those concerns,' said Mr Timms as he announced the government was effectively backing down. Coming on top of earlier concessions to rebels that exempted existing Pip claimants from any reforms designed to save cash, the Labour rebels have now effectively gutted the landmark welfare reform Bill that Mr Starmer's government had put forward. The Bill as originally proposed was supposed to save £5 billion for the UK's straitened Treasury. Now that it has been pulled apart by the rebellion, the UK's chancellor, Rachel Reeves, will have to try to find most of those savings elsewhere. As well as giving the chancellor a fiscal headache, the rebels have also seriously dented the prime minister's authority as he approaches his first anniversary in the job. Mr Starmer's U-turn on Pip may have saved him from an embarrassing defeat in a parliament where he is supposed to wield a 165-seat working majority. But it was also just the latest in a string of domestic U-turns that have sparked disquiet among Labour MPs over his leadership. Earlier in the Commons, in advance of the vote that was due soon after 7pm, MPs held an emotionally charged debate over the proposed welfare cuts, with Labour MPs effectively providing both a government position and their own opposition. The drama had started for the government last week when it belatedly realised that enough rebel MPs – the total at one stage stood near 130 – were prepared to back a so-called 'wrecking amendment'. It would have killed the original Bill and seriously undermined Mr Starmer's ability to govern. After negotiations between rebels and emissaries for Mr Starmer's Downing Street operation, the concession was given exempting existing Pip claimants, and it was expected the government would win the vote. It became clear on Monday and Tuesday, however, that there was still huge concern among Labour MPs over the timing eligibility changes. Marie Tidball, one of the few visibly physically disabled MPs in the Commons, broke down in tears as she said she would go against her own government 'with a heavy and broken heart' because it wasn't protecting disabled people. Meg Hillier, a Labour MP who led the original rebellion, said she would back the government but warned Downing Street that backbench MPs were not 'message replicators' or 'voting fodder'.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Splitting' raises questions about oversight of Help to Buy scheme, says Simon Harris
Tánaiste Simon Harris has said the issue of 'splitting' a Help to Buy transaction raises important questions over the oversight of the Government scheme He was speaking after estate agent Sherry FitzGerald launched an internal investigation after a home buyer was offered a 'split' sale for a new-build property , in order for it to qualify for the Help to Buy scheme. The case was first reported in The Irish Times on Tuesday . Mr Harris reaffirmed the Government's commitment to the scheme for the lifetime of the Coalition, but he said that important questions had been raised by the issue of 'split' sales. 'When issues like that come to the fore it does raise important questions in relation to the oversight of the scheme,' he said. Mr Harris said he had total confidence in the Revenue Commissioners operation of the scheme but added that it was ultimately taxpayers money being used. READ MORE 'It's important that the integrity of the scheme is protected at all costs.' He said the Government would await any guidance or advice from the Revenue Commissioners or the Department of Finance in relation to the scheme. The Help to Buy (HTB) scheme is administered by Revenue and provides a refund on income tax of up to €30,000 to first-time buyers on new-build properties up to a value of €500,000. Social Democrats ' spokesman on housing Rory Hearne said it was 'alarming to see evidence of such blatant breaches of the scheme'. 'Questions need to be answered now about how widespread this issue is and if this case is just the tip of the iceberg,' the Dublin North-West TD said. The story 'shows that estate agents are playing a role in pushing for and facilitating higher house prices, which developers are also lobbying for'. [ The 'emotional toll' of buying a home in Ireland: 'split' deals and queueing for houses already sold Opens in new window ] 'The Government has done nothing to challenge the various market actors pushing up house prices, and has actually added to and facilitated house price inflation through the help to buy schemes. We need to see proper regulation and transparency in the house purchase market to stop the price gouging going on now,' Mr Hearne said. Mr Harris also spoke about the potential impact of trade tensions between the United States and the European Union as the clock ticks down on a 90-day tariff pause to charges announced by the White House earlier this year. The Tánaiste said this week would be an 'extremely intense' period in trying to secure a framework agreement between Brussels and Washington. He said that at the very least, the aim was to provide a sense of certainty where there was a 'vacuum' at the moment. He said the current situation was 'holding back people in terms of jobs decisions and investment decisions. We need clarity and certainty as to what the trade environment works like.' He said Europe and Ireland wanted to see 'zero-for-zero' tariffs as widely as possible and that the Dublin Government was working hard on the issue of pharmaceutical exports to the United States.
